RFI_0003DME_20150804-signed.pdf

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION / CLARIFICATION FORM

FOR CONTRACTOR USE ONLY

CONTRACT NO:

RFI NO: 0003 DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150804

SUBJECT:

Solicitation FA6675-15-R-0006

DRAWING REFERENCE/ DETAIL:

ATTACHMENT SENT UNDER SEPARATE

COVER(__)

RESPONSE NEEDED BY:

ASAP

REQUEST:

The instructions for proposal preparation do not seem to match. The table following paragraph L-01 on page 43 of 47 provides the following page limits:

Cover Page, 1 page; SF 1442, 1 page; and Price Proposal, 20 pages. The SF 1442 is a 2-page document, so are you asking for only page 2 of the SF 1442? On the same page, the Price Proposal is shown to consist of the SF 1442, the CLIN bid schedule, and the fill-ins for sections C – K. If you only want 1 copy of the Cover Page and the SF 1442 and we have to provide two copies of the Price Proposal, into which copy do we place the Cover Page and SF 1442? Also, can you please clarify what is expected in the cover page?

In the same table following paragraph L-01, there is a column heading of “Table of Contents”, followed by Sections I – V. This is the only time the section numbers are referenced. We are confused about how to organize our proposal. It appears that we should have two binders with Price Proposal and Technical Proposal. We understand how to tab out the various pieces of the proposal, but we are not sure how these five Sections are used in that schema.

Finally, in the same table, there is a Section V, Certifications that is 1 page in length. What is this certification? We can find no other requirement for a 1-page certification. The Reps & Certs are much more than one page.

PROPOSED SOLUTION (If applicable:

Recommend the table following paragraph L-01 be changed as follows:

Table of Contents Title Copies Page Limit Cover Page Four (4) paper; Two (2) electronic

(one copy for each binder and electronic copy)

One (1)

Binder 1 Price Proposal Two (2) paper; One (1) electronic None

SF 1442

Bid Schedule Reps & Certs Bid Bond [if required—see our RFI 0001] Binder 2 Technical Proposal Two (2) paper; One (1) electronic Twenty (20) Subfactor (a) – Project Management Subfactor (b) – Key Personnel

TO(Contracting Officer): 301 CONF/LGC

FROM (Contractor):

Dakota Meyer Enterprises, Inc

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150804

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

John P. Feiler, Technical Writer

SIGNATURE:

//SIGNED//

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY

FROM CONTRACTING TO:

BCE: Charles Tehan (__); Robert Dudley(__; OR OTHER(__)

For Evaluation and Action

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150811

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION (refer to page 2)

RFI RESPONSE / CLARIFICATION:-

Government to complete following sections:

A new “Proposal Organization” table has been inserted via amendment into Section L of the solicitation.

The cover page should contain standard info such as company name, contact info, solicitation # etc. Nothing elaborate is required.

The certification in the table refers to the requirement under Section L, Specific Instructions, 1(c).

TO:(AF Contractiing Office)

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

TO:(Contractor)

DATE (YYYYMMDD)

20150811

TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE

Yvette Todtenhoefer, Contracting Officer

CONTRACTOR REVIEW

After reviewing the Government response, does the contractor anticipate A change order will be required? YES NO There will be an increase in the cost of the project? YES NO

Reviewer:

Yvette Todtenhoefer

Yvette Todtenhoefer

DATE (YYYYMMDD) TYPE OR PRINT NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE:

*Contractor- return reviewed form to Contracting Officer. Should the review results in YES for either of the two questions, if any further action is required by the contractor (i.e. submission of change proporsal), they will be notified by the contracting office.