Attachment 5 PPQ.doc
DOC document 64 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-12-R-0001
About this file
Attachment 5 (PPQ) Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3. Amendm-01 - Atch 4 ReplPg 6.pdf | ||
| 2. Amendm-01 - Atch 4 ReplPg 4.pdf | ||
| 1. Notification of Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| 6. Attendance Sheet - Gvmt.pdf | ||
| 4. Pre-Proposal Conference Minutes 10Aug12.pdf | ||
| 5. Elevator Pre-Proposal Conference 10Aug12.pps | PPS file | |
| 7. Attendance Sheet - Vendors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Applicable Clauses and Provisions.doc | DOC document | |
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 2 PWS etc..docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 Pricing Schedule.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 Historical Workload Data for repair Calls.doc | DOC document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5
FA5613-12-R-0001
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
This Acquisition is for Preventive Maintenance, Safety Inspections and Repairs of Elevators and Escalators in the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC), Ramstein Air Base, Landstuhl-Kirchberg, Kaiserslautern-Vogelweh and Kaiserslautern-Kapaun.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Erika Voss-Elsaesser/Contract Specialist Inge Jenkins/Contracting Officer
700 CONS/LGCE
and
700 CONS/LGCE
erika.voss-elsaesser@ramstein.af.mil inge.jenkins@ramstein.af.mil +49-631-536-6809 or DSN 489-6809 +49-631-536- 6800 or DSN 489-6800
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan. |
| 5. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 8. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 9. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 10. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 11. |
| Provided timely resolution of defects. |
| 12. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 13. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 14. |
| Complied with environmental requirements. |
| 15. |
| Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames? |
| 16. |
| Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work? |
| 17. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award? |
| 18. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 19. |
| How many elevators and escalators have been serviced under this contract? |
| Qty: |
| 20. |
| Did the contractor follow DIN EN 13015 Instandhaltung von Aufzuegen und Fahrtreppen – Regeln fuer Instandhaltungsanweisungen / Maintenance for Lifts and Escalators – Rules for Maintenance Instructions perform |
| YES /NO |
| 21 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |
If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
| 22. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES / NO |
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
Remarks:
For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .