Solicitation Amendment FA520924Q00040002 SF 30.pdf

PDF 580 KB Posted

Attached to
Management, Operation and Maintenance of Refuse Incinerator Plant at Yokota Air Base, Japan
Solicitation number
FA520924Q0004
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Standard Form 30 (SF-30) Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract for Solicitation Number FA520924Q0004, "Management, Operation and Maintenance of Refuse Incinerator Plant at Yokota Air Base, Japan."

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Attachment 2 (PWS_17 Apr 24_Amend2), Attachment 5 (OM Incinerator Price Exhibit_17Apr24_Amend2), add an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 (Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services), and include Appendix C - JEGS (Japan Environmental Governing Standards). The revisions provide additional information on special qualifications, update ELIN numbers, clarify qualification requirements, and include a missing attachment. This is a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) competitive best value award. The evaluation process will assess price and technical acceptability.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of the subject amendment is to revise Atch 2. PWS_17 Apr 24_Amend2, Atch 5. Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

OM Incinerator Price Exhibit_17Apr24_Amend2, Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and attach missing Appendix C - JEGS.

The following section of the PWS_17 Apr 24_Amend2 was revised to provide additional information to the subject tasks: Section 1.9.6. Special Qualifications.

The ELIN numbers of the OM Incinerator Price Exhibit_17Apr24_Amend2 were revised IAW DFARS PGI 204.7105(c).

Solicitation Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services was revised to clarifying information to the offerors: Qualification 1 and Qualification 2.

Appendix C - JEGS was a missing attachment of PWS and was provided to explain Japan Environmental Governing Standards.

List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

2c. Appendix C - JEGS O&M Incinerator Price Exhibit_17Apr24_Amend2 PWS_17Apr24_Amend2

The following attachments were deleted:

3. OM Incinerator Price Exhibit_25Mar24 PWS_11 Apr 24_Amend1

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:

Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) Price and (ii) Technical

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

FA520924Q00040002

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

(d) Basis for Contract Award: This is a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) competitive best value award conducted in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 13. By submission of its quote IAW the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial products and Commercial Services, the quoter(s) accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions and representations and certification. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a quote being determined unacceptable. Each quote received will be evaluated for responsiveness.

Responsive quotes will be ranked from lowest to highest Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The quote with the lowest TEP will then be assessed for technical acceptability. If the lowest TEP is not technically acceptable, the Government will evaluate the next lowest quote and continue until a rating of technically acceptable is achieved. If the quote is determined acceptable, the evaluation then stops, and an award is made without further evaluation of other quotes. The Contracting Officer will only make an award once the quoter's quoted price is determined fair and reasonable and meets the technical criteria stated in the proceeding paragraphs.

The evaluation process will include the following:

(1) Price: The Government will rank all quotes in order of each TEP, which is the sum of all total cost for base ordering period.

The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP.

(2) Technical Acceptability Factor: The government will evaluate technical proposals on a pass/fail basis and assign an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Technical Ratings

Rating Definition

Acceptable Quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The quoter must have capabilities to perform services properly in accordance with PWS Paragraph 1.9.6.1 and 1.9.6.5.2. The following copy of license/permits shall be submitted.

Project Manager Qualification.Qualification 1:

1. "Technical Manager of the Refuse Treatment Plant (Gomishorishisetsu-Gijyutsukanrishi)" in accordance with Japanese "Waste Management and Public Cleansing Law ( )" and Japanese national Haikibutsu-no-shori-oyobi-Seisounikansuru-hou license certified by Japan Environmental Sanitation Center ( )Nihon Kankyo Center

Contractor Employees Qualifications, which are the followings:Qualification 2:

1. Chief Electric Engineer, Class 3 ( ) DaiSansyu DenkiShunin gijyutsusha which is Japanese national qualification issued by Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry ( )Keizai Sangyo Shou

2. Hazardous Material Handler, Otsu Group 4 ( ) Kikenbutsu Toriatsukai otsu-shu Yon-shu IAW Japanese Fire Law (SyoubouHou <span gothic="" ui",sans-serif;color:red;mso-fareast-language:ja'="">) and Japanese national qualification certified by Fire Test Research Center ( and issued by each prefectural governor in Japan.Syoubou Shikenkenkyu Center)

3. Individual being trained exclusively for Operation, Inspection, and Demolition Works at Refuse Incinerator Plant IAW para 34 thru 36 of Article 36 of Ordinance of Labor Safety and Hygiene, issued by Chairman of Tokyo Federation of Labor Standards Association ( ).Tokyo RoudouKijyun Kyoukai Rengou Kaicho

4. Supervisor of Anoxic Area Work ( ), issued by Chairman of Tokyo Sansoketsubou Kikensagyo Syuninsha Federation of Labor Standards Association (Tokyo RoudouKijyun Kyoukai Rengou Kaicho).

5. Crane Operator (below 5 ton)

6. *Forklift Operator or Small-sized Special Motor Vehicle Operator such as Payloader

7. **Supervisor of Specified Chemical Substance (Tokuteikagakubusshitsutou-Sagyoshuninsha: Daiokishin Toriatsukaisya-wo- ), issued by Chairman of Tokyo Federation of Labor hukumu Standards Association (Tokyo RoudouKijyun Kyoukai Rengou

Kaicho).

Notes:

*Optional or required only when it is determined by the Contractor that this equipment are necessary during the operation.

**Only the licensed personnel shall perform the dioxin and other chemical analysis tests as required in paragraph 1.1.3 (Analysis Reports) in the PWS. The subject full tasks can be delegated to the licensed company if no one in the Contractor's company meets the license requirement, however the Contractor shall submit a copy of license with the personnel and the name of the company for delegation.

(3) Quoters are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1 of this solicitation. The Government intends to award a contract without further interchanges with quoters. Consequently, quoters are highly encouraged to quote their best quote in their initial submissions. However, the Government reserves the right to have interchanges with any or all quoters, if it is determined advantageous for the Government to do so. This statement is not to be construed to mean that the Government is obligated to have interchanges with every quoter (note that FAR Part 15 procedures do not apply to FAR 13 procedures, therefore formal discussions are not applicable). A quoter may be eliminated from consideration without further interchanges if its quote is not among those considered most advantageous to the Government based on a best value determination.

(End of Addendum)

IDCode: J
Page: 1
Pages: 4
AmendNo: 0002
EffDate: 22 Apr 2024
ReqNo:
ProjNo:
IssCode: FA5209
AdmCode:
IssuedBy: FA5209 374 CONS PK

UNIT 5228, APO AP 96328-5228

APO, AP 96328-5228

UNITED STATES

KANAMI EZOE, Email: kanami.ezoe.jp@us.af.mil Telephone: 225-5473 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS:

ContractorNameAdd:
Code:
FacCode:
SolChg: 1
SolNo: FA520924Q0004
SolDate: 27 Mar 2024
AwardChg: Off
AwardNo:
AwardDate:
Amended: 1
OffrExt: Off
OffrNoEx: 1
NoCopies: 1
ApprData: See Section G - Contract Administration Data
ChgeOrd: Off
ChgeOrder:
Modify: Off
SuppAgre: Off
SuppAuth:
ModOthr: Off
OthrSpec:
NoReq: Off
Require: Off
Copies:
Descript: See Schedule
ContNameTitle:
CoNameTitle: TOMOKO SHIODA, Contracting Officer
ContDate:
CODate: 22 Apr 2024

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .