Solicitation Amendment FA568223R00060003 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Reference

52.214-34 Submission of Offers in the English Language. 1991-04

L-01. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein and meet solicitation all requirements.

Failure to meet any solicitation requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

Offerors must submit the following:

1. Acknowledgement of compliance with all solicitation terms and conditions.

2. Acknowledgement of all solicitation amendments.

3. Active registration status in SAM on submittal of proposal as required by provision 52.204-7

4. Current Societa' Organismi di Attestazione (SOA) certification for category OG11 and classification adequate to cover the offeror's proposed amount for project performance.

5. Current Documento Unico di Regolarita' Contributiva (DURC) certifying the payment of host social security benefits. This documentmust not be older than 120 days from date of proposal.

B. In addition to the requirements outlined above proposals must consist of two additional separate parts:

1. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL

The offeror must provide a price breakdown for the project by completing the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown form provided. Proposed amounts shall be limited to 2 digits after the decimal. To be considered for award all prices must be in EURO currency only. The Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown form must be complete, accurate, and sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirement. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed pricing rests with the offeror.

(a) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 19 (if amendments are issued) and 20A through 20C of the RFP Section A, SF1442. In doing so, the offeror accepts the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(b) Insert the proposed price in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) using the amount resulting from the completion of the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown form.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K, including Section H.

(d) The entire solicitation sections A through M as well as the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown form must be returned in their entirety.

(e )The excel file used to develop the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown shall be returned with the offer.

(f) The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required.

However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

2. PART II - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 12 pages (excluding Government released documents which are not subject to any page limitation). Pages exceeding the page limitation will not be read or evaluated. The proposals must not be bigger than A4 size paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed A3 size paper. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

(a) Subfactor 1 - Experience: Submit offeror's experience with the same work/trades and complexity as this requirement. The offeror must submit evidence of at least two (2) similar projects successfully performed within the last five (5) years from the date of proposal where the offeror was solely responsible for the entire project performance that involved substantially the same work and principal trades, magnitude and complexity as this requirement.

(b) Subfactor 2 - Detailed phasing plan to ensure minimum impact on work performed in the areas affected by construction: submit a schedule indicating the principal work elements, their performance in chronological sequence, the impact on performance schedule of items such as material

FA568223R00060003

submittals, and material/equipment lead time. The schedule must be subdivided in phases in compliance with the requirement provided in the Technical Specifications, as to limit as much as possible service interruptions and inconveniences.

In the development of the phasing plan, respect of the period of performance as specified in FAR 52.211-10 is mandatory.

L-02. CURRENCY

A. All prices in response to this solicitation must be in Euro currency.

B. The Contracting Officer has determined that submission of offers in U.S. currency is not required for this solicitation to be entered into and performed outside of the United States. Therefore, the requirement forU.S. currency at provision 52.215-1(c) (5) is not applicable to this solicitation.

L-03. PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

All proposal documentation in response to this solicitation must be submitted in the English language. Summary translations of documents in the Italian language (to include SOA, DURC, etc.) must be provided.

L-04. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

A. Proposals in response to this solicitation must be submitted to reach the issuing office indicated below by the date and time specified in block 13A of the Standard Form1442:

31CONS LGC -FA5682

VIA PORDENONE89/B, AREA "E" EDIF. 600

BASE AEREA DIAVIANO

33081AVIANO (PN)

B. Submissions of offers must follow the instructions below:

PAPER COPY

Submit the proposal in a sealed envelope or package showing the time and date specified for receipt, solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.

- one (1) ;original paper copy

- one (1) of the Technical Proposal indicated in Section L, provision L-01, paragraph B, 2. A redacted copy removes all direct redacted paper copy references that can identify an offeror by name or other easily recognizable characteristic. The redacted copy will be used during source selection procedures as detailed in Section M of the solicitation.

ELCTRONIC COPY CD/DVD

- one (1) ; and original copy

- one (1) of the Technical Proposal indicated in Section L, provision L-01, paragraph B, 2.redacted copy Electronic copies may be submitted on the same disk if sufficient capacity is available.

Flash drives will not be accepted.

C. Offerors are cautioned that Aviano AB has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED IF HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the contracting office PRIOR to the time specified for receipt.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

M-01. SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award

1. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted inaccordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15 Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationS upplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix C, 20 August 2022 and Air Force Mandatory revised on 2 May 2022Procedures 5315.3 2019 edition, . These regulations are available electronically at https://www.acquisition.gov/.

Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation's requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

2. Proposals meeting the solicitation requirements set forth in section L will be ranked first by price and then evaluated for technical acceptability.

The technical evaluation team will evaluate the lowest two (2) offers for technical acceptability. Evaluations will terminate once two lowest priced technically acceptable proposals are identified. The lowest price technically acceptable proposal whose price is determined reasonable and balanced will be selected for award.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded.

The Government intends to award one contract for the performance of Project ASHE 21-1023 REPAIR HVAC B.1403, Area F, Aviano AB, Italy.

C. Discussions

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the procedures outlined in FAR 15.306 will be used.

D. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

Offerors must follow the instructions contained in section L and meet all solicitation requirements. Failure to meet any solicitation requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

M-02. EVALUATION FACTORS

A. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or subfactors.

Factor 1: Price

Factor 2: Technical

- :ExperienceSubfactor1

- Subfactor 2: Detailed phasing plan with extensive minimization of functions inconveniences

B. Factor 1: Price

For the purpose of conducting evaluations, all proposals meeting the solicitation requirements set forth in section L will be ranked first by Total Evaluated Price (TEP). Technical evaluation will then be conducted on the two lowest priced proposals. If the lowest priced proposal of the two is evaluated as technically acceptable, that proposal represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. This proposal will then be evaluated for price reasonableness and balanced pricing in accordance with FAR 15.404-1.

If the lowest priced offer is rated unacceptable,unreasonable or unbalanced the Government will then evaluate the proposals of the next two lowest priced proposals using the same process as outlined here above. This process will repeat until a proposal is evaluated as technically acceptable and has both reasonable and balanced pricing. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable and/or unbalanced may not be considered foraward.

C. Factor 2: Technical

1. TheGovernment's technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as "Unacceptable" will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, un-awardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

2. Technical Ratings

Acceptable proposal: clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable proposal: does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Experience

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror's experience with the same work/trades, and complexity of this requirement.

Measureof Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror's proposal includes evidence of at least two (2) similar projects, in terms of magnitude and works typology, successfully performed within the last five (5) years from the date of proposal that involved substantially the same work/trades, magnitude and complexity as this requirement.

Subfactor 2: Detailed phasing plan with extensive minimization of functions inconveniences.

Description: This subfactor will assess the offeror's ability to realistically schedule the project's principal work elements to meet the required period of performance.The subdivision of the works in phases must demonstrate the minimal impact on the administrative functions performed in Facility 1403 and the working personnel and must be in compliance with the required phases subdivision provided with the Technical Specifications.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when:

- the schedule and the phasing plan is realistic and demonstrates the offeror's full understanding of the principal work elements;

- performance of work items shall be presented in a logical and reasonable sequence;

- contractor shall show proper and full consideration was given to the impact of material submittals and material/equipment lead time on the overall schedule;

- phasing plan shall meet the requirements of the Technical Specifications (paragraph AC1-20). More specifically the phasing plan shall demonstrate that the contractor has considered the feasibility of performing the partial work as described in the cited paragraph, ensuring the minimal impact on the administrative functions, and preventing inconveniences.

- period of performance in FAR 52.211-10 is respected

UNIT 6102 BOX 140, APO AE 09604-6102

APO, AE 09604-6102

UNITED STATES

Valeria Breda, Email: valeria.breda.it@us.af.mil Telephone: 0434-305807