Attachment 6 - PPQ 20200908.pdf

Attachment 6

Past Performance Cover Letter/Questionnaire

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FA5000-20-R-0019 BASE OPERATING MAINTENANCE SERVICES

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Questionnaire

TO: Whom It May Concern

We are currently participating in a proposal in response to the Government’s Request for Proposal No. FA5000-20-R-0019 for a firm fixed price contract on Base Operating Maintenance Services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.

The Government will be evaluating contractors for this service based on several selection factors.

One of the key factors in the Government’s final decision is past performance. To assist the Government in its assessment of our past performance, we are required to identify previous contracts and clients who are familiar with our past performance. For the purpose of this questionnaire, past performance is defined as contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.

As one of our customers for past contracting work on _________________________, we are requesting that you complete the attached questionnaire regarding our past performance. This letter authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance as directed.

Your prompt attention in completing the attached questionnaire will ensure we receive full consideration in this competition. Please return the completed form to the Government’s point of contacts identified below, to arrive no later than 2:00 P.M. local Alaska Time on Thursday, October 1, 2020.

Please use the point of contact information below to email the completed questionnaire:

Mr. Robert Peters at robert.peters.11@us.af.mil and MSgt Daniel Morphew at daniel.morphew@us.af.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.

(Signature and title of individual having the authority to sign for and legally bind the offeror.)

1365571607A Typewritten Text FA5000-20-R-0019 Atch 6 - PPQ

Competitively Awarded Contract: (Yes/No)

Contract Type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.):Contract Number:

Physical Address (Street, City, State, Zip Code): Telephone Number (to include area code): Email Address:

Reason for Difference Between Initial & Current/Final Contract Costs, if any exists:

Initial Contract Value: Current/Final Contract Value: Total Value:

Period of Performance:

SECTION B - CONTRACT SPECIFICS: (Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference.)

Email Address: Point of Contact:

Date:Signature:

SECTION A - CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: (Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference.)

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contractor Company Name: Address: Cage Code:

Duns Number:

Telephone Number:

Name: Title: Company/Organization:

SECTION C - RESPONDENT INFORMATION: To be completed by each reference providing information in Sections C-F. Please send filled out PPQs to both Mr. Robert Peters at robert.peters.11@us.af.mil and MSgt Daniel Morphew at daniel.morphew@us.af.mil.

Contractor being evaluated as Prime or Subcontractor?:

Contract Title:

Description of Services:

YES NO N/A

Mechanical

(HVAC,

Controls, Plumbing)

Oil Water Separators

Horizontal Maintenance

Roads & Airfields

Industrial Electrical (Lightning Protection/

Grounding, etc)

Fire Suppression

Hazmat/ Asbestos/ Mold/

Abatement Removal

Roofing/ Insulation/ Thermal & Moisture Control

≥300 150‐299 <150

Multiple Single

CDCs Gyms Dining Facilities Dormitories Office Buildings Motorpools Other

>50 Years old >40 Years old >30 Years old >20 Years old >10 Years old <10 Years old

Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

1. QUALITY OF SERVICES

a. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to maintain a schedule, meet specific response times, and adjust to varying work load?

a. How would you rate the contractor's response to deficiencies, customer complaints, and re-performance if necessary?

5. Please select how many facilities were maintained under this contract?

7. Please select what types of facilities were maintained under this contract? (Select all that apply)

8. Please select the ages of facilities maintained under this contract? (Select all that apply)

SECTION D: QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SCOPE OF CONTRACT

To be completed by each reference using checkmarks to indicate selection.

6. Were there multiple facility types maintained under this contract, or were they of a uniform/single type?

REMARKS

4. Please select what maintenance services were included under this contract? (Select all that apply)

QUESTIONS

2. Did this contract include inspection, certifying, maintaining, and cleaning of oil water separators?

3. Did your service contract include any temporary or portable heating capabilities in case of an unexpected outage?

1. Did this contract contain industrial application boiler maintenance and operations?

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SECTION E - EVALUATION RATING DEFINITIONS:

RATING DEFINITIONS

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the requiring activity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

b. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to provide CDRLS, reports, submittals, or other deliverables in a timely manner?

Overall Rating for "Schedule"

Remarks (if necessary)

SECTION F - ASSESSED EVALUATION RATINGS:

To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section E. Please provide a check mark to indicate assessed rating for each question. An overall rating is requested for each of the major rated area (i.e Quality, Schedule, Management, Regulatory). Please describe in the remarks, any issues that may have influenced overall ratings which are not represented in the questions.

2. SCHEDULE

c. How would you rate the contractor's ability to provide services in compliance with contract requirements?

b. How would rate the contractor's ability to comply w/ their inspection procedures and Quality Control Plan?

Remarks (if necessary)

RATED AREAS RATINGS

Overall Rating for "Quality of Services"

Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Please provide any additional remarks they may have influenced the ratings above:

3. MANAGEMENT

a. How would you rate the contractor's ability to adhere to OSHA guidelines for safety?

b. How would you rate the contractor's ability to adhere to environmental regulatory guidance?

Overall Rating for "Regulatory"

c. How would you rate the contractor's ability to meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting? (if applicable)

a. How well would you rate the contractor's responsiveness of communication?

b. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to adapt to varying work situations?

c. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to identify problems, displayed initiative to provide solutions to those problems, and performed as a Team Member?

Remarks (if necessary)

d. How well would you rate the contractor's ability to hire quality subcontractor's and successfully manage their work?

Overall Rating for "Management"

4. REGULATORY Remarks (if necessary)