RFI log - Fence 1 Sept 2020.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 218 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Perimeter fence extension and EOD fences Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA488720Q0059
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI log - Fence 2 Sept 2020.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA488720Q00590002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA488720Q00590001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Wage determination 08212020.txt | TXT text file | |
| RFI Log.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - SOW-FENCE EXTENSION v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - FA488720Q0059.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - SOW-EOD FENCE v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - wage determination 06052020.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Fencing for pro range.jpg | JPG image | |
| Attachment 6 - EOD FENCE Plan B951.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - SOW-EOD PERIMETER FENCE v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 8 - SPRS color legend.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - South EOR Detailed Fence Aug 2020 v2.jpg | JPG image |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| REQUEST FOR INFORMATION LOG | |
| CONTRACT #: | PROJECT # / TITLE:OP1065032 Gila Bend ADP |
| TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR | TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNMENT | ||||||||
| RFI # | DATE | DOCUMENT | SHEET / PAGE / PARA | DISCIPLINE | QUESTION / ISSUE | RESPONSE DATE | RESPONSE | POC | |
| OFFICE SYM | NAME | ||||||||
| 001 | 31-Aug-20 | Each of the attachments describes most of the requirements for the fences 7 gates for each particular area, however, is there a particular Standard Fence & Gate Specs we need to adhere to on top of the stated requirements, like it is usually the case on military fencing? | No specific standard or specs to follow. Only height requirements per each SOW. | 56 CONS | Jensen | ||||
| 002 | 31-Aug-20 | Confirm no landscaping is required for this contract. | Yes landcaping is required where the trench from electrical panel | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 003 | 31-Aug-20 | Will 100% grading to even elevation required or will rough grade by bucket be acceptable? | rough grading will be ok. | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 004 | 31-Aug-20 | Will any signs need to be installed on the fence as part of this project? | All signs will be installed by 56 CES | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 005 | 31-Aug-20 | Will all new fencing receive single or double security cabling as detailed in MILHDBK-1013? | single | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 006 | 31-Aug-20 | Will cable reinforcing be required on the new chain link fence? | YES cable reinforcing will be required | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 007 | 31-Aug-20 | Is cable reinforcing required on the gates? | No | ||||||
| 008 | 31-Aug-20 | Is grounding required on the new chain link fence? If cable is required on the fence, there is no grounding detail for the cable. Please provide. | No grounding necessary | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 009 | 31-Aug-20 | Are there are security/access requirements for this project? | Only security requirements is passes to be able to work on base | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 010 | 31-Aug-20 | Are there any specific permits/coordination needed with Security Forces for this project? | no | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 011 | 31-Aug-20 | Does the chain link need to be galvanized? | yes | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 012 | 31-Aug-20 | Will 50-lb test be required on new fence? | No | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 013 | 31-Aug-20 | Will the base handle the blue staking if an AF-103 dig permit is submitted? | yes the state will handle the AF-103 and blue stake | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 014 | 31-Aug-20 | Is temp fence or barricading required for this project? | No for 951 Pro Range will need a temp fence of fence constructed inside or outside of fence already there so range is 100% secured at all times | ||||||
| 015 | 31-Aug-20 | Is a project sign required for this project? | No sign required | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 016 | 31-Aug-20 | EOD Fence Plan drawing shows boulders. Are contractors to supply and install boulders as part of this project? | No the fence will be behind the boulders | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 017 | 31-Aug-20 | In the removal of the fencing/gates, should the concrete encasements also be removed and disposed of? | yes all fence/poles removed will need to be disposed of | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 018 | 31-Aug-20 | Is a SWPPP needed for this project? | No SWPPP needed | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 019 | 31-Aug-20 | Are there any specific permits/coordination needed with the City of Glendale for traffic control or with SF when removing and replacing gates? | No permits will be needed | 56 CES | Landford | ||||
| 020 | 31-Aug-20 | SOW states to install 44’ of 12X12X12 V-Track Pad with #4 rebar 4000PSI and 24”X24” gate operator pad. Please confirm unit of measure on V-track pad (ft, inches, etc.). | Still waiting on answer. Will be posted as soon as we get answer | 56 CONS | Jensen | ||||
| 021 | 31-Aug-20 | Solicitation evaluation factors for award list Factor II Past Performance will be evaluated using the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) rating. Please confirm offerors do not have to submit anything for this Factor and all we are submitting is a price proposal. | Contractor does not have to submit any documentation for the past performance evaluation. | 56 CONS | Jensen | ||||
| 022 | 31-Aug-20 | Please extend proposal due date to allow for sufficient review of RFI responses. | Dead line will be extended through 4 Sept. | 56 CONS | Jensen | ||||
| 023 | Per the SOW for EOD perimeter fence B951, please confirm/specify as to the type of fencing that is to be installed? I believe the SOW should have stated "slatted fence" and not slated. Furthermore, is this fence to be wood or another material? | The SOW should state that it should be slatted fence. The fence will be chain link with plastic slates. | 56 CES | Landford | |||||
| 024 | |||||||||
| 025 | |||||||||
| 026 | |||||||||
| 027 | |||||||||
| 032 | |||||||||
| 035 | |||||||||
| 037 | |||||||||
| 040 | |||||||||
| 044 | |||||||||
| 048 | |||||||||
| 054 | |||||||||
| 060 | |||||||||
| 063 | |||||||||
| 066 | |||||||||
| 068 | |||||||||
| 071 | |||||||||
| 074 | |||||||||
| 076 | |||||||||
| 080 | |||||||||
| 083 | |||||||||
| 085 | |||||||||
| 087 | |||||||||
| 090 | |||||||||
| 092 | |||||||||
| 099 | |||||||||
| 105 | |||||||||
| 112 | |||||||||
| 117 | |||||||||
| 119 | |||||||||
| 123 | |||||||||
| 126 | |||||||||
| 130 | |||||||||
| 131 | |||||||||
| 132 | |||||||||
| 133 | |||||||||
| 134 | |||||||||
| 135 | |||||||||
| 136 | |||||||||
| 137 | |||||||||
| 138 | |||||||||
| 139 | |||||||||
| 140 | |||||||||
| 141 | |||||||||
| 142 | |||||||||
| 143 | |||||||||
| 144 | |||||||||
| 145 | |||||||||
| 146 | |||||||||
| 147 | |||||||||
| 148 | |||||||||
| 149 | |||||||||
| 150 | |||||||||
| 151 | |||||||||
| 152 | |||||||||
| 153 | |||||||||
| 154 | |||||||||
| 155 | |||||||||
| 156 | |||||||||
| 157 | |||||||||
| 158 | |||||||||
| 159 | |||||||||
| 160 | |||||||||
| 161 | |||||||||
| 162 | |||||||||
| 163 | |||||||||
| 164 | |||||||||
| 165 | |||||||||
| 166 | |||||||||
| 167 | |||||||||
| 168 | |||||||||
| 169 | |||||||||
| 170 | |||||||||
| 171 | |||||||||
| 172 | |||||||||
| 173 | |||||||||
| 174 | |||||||||
| 175 | |||||||||
| 176 | |||||||||
| 177 | |||||||||
| 178 | |||||||||
| 179 | |||||||||
| 180 | |||||||||
| 181 | |||||||||
| 182 | |||||||||
| 183 | |||||||||
| 184 | |||||||||
| 185 | |||||||||
| 186 | |||||||||
| 187 | |||||||||
| 188 | |||||||||
| 189 | |||||||||
| 190 | |||||||||
| 191 | |||||||||
| 192 | |||||||||
| 193 | |||||||||
| 194 | |||||||||
| 195 | |||||||||
| 196 | |||||||||
| 197 | |||||||||
| 198 | |||||||||
| 199 | |||||||||
| 200 | |||||||||
| 201 | |||||||||
| 202 | |||||||||
| 203 |
Requested Information (See below)
Sheet2
Sheet3 image1.JPG
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .