Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_20151006.pdf

Attachment 4

ATTACHMENT 4

Solicitation No. FA5215-13-R-0013

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands:

FA5215-16-Q-0001

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PERFORMANCE RATING

EXCEPTIONAL (E) - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

VERY GOOD (VG) - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

SATISFACTORY (S) - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

MARGINAL (M) – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY(US) – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E V S M US N/A

T1 How well did the contractor meet on-site technical support, database administration, equipment and software maintenance and sustainment of stand-alone and web-based capabilities to integrate into civil engineering and/or other functional community business rules and practices such as

Linear Segmentation of Horizontal Infrastructure mapping data to identify and quantify linear segments and nodes to ensure: asset visibility;

accurate inventory; characterization of age, type and condition; and integrated engineering performance analysis for visualization of a systems criticalities and the associated costs of operation and sustainment?

T2 How well did the contractor acquire, maintain and consolidate geospatial data holdings within an organization’s-specific Spatial Data

Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment model meeting timeframe and quality specifications; encompassing data from geographically separated units that collect, edit and store data independently and for replication organization-wide through global positioning system surveys; imagery rectification, feature extraction and digitizing; topology and data reviews to provide authoritative imagery, vector and attribute data?

T3 How well did the contractor meet Defense Information Systems

Agency, DoD and departmental security and accreditation requirements

(Risk Management Framework formerly DoD Information Assurance

Certification and Accreditation Process)?

T4 How well did the contractor provide IT consultation; administration, maintenance and sustainment of hardware and software for a federated enterprise solution of servers at geographically separated organizations to include backing up of data, hosting and replicating of web-based services and authenticating users and various security groups to provide information to internal and external customers?

T5. How well did the contractor provide server and desktop development for Oracle databases and ArcSDE web-services (i.e., creating desktop/server geo-processing tasks and server object extensions) for geospatial applications?

T6. How well did the contractor geo-enable cross-functional communities and Automated Information Systems by obtaining, creating and integrating data and web-based viewers, applications, interfaces and tools to more efficiently and effectively perform tasks with real property, asset management and maintenance IAW Law, Regulatory tracking and reporting for Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health

Management System’s; as well as, systems and processes required for

Airfield and/or Military Operations and Hazard Analysis and

Management?

T7. How well did the contractor develop training curriculum and teaching aids; setup appropriate classroom IT or telecommunications environments; and conduct in-person or distance courses to meet an organization’s training requirements through formal training courses

(minimum duration of 3 days and minimum of 8 students) and informal

(impromptu individual, small group) training sessions applicable to:

commercial off the shelf ESRI and Autodesk GIS software; custom geospatial applications/tools; applications usage specific to job/position requirements?

T8. How well did the contractor meet USG, DHS, DoD and/or NGO requirements for geospatial planning support through traditional applications and/or graphic user interfaces for emergencies, contingencies, humanitarian assistance and/or disaster relief operations to: map damage assessments, develop facility and utilities siting requirements (mobile assets) and determine constraints; plan and site tent cities; and/or develop operational aircraft parking plans?

T9. How well did the contractor meet National Incident Management

System and/or subordinate level requirements (e.g. Federal, State, Municipal; DoD, U.S Air Force, Joint Service, Combined Forces) for near/real-time web-enabled Common Operating Picture viewer to effectively communicate statuses, track incidences and direct

Consequence Management operations including Force Protection/Anti-terrorism, First Responders, Emergency Management, Engineering and other vital Emergency Support Functions?

Program Management E V S M US N/A

P1. How effective was overall project management with regard to

Transition In/Out Plans?

P2. How effective was the contractor at developing strategic guidance, spiral development and configuration management/action plan?

P3. How well did the contractor develop staffing plans with the required job qualifications to include training, certifications, experience and personal security clearances up to TOP SECRET?

P4. How effective was the contractor at the human resources management of contractor personnel located in one of more foreign countries necessitating country clearances, status of forces agreements, cost of living, dependents education, vacations, remote locations, and relocation considerations?

Transition/phase-in E V S M US N/A

T1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

T2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention/Attraction E V S M US N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M

(Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

OVERALL RATING E V S M US N/A

Based on the above, what is your overall assessment of the contractor’s past performance? And why (please provide below)?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s overall performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

th

Specialized Contracting Squadron

Attn: Ryan Truong and Amy Burke

766 SCONS/PKZ

90 G Street

JBPH-H, HI 96853-5230

or

Email: Ryan Truong, ryan.truong.1@us.af.mil

Amy Burke, amy.burke.2@us.af.mil

FA5215-16-Q-0001

mailto:ryan.truong.1@us.af.mil mailto:amy.burke.2@us.af.mil