22R0002_Attch10-Questions and Answers.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

86TH AIRLIFT WING (USAFE)

2 March 2022

MEMORANDUM FOR INTERESTED PARTIES

FROM: 496 ABS/PK

SUBJECT: Amendment 2_Questions and answers for FA557522R0002-CNS PV Farm, Moron AB

A. The purpose of this is to answer questions proposed by interested parties.

1. Question: Dwg E-601 does not show the planned connection point of the 12.47KV coming from the new PV park. We assume that it would be in the 12470 V busbar and for this reason the following questions arise:

a) Is there sufficient space inside the substation enclosure (Bldg.#212) for the addition of the new protection cabins and switchgear?

b) If there is not enough space within the substation enclosure (Bldg. #212), would it be approved to install the new protection cabins and switchgear in a separate prefabricated shelter next to the substation

Answer: Dwg E601 was updated in Amd #1. Dwg E-601 in 22R0002_Atch5-

Concept+Drawings+dated+13+Jan+22 file of the solicitation shows the suggested injection point in the 12,470 V busbar of the Bldg #212. However, the basis of design should consider multiple injection points and determine the most feasible solution.

a) We think there is space enough inside the power plant (bldg. #212) for the additional

HV equipment; however, the final solution has to be developed as part of the design of this contract, and the space requirement will be different depending on the solution adopted by the AE Firm.

b) In the case that the solution adopted by the AE requires more space than the available in the power plant (Bldg #212), it could be approved. However, during the site visit, Contractors were able to inspect the existing spaces at Bldg #212 for a better idea.

2. Question: The project plans do not show the location of the Scada monitoring system of the new PV park; we assume that it will be located in Bldg.#212.

However, it is not indicated if the internet connection needed for the monitoring will be provided by the Government, and if the contractor will have to make a specific internet connection from a neighboring building.

Answer: Monitoring system for the PV Farm shall be located in the PV Famr utility vault, and a remote unit shall be located at the Base Power Plant, Bldg #212 (see Scope of Work, Part 5, paragraph 3.2.5). In any case, remote monitoring capabilities of the status and production of the PV Farm will be required to be displayed in the Bldg #212.

That is why a Fiber Optic cable is to be installed in this project between both facilities.

No internet connection is required, the communication between PV Farm and Bldg #212 shall be a dedicated fiber optic line provided as part of this project.

3. Question: A Lighting System is not indicated for the new PV park area. If required:

a) Can the new lightings circuit be fed from the public lighting circuit of Vazquez Sastizabal street?

b) As an option, could autonomous lighting columns powered by batteries be used?

Answer: No lighting is required for the PV Farm fenced area. Only lighting required is specified in Statement of Work, Part 5 – Performance Technical Specifications, paragraphs 3.4 Interior lighting and 3.5 Exterior lighting.

4. Question: This bidder believes that section A.2. MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL

APPROACH on the RFP, does not coincide with what has been expressed on section 1.2

MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL APPROACH of attachment 6:

a) Organizational Chart: This is laid out on the RFP in its section A.2., but on attachment 6 this is developed under the section TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT NUMBER 4:

ORGANIZATION CHART.

b) Also, section g) within the RFP and section f) in attachment 6 differ, although both are intimately dependent on Quality requirements.

c) Sustainability: There is a specific sustainability requirement on Attachment 6 (point g.), which it is not required on the RFP.

Answer: The RFP will be changed to reflect Attachment 6. Please use the instructions within the RFP.

5. Question: With outmost respect, please clarify what seems to be discrepancies between the information provided on the RFP and its subsequent attachment 6:

RFP SECTION L Subfactor 2 - Past Experience: The Offeror shall include with the proposal projects that demonstrate the capabilities of the Offeror through past experience.

Examples should at minimum describe magnitude, scope, and Offeror role.

B.1. (2) to (4) example projects demonstrating the design-build project management experience of the Offeror as the prime contractor of a project. Additionally, the offer should choose (1) of the example projects and provide further information within their proposal.

Information should include specific applications of best management practices and lessons learned as it relates to Subfactor A.2 Management and Technical Approach.

B.2. (2) to (4) example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Offeror as a Construction Firm when a full design has been provided by the Government. Examples should demonstrate the capability to manage a construction contract of similar type and scope to this project, i.e. PV Farm construction and installation. Additionally, the offer should choose (1) of the example projects and provide further information within their proposal.

Information should include specific applications of best management practices and lessons learned as it relates to Subfactor A.2 Management and Technical Approach.

This requirement is met when the Offeror demonstrates with examples that the Offeror has past experience with a minimum magnitude of $1,000,000 and demonstrated the capacity to apply best management practices with specific project examples.

RFP SECTION M Subfactor 2 - Past Experience: The Offeror shall include with the proposal projects that demonstrate the capabilities of the Offeror through past experience.

Examples should at minimum describe magnitude, scope, and Offeror role.

B.1. (3) to (5) example projects demonstrating the design-build project management experience of the Offeror as the prime contractor of a project. Additionally, the offer should choose (1) of the example projects and provide further information within their proposal.

Information should include specific applications of best management practices and lessons learned as it relates to Subfactor A.2 Management and Technical Approach.

B.2. (3) to (5) example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Offeror as a Construction Firm when a full design has been provided by the Government. Examples should demonstrate the capability to manage a construction contract of similar type and scope to this project, i.e. PV Farm construction and installation. Additionally, the offer should choose (1) of the example projects and provide further information within their proposal.

Information should include specific applications of best management practices and lessons learned as it relates to Subfactor A.2 Management and Technical Approach.

This requirement is met when the Offeror demonstrates with examples that the Offeror has past experience with a minimum magnitude of $1,000,000 and demonstrated the capacity to apply best management practices with specific project examples.

ATTACHMENT 6 PAST EXPERIENCE: The Bidder shall include in his proposal the following documents:

1 to 3 example projects demonstrating the design-build project management experience of the Bidder and/or Key subcontractor, if any, and his (their) capability on a construction project of similar type and scope.

1 to 3 example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Architect-

Engineer Design Firm on a design of similar type and scope. At least 1 of those example projects must be a design of a photovoltaic farm of similar type and size.

1 to 3 example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Construction

Firm on a construction of similar type and scope. At least 1 of those example projects must be the construction of a photovoltaic farm of similar type and size.

Answer: Please provide 2 to 4 example projects. The RFP and attachment 6 will be changed to reflect this change. Technical requirements for this project were included in

Attachment 6. The requirements in the solicitation currently removes the AE Firm experience in design of PV Farms, which we consider of the utmost importance in this project. The RFP will be changed to incorporated AE Firm experience.

6. Question: For the supporting structure of PV panels, concrete footing construction, including tie beams are mandatory? Can the structure be nailed into the ground?

Answer: The bidder must submit bids for BASIC BID, ADDITIVE ITEM #4 and

ADDITIVE ITEM #5, which include the line item "Concrete footing construction, including tie beams", according to the cost estimate forms provided for those bids.

Bidders may choose to replace the line item "Concrete footing construction, including tie beams" with "Driven pile footing construction" for consideration and evaluation by the Contracting Office. The foundation type shall be selected by Civil Engineering from the foundation types recommended by the geotechnical report to be submitted by the contractor after the corresponding geotechnical study to be carried out by the contractor. An example geotechnical report at Moron has been provided for consideration.

7. Question: The electric basic design, could be changed? Pv panels power, inverter power, etc

Answer: Since this is a Design-Build project, there are some items that can be modified during the design, within the requirements indicated in the Scope of Work, Part 5. For instance, PV modules minimum requirements to be satisfied are stated in parag. 3.2.1 of

Part 5 (sheet 33 of the Scope of Work document), and inverter modules minimum requirements are set in parag. 3.2.2 of Part 5 (Sheet 34 of the Scope of Work document).

8. Question: For the additive Item #5, Is it necessary to install two prefabricated buildings? Or could we build one with capacity for two high voltage transformers?

Answer: If a single vault can house the transformers required in accordance with all electrical applicable codes, there is no objection to using a single vault.

9. Question: For the additive Item #6, What is the minimum number of fire hydrants required by

NFPA?

Answer: NFPA does not specifically address the number of hydrants for this type of installation; however, per the Authority Having Jurisdiction AHJ the installation of one

(1) fire hydrant is required near the Transformer Vault. Therefore, option #6 may be written as follows: “Provide one (1) fire hydrant near the Transformer Vault supplied from the nearest existing 8” HDPE potable water line running parallel to 1st street

(North side). Road crossing shall be performed by directional boring.”

10. Question: For the economic offer, on page 51 of the solicitation document, it says that we must send section b (page 3) with the price of all clins; should we send this document or the excel file "22R0002_Attch8-Ktors Construction Cost Estimate BLANK" with all the breakdown of prices?

Answer: Contractors should provide both the CLIN pricing in section B and the breakout of costs in Attachment 8 with their proposal.

11. Question: Will digitally signed documents be considered as originals?

Answer: YES, for agreements with subcontractors if digitally signed by both. As long as the digital signature is a real digital signature, with appropriate digital certificates, this is correct. A ‘wet ink’ signature scanned is not a digital signature. In any case, classification certifications need to be original or a notarized copy.

12. Question: In this request of proposal there are 2 documents, "FA557522R00020001+-

+Conformed+Solicitation" and "22R0002_Atch6-Technical Requirements and

Qualifications".; Which of the two documents is the one we must consider presenting our proposal? Each one of them, request different documents in a different order.

Answer: Please align with the revised RFP. Please use the instructions within the RFP.

13. Question: Point 3.2.4. of the Statement of Work reads: “Mounting system must be ground mounting type”. However, on point 2.2.1.20 of said Statement of Work it also reads:

“Construct the concrete footings for the 900-kWp PV panels supporting structures connected with concrete tie beams”. Please clarify which type of structure is required, either ground mounting one or the one with concrete footings.

Answer: Paragraph 3.2.4 corresponds to the steel structure for the support of the panels and Paragraph 2.2.1.20 corresponds to the foundation of that steel structure

14. Question: Very grateful if you could provide more information about the final finish of the photovoltaic plot on the ground.

Answer: No final finish is required, but the contractor shall perform the required earthworks for clearing and grubbing, site grading (grading to provide a slope for gravity surface drainage), construction of the drainage system (ditches, culverts, headwalls, aprons, rip-raps, wingwalls), foundations.

15. Question: According with Solicitation 252.225-7018 Deviation 2020-O0019 Photovoltaic

Devices Certificate, paragraph 2 If $182,000 or more, then the Government will consider only offers that utilize photovoltaic devices that are U.S.-made, qualifying country, or designated country photovoltaic devices. DFARS 252.225-7017 defined the designated countries and the qualifying countries. Additionally, the manufacturer of panel must be one of the top-10 in the BNEF Tier-1 module rating. Crossing both lists there are only two modules manufacturers that may be acceptable. Please confirm that the criteria also applies to the inverters manufacturers regarding the qualifying and designated countries.

Answer: IAW with DFARS 252.225-7018(6)(ii) multiple countries can be specified as qualifying countries, which includes but is not limited to Spain. This allows the offeror to specify which country of origin the products will be provided from. Furthermore, IAW DFARS 252.222-7017-1(2) this requirement is exempt due to performance being conducted outside the United States. That is to say, DFARS 252.225-7018 Deviation

2020-O0019 Photovoltaic Devices Certificate will be removed from the contract vehicle.

16. Question: Section L; Part II; para. A. Subfactor 1; subpara. A.1 A-E Design Capabilities (Pag

52 of 60).:

Last paragraph states:

This requirement is met when the Offeror demonstrates the capability of in-house or sub-contracted A&E design services and has experience performing design-build construction projects and design of ATFP measures and pavement repair and construction with a minimum magnitude of $100,000.

By other hand, Atach6; Section 6 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT NUMBER 6: PAST

EXPERIENCE; paragraph b. requires:

1 to 3 example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Architect-

Engineer Design Firm on a design of similar type and scope. At least 1 of those example projects must be a design of a photovoltaic farm of similar type and size.

Could you kindly please confirm that Section L; Part II; para. A. Subfactor 1; subpara. A.1 requirement is met when the Offeor´s A-E Design Firm demostrates experience according to

Section 6, paragraph b.of Atach6?

17. Question: Section M; para. A. Subfactor 1; subpara. A.1 A-E Design Capabilities(Pag 58 of

60), states:

This requirement is met when the offeror demonstrates that the A-E firm has experience performing design-build construction projects and/or design of projects of similar type/scope and magnitude.

By other hand, Atach6; Section 6 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT NUMBER 6: PAST

EXPERIENCE; paragraph b. requires:

1 to 3 example projects demonstrating the experience and capability of the Architect-

Engineer Design Firm on a design of similar type and scope. At least 1 of those example projects must be a design of a photovoltaic farm of similar type and size.

Could you kindly please confirm that Section M; para. A. Subfactor 1; subpara. A.1 requirement is met when the Offeor´s A-E Design Firm demostrates experience according to

Section 6, paragraph b.of Atach 6?

18. Question: “SOW” Could be supplied the hydrants using the same pipe to be installed for the hose bib or it is required a different and additional pipe to be installed from the nearest existing 8” HDPE non-potable water line running parallel to 1st street (South side).

If additional pipe is required, road crossing shall be performed by directional boring?

Answer: The hydrant shall be supplied from the potable water line and the hose bibb from the non-potable water supply. Therefore, two independent lines are required.

19. Question: Geotechnical Report is under Contractor scope but in order to have a better knowledge of the site, please we kindly ask for a geotechnical report of another project close to the area if possible.

Answer: An example geotechnical report at Moron has been provided for consideration.

20. Question: "SOW” 2.2.1.20. Construct the concrete footings for the 900-kWp PV panels supporting structures connected with concrete tie beams. Please confirm if that is the solution required or the Contractor after performing the geotechnical report and Pull-Out Tests may design the best solution that may be direct ramming, pre-drill or micropilling."

including tie beams", according to the cost estimate forms provided for those bids.

Bidders may choose to replace the line item "Concrete footing construction, including tie beams" with "Driven pile footing construction" for consideration and evaluation by the Contracting Office. The foundation type shall be selected by Civil Engineering from the foundation types recommended by the geotechnical report to be submitted by the contractor after the corresponding geotechnical study to be carried out by the

21. Question: Please confirm if it´s necessary any anti-spill device.

Answer: As long as the PV Farm generates power @ 60 Hz, an anti-spill device is not needed.

22. Question: Please confirm if it´s necessary any perimetral lighting in the PV Plant or just lighting in the exterior and interior of the prefabricated building.

Answer: No lighting is required for the PV Farm fenced area. Only lighting required is specified in Statement of Work, Part 5 – Performance Technical Specifications, paragraphs 3.4 Interior lighting and 3.5 Exterior lighting.

23. Question: SOW - 3.10.1. Transformer Shelter: Transformer shelter shall be prefabricated concrete and shall include metal clad HV switchgear and the low voltage cabinet. Please confirm that the prefabricated concrete solution in the only one accepted and if the string inverters are required to be installed inside the prefabricated building.

Answer: SOW Part 5, parag 3.10 states: Provide a secondary substation in a pre-manufactured concrete vault that will house all equipment required to transform DC voltage from the PV modules and combiner boxes to high voltage AC that shall be distributed to the base power plant." Therefore, pre-manufactured concrete is the only option for the secondary substation and the string inverters are required to be housed in this pre-manufactured building. Combiner boxes are not required inside the vault, they should be better located next to the PV strings.

24. Question: SOW - 3.3.3.1. AC Main Distribution Panel to Secondary Panels: Connecting conductors for main distribution panel to secondary panels and from inverter modules to transformer low-voltage side shall be flexible class 5 copper and shall be rated 1000 volts nominal capacity with cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation in accordance with UNE

21123-4. Insulation shall be moisture and heat resistant and be suitable for maximum operating temperature rise of 90ºC. Technical designation RZ1-K (AS), flame retardant (AS), halogen-free with thermoplastic polyolefin (Z1) jacket. Please confirm if aluminum may be acceptable.

Answer: Aluminum is not acceptable for cables/wiring under this project.

25. Question: SOW - 3.7.10. Underground Medium Voltage Cables: Cable (conductor) sizes shall be designated in square millimeters. Provide single conductor copper cables only.

Medium voltage cable shall be RHZ1-OL 12/20Kv 1x35 Cu H16 in accordance with UNE-

HD 620-10E.

Answer: Aluminum is not acceptable for cables/wiring under this project.

26. Question: In order to offer the best solution to this RFP, this bidder would appreciate if the the civil works activities involving excavations and final pavement of the plot were further defined.

Answer: See the requested information in Paragraph no. 1 and following subparagraphs of Part 5. The new pavement shall be gravel. The earthworks required are for clearing and grubbing, site grading (grading to provide a slope for gravity surface drainage), construction of the drainage system (ditches, culverts, headwalls, aprons, rip-raps, wing walls), foundations.

27. Question: It would be greatly appreciated if the type of perimeter fence of the plot were described in detail.

Answer: See the requested information in Paragraph no. 1.7 and following subparagraphs of Part 5. The fence shall be a galvanized steel chain link fence type with a single extension arm and three strand barbed and the fence gate shall be a double swing gate with a 6.1-m clear opening. See UFC 4-022-03 and UFGS 32 31 13.53 for additional requirements about the galvanized steel chain link fence.

28. Question: Regarding drainage, we respectfully request a more detailed description of the actions required concerning ditching, grading and/or installation of a road piping system underneath the roads to drain any inland water from the plot.

Answer: See the requested information in Subparagraph no. 2.2.1.12 and following subparagraphs of Part 3 and Subparagraph 1.4 and following subparagraphs of Part 5.

The components of the new culverts shall be concrete headwalls, wing walls, aprons, pipe and encasement. The slope of both ditch banks shall be 4H:1V and the width of the ditch bottom shall be 0.40 m. The riprap shall be concrete riprap type.

29. Question: Regarding Clin 12 Construction of Additive Item #5, it would be appreciated if confirmed that a new transformer, different from the one included in the BASIC BID, shall be required for installation, including a new Tranfo with a prefabricated building and its respective medium voltage protections.

Answer: Yes, a new transformer for the additive item #5 is the preferred option, since standard transformer vault are rated for up to 1,000 KVA transformers. Bigger transformers, as needed to manage the 1,300 kWp PV Farm resulting of awarding additive item #5, will not fit in standard pre-manufactured vaults. Characteristics of the additional transformer would be same as the one in the basic bid package to allow for future expansion.

30. Question: If possible, we respectfully request further detail on the connection point of the discharge line as well as the actions to be performed within the power plant. Please provide clarification on the switching and protection devices for the connection of the discharge line to the plant.

Answer: This shall be developed during the design by the awarded contractor.

31. Question: In the sheet you distributed on the 22nd at the site visit it says that the bank transaction will be done in euros and in most parts of the documents also mention euros but in the Solicitation document (page 54) it says: Submission of Offers in U.S. Currency. Please confirm what is the applicable currency for the offer, the awarded contract and the progress payments?

Answer: The clause requiring submission of offers in U.S. Currency has been removed.

32. Question: Who is the warranted contracting entity (local Air Force Base office or geographically separated Contracting Office?

Answer: The 496th Contracting Office is located at Moron AB.

33. Question: 22R0002_Atch1-Statement of Work mentions that excess delays should be submitted in writing. Will these delay that by mutual agreement are not directly caused by the

Contractor compensated in extension time frame and/or economically?

Answer: It depends. Each situation will be discussed with the awarded contractor and a decision will be made on a case by case basis if a delay arises.

34. Question: 22R0002_Atch1-Statement of Work states that: “Delay in delivery/procurement will not justify an extension of the period of performance.” Also, these delays are mentioned in page 106, point 39.5. Some issues are considered in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause "52.249-10 – Default” but, could you please clarify. Unstable world conditions, numerous supply chain instability and Covid 19 pandemic have significantly impacted vendors ability to produce and deliver certain products within typical timelines. Which contractual requirement, paragraph 13.1 or the defaults clause is applicable

35. Question: 22R0002_Atch1-Statement of Work on page 113, point 5.3.1.3: “Compensable

Delay: Government Responsibility - Contractor may receive compensable time extension.”

Will these delay that by mutual agreement are not directly caused by the Contractor compensated in extension time frame and/or economically?

36. Question: Given the serious doubt concerning the stability of market or labor conditions that will exist during the period of contract performance, and contingencies that would otherwise be included in the contract price, will the Government consider including an economic price adjustment clause consistent with FAR Part 16? Please provide order of precedence for RFP documents in case of conflict.

Answer: No, EPA will not be considered. Please view the instructions provided within

Section L.

37. Question: The SOW references technical conflicts between Spanish requirements and USGS requirements are governed by the latest Agreement of Defense Cooperation between the USA and the Kingdom of Spain. Can you please provide the details regarding the most recent agreement?

Answer: The more conservative technical approach will control design standards.

Technical construction standards shall conform to the requirement of Spanish legislation and to the requirements of the U.S. legislation if the latter does not contradict the former.

38. Question: Does the DFARS 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and

Cyber Incident Reporting clause apply?

Answer: You are correct. DFARS 252.204-7012 does not apply to this requirement and will be removed from this contract vehicle.

39. Question: Are the inverters required to have UL certification?

Answer: Scope of work Part 5 - Performance Technical Specifications, parag. 3.2.2

Inverters (sheet named SOW 33 of 120 of the SOW document) contain the requirements for inverters for this project. Inverters are required to hold CE mark. UL listing is not a requirement.

40. Question: How much time of inverters warranty is required?

Answer: Scope of work Part 5 - Performance Technical Specifications, parag. 3.2.2

Inverters (sheet named SOW 33 of 120 of the SOW document) contain the requirements for inverters for this project. See also Part 11 - General Conditions, parag. 5:

"WARRANTY: For this contract the Contractor shall provide a two year standard commercial warranty for with all line items of the scope of work, including materials and workmanship, except for those specific items with a specific higher warranty period states elsewhere in this document."

41. Question: How much time of PV Structure warranty is required?

Answer: Scope of work Part 5 - Performance Technical Specifications, parag. 3.2.4

Ground mounting structures (sheet named SOW 33 of 120 of the SOW document) contain the requirements for Ground mounting structures for this project. Minimum warranty for structures shall be 10 years. See also Part 11 - General Conditions, parag.

5: "WARRANTY: For this contract the Contractor shall provide a two year standard commercial warranty for with all line items of the scope of work, including materials

42. Question: How much time of PV modules warranty is required?

Answer: Scope of work Part 5 - Performance Technical Specifications, parag. 3.2.1 PV modules (sheet named SOW 32 of 120 of the SOW document) contain the requirements for PV Modules for this project. See also Part 11 - General Conditions, parag. 5:

"WARRANTY: For this contract the Contractor shall provide a two year standard commercial warranty for with all line items of the scope of work, including materials

43. Question: Would it be allowable to propose driven pile foundations for PV structure assembly instead of concrete cast in place footings?

including tie beams", according to the cost estimate forms provided for those bids.

Bidders may choose to replace the line item "Concrete footing construction, including tie beams" with "Driven pile footing construction" for consideration and evaluation by the Contracting Office. The foundation type shall be selected by Civil Engineering from the foundation types recommended by the geotechnical report to be submitted by the contractor after the corresponding geotechnical study to be carried out by the

44. Question: Could you provide a geotechnical survey from PV plant location or nearby area?

Answer: The geotechnical report is to be submitted by the contractor after the corresponding geotechnical study to be carried out by the contractor under the design scope of this contract. An example geotechnical report at Moron has been provided for

45. Question: For the required hose bibb is the supply the same as the one that supplies the fire hydrant?

Answer: The hydrant shall be supplied from the potable water line and the hose bibb from the non-potable water supply. Therefore, two independent lines are required

46. Question: The RFP documents seem to use the terms High voltage and medium voltage interchangeably. Please confirm that this is referring to the same system

Answer: Terms High Voltage and Medium Voltage are used interchangeably throughout the whole document. Reason for this is customarily, since current Spanish

Codes have removed the classification of ‘medium voltage' and only considers 'low' and

'high' voltages below or up 1,000V. However, it is of common practice in the field to still use the term medium voltage in Spain, and US regulation still considers the division between low, medium and high voltage.

47. Question: Would it be allowable to install the permanent fence first so it could act as the temporary construction fence as well?

Answer: Yes, permanent fence installation is allowed first to act as temporary construction fence, but any damaged fence material identified during pre-final or final inspections must be replaced by the contractor at no cost to the Government prior to beneficial occupancy.

48. Question: Is cyber security ATO required for full project acceptance?

Answer: Cybersecurity requirements under this contract are specified in part 5 -

Performance Technical Specifications, parag. 3.2.6 (sheet SOW 33 of 120) of the Scope of the Work document.