Response_to_Questions_11-1200P2.pdf

PDF 317 KB Posted

Attached to
QKKA 11-1200P2, Repair Airfield Lighting System, Misawa AB, Japan
Solicitation number
FA5205-13-R-0005
Issued by

About this file

Responses to Questions RFP No. FA5205-13-R-0005

View the file

Other files

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Responses/Clarifications by Government

Yes

Yes

N/A

Area 3

Area 4

COMMON

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Amendment is issued?

Yes

Yes

A construction note No. 19 was incorrectly inserted in four (4) locations at the area on the DWG No. E-404, and will be changed to a construction note

No. 18 in Addendum No. 2.

A construction note No. 19 was incorrectly inserted in two (2) locations at the area on the DWG No. E-406, and will be changed to a construction note

No. 18 in Addendum No. 2.

A construction note No. 18 was incorrectly inserted in four (4) locations at the area on the DWG No. E-406, and will be deleted in Addendum No.2.

Installation work of Taxiway End Lights at this area is required as indicated in the detail (symbol) of DWG No. E-107. A construction note No. 21 on the DWG No. E-412 will be deleted in Addendum No.2.

Offerors may submit questions regarding the manufacturer's software upgrade for the airfield lighting control system after the question submission date of 11 Feb 13, but must understand this software upgrade work shall be performed by the manufacturer as required in the General Note No. 21 on the DWG No. Area 4 G-003.

As-built drawings for section details of existing asphalt pavement shoulder at Taxiway Alpha and Bravo, and Taxiway Charlie and Delta will be provided as an additional attachment to the solicitation in Addendum No. 2.

8 N/A

Please provide information of existing pavement cross section of taxiway shoulder for removal and restoration work.

On the Drawing No. E-406, a construction note No. 19 of "MODIFY

EXISTING WINDCONE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET E-503" is indicated in 2 locations on the Westside of C45. However, there are no windcones in this area. Please clarify.

On the Drawing No. E-406, a construction note No. 18 of “INSTALL

(1) 53mmC PVC SCH 80 PER DETAIL 2, SHEET E-501” is indicated in 4 locations on the Westside of C45. However, there are no conduits in this area. Please clarify.

E-406

E-505

On the Drawing No. E-406, a construction note No. 23 of

“EXISTING HAND HOLE, REMOVE CONCRETE BLOCK

COVER AND REPLACE PER DETAIL 1, SHEET E-505” is indicated on the eastside of C47. However, there are no existing handholes in this area. Please clarify.

E-412

E-107

On the Drawing No. E-412, a construction note No. 21 of “ITEM IS

NIC AND ONLY SHOWN FOR REFERENCE” is indicated in the intersection of Taxiway C1 and Taxiway Bravo, However, on the

Drawing No. E-107, details of the above area, words of “CENTER

TAXIWAY END LIGHTS ON EXTENDED TAXIWAY

CENTERLINE” is indicated as a required construction work. Please clarify if this area work is required or not.

E-404

E-503

On the Drawing No. E-404, a construction note No. 19 of “MODIFY

EXISTING WINDCONE PER DETAIL 2, SHEET E-503” is indicated in 4 locations around the intersection of Taxiway D1 and

Charlie 1. However, there are no windcones in this area. Please clarify.

3 N/A

We are awaiting the manufacturer’s response to identify extent of software upgrade for the airfield lighting control system required under this project, as advised by the Government engineer in the pre-proposal conference of 7 Feb 13. However, it takes us about 2 weeks to get the manufacturer’s response, and there may be questions arisen per our review on the Aera-3 work based on the manufacturer’s response In that case, would it be possible for us to submit the questions?

E-412

E-501

E-502

Ref. No. Questions by Prospective Offerors

A construction note No. 25 was incorrectly inserted on the DWG No. E-

412, and will be changed to a construction note No. 24 in Addendum No. 2

A construction note No. 23 was incorrectly inserted on the DWG No. E-

406, and will be deleted in Addendum No. 2.

10 N/A

Please clarify restoration method of sod, such as sodding or seeding.

And also please clarify type of sod for restoration.

See "Basic Repair Method" Note No. 3 of "Utility Trench and Repair"

Detail No. 3 on the DWG No. E-503 and Spec-Sec. 32 92 19 Seeding for each area.

E-406

E-501

Attachment to 35 CONS Response Letter of 28 Feb 2013

RFP No. FA5205-13-R-0005

Project No. QKKA 11-1200P2, REPR Airfield Lighting System, Misawa AB, Japan

Area 1

9 N/A

Please clarify existing and restoration thickness of base course and asphalt/concrete pavement. If pavement and base course thickness are different at each portion, please provide the information.

Ditto.

E-406

E-503

On the Drawing No. E-412, a construction note No. 25 of “INSTALL

(2) 53mmC PVC SCH 80 PER DETAIL 2, SHEET E-501” is indicated between B1-1 and B1-19 in the Taxiway B1. It should be a construction note No. 24 of “REMOVE EXISTING ELEVATED

LIGHT FIXTURE AND INSTALL LED FIXTURE PER DETAIL 1,

SHEET E-502.”. Please verify.

No.

Attachment to 35 CONS' Memo dated 28 Feb 13

Yes

12 N/A

Total quantity of "Cable 1/C #8 AWG 5KV Type C" and "Cable 1/C

#6 AWG 5KV Type C" to be required for subject project is

184,212,000 meters per our counting on the drawings while total quantity of the above two types of cables is 112,390 meters in the List of Contractor-Furnished U.S. Material. Please advise us which quantity should be used for our estimation, as the difference is significant.

The quantities specified in the list of CFUSM shall be disregarded, and offerors are required to count and verify each quantity on the project drawings. Revised list of CFUSM will be provided.

Yes

G-003

E-502

Total quantity of new LED L-861T to be required for work of the

Construction Note No. 3 "Remove existing elevated edge light and install LED fixture per detail 3, E-502" specified on the Drawing No.

G-003 is 1,316 each per our counting on the drawings. However, the total number of new LED L-861T elevated lights to replace existing quartz lights specified in the General Note No. 23 of the Drawing No.

G-003 is indicated as "(55 REFERENCE)", as referred in the Detail 1 and 3 of the Drawing No. E-502. Please advise us if "(55

REFERENCE)" is the quantity for the work of the Construction Note

No. 3, since there is a significant difference between the quantities above and total number of 139 each for LED L-861T Elevated Taxi

Light Fixture in the List of Contractor-Furnished U.S. Material provided as an attachment of the solicitation.

The words "(55 REFERENCE)" was inappropriately inserted in the general note No. 23 of Drawing No. G-003. The description “(FOR QUANTITY

SEE GENERAL NOTES 23 ON SHEET G-003)” in the Detail 1-Note No.

2 and Detail 3-Note No. 2.b. of the Drawing No. E-502 and the quantities specified in the list of CFUSM shall be disregarded. Offerors are required to count and verify each quantity on the project drawings. Revised Drawing

No. G-003 and E-502 for each area will be provided in Addendum No. 3.

List of CFUSM will be revised to delete approximate quantities of each item.

Attachment to 35 CONS' Memo dated 28 Feb 13

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .