RFI_0004DME_20150811-signed.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA6675-15-R-0001
About this file
RFI 0004DME 20150811
View the file
Other files
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION / CLARIFICATION FORM
FOR CONTRACTOR USE ONLY
CONTRACT NO:
RFI NO: 0004 DATE (YYYYMMDD)
20150810
SUBJECT:
Solicitation FA6675-15-R-0006
DRAWING REFERENCE/ DETAIL:
ATTACHMENT SENT UNDER SEPARATE
COVER(__)
RESPONSE NEEDED BY:
ASAP
REQUEST:
Referencing solicitation page 48 of 50, paragraph 2.b. The requirement for Project Managers and Superintendents is to have “at least three (3) recent projects of similar scope and size, from award through project completion within the past three years.” We believe it is unrealistic to expect a person to have three projects, up to $5 million, completed from cradle-to-grave in a three-year period.
PROPOSED SOLUTION (If applicable):
For the PM and superintendents, expand the period of performance from 3 years to at least 5 years, preferably 7. Alternatively, reduce the number of project to “at least one”.
TO(Contracting Officer): 301 CONF/LGC
FROM (Contractor):
Dakota Meyer Enterprises, Inc.
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
20150810
TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE
John P. Feiler, Technical Writer
SIGNATURE:
//SIGNED//
FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
FROM CONTRACTING TO:
BCE: Charles Tehan (__); Robert Dudley(__; OR OTHER(__)
For Evaluation and Action
DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:
RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION (refer to page 2)
RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION:-
Government to complete following sections:
The solicitation will be amended to reflect the requirement for the Project Manager and the Superintendent’s experience to expand from “the past 3 years” to “the past 5 years”. In addition, we will reduce the number of projects of similar size and scope required from “3” to “at least 2”.
TO: AF Contractiing Office From Responding Agency
TO:(Contractor from Contracting Officer)
DATE (YYYYMMDD)
20150811
TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE
Yvette Todtenhoefer, CO
SIGNATURE:
CONTRACTOR REVIEW
After reviewing the Government response, does the contractor anticipate A change order will be required? YES NO There will be an increase in the cost of the project? YES NO
Reviewer:
*Contractor- return reviewed form to Contracting Officer. Should the review results in YES for either of the two questions, if any further action is
Yvette Todtenhoefer required by the contractor (i.e. submission of change proporsal), they will be notified by the contracting office.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .