About this file

Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amd_02 _Exchange_Page_Atch_3.docx DOCX document
Amendment_02.doc DOC document
Pre-Proposal_Slides_PAX.ppt PPT presentation
Attendance_Pre-Prop_15_Dec_14.pdf PDF
Questions_ _Answers_FA5613-15-R-0002.docx DOCX document
Amd_02 _Exchange_Page_3 _PWS.docx DOCX document
Amd_02 _Exchange_Page_11 _PWS.docx DOCX document
Amendment_01.doc DOC document
Solicitation_Cover_Letter _FA5613-15-R-0002.pdf PDF
Atch_3 _Applicable_Clauses_ _Provisions.doc DOC document
Atch_1 _Pricing_Schedule.doc DOC document
Atch_6 _EMS_Flyer.pdf PDF
Atch_2 _PWS.doc DOC document
Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.doc DOC document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5

FA5613-15-R-0002

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

This acquisition is for Passenger Terminal Security and Baggage Screening services at the Ramstein Air Base (AB) Air Mobility Command (AMC) Passenger Terminal, Germany.

A.

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:

Contract Number*:

Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B.

RATER INFORMATION:

Name of Rater:

Name of Rater:

Title:

Title:

Address:

OR

Address:

Phone Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Email Address:

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY NOT LATER THAN 05 JAN 2015 TO:

Erika Voss-Elsaesser/Contract Specialist Inge Jenkins/Contracting Officer

700 CONS/LGCA

and

700 CONS/LGCA

erika.voss_elsaesser.1.de@us.af.mil ingeborg.jenkins.1.de@us.af.mil +49-631-536-6809 or DSN 489-6809 +49-631-536- 6800 or DSN 489-6800

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor…
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
…provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical/ administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
…demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
…provided sufficient manning at all times to perform the required services.
4.
…provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5.
…corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
6.
…provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
7.
…identified problems as they occurred.
8.
…suggested alternative approaches to problems.
9.
…displayed initiative to solve problems.
10.
…provided timely resolution of defects.
11.
…was responsive to contract changes.
12.
…complied with environmental requirements, if applicable.
13.
…performed passenger screening.
14.
…performed baggage screening.
15.
…performed identification checks.
16.
...used x-ray equipment for screening.
17.
…used metal detection equipment for screening.
18.
…used ion scanning equipment for screening.
19.
…screened passengers at a rate of no less than 6 passengers per minute for passengers entering the sterile area (separated secured waiting area where passengers stay prior to boarding).
20.
…maintained constant surveillance of alarm room and video surveillance system with multiple monitors.
21.
…responded to security alarm activations within the established response time.
22.
…performed security patrols in accordance with established schedules.
General:
E
G
S
M
U
N
23.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
24.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO
For US Government contracts only:
E
G
S
M
U
N
25.
The contractor followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan.
26.
The contractor cooperated with Government personnel after award.
27.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
28.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES / NO

Remarks: ____________________________________________________________________________________

For Official Use Only

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .