_120107 Limited Haz Mat Report Info Only.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Repair/install Four Elevators Falcon Stadium
Solicitation number
FA7000-18-R-0011
Issued by

About this file

Info Only

View the file

Other files

Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LIMITED HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY

FALCON STADIUM ROOM 102

COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

PREPARED FOR:

Merrick & Company

5970 Greenwood Plaza Boulevard

Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111

PREPARED BY:

Ninyo & Moore

Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants

6001 South Willow Drive, Suite 195

Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111

June 29, 2017

Project No. 501013006

June 29, 2017

Project No. 501013006

Mr. Lucas Souhrada

Merrick & Company

5970 Greenwood Plaza Boulevard

Greenwood Village, Colorado

Subject: Limited Hazardous Building Materials Survey

USAFA Falcon Stadium Room 102

Colorado Springs, Colorado

Dear Mr. Souhrada:

In accordance with your authorization to proceed, Ninyo & Moore has conducted a limited hazardous building materials survey at the United States Air Force Academy, Falcon Stadium

Room 102, in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

The attached report presents our methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding our survey. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this important project.

Sincerely, NINYO & MOORE

Steven Truesdale, PG

Senior Geologist

CDPHE #11759

SRT/drm

Distribution: (1) Addressee (via e-mail)

USAFA Falcon Stadium Room 102 June 29, 2017

Colorado Springs, Colorado Project No. 501013006

501013006 R i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

3. SITE DESCRIPTION

4. PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS

5. HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIAL SURVEY

5.1. Asbestos Inspection

5.1.1. Sample Collection

5.1.2. Laboratory Analyses and Results

5.1.3. Findings and Opinions

5.2. Lead Sampling

5.2.1. Assessment

5.2.2. Laboratory Analyses and Results

5.2.3. Findings and Opinions

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

7. LIMITATIONS

Table

Table 1 – Asbestos Sample Results

Table 2 – Lead Sample Results

Appendices

Appendix A – Certifications

Appendix B – Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records (Asbestos)

Appendix C – Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records (Lead)

501013006 R 1

1. INTRODUCTION

In accordance with your request and authorization to proceed, Ninyo & Moore has conducted a

Limited Hazardous Building Materials Survey (HBMS) of Room 102 at Falcon Stadium at the

United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Ninyo & Moore understands the area is scheduled for renovation. Therefore, a Limited HBMS was conducted to identify and quantify potentially hazardous building materials prior to renovation.

This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental science and engineering practices and applicable federal and state regulations. The report is based upon site conditions at the time of the field activities, and provides documentation of our findings and recommendations.

2. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

The purpose of the HBMS was to assess and quantify asbestos-containing material (ACM), and paint coatings that contain lead.

Ninyo & Moore performed the following services:

Visual assessment of accessible areas to evaluate the presence of suspect ACM and lead paint.

Collection of building material samples and submittal of these samples to an independent laboratory for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM).

Collection of paint chip samples and submittal of these samples to an independent laboratory for lead analysis in general accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-

846 Method 3050B/7000B.

Preparation of this report, presenting the data and summarizing the methodology used. This report includes a site description, figures, laboratory testing information, conclusions and recommendations, and tables summarizing the assessed building materials.

501013006 R 2

3. SITE DESCRIPTION

The subject site is Room 102 at Falcon Stadium at the USAFA in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

Room 102 is a media meeting room, and was constructed within a materials storage area adjacent to the south end of the stadium field level. With the exception of the small (approximate 300 square-feet) media room area, Room 102 is a concrete-walled storage area. Most of the storage area portion of Room 102 is unpainted concrete. The media room area of Room 102 is a drywall room, within the larger storage area structure.

4. PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS

No physical limitations, such as locked rooms and fenced areas, were encountered during the

HMBS. However, access to the interstitial wall and ceiling spaces of the media room area was limited. Therefore, there is a possibility that during renovation activities, additional ACM may be encountered in these spaces. Suspect materials encountered during renovation activities that have not been assessed previously may either be assumed to be ACM and handled accordingly, or may be sampled and analyzed at that time to assess whether they are asbestos-containing.

5. HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIAL SURVEY

On June 1, 2017, Ninyo & Moore conducted a Limited HBMS that included an asbestos inspection and limited lead sampling.

5.1. Asbestos Inspection

Mr. Steven Truesdale, a Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE)-certified Asbestos Building Inspector with Ninyo & Moore, conducted the asbestos inspection. The inspection was conducted in general accordance with the Colorado Air

Quality Control Commission’s Regulation 8, Part B (Regulation 8).

5.1.1. Sample Collection

A preliminary visual assessment of suspect ACM was conducted and homogeneous areas (areas in which the materials are uniform in color, texture, construction or

501013006 R 3 application date, and general appearance) were identified. Each homogeneous area was observed for material type, location, condition, and friability. Representative samples were collected from each homogeneous material, within the limitations of the inspection, using EPA-recommended sampling procedures. Building materials that were sampled and analyzed for the presence of asbestos are summarized in Table 1.

5.1.2. Laboratory Analyses and Results

A total of 10 samples of suspect ACM were collected and submitted to EMSL Labs, Inc.

(EMSL) of Denver, Colorado for analysis. EMSL is a CDPHE-registered asbestos laboratory and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NVLAP No. 200828-0) for bulk asbestos fiber analysis. The samples were analyzed by PLM for the presence and quantification of asbestos fibers, in general accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116. A copy of Ninyo & Moore personnel and laboratory certifications are presented in Appendix A.

The lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM method is approximately 1% by volume. Materials containing asbestos in amounts less than 1% but in excess of 0.1% are defined as containing “trace” amounts. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody records are presented in Appendix B.

5.1.3. Findings and Opinions

The findings of the asbestos inspection are based on our visual observations and laboratory analysis of suspect building materials. Based on the analytical results, the materials sampled were not reported to contain asbestos.

501013006 R 4

5.2. Lead Sampling

Limited lead sampling was conducted to assess the lead content of paint coated surfaces.

5.2.1. Assessment

Ninyo & Moore conducted a visual assessment for possible lead-based paint (LBP). The sampling was conducted in general accordance with applicable federal and state regulations within the scope of this assessment.

5.2.2. Laboratory Analyses and Results

A total of three samples of suspect LBP were collected and submitted to EMSL for analysis. EMSL is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA

No. 157245) for environmental lead analysis The samples were analyzed by atomic absorption spectroscopy in general accordance with EPA SW-846 Method

3050B/7000B.

LBP is paint with a lead concentration in excess of the EPA total threshold limit concentration of 5,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 5,000 parts per million (ppm), 1 milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm ), or 0.5 percent by weight. Paint with a lead concentration in excess of the laboratory reporting limit but less than the EPA total threshold limit is considered to be lead-containing paint (LCP).

A Summary of Lead Sample Results is presented in Table 2. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody records are presented in Appendix C.

5.2.3. Findings and Opinions

The findings of this assessment are based on limited paint chip samples collected from the site. None of the samples collected were reported to contain lead exceeding the EPA total threshold limit. Although none of the samples are considered LBP by definition, two of the samples were reported to have lead above the laboratory analytical reporting limit and are considered LCP.

501013006 R 5

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lead standard for the construction industry does not make a distinction between working on painted surfaces with greater than 0.5% lead and those that have less. Since there is some measurable lead in the wall paint of the storage area, a potential exists of occupational exposure to lead during remodeling when the painted surfaces are disturbed via sanding. Should paint in the storage area be sanded or disturbed, during a remodeling effort, an initial air monitoring scope should be conducted to determine if the sanding induces an airborne lead concentration above OSHA action levels or permissible exposure limits.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the analytical results of the bulk samples collected during the limited asbestos inspection and limited lead sampling, no ACM or lead-based paint was identified. However, detectable levels of lead were reported in two of the paint chip samples. Therefore the following recommendations are provided:

Any suspect ACM or LCP discovered during renovation that was not assessed during this or previous inspections should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance.

Should paint in the storage area be sanded or disturbed, during a remodeling effort, an initial air monitoring scope should be conducted to determine if the sanding induces an airborne lead concentration above OSHA action levels or permissible exposure limits.

7. LIMITATIONS

Ninyo & Moore's opinions and recommendations regarding environmental conditions, as presented in this report, are based on limited sampling and analysis. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed to be representative of the area(s) evaluated. However, if additional suspect ACM or hazardous building materials are encountered during demolition activities, these materials should be sampled by qualified personnel, and analyzed prior to further disturbance.

501013006 R 6

The environmental services described in this report have been conducted in general accordance with applicable regulation and the standard-of-care exercised by environmental consultants performing similar work in the project area. Variations in site conditions may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during subsequent activities.

This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. No portion of the document, by itself, is designed to completely represent any aspect of the project described herein. Ninyo & Moore should be contacted if the reader requires any additional information, or has questions regarding content, interpretations presented, or completeness of this document.

The environmental interpretations and opinions contained in this report are based on the results of laboratory tests and analyses intended to detect the presence of ACM and lead in samples collected from the subject site. The testing and analyses have been conducted by an independent laboratory, which is accredited by the NVLAP and AIHA for bulk asbestos fiber analysis and lead analysis. Ninyo & Moore has no involvement in, or control over, such testing and analysis.

Ninyo & Moore, therefore, disclaims responsibility for any inaccuracy in such laboratory results.

Ninyo & Moore’s conclusions, recommendations, and opinions are based on an analysis of the observed site conditions. It should be understood that the conditions of a site could change with time as a result of natural processes or the activities of man at the subject site or nearby sites. In addition, changes to the applicable laws, regulations, codes, and standards of practice may occur due to government action or the broadening of knowledge. The findings of this report may, therefore, be invalidated over time, in part or in whole, by changes over which Ninyo & Moore has no control.

501013006 R

TABLES

ASBESTOS SAMPLE RESULTS

LEAD SAMPLE RESULTS

USAFA - Falcon Stadium Room 102

Colorado Springs, Colorado

June 29, 2017

Project No. 501013006

Building

No.

HA Sample No. Sample Location Layer Sample Description

Friable

(Y/N)

Condition

(G/D/SD)

Asbestos % /

Type

1 Texture (White/Gray) Y G ND

2 Drywall (Brown/White) Y G ND

1 Texture (White/Gray) Y G ND

2 Drywall (Brown/White) Y G ND

1 Texture (White/Gray) Y G ND

2 Drywall (Brown/White) Y G ND

R102-B-004A Room 102, North Wall, Bottom, Sealant 1 Non-Fibrous Sealant (White) Y G ND

R102-B-004B Room 102, North Wall, Bottom, Sealant 1 Non-Fibrous Sealant (White) Y G ND

R102-B-004C Room 102, West Corner, Bottom, Sealant 1 Non-Fibrous Sealant (White) Y G ND

R102-B-005A Room 102, Storage Area, South Wall 1 Non-Fibrous Wall Coat (White) Y G ND

R102-B-005B Room 102, Storage Area, North Entrance, Near Floor 1 Non-Fibrous Wall Coat (White) Y G ND

R102-B-005C Room 102, Center Wall, 3-feet Up 1 Non-Fibrous Wall Coat (White) Y G ND

4 R102-B-007 Room 102, Ceiling Utility Portal 1 Concrete Filler (Gray) G ND

Notes:

G -Good

Y/N - Yes/No

ND - Non Detect

HA - Homogeneous Area

% - Percent

No. - Number

Table 1. Asbestos Sample Results

F al co n

S ta d iu m R o o m

Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, West Side, 4-Feet

Up R102-B-001A

R102-B-001B Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, South Side, Outlet

Box

R102-B-001C Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, North Side, East

Window

Table 1

USAFA - Falcon Stadium Room 102

Colorado Springs, Colorado

June 29, 2017

Project No. 501013006

Sample No. Building/Room Side Component Color Substrate Condition

Lead

Concentration

(% wt)

LCP (Y/N) LBP (Y/N)

R102-P-002 North Wall White Concrete Good 0.036 Y N

R102-P-003 East Wall White Drywall Good 0.1 Y N

R102-P-006 North Wall White Drywall Good BRL N N

Notes:

LCP - Lead-containing paint

LBP - Lead-based paint

Y - Yes

N - No

Wt - Weight

BRL - Below reporting limit

Table 2. Lead Sample Results

Falcon Stadium Room 102

APPENDIX A

CERTIFICATIONS

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

6340 Castleplace Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46250

Laboratory ID: 157245 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA-LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: June 01, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: June 01, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires: June 01, 2019 FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and AIHA-LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA- LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

William Walsh, CIH Chairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board

Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Revision 15: 03/30/2016 Date Issued: 05/31/2017 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS (Asbestos)

1010 Yuma Street Denver, CO 80204

Tel/Fax: (303) 740-5700 / (303) 741-1400 http://www.EMSL.com / denverlab@emsl.com

221703508EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NYOM42

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Steven Truesdale (720) 785-0803

Fax:Ninyo & Moore (303) 629-6001

Received Date:6001 South Willow Dr. 06/02/2017 6:35 PM

Analysis Date:Ste 195 06/09/2017

Collected Date:Greenwood Village, CO 80111 06/01/2017

Project: USAFA Rm 102

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

R102-B-001A-Texture

221703508-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 West

HA: 1

R102-B-001A-Drywall

221703508-0001A

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

40%

Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 West

HA: 1

R102-B-001B-Texture

221703508-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 South

HA: 1

R102-B-001B-Drywall

221703508-0002A

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

50%

40%

Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 South

HA: 1

R102-B-001C-Texture

221703508-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 North

Inseparable paint / coating layer included in analysis

HA: 1

R102-B-001C-Drywall

221703508-0003A

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

60%

30%

Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 North

HA: 1

R102-B-004A

221703508-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 North Wall

HA: 2

R102-B-004B

221703508-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 North Wall

HA: 2

R102-B-004C

221703508-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 West

Corner

HA: 2

R102-B-005A

221703508-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 South Wall

HA: 3

R102-B-005B

221703508-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 North

Entrance

HA: 3

R102-B-005C

221703508-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Room 102 Center

Wall

HA: 3

Initial report from: 06/09/2017 17:22:57

Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 6/9/2017 3:22 PM

1010 Yuma Street Denver, CO 80204

Tel/Fax: (303) 740-5700 / (303) 741-1400 http://www.EMSL.com / denverlab@emsl.com

221703508EMSL Order:

Customer ID: NYOM42

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

R102-B-007

221703508-0010

None DetectedQuartz

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

80%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Filler

HA: 4

Analyst(s)

Molly Elkins (4)

Patricia Wood (9)

Amanda Lang, Asbestos Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Denver, CO NVLAP Lab Code 200828-0

Initial report from: 06/09/2017 17:22:57

Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 6/9/2017 3:22 PM

OrderID: 221703508

Sheet _1_ of _1_

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET

Ninyo & Moore Project Name: Merrick Sampled By: SRT Laboratory:

6001 S Willow Dr., Suite 195 Project No.: 501013006 Date Sampled: 6/1/2017 EMSL Analytical Laboratory Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Task No.: Project Manager: SRT 1010 Yuma Street, Denver, CO Tel: (303) 629-6000 Chain-of-Custody Information: See attached Tel: 303-740-5700 Fax: (303) 629-6001 Fax:

Sample ID HA# Sample Description Sample Location Quantity

(LF/SF)

Friable (Y/N)

Condition

(G/D/SD)

R102-B-001A 1 Drywall and Texture, White Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, West Side, 4-Feet Up 800 SF Y G

R102-B-001B 1 Drywall and Texture, White Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, South Side, Outlet Box 800 SF Y G

R102-B-001C 1 Drywall and Texture, White Drywall, Room 102, Media Area, North Side, East Window 800 SF Y G

R102-B-004A 2 Non-Fibrous, Weather Seal, White Room 102, North Wall, Bottom, Sealant 10 SF Y G

R102-B-004B 2 Non-Fibrous, Weather Seal, White Room 102, North Wall, Bottom, Sealant 10 SF Y G

R102-B-004C 2 Non-Fibrous, Weather Seal, White Room 102, West Corner, Bottom, Sealant 10 SF Y G

R102-B-005A 3 Wall Coat. White Room 102, Storage Area, South Wall 200 SF Y G

R102-B-005B 3 Wall Coat, White Room 102, Storage Area, North Entrance, Near Floor 200 SF Y G

R102-B-005C 3 Wall Coat, White Room 102, Center Wall, 3-feet Up 200 SF Y G

R102-B-007 4 Concrete Filler, Gray Room 102, Ceiling Utility Portal 5 SF Y G

Condition:

D = Damaged G = Good SD = Significantly Damaged Quantity:

EA = Each LF = Linear Feet SF = Square Feet

Building Materials:

ACT = Acoustical Ceiling Texture (Popcorn) BM = Button Mastic CT = Ceiling Tile CRM = Ceramic Tile CRS = Composite Roofing Shingle CC = Concrete CMU = Concrete Masonry Unit (Block)

Building Materials (continued):

FP = Fire Proofing JC = Joint Compound PM = Penetration Mastic ROR = Rolled-On-Roofing RF = Roofing Felt RT = Roofing Tar

Building Materials (continued):

TSI = Thermal System Insulation DW = Drywall VCB = Vinyl Cove Base VFT = Vinyl Floor Tile VSF = Vinyl Sheet Flooring (Linoleum) WC = Window Caulking WG = Window Glazing

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS (Lead)

ConcentrationAnalyzed RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

6340 CastlePlace Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46250 Phone/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com indianapolislab@emsl.com

Attn: Steven Truesdale Ninyo & Moore 6001 South Willow Dr.

Ste 195 Greenwood Village, CO 80111

Received: 06/02/17 10:05 AM

USAFA RM102

Fax: (303) 629-6001 Phone: (303) 629-6000

Project:

6/1/2017Collected:

161710187 CustomerID: NYOM42 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Site: Room 102 Foyer, North wall

0.036 % wt6/6/2017

161710187-0001 0.0106/1/2017R102-P-002 % wt

Site: Room 102 Storage, East wall

0.10 % wt6/6/2017

161710187-0002 0.0106/1/2017R102-P-003 % wt

Site: Room 102 Media, North wall <0.010 % wt6/6/2017

161710187-0003 0.0106/1/2017R102-P-006 % wt

Page 1 of 1Test Report PB w/RDL-7.32.3 Printed: 6/9/2017 8:24:26 AM

Doug Wiegand, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Indianapolis, IN AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP 157245, OH E10040

Initial report from 06/09/2017 08:24:26 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:indianapolislab@emsl.com

OrderID: 161710187

Sheet ___ of ___

LEAD SAMPLE DATA SHEET

Ninyo & Moore Project Name: Merrick Sampled By: SRT Laboratory:

6001 S Willow Dr., STE 195 Project No.: 501013006 Date Sampled: 6/1/2017 EMSL Analytical Inc Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Task No.: Project Manager: SRT Tel: (303) 629-6000 Chain-of-Custody Information: Tel: 303-740-5700 Fax: (303) 629-6001 Fax:

Sample ID Side Component Color/Substrate Quantity

(LF/SF)

Condition (I/F/P) Note

R102-P-002 North Room 102 Foyer Area, Wall Paint Concrete 200SF I

R102-P-003 East Room 102 Storage Area, East Wall Paint Drywall 200SF I

R102-P-006 North Room 102, Media Area, North Wall Paint Drywall 400SF I

File details come from the government source that posted it.