Solicitation Amendment FA524026Q00270003 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11 Sep 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA5240

FA5240 36 CONS LGC

APO AP 96543-4040, UNIT 14040

APO, AP 96543-4040

UNITED STATES

GREGOR HOESSEL, Email: gregor.hoessel.1@us.af.mil Telephone: 6713663673 GARY SCULLIN, Email: gary.scullin.1@us.af.mil Telephone: 0425534338

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA524026Q0027

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28 Aug 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this modification is to correct and clarify verbiage contained within 52.212-2. Additionally extend the proposal due to 30 Sep 2026 at 10:00am CHST.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Gary S. Scullin, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

29 Sep 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Response Due Time 04:00 PM 02:00 PM Response Due Date 13 Sep 2026 29 Sep 2026 Solicitation Number FA524026Q00270002 FA524026Q00270003

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Addenda to RFO 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

(a) Submission of Quotes:

In accordance with FAR 12.204, offerors must submit a complete quote prior to the solicitation closing date. Quotes must remain valid for a minimum of 90 calendar days from the date of submission.

(b) Quote Structure & Submission Instructions:

To permit a streamlined evaluation, the offeror's quote must be divided into three (3) distinct, self-contained sections:

Section 1: Technical Capability Submission & Objective Evidence

This section is not an evaluation factor, but a mandatory prerequisite for an offer to be considered.

Offerors MUST provide objective, verifiable evidence (via engineering drawings, manufacturer spec sheets, test reports, or certifications) demonstrating their proposed commercial product meets the following mandatory baseline standards. Failure to provide this objective evidence will result in the offer being rejected as non-responsive prior to any evaluation. Offerors shall limit such evidence to only those items priced out as a part of the quote submission.

To be considered for award, the offeror's quote must receive an "Acceptable" rating in all non-price factors. Quotes will be evaluated against the following factors:

The Government will evaluate the technical descriptions, specifications, and drawings submitted in Section 1 against the mandatory baseline standards. Quotes will be assigned an adjectival rating using the criteria in Table 1:

Table 1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method (CPM 26-C-13)

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

FA524026Q00270003

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

1. Air Transportability (MIL-STD-1791C & MIL-STD-209K): Detailed transport configuration schematics proving the rig must be able to be driven directly onto a C-17 military transport aircraft and driven off without needing a crane or major disassembly (like removing the mast). It must also have built-in, certified tie-down points that are strong enough to keep it from shifting during a bumpy flight, specifically withstanding forces equal to 3 times its own weight pulling it forward and 2 times its weight pulling it upward.

2. Expeditionary Powerplant: Comprehensive engine technical sheets confirming a Tier 3 / "Export" compliant diesel engine. The documentation must verify the powerplant can operate continuously on high-sulfur diesel and JP-8 jet fuel without requiring Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) or Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF). (Note: This acquisition is supported by an approved EPA National Security Exemption under 40 CFR (S) 1068.225).

3. Core Mechanical Performance: Manufacturer data sheets verifying a minimum top head pullback hoist capacity of 50,000 lbs, alongside integrated dual-system capability for both air and mud rotary drilling down to a minimum depth of 1,500 feet with a 12.25-inch borehole.

4. Guam Environmental Weatherization: A detailed painting and material process specification confirming:

Surface preparation conforming strictly to SSPC-SP 10 (Near-White Metal Blast). A multi-step marine-grade protective coating system totaling a minimum of 10.0 mils dry film thickness (DFT) in Desert Sand (Color 30313). Weatherproof NEMA 4X rated electrical enclosures and 316 stainless-steel hydraulic fittings, lines, and hardware.

5. System Completeness: Written confirmation that the base quote includes the 1,000-hour fielding/repair parts kit, complete manuals, and 80 hours of on-site training.

Section 2: Information for Discriminative Evaluation

To facilitate the discriminative evaluation conducted under FAR 52.212-2, the offeror must submit:

1. Past Performance: Up to three (3) references for recent (within the last 3 years) and relevant (heavy drill rig manufacturing) contracts. Each reference must include the contract number, customer agency, point of contact, and a brief description of the equipment delivered.

The Government will conduct a confidence assessment of the offeror's past performance. The Contracting Officer will evaluate the recency, relevancy, and quality of the submitted references to subjectively determine the Government's level of confidence in the offeror's ability to successfully deliver the drill rig to Guam.

Neutral Past Performance: An offeror without a record of relevant past performance shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably and will be considered "Acceptable."

Recency: Past performance efforts must have occurred or been active within the last three (3) years prior to the solicitation release date.

Relevancy: Prior contracts will be deemed relevant if they involved the manufacture, delivery, maintenance, or training support of truck-mounted drilling rigs or heavy-machinery packages of equal or greater size and complexity.

Unknown (Neutral) Past Performance: In accordance with FAR 12.205, an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom performance information is not available, will not be rated favorable or unfavorable. A neutral past performance rating will be scored as "Acceptable" under Table 2.

Table 2. Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method (DFARS 215.305)

Adjectiva l Rating

Description

Accepta ble

Description Acceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (see note above).

Unaccep table

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 [a][2][iv]). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

2. Delivery Schedule: A proposed delivery timeline reflecting total months from contract award to final delivery at Andersen AFB, Guam. The Government will evaluate the realism and viability of the proposed delivery timeline to Andersen AFB, Guam. The baseline target is 30 months ARO. Any proposed delivery schedule exceeding 30 months ARO may be rated as "Unacceptable".

Note: If offeror is a large business, the large business entity shall submit a subcontract plan.

Section 3: Price Submission Offerors must complete and return the firm-fixed-price schedule provided in Section III (CLIN Structure) and the attached Exhibit A - Pricing to this combined synopsis/solicitation.

A. The Government will evaluate the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for fairness and reasonableness using commercial price analysis techniques outlined in FAR 12.209.

B. Receipt of Only One Offer ("1-Bid" Provision):

If only one (1) responsive quote is received, the Government reserves the right to determine price reasonableness based on market research or a comparison to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), and may make an award directly to the single offeror.

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Addenda to RFO 52.212-2, Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

(a) In accordance with RFO 12.201 and 12.603, once an offeror's quote has been deemed responsive to the solicitation by meeting the objective FAR RFO FAR technically evidence requirements in RFO 52.212-1, the Government will conduct a discriminative evaluation based on the following factors to determine the FAR best value:lowest

To be considered for award, the offeror's quote must receive an "Acceptable" rating in all non-price factors. Quotes will be evaluated the lowest price technically acceptable:

against the following factors:

(b) FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY*

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE*

FACTOR 3: DELIVERY TERMS*

FACTOR 4: PRICE*

* as described in RFO 52.212-1 addenda

(c) The Government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose quote, having been deemed technically responsive the lowest price technically acceptable under 52.212-1, is determined to represent the best value to the Government. FAR RFO A best value determination will be made by comparing the differences in Past Performance and Delivery Schedule among offerors to determine if any advantages offered are worth any associated difference in price. The Government is more

Awards may be made to concerned with obtaining a superior combination of past performance and delivery schedule than with making an award at the lowest overall price.

a higher-priced offeror if the Government determines that the technical or past performance advantages of that offer warrant the additional price the lowest priced quotes

The Contracting Officer will document the supporting rationale for the award decision in a streamlined commercial award memorandum in accordance are not acceptable.

with 12.201 and 12.603.FARRFO FAR RFO

Award on Initial Quotes: The Government intends to evaluate quotes and award a contract without . Therefore, the offeror's discussions interchanges or communications initial quote should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to conduct discussions if interchanges determined to be in the Government's best interest.

The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

1. , price ranking: All quotes will be ranked from lowest to highest based on the TEP. First

2. , : The Government will evaluate the technical and past performance volumes of the lowest-priced quote first. Second Sequential Evaluation

3. , if the lowest-priced quote is rated as "Acceptable" across all non-price factors, evaluation of higher-priced quotes will cease, and award will be made to that Third offeror.

4. If the lowest-priced quote is rated "Unacceptable," the Government will proceed to evaluate the next lowest-priced quote, repeating this process sequentially until an acceptable quote is identified.

Note: The government reserves the right to award all or some of the CLINS associated with this combined synopsis/ solicitation.

Additional Regulation or Supplemental Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

The following Clause modifications were made:

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation 2026-O0038) (Tailored) Jan 2026 hereby reads as follows:

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026-O0038)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Evaluation factors other than price when combined are equal to price.

See addenda for factors and importance numbering.

(b) . Options Not Applicable

(c) . A written notice of award, or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror, within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result Notice of award in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)