Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 103 KB Posted

Attached to
Mess Attendant Services (One Year Only)
Solicitation number
FA5004-12-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA5004-12-R-0001-0003.pdf PDF
PWS 18 Jan 12.pdf PDF
Q A 2.pdf PDF
EIELSON ADDENDUM AK.pdf PDF
FA5004-12-R-0001-0002 - SF 30.doc DOC document
Q A 1.docx DOCX document
amendment 1 CBA.pdf PDF
supplement to cba.pdf PDF
PWS 22 Nov 2011.doc DOC document
AFI34-239.pdf PDF
DFAC Layout(GeoBase Provided).pdf PDF
CBA.pdf PDF
Equipment List for Mess Attendant.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QASP.pdf PDF
AFMAN34-240.pdf PDF
AFMAN-34-240.pdf PDF
Solicitation.pdf PDF
AFI-34-239.pdf PDF
QASP.pdf PDF
DFAC Layout(GeoBase Provided).pdf PDF
Equipment List for Mess Attendant.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS 22 Nov.pdf PDF
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ____________________________

J. Description of service provided: ________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

Program Management B P G Y R N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished

Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in B P G Y R N

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or

R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .