CN GT_Pre-Proposal_Conference_Briefing.pdf

PDF 506 KB Posted

Attached to
CN & GT Training Support Services IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4890-14-R-0024
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CN & GT Training Support Services IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0008.pdf PDF
A0007_CO_Letter.docx.pdf PDF
WD_05-2309.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0007.pdf PDF
WD_05-2297.pdf PDF
WD_05-2167.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024_CN GT_Training_Qs As_20_Apr_15.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0006.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0005.doc.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0004_CN GT_Training_PWS_Rev_02_20150330.docx DOCX document
FA4890-14-R-0024_CN GT_Training_Qs As_30_Mar_15.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024_CN GT_Training_QASP_20150330.docx DOCX document
CO_Letter_A0005.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0004_CN GT_Training_Table_B-1_Pricing_Table_20150330.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0004.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0003_CN GT_Training_Table_B-1_Pricing_Table_6_Mar_15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0003_CN GT_Training_PWS_Rev_01_6_Mar_15.docx DOCX document
FA4890-14-R-0024_CO_Letter_-_Amendment_0003_6_Mar_15.pdf PDF
Notice_and_Order_-_Illimite.pdf PDF
CO_Letter_Pre-Proposal_Conference__-_Training.pdf PDF
CO_Letter_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024-A0002.pdf PDF
Training_Pre-Proposal_Conference_List_of_Attendees.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Notice_and_Order.PDF PDF
Notice_to_Offerors_of_Pending_Appeal_of_the_NAICS_Code.pdf PDF
CO_Letter_for_FA4890-14-R-0024_Pre-Proposal_Conference.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024_CN GT_Training_Qs As_2_Feb_15.docx DOCX document
FA4890-14-R-0024_AMIC_CNGT_Training_FINAL_RFP_2Feb.pdf PDF
CN GT_Training_Table_B-1 _Pricing_Table_2_Feb_15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA4890-14-R-0024_CN GT_Training_FINAL_PWS_2_Feb_15.docx DOCX document
TORP_0303.doc DOC document
TORP_0346.docx DOCX document
TORP_0312.doc DOC document
TORP_0404.docx DOCX document
TORP_0405.doc DOC document
TORP_0363.doc DOC document
TORP_0374.docx DOCX document
14-R-0024_Training_RFP_Final_Draft_20150109.doc DOC document
14-R-0024_Draft__23DEC14_Draft.pdf PDF
FA4890-14-R-0024_Training_Q A_3_Nov_14.docx DOCX document
CN GT_Training_RFP_Sections_H _L M_20141010.docx DOCX document
CN GT_Table_B-1 _Pricing_Table_20141010.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA4890-14-R-0024_Training_DRAFT_RFP_Sections_H_L_M.docx DOCX document
CN GT_Industry_Day_ _1-on-1_Q A_14sep14.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Consolidated_Questions_20140902.docx DOCX document
Request_For_Additional_Info_From_SB.docx DOCX document
Additional_Market_Research_Questionnaire_2Sep14.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Schedule__Registration_CNGT_20140827.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_-_Additional_Informtion_.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Announcement_-_Training.pdf PDF
Show all 50

CN & GT Training Support Services IDIQ has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

This Briefing is:

UNCLASSIFIED

Headquarters Air Combat Command

Counter Narcotics & Global Threats

Operations & Logistics Support and

Training Support Services

Pre-Proposal

Conference

18 February 2015

Overview

• Background Information

• Program Overview

• Solicitation Overview

• Changes / Clarifications

Background

• Ops & Log / Training - 2 of 4 ID/IQs replacing one ID/IQ

• Managed by Army Contracting, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL

• Ordering Period thru Dec 15; T/O performance thru Dec 16

• Remaining 2 are in source selection & Army-managed:

• C3IDM - Command, Control, Communication, Information, Detection and Monitoring Support

• $480M ceiling

• Proposals received May 13

• PPS - Program & Programmatic Support

• $200M ceiling

• Proposals received Jun 12

• OCI prohibition – PPS awardees may not receive other

ID/IQ awards and may not perform on either (see H-2)

Answers to Industry Questions

• The Government will provide “official” responses in writing via posting(s) to FedBizOpps

• All questions for which Contractors desire an “official” answer must be submitted:

• “In writing” to the Contracting Officer

• In compliance with paragraph L-2 of the applicable solicitation

• Clearly indicating solicitation to which each question applies

• Proprietary Information:

• Clearly identify any information deemed proprietary

• The Government will provide answers to proprietary questions directly to the contractor

Stakeholders

• AFPEO/CM - Air Force Program Executive Officer for

Combat and Mission Support (AFPEO/CM)

• >$500M acquisitions, so both acquisitions in AFPEO/CM portfolio

• Acquisition Approval Authority

• Source Selection Authority

• AFICA/KC – Air Force Installation Contracting Agency, Operating Location Langley

• Clearance Authority

• Ombusdman

• MIRT - Multi-functional Independent Review Team

• Technical

• Legal

• Contracting

Milestone Ops & Log Date Training Date

RFP Release 4 Feb 15 2 Feb 15

Proposals Due 23 Mar 15 19 Mar 151

Source Selection (8 months allotted) Mar – Oct 15

Contract Award ~29 Oct 15

Performance Start NLT 23 Dec 152

1May be impacted by NAICS appeal; please monitor FBO closely 2Hard limit for award

Anticipated Project Milestones

Program Overview

PWS Objectives

• Operations & Logistics - Provide services, equipment, material and minor construction and repair services to improve the capability of

US and partner nation agency operational and logistics organizations

• Training - Provide training support services, equipment, material, instruction, and products to improve the capability of US and partner nation agencies’ capability and expertise

• Both - Detect, deter, disrupt, degrade and national security threats posed by illegal drugs, trafficking, piracy, transnational organized crime, threat finance networks, and any potential nexus among these activities

Performance Locations

• CONUS and OCONUS, with the bulk of performance occurring OCONUS

• OCONUS work may include dangerous areas including theaters of operations, combat zones, partner nation

• Specific place(s) of performance identified in each T/O

PWS

• May authorize performance at Contractor locations

Scope of Use Formerly “Customers”

• Support all organizations supporting or supported by

DASD (CN&GT), and those conducting CN/CT work or other work with a CN/CT nexus

• Within bounds of statutes/authorities specified in PWS

(as amended / supplemented) , contracts will support

DoD activities reasonably related to its counterdrug / counterterrorism efforts, which includes supporting other agencies / departments, and partner nations

• May also include any missions or requirements covered by addition, amendment or supplement to the currently established authorities with a CN/CT nexus or as appropriate to cover evolution of DASD (CN&GT) and/or CN/CT mission(s) over the life of this contract

Contract Scope Summary Operations & Logistics

• Personnel, services, equipment, construction - Start of new, restart of former, or conduct / sustain capability to operate, maintain, sustain new, restart, existing capability

• Actions to keep items in serviceable condition, return those items to service, update or upgrade a capability

• Movement of units, personnel, equipment, materials, supplies, to include obtaining modes of transportation

• Training incidental to equipment acquired under a T/O

• Design; construct new; and/or renovate, remodel, upgrade and/or repair existing facilities

Contract Scope Summary Training

• Activities to transfer knowledge, skills, abilities to improve individual or organizational performance or create a required level of competency

• Training Assessment – Determine feasibility of providing training to an intended organization / audience

• Training Development – Recommend / provide: training aids; instructor / student / personnel material, needs, qualifications, limitations; timeline; facilities; locations

• Training Delivery – Provide instruction / training products;

retrain; document progress, outcomes, successful completion; assess effectiveness of medium / instructors

• Focus - Strategic / Operational Training; Training Products

PWS Summary ID/IQ Program Management

• Program Management Capability to manage ID/IQ contract and all T/Os issued under the ID/IQ contract

• Inherently Governmental Functions / Decisions – Do neither for Government; recommendations only

• Communication within contractor team, professional, monitor and report situations that could cause delays

• Documentation – Follow naming / submission standards

• Management Information System (MIS) – Develop, administer and maintain capabilities, deliverables, status

• Performance Reviews – at least annually; if needed

• Kick-off Meetings – ID/IQ and T/O

Human Resource Management

• Personnel Qualifications – attract, hire, train, retain qualified personnel

• Personnel Training – Contractor responsibility throughout

• Rapid Response to T/O requirements

• Personnel Turnover – Continuation of services during personnel absences to minimize impact to Government

• Key Personnel – binding; specified requirements

• Removal of Contractor Personnel by Government –

Security, safety, environment, health, fraud, bad behavior

• Contractor Identification – Easily identifiable in person, communications, representations (except safety / security)

• Financial Management

• Travel Reimbursement – IAW FAR 31.205-46, ‘as needed’ basis, coordinated and approved in advance, receipts, adjustments

• Material Reimbursement – Allowable costs, less discounts, application of indirect rates

• Billing / Invoicing – monthly unless otherwise specified in T/O or by CO, travel within 30 days on single invoice, no separation of subcontractor costs

• Duty Hours, Holidays, Overtime

• Duty Hours – CONUS typically 40 hours a week; OCONUS any variety of work hours (contributor to daily vs. hourly rates)

• Holidays – CONUS performance follows US federal holidays

• Base Shut Downs – IAW FAR 52.249-14, payment terms negotiated, Government personnel must be in place and alternate work locations specified in T/O or pre-negotiated

Quality Control (QC)

• Quality Management System (QMS) – ISO 9001 registered (compliant for Training); monitor cost, schedule, performance

• Quality Manual – Describes QC process, QMS and

Contractor’s inspection system

• Records of Inspection – available to Government;

includes inspection schedule and inspection plan

• Performance Evaluation – Government access;

performance IAW requirements (nonconformances); Initial

Performance Status

Quality Control - Deliverables

• On time and in specified format

• Calendar days unless otherwise specified

• Minimum Guarantee - $50,000, T/O 0001 per awardee

• Management / Staffing Plan – approach for planning / controlling ID/IQ contract and multiple T/Os globally;

submitted with ID/IQ proposal

• OCI Plan – Disclose all cross-teaming; plan for handling

OCI at ID/IQ and T/O levels; submitted with ID/IQ proposal

• Subcontractor List – all companies expected to perform on prime’s team; 10 days post award

• ID / IQ Kick-Off Meeting – Government coordinated

• MIS – Capabilities; program management information and metrics; 8 concurrent access seats; 30 days post award

• Quality Manual – Describes QC process / QMS with documented procedures to monitor and control; outline with ID/IQ proposal; full manual 30 days post award

• Property Management Plan - Processes & procedures to monitor & control PWS paragraph 5.0; 30 days post award

• Contractor-identified Concerns / Issues – Highlights need for timely communication; initial notification; follow-up with recommendations / corrective action; situation specific

• Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting

(eCMRA) – Labor hour reporting; annually by 31 October

• Initial Performance Report – Initial status IAW AFI 63-

138, Acquisition of Services, 45 days post award

• ES&H Plan – Processes and procedures to monitor and control PWS paragraph 4.1; Environmental Management

Plan and Safety & Health Plan; 45 days post award

• Mishaps – Security, ES&H or other reportable mishaps / events; NLT 48 hours post event / per applicable guidance

• Monthly Report – Issues, concerns, high interest items, personnel activity, mishaps that occurred during previous month or still open during that month; 15th of each month

• ISR/SSR – Large Business Primes only (Ops & Log only);

semi-annually per FAR Part 19

Quality Control - Services Summary

• Identifies critical factors / surveillance items as basis for Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and successful performance of requirements

• Purpose: Performance objectives for required service

• Components: Objective, Standard, Threshold for each critical success factor (accept / reject point)

• Objectives:

• Qualified people at start - for ID/IQ and T/O performance

• Key personnel retention - per PWS, contract (ID/IQ and T/O) and place of performance; minimize vacancies and mission impact

• Deliverables Management - on time and accurate

• Proactive QC / QA - ISO registration / compliance; Quality Rep

• SB participation - 40% performance requirement (Ops & Log only)

Environmental, Safety & Health Program

• Comply with executive orders and all federal, state, local, Air Force & host nation guidance, as applicable

• Environmental Management Plan – spill response notifications; pesticide and herbicide reporting and use

• Safety & Health Plan – Employee Safety & Health Plan and Site Safety Plan

• Contractor Liability – Contractor liable & responsible for non-compliance; pays all fines / fees for Contractor actions

Security

• Safeguard / properly control Government property (keys, access badges, combinations, automatic data processing equipment (ADPE)), controlled items, classified information

• Comply with all DoD, Air Force and local guidance

• DD Forms 254 – as applicable at T/O level

• Performance on DoD / AF Installations – follow required processes, documentation, reporting, rules, restrictions;

appoint security manager; applicable employee training

• Clearance Requirements – facility, personnel, theater / country clearance requirements; special access programs

• Adhere to: FOIA, Privacy Act, COMSEC, OPSEC

Property Control / Administration

• Property Management System – internal controls to efficiently and effectively manage any Government property in Contractor’s possession or use; IAW FAR

52.245-1; described in Property Management Plan

• Item Unique Identification (IUID) – Government furnished items (NOT those transferring to a foreign government)

• Annual Property System Analysis – Conducted by

Government; Contractor to provide Government access

• Transportation – management for planning, shipment, identification, cargo, loading / unloading, documentation

• Real Property and Real Property Installed Equipment -

Contractor maintains, controls until transfer to Government

Task Order Requirements

• Government Notification to Contractors

• T/O RFPs via e-mail

• T/O RFP Content standards

• Post T/O RFP Communications – With CO, unless otherwise specified in writing

• Contractor T/O Proposal Requirements

• Comply with specified due date and T/O RFP instructions

• Address OCI

• Technical Proposal

• Proposal content should stand on its own, explain intended approach & demonstrate thorough understanding of requirement

• Do not restate, paraphrase or state intent to comply with PWS

• Identify key personnel and provide qualification summaries, as required

• Contractor T/O Proposal Requirements (continued)

• Past Performance Proposal

• Recency – meet criteria specified in T/O RFP

• Relevancy – describe how references are relevant to the work under solicitation; Contractor’s assessment of relevancy has no bearing on Government’s resulting assessment

• Performance – provide references that demonstrate positive successful performance

• Cost / Price

• Direct Labor - Appropriate labor category, level and information by proposed position, to include base labor and cost elements

• Indirects applied as applicable to the requirement

• Adequate Accounting System and Approved Purchasing

System, as applicable

• SB primes IAW FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting

• T/O Proposal Evaluation Parameters - The Government

• Will conduct T/O source selection IAW DoD Source Selection

Procedures & AFFARS 5315.3 & comply with source selection methodology (currently LPTA / trade-off) specified in T/O RFP

• May reduce pool of offerors eligible for evaluation per T/O RFP

• Evaluates proposal content, not based on existing knowledge

• Reserves the right to incorporate all or part of proposal

• Will conduct a responsibility determination

• Will address adverse past performance, with consideration for number / severity of issues and effectiveness / appropriateness of actual corrective action taken, not just promised / planned

• Use comparison of proposed prices as preferred / intended

Cost / Price analysis technique

• Base award on fair and reasonably priced proposals that are realistic & consistent with a technical proposal, as applicable

• T/O Awards

• The Government:

• Will notify all offerors of T/O award

• Will notify all Contractors of cancelled T/O RFP if no offeror deemed acceptable

• May issue a written notice to allow work to start when funds are available but an award action or modification cannot be completed in time for continuation of services (unusual)

• The Contractor may not start T/O performance without written notice from Contracting Officer or issuance of T/O award

• Contracting Officer Representative (COR):

• Will be highly qualified, fully trained and officially appointed in writing by the Contracting Officer

• The Government will provide a copy of the COR appointment letter to the Contractor as part of T/O award

• T/O Requirement Documents

• Statement of Objectives (SOO)

• Statement of Work (SOW) – more common for construction

• Performance Work Statement (PWS) – desired document

• May include Period of Performance (PoP)

• Will include:

• Task Order Objective / Scope – Strategic

• Performance Requirements – Details for performance

• Task Leads, Meetings, Travel, Life Support / Security

• Delivery Expectations, Deliverables, Brand Name Only Items

• Services Summary and QA Surveillance Plan (QASP)

• Government and/or Contractor Furnished Items

• Warranty Information / Operation Manuals

• Insurance, Taxes, Customs, Duties, Arms Export Control & ITAR

• Transition / Mobilization

Labor Categories

• General

• Table 4 specifies required education / experience minimums

• Categories – Government’s best estimate of ID/IQ & T/O work; No guarantee that requirements will exist for all or that all will be used

• T/O Requirements

• Government may provide T/O pricing template

• Contractors shall propose: Categories, levels, skill mix appropriate for T/O requirements and ID/IQ oversight / management, with hours reflective of actual work expected

• May be unawardable if propose excessive category or rates

• New labor categories

• Government has right to create / identify new categories

• Contractor may propose at T/O level, but must fully justify

• Will be negotiated separately and incorporated at T/O level

• Performance Levels

• Junior / Apprentice – basic competency; 0-3 years of experience

• Experienced / Journeyman

• Meet specified education requirement; 3-10 years of experience

• Typically performs work independently and may supervise or manage small number of junior / apprentice personnel

• Senior / Expert

• More than 10 years of T/O-specific experience

• High-visibility, mission critical aspects of T/O requirement

• Performs all functional duties independently

• Ability to oversee, supervise, manage multiple less-experienced or junior staff or all staff assigned to functional area

• Experience in Lieu of Education

• When a Contractor proposes a higher level degree than the minimum (or no degree requirement is specified):

• Associate’s Degree = 1 year of experience

• Bachelor’s Degree = 4 years of experience

• Master’s Degree = 5 years of experience

• When no experience is listed in lieu of educational requirement, the minimum degree listed is required – no experience substitute will be accepted

• 23 Labor Categories for Ops & Log

• 20 Labor Categories for Training (same as Ops & Log less Draftsperson, Construction Superintendent, Architect)

Solicitation Overview

Key Contractual Aspects

• Solicitation Numbers:

• FA4890-14-R-0023 – Operations & Logistics Support

• FA4890-14-R-0024 – Training Support Services

• North American Industry Classification System

(NAICS) for these requirements:

• 561210 - Facilities Support Services

• 541330 - Engineering Services **Currently Under Appeal**

• Contract Type - Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery /

Indefinite Quantity (MA ID/IQ)

• Non-commercial acquisition (FAR Part 15)

• Ceilings: $975M (Ops & Log); $650M (Training)

(continued)

• Final RFPs: 2 Feb 15 (Training); 4 Feb 15 (Ops & Log)

• PWSs written in performance-based terms

• Industry review & feedback received & addressed

• Government received 80 pages of questions since Final RFPs

• Proposals good for 300 days

• Small Business Application

• Ops & Log

• Target of 8 primes, with target of 5 large & 3 small businesses

• SB Subcontracting Plan required for Large Businesses IAW

FAR Part 19 (40% SB subcontracting requirement (H-4))

• Training – total small business set-aside with target of 8 primes **May change based on NAICS Code appeal decision**

• Government Furnished Property / Equipment - FAR 45

(continued)

• Invoice Payments IAW PGI Clause 252.204-0012

(204.7108(d)(12)) – “as invoiced within each line item”

• Section H Special Contract Requirements Highlights

• H-2, OCI prohibition – changed from ‘are not eligible to propose or perform’ to ‘will be removed from eligibility for award and may not perform as part of a prime’s team’

• H-8, Other Terms and Conditions Concerning T/Os

• Government may reduce pool of offerors eligible for evaluation as specified in T/O RFP

• Application of Option to Extend Services (FAR Clause 52.217-8) using 50% of T/O’s last option period

• Ops & Log - Competed as full and open unless set-aside per paragraph H-8(d)

Period of Performance

Contract Length (Ordering Period)

7 years (3-year Base with two 2-year options)

Period Duration

Base Period (3 years) 23 Dec 15 - 22 Dec 18

Option Period 1 (2 years) 23 Dec 18 - 22 Dec 20

Option Period 2 (2 years) 23 Dec 20 - 22 Dec 22

Note: Task Orders can be issued on the last day of the ordering period for up to 2 years (T/O performance will not go beyond 22 Dec 24)

CLIN Structure

CLIN # Type Reference Unit of

Issue

XX01 Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) FAR 16.202 Months

XX02 Firm-Fixed Price Level-of-Effort (FFP LOE) Term FAR 16.207 Months

XX03 Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) Firm FAR 16.403-1 Months

XX04 Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) Successive FAR 16.403-2 Months

XX05 Fixed-Price Award Fee (FPAF) FAR 16.404 Months

XX06 Cost Reimbursement (CR) FAR 16.3 Lot

XX07 Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)

FAR 16.304;

FAR 16.405-1

Lot

XX08 Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)

FAR 16.305;

FAR 16.405-2

Lot

XX09 Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Term FAR 16.306 Lot

XX10 Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Completion FAR 16.306 Lot

XX11 Cost Plus Fixed Fee level of Effort (CPFF LOE)

CPFF LOE

Guide Hours

Source Selection Methodology

• Best Value: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

(LPTA) IAW DoD Source Selection Procedures and

AFFARS 5315.3

• Factors

• Factor 1 – Technical (Acceptable / Unacceptable)

• Factor 2 – Past Performance (Acceptable / Unacceptable)

• Factor 3 – Cost / Price (Fair, Reasonable, Balanced)

• Trade-offs not permitted

• Government reserves right to award w/o Discussions

Source Selection Process

• Rank by initially proposed total price

• Ops & Log - Evaluate minimum of 8 large business and 6 small business proposals (or all if Government receives less than minimums) for target award to 5 large and 3 small businesses

• Training – Evaluate minimum of 12 (or all of Government receives less than 12) lowest priced proposals for target award to 8 small business primes

• Evaluate factors simultaneously to maintain minimums

• If any of the proposals received any “Unacceptable” rating, and proposal is not deemed easily correctable, Government reserves the right to pull in the next lowest priced proposal to ensure adequate competition or until all proposals are evaluated

Source Selection Technical Factor

• Subfactor 1: Program Management

• Management / Staffing Plan

• Human Resources

• Quality Management System

• Subfactor 2: Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan

• Subfactor 3: OCONUS Process (includes experience)

• Subfactor 4: Scenarios (2 per solicitation)

• Ops & Log - Live Fire Shoot House, Kazakhstan; Multi-Country

Vehicles / Equipment (Chad, Uganda, Pakistan, El Salvador, Panama, Kazakhstan)

• Training - OH-58A Helicopter Flight Training, Colombia; Nigerian

National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Training

Technical Evaluation Process

• Rated “Acceptable”/ “Unacceptable” at Subfactor level

• Technical proposals must be rated “Acceptable” in all subfactors to be eligible for award

• No extra credit for proposals that exceed requirements

• Subfactors will be rated “Unacceptable” is contain a:

• Deficiency - material failure or combination of significant weaknesses increasing risk to unacceptable level or

• Weakness - flaw increasing risk of unsuccessful performance

• An overall factor-level rating will not be assigned

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table A-1

Past Performance Factor

• Submit Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheets

• Up to 6 PPI references; minimum of 1 on Prime

• 1 page PPI sheet per reference

• Recent – at least 6 months of performance within last 5 years

• PPI Summary – single, 5 page narrative describing:

• Roles of proposed team

• How all PPI references are relevant (individually or in aggregate) in demonstrating ability to perform full range of

ID/IQ PWS requirements

• Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter

• Organizational Change History

Past Performance Evaluation Process

• Rated “Acceptable” / “Unacceptable” at Factor level

• References must be:

• RECENT – minimum of 6 months of performance during 5 years preceding RFP release date

• RELEVANT – “Relevant” or “Not Relevant” based on scope, magnitude of effort, complexity (individually or in aggregate)

• NO adverse past performance - Government will use a variety of sources to determine performance

RATING DEFINITION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (see note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)).

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

Past Performance Rating Process

Obtain Past Performance Information on Each Offeror and Determine Recency

Assess Relevancy for Each Recent Contract

Review Performance Quality for Each Contract

Review Offeror Relevancy and

Performance Ratings

Assign Offeror’s PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR

Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating

Cost/Price Factor

• Complete Table B-1, Pricing Schedule

• Labor Rates

• Hourly - CONUS

• Daily - OCONUS

• Indirect Rates

• Minimum Guarantee (Program Management Capability)

• Complete all applicable proposal documentation

• Sections A (SF 33), C – I (as applicable), K – Reps and Certs

• Acknowledge all amendments

• Address any exceptions or deviations

• Adequate Accounting Systems (see H-6)

• Host Nation Law Compliance and Financial Statements

• Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) clearance

• SB Subcontracting Plan (Ops & Log only)

Cost/Price Evaluation Process

• Cost / Price analysis IAW FAR 15.404-1

• Price reasonableness based on comparison of offerors’ Total Overall Evaluated Prices (TOEP)

• Preferred and intended method

• Includes Labor and Indirect Rates for all performance years

(years 1-7 + performance periods A and B) + 50% of period B

• Minimum Guarantee

• Cost / Price must be:

• Fair

• Reasonable

• Balanced

Read and evaluate

Offerors’ initial proposals

Document eval findings

Reach Consensus

Finalize ENs

Evaluate

EN responses

Document eval findings

Prepare follow-up ENs, if required

Establish initial ratings

Competitive Range or

Award w/o Discussions

Adjust ratings and/or

Competitive Range based on EN responses

** IEB **

Award w/o Discussions or

Release ENs upon SSA approval

Discussions Started

Receive Contract Clearance

** Pre-FPRB**

Issue Request for FPRs upon SSA approval

Discussions Closed

Receive & evaluate

FPRs from offerors

Document FPR Findings

Formulate award recommendation

Establish final ratings

Finalize PAR/SSDD

Award recommendation

Receive Clearance

** SSDB**

SSA makes Award decision

PAR/SSDD signed

Award

INITIAL

EVALUATION

INTERIM

EVALUATION

FINAL

EVALUATION

Source Selection Evaluation Phases

Initial Evaluation

• Based on Initial Evaluation, CO must decide to either:

• Recommend SSA Award Without Discussions (AWOD), OR

• Establish Competitive Range (CR) and enter Discussions

• AWOD is the desired approach (submit best proposal with original submission)

• CO will notify offerors if:

• AWOD

• Entering Discussions

• Eliminated from CR (may request pre- / post-award debriefing)

Discussions

• CO will open Discussions by Releasing

• Ratings from initial evaluation

• Proposal Issues - captured in Evaluation Notices (EN)

• Offerors in CR provide responses to ENs by due date

• Government evaluates responses

• May require “follow-on” ENs

• CO makes determination when to close Discussions

• CO may recommend further reduction of CR

• CO will notify offerors when:

• Closing Discussions

• Requesting Final Proposal Revisions (FPR)

• Eliminated from CR (may request pre- / post-award debriefing)

Final Proposal Revisions

• CO will Close Discussions and Request FPRs

• Release ratings resulting from Discussions

• No further Discussions allowed

• Offerors in CR provide FPRs by established due date

• Government evaluates FPRs

• CO makes award recommendations

Points of Contact

• Contracting, ACC AMIC/PKD

• Contracting Officer: Mr. Jim Robinson james.robinson.54@us.af.mil

757-225-7706

• Contract Manager: Ms. Shiran Zerach

757-225-2311

• All questions or comments regarding this recompete shall also be submitted in writing to appropriate box:

• Operations and Logistics Support:

accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil

• Training Support Services:

ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil mailto:james.robinson.54@us.af.mil mailto:accamic.pkd.cngtopslogrecomp@us.af.mil mailto:ACCAMIC.PKD.CNGTTrainingRecomp@us.af.mil

Internet Links

• www.FBO.gov or www.FedBizOpps.gov

• FA4890-14-R-0023 (Operations & Logistics)

• FA4890-14-R-0024 (Training)

• http://farsite.hill.af.mil (Federal Acquisition Regulation) http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.fedbizopps.gov/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .