Atch 4 PP Quest 17 Mar 12.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION OF BASE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA6656-12-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Reserve Command

About this file

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION OF BASE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS (SABER), newest first.
File Type Posted
SABERamendment4.doc DOC document
Overhead door _ELEVATION_ .pdf PDF
DOOR BRICK DETAIL 14 JUN12.pptx PPTX presentation
04_20_00_UnitMasonry.doc DOC document
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS.pdf PDF
Q As.docx DOCX document
04_01_00_MaintenanceofMasonry.doc DOC document
EXISTING GUTTER DETAIL 1.pptx PPTX presentation
EXISTING GUTTER DETAIL 3.pptx PPTX presentation
EXISTING GUTTER DETAIL 2.pptx PPTX presentation
ZQEL 12-0015 REPAIR EXTERIOR BUILDING 207_13JUNE12.pdf PDF
ROOF DETAIL 1.pptx PPTX presentation
FLASHING DETAIL 14 JUN12.pptx PPTX presentation
Atch 5.1 Rep Ext Floor Plan B207 Dtd 7 Jul 11.pdf PDF
Existing Overhead Door.pptx PPTX presentation
Amend3SABER.doc DOC document
ZQEL 12-0015 SOW 14 June 2012.doc DOC document
WageDetSABERRev1HH.docx DOCX document
WageDetSABERRev1Bldg.docx DOCX document
SABERamendment2.doc DOC document
SiteVisitAttendees.pdf PDF
FA6656-12-R-0003-0001 Correct Site Visit Data.doc DOC document
Atch 3 - WD Building thru Mod 7.docx DOCX document
Atch 5.2 Prop Project Site Dtd 7 Jul 11 Pg 4 of 4.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - Inst Acq SOW Dtd 11 Apr 12 —
Atch 1 - Basic SABER SOW Dtd 27 Apr 12.doc DOC document
FA6656-12-R-0003.doc DOC document
Atch 2 - WD Hvy-Hwy thru Mod 10.docx DOCX document
Atch 5.1 Rep Ext Floor Plan B207 Dtd 7 Jul 11.pdf PDF
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FA6656-12-R0003, Attachment 4

SOURCE SELECTION SENITIVE

IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 3.104

When filled in, this document become Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: (To be completed by offeror prior to sending to reference provider)

a.
Contractor’s Name/Company:

Address:

b.
Point of Contact:
c.
Phone:
d.
Contract #/Contract Type:
e.
Project Title:
f.
Performance Period:

Authorization is hereby given to provide information in SECTION B of this questionnaire to the government.

Signature of Contractor Authorized Representative
Date

Printed Name and Title of Authorized Contractor Representative

Instructions to respondents: Thank you for taking the time to fill out this past performance questionnaire. Please fill out the questionnaire and send back within the time frame the contractor has requested (this is TIME SENSITIVE and may adversely affect past performance rating, if not sent back timely). Please answer all questions honestly and accurately.

When completed, please mail, fax, or email to:

910 CONF/LGCphone: 330-609-1306, DSN: 346-1306
Phyllis Delgrosfax: 330-609-1042, DSN: 346-1042
3976 King Graves Road – Unit 31*email: phyllis.delgros@us.af.mil
Vienna, OH 44473-5931*MS Word (*.doc) or Adobe readable (*.pdf) format only

When responding to the following statements, rate the contractor by selecting the rating below that most accurately describes the contractor’s overall performance for each element (Quality Control, Timely Performance, etc…). If the statement is not applicable, then circle “N”. The letters correspond to the following:

(A) Acceptable: Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

(U) Unacceptable: Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Neutral: Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

SECTION B: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONDENT)

a.
Respondent’s Company:

Address:

b.
Point of Contact:
c.
Phone:
d.
Contract #/Contract Type:
e.
Project Title:

Award Amount:

Final Amount:

f.
Performance Period:

Date of completion:

Authorization is hereby given to provide information in SECTION B of this questionnaire to the government.

Signature of Respondent Authorized Representative
Date

Printed Name and Title of Authorized Respondent Representative

RESPONSE SECTION

A.
Quality Control
1.
Was the quality of the workmanship sufficient?
A

U

N

2.
Were the as-built drawings accurate and timely submitted?
A

U

N

3.
Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished timely?
A

U

N

B.
Timely performance
1.
Were submittals provided on time?
A

U

N

2.
Did the submittals clearly identify the proposed item?
A

U

N

3.
Were progress schedules realistic?
A

U

N

4.
Were progress schedules met?
A

U

N

C.
Management Effectiveness
1.
General Business Practices

a. Were experienced managers/supervisors provided who possessed the technical and administrative abilities necessary to manage the project and meet contractual requirements?

A

U

N

b. Were experienced subcontractors hired?
A

U

N

c. Were subcontractors/suppliers paid timely?
A

U

N

d. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting a final inspection, with no major deficiencies?

A

U

N

e. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after project completion?

A

U

N

f. Did the contractor cooperate to resolve problems, attend meetings (as applicable) and maintain effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution?

A

U

N

2.
Pricing

a. Were price proposals submitted timely accurately representing the required work?

A

U

N

b. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting pricing information provided for modifications/change orders (not overinflated or underinflated)?

A

U

N

3.
Site Management/Superintendence

a. Did the site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?

A

U

N

b. Was he/she consistently on site while work was being performed?
A

U

N

c. Did he/she ensure compliance with contract and safety requirements?

A

U

N

d. Was prompt action taken by him/her to resolve problems with work quality?

A

U

N

D.
Compliance with Labor Standards

1.

Were payrolls submitted timely?

A

U

N

2.
Were payrolls completed and accurate?
A

U

N

3.
Was the contractor compliant with all labors laws and regulations, with specific attention to the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act?

A

U

N

E.
Compliance with Safety Regulations
1.
Were workplace safety standards and regulations (OSHA, Federal, State, Local and Agency) met?

A

U

N

2.
Did the contractor submit and implement/enforce an adequate health and safety plan?

A

U

N

F.
Compliance with Environmental and Other Standards
1.
Did the contractor submit and implement an adequate environmental pollution control plan? (Including, but not limited to recycle and disposal of waste material, hazardous waste management and/or sediment and erosion control.)?
A

U

N

Please include any additional comments as appropriate:

Do you know of any similar projects the company has completed or is in progress with, if so please provide agency and location?

Location:_____________________________________________________________________________

Please circle the most applicable:

1. I would enter into another contract with this contractor.

2. I might enter into another contract with this contractor.

3. I would not enter into another contract with this contractor.

Evaluator’s Signature:___________________________________________________________________

Evaluator’s Duty Title:___________________________________________________________________

Date: ________________________________________________________________________________ 17 May 12 Page 1 of 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .