Solicitation Amendment FA561325R00060004 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On:

28 May 2025, 11:56 AM Central European Summer Time

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is as follows: Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1. release updated PWS

2. release the Q&A

3. extend submission deadline of PPQ's

Changes to Amendment 3 are highlighted pink. Non-highlighted areas remain unchanged. The RFP was not extended.

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Size Standard - Dollars $17,000,000.00

Contract Clauses

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

This Request for Proposal for commercial services is prepared IAW the format in FAR Part 12 Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services and FAR Part 15 Contracting by Negotiations, supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

Submission Deadlines and Points of Contact:

All questions regarding this Request for Proposal are due in writing by . 14:00 Central European Summer Time (CEST), Wednesday 14 May 2025 Proposals must be submitted by Thursday 05 June 2025, at 1600 Central European Summer Time.

PPQ's are to be submitted by 1 6:00 CEST, Thursday, 05 June 2025. Please see submission info in section (b)(10) of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 below.

Proposals, Questions and all other correspondence shall be submitted via email to Darrell Hafer, and Iris Laub, IAW darrell.hafer.2@us.af.mil iris.laub.de@us.af.mil the submission instructions detailed in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 below.

A will be held for all interested parties site visit on Wednesday, 07 May 2025 at 10:30 Central European Summer Time (CEST) at Ramstein Air Base (RAB), Germany.

Offerors shall contact via email Darrell Hafer, darrell.hafer.2@us.af.mil and Iris Laub, iris.laub.de@us.af.mil NLT 14:00 CEST on attendance and allow the Government sufficient time to coordinate base access.05 May 2025 to confirm

To allow sufficient time to obtain access from the Visitor Control Center (VCC) for access to the Installation, all interested parties will meet at Rhine-Ordnance- Any attendees need to provide a valid form of identification (Passport, Personalausweis etc.) in order Barracks-Medical-Center (ROB-MC) Gate NLT 10:00 CEST.

to gain access to the installation.

The site visit will not be delayed due to late arrival of any interested parties.

Definitions of words and terms as used in the following addenda:

Recent - within the past five (5) years from the issuance date of the solicitation for a minimum of one continuous year per referenced contract.

Relevant - similar in scope and magnitude; means the work must have been passenger terminal security and baggage screening including same or similar tasks described in Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement (PWS) for a comparable number of passengers, and for a minimum of one continuous year (see PWS 9.0 for workload estimates).

Referees - entity the referenced services were performed for. the

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (SEP 2023)

This addendum replaces the below referenced paragraphs of the provision as follows:

(b) The Offeror shall submit written documentation as follows:

FA561325R00060004

(b)(4) Technical Capability:

(A) Past Experience (Times New Roman, size 12, limited to 2 pages per submission, single sided, single spaced):

The offeror shall of at least one continuous year of and submit a least 1, but not more than 5 submissions recent contract performance (or the past experience of a joint venture partner or subcontractor being intended to relevant perform the solicited service or instances where the offeror performed as a subcontractor). This information shall include but is not limited to tasks performed, years of service, Government contract number and location. The offeror shall identify the approximate number of passengers per year for each submission. The Government will not evaluate any additionally received submissions.

(B) (limited to no more than 4 pages, single sided, single spaced): Offerors Performance Management Plan (PMP) shall submit a PMP with their proposal. Offeror shall use Attachment 3, PMP and address all areas identified in the attachment. All paragraphs 1 through 5 of Attachment 3 shall be completed. Page limitation excludes additional requested documentation in case of a team arrangement or subcontracting arrangement. Said additional documentation shall be combined into one pdf file.

(b)(6) Offerors shall insert a unit and extended price in Attachment 2, Pricing Sheet, for each Contract Line Price:

Item Number (CLIN) 0001, 1001, 2001, 3001 and 4001. Offerors shall insert the grand total for the base and all option years. The document shall include all discount terms if applicable. NOTE: Only USD and EURO currency offers will be accepted. Evaluation IAW FAR 52.225-17.

(b)(10) Offerors shall and contracts by completing Past Performance: reference up to a total of 3 recent relevant sections A. and B. of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment 4, 1 PPQ for each referenced contract. Past performance references of a joint venture partner or subcontractor being intended to perform the solicited service, or instances where the offeror performed as a subcontractor will be accepted. Offerors shall then send the PPQs to the to fill out section D prior to the due date of offers for completion. Offerors shall ensure referees that the identified in section submit the PPQs directly to the POC's referees Submission Deadlines and Points of above, within the proposal submission deadline defined in the same section. Offerors are advised to follow-Contact up with their to ensure the questionnaires are submitted timely. A listing of these referees shall be referees submitted with the proposal. The Government will not evaluate any additionally received references and/or references submitted by the offeror directly (this does not include Past Experience submissions IAW paragraph (b)(4)

(A) of this addendum).

(b)(12) Offerors shall provide their CAGE (Commercial and Government Entity) code and UEI SAM Registration:

(Unique Entity Identifier) along with their proposal.

(b)(13) Offerors shall provide certification of their authorization (or the authorization of a joint venture partner or subcontractor being intended to perform the solicited service) to perform security services in accordance with (IAW) the German Trade Act (Gewerbeordnung), paragraph 34a, Security Trade (Bewachungsgewerbe) with the proposal.

Failure to submit the certification of authorization IAW paragraph 34a of the German Trade Act with the proposal will adversely impact the responsibility determination of the offeror.

(c) . The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from Period for acceptance of offers the date specified for receipt of offers.

(h) Deleted. Multiple awards

(m) NOTE: Section 613A BGB (Buergerliches Gesetzbuch/German Civil Code) may apply to any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation for personnel employed in Germany. It is the offeror's responsibility to determine if Section 613A BGB applies and propose accordingly.

(End of addendum)

FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government will award a single contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation is determined to be the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) proposal with acceptable past performance. The Government may award without discussions, reserving the right to hold discussions if deemed necessary by the CO. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

(1) FACTOR 1 - Price

(2) FACTOR 2 - Technical Capability:

: Past experience for performing passenger terminal security and baggage screening services Subfactor 1 : Performance Management Plan (PMP) Subfactor 2

(3) FACTOR 3 - Past Performance

(1) FACTOR 1 - Price. Offeror's attachment 2 will be evaluated on their Total Evaluated Price (TEP) which consists of the total amounts of all CLINs 0001 through 4001. The six-month extension of services IAW FAR 52.217-8, "Option to Extend Services" will be utilized if necessary and is not to be considered part of Option Year 4. It will be a separate option exercised if it is utilized. Offerors will not be required to submit pricing for the six-month extension of services. The six-month Option to Extend Services will be calculated by dividing the proposed total of Option Year 4 by two. Should the extension occur at any performance period other than the last option period or be less than 6 months, the prices of the most current performance period will be used to determine the total amount of the extension by multiplying the unit price of the current performance period with the number of days/weeks/months the contract is being extended.

Only USD and EURO currency offers will be accepted. Unbalanced prices may serve as a basis for rejection of the proposal. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and completeness of the TEP. Prices will be evaluated for fair and reasonableness of total evaluated price IAW FAR 15.402(a).

Arithmetic Discrepancies. For the purpose of initial evaluation of offers, the following will be utilized in resolving arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the pricing schedule as submitted by the offeror.

(A) Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected;

(B) Discrepancy between unit price and extended price, the unit price will govern;

(C) Apparent errors in extension of unit prices will be corrected;

(D) Apparent errors in extended prices per CLIN will be corrected.

(E) Rounding of unit prices shall be limited to 2 digits after the decimal

The totals calculated by resolution of the arithmetic discrepancies listed above will represent the total evaluated price. These procedures will not be used if the total evaluated price displaces the low offeror. Discussions may then be conducted.

(2) FACTOR 2- Technical Capability. Offerors will be evaluated on written documentation provided in accordance with paragraph (b)(4) of the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and listed as subfactors 1 and 2 above. Technical acceptability is based on successfully meeting this requirement and will be rated "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" as follows:

TECHNICAL CRITERIA RATINGS

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Offerors must receive an "Acceptable" rating for each subfactor to receive an overall "Acceptable" rating in the technical evaluation. In the event one or more subfactors receive an "Unacceptable" rating, the proposal will receive an overall "Unacceptable" rating in the technical evaluation.

(A) : Past Experience. The submitted past experience evidence will be evaluated on the evidence of Subfactor 1 at least 1 continuous year of and contract performance (or the past experience of a joint venture recent relevant partner or subcontractor being intended to perform the solicited service, or instances where the offeror performed as a subcontractor). The Government will not evaluate submissions in excess of the requested maximum of 5 submissions.

(B) : Performance Management Plan (PMP). Attachment 3, Performance Management Plan (PMP) Subfactor 2 will be evaluated on the offeror's approach to the areas identified in the attachment to provide a credible approach of successful performance for passenger terminal security and baggage screening services. All paragraphs 1 through 5 of Attachment 3 shall be completed. An incomplete PMP may render the proposal unacceptable.

(3) FACTOR 3 - Past Performance. Past Performance will be evaluated based on subjective assessment of how well the offeror performed on and work, as outlined in Addendum to FAR Provision 52.212-1, recent relevant paragraph (b)(10). Other than prime contractor past performance references, those of a joint venture partner or instances where the offeror performed as subcontractor will be accepted. The Government will not evaluate any received references in excess of the requested maximum of 3 references and/or references submitted by the offeror directly. For the purpose of assessing acceptable performance, PPQ ratings S (Satisfactory), G (Good) and E (Exceptional) assigned on the PPQs will be considered "Acceptable". M (Marginal) and U (Unsatisfactory) will be considered "Unacceptable". The rating is based upon offeror-provided references, received PPQs, or information obtained by the Government from other sources of past performance information such as, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). Offerors will have the opportunity to address any negative performance information received, that the offeror has not already had the opportunity to address, through clarifications.

Offeror must receive "Acceptable" rating to receive an award, as follows:

PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Rating Definition

Accept able

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (see note below).

Unacce ptable

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 [a][2][iv]).

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered "Acceptable".

(b) The Government intends to award to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror with an Award Process:

acceptable past performance rating; the Government reserves the right to hold discussions at any point during the evaluation. The evaluation process is as follows:

(1) The Government will first evaluate all proposals for price, ranking the offerors from lowest to highest total evaluated price.

(2) Next, a technical and past performance evaluation will be performed beginning with the lowest priced offerors.

Evaluations will stop when two technically acceptable proposals receive an acceptable past performance rating for price comparison purposes. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable with an acceptable past performance rating, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

(c) The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options, to the Options.

total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(d) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

AF BPN NO MILSBILLS PROCESSES, UNIT 3076

APO, AE 09021-3076

UNITED STATES

Iris Laub, Email: iris.laub.de@us.af.mil Telephone: 489-7509 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: