Revised - Atch 17 - Section L - Instructions - Amendment 0003 - 2 Jun 21.pdf

Section L Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors.

L-1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

L-1.1. Notice To Offeror(s). This section of the RFP provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the required proposal volumes. Each proposal must include all data and information requested in the RFP. Offerors are cautioned to strictly comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete proposal. Failure to furnish a complete proposal at the time of proposal submission may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and thereby eliminated from consideration for award. The offeror’s proposal must reflect a thorough understanding of the services required and display a logical development of the offeror’s plans to implement all General Provision requirements as assessed by the RFP evaluation criteria.

L-1.2. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation at any point before contract award. In the event this solicitation is cancelled, the Government has no obligation to reimburse offerors for any costs incurred.

L-1.3. This acquisition is a competitive procurement pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Small Business Administration (SBA) Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)), in accordance with FAR Part 19.8, Contracting with the SBA (The 8(a) Program) and FAR Part 6.204, Section 8(a) competition. The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction and the Product Service Code (PSC) is Z2AA, Repair of Alteration of Office Buildings.

L-1.4. The Government intends to award one Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract from this solicitation to the responsible offeror (IAW FAR Part 9) whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and subfactors in the solicitation (FAR 52.215-1(f)(1)).

L-1.5. Offerors shall acknowledge awareness of all amendments to the solicitation by signing and dating Block 19, Page 2 of the Standard Form 1442.

L-1.6. The Government expects adequate competition and intends to award a contract without discussions. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms for all factors/subfactors in its initial proposal.

L-1.7. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in all provisions/clauses throughout the solicitation. Failure to complete these items may result in the proposal being found non-responsive and/or non-responsible.

L-1.8. Proposals shall be clear and concise, and shall include sufficient detail to permit the Government to adequately evaluate and substantiate proposal statements.

L-2. SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS.

L-2.1. Questions in response to this solicitation are due no later than 4:30 PM ET on 27 May 2021. All questions shall be submitted via email and only to the points of contact (POCs) noted below. It is the offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt.

Mr. Phillip Nease: phillip.nease.1@us.af.mil Mr. Ian Barnes: ian.barnes.11@us.af.mil Ms. Valarie Fleming: valarie.fleming.1@us.af.mil Please note the following in the subject line: “Questions: SABER Sol FA480021R0005”

L-2.2. Questions shall be submitted in the following format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2013 or newer:

Document / Section Paragraph / Reference Question / Issue / Concern

Questions with Government responses will be posted to beta.SAM.gov as an amendment to this solicitation.

L-3. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND FORMAT.

L-3.1. Proposals in response to this solicitation shall be valid for 365 calendar days after the date offers are due.

L-3.2. SAFE SUBMISSION. Electronic proposals shall be submitted via Department of Defense (DoD) Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) at https://safe.apps.mil . The Government will not accept proposals through any other medium.

mailto:phillip.nease.1@us.af.mil mailto:ian.barnes.11@us.af.mil mailto:valarie.fleming.1@us.af.mil https://safe.apps.mil/

L-3.2.1. In order to submit a proposal, offerors must notify the POCs listed in L-2 no later than 01 Jun 2021 of their intent to propose. The notification email shall include the name and email address of the offeror representative submitting the proposal. On 03 Jun 2021, the Government will send a ‘drop-off request’ through DoD SAFE to the offeror email provided.

This request will provide the link required to submit proposals. It is the offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt once proposals are submitted.

Intent notifications due: 01 Jun 2021 Drop-off request sent: 03 Jun 2021 Proposals due: 14 Jun 2021, NLT 4:30 PM ET

L-3.3. Operating System and Applications. Proposals will be accessed with the Microsoft Windows 10 Operating System. Proposal files shall be submitted using only the applications listed below:

Application / File Valid Extensions Portable Document Files .pdf Microsoft Word .doc / .docx Microsoft Excel .xls / .xlsx Microsoft Power Point .ppt / .pptx

L-3.4. File Naming Convention. Offerors shall follow the basic structure of the file naming convention below for file submissions, where "#" represents the sequential file number. Offerors shall keep the file name under 40 characters.

L-3.4. Table 1: NAMING CONVENTIONS Section File Name

Business Cover Page (FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)) Model Contract Signed SF1442 (and SF30s as applicable) Section B, Section I, and Section K Pre-award Clearances documentation Partnering documentation

Offeror name BUS Cover# Offeror name BUS Kt#

Offeror name BUS Clear# Offeror name BUS PA#

Factors Technical Capability (Factor 1)* Program Management Plan, Subfactor A Staffing Plan, Subfactor B Seed Project, Subfactor C Past Performance (Factor 2) Price (Factor 3)

Offeror name FAC1 MC# Offeror name FAC1 SubA# Offeror name FAC1 SubB# Offeror name FAC1 SubC# Offeror name FAC2 PP# Offeror name FAC3 Price#

*Offerors may submit either one file to address all three subfactors, or three separate files for each individual subfactor.

L-3.5. Hyperlinks. Offerors may use hyperlinks within and among proposal factor files. However, there shall be no links from price factor files to non-price factor files. NOTE: Each factor submission shall be on a stand-alone basis. Any information required for evaluation, and not found in its designated file, is assumed omitted from the proposal.

L-3.6. Virus Free Electronic Submission. Offerors shall ensure that proposals are virus free. The offeror shall certify, in the proposal cover letter, that all electronic proposal information delivered throughout the evaluation (e.g., initial proposal, responses to evaluation notices, final proposal revisions) is virus free. Offerors should specify the software, version, and virus definition used to check the data.

L-3.7. Multimedia and Graphics. Sound and video (e.g., MPEG) files shall not be imbedded within the proposal. Offerors shall:

a. Avoid submitting large files;

b. Simplify color palettes and minimize the use of color images or graphics;

c. Minimize size of graphics files; and

d. Avoid scanned images.

L-3.8. Pre-award Clearances.

VETS-4212 (FAR 52.222-38): Provide documentation that the prime, and any subcontractors over $150K (total value), is current with their reporting as required by FAR Subpart 22.13.

L-3.9. Proposal Format. F

L-3.9.1. Fonts: Proposal text fonts shall not be smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman 11 or Arial Narrow 12 point font, single column, normal character spacing and position. The text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 9 point font. Line spacing shall be at least single-spaced.

L-3.9.2. Pages: All pages shall be formatted as 8.5” x 11” letter size with one-inch margins all around. 11” x 17” is allowed for charts, tables, and graphs only. Any proposal text included on these pages, other than the information specific to the graphics, will not be considered in the evaluation. One 11” x 17” page will be counted as two pages. All material shall be contained within the page limits identified below for each section, and all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc., are included in the page count. Not included in the page count are title pages, tables of content, glossaries of abbreviations, acronyms, or definitions. Evaluators will only evaluate up to the maximum number of pages specified in Table 2 below.

L-3.9.3. Headers and Footers: Information contained in headers and footers shall only provide company name, solicitation number, proposal section (e.g. Factor 2, Past Performance), disclosure markings (FAR 52.215-1(e)), dates, or page numbers.

Text sizes shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 9 point font.

L-3.9. Table 2: PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITS Section Pages

Business Cover Page (FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)) Model Contract Pre-award Clearances documentation Partnering documentation

3 Pages No Limit No Limit No Limit

Factors Technical Capability (Factor 1)* Program Management Plan Subfactor A Staffing Plan Subfactor B Seed Project Subfactor C Past Performance (Factor 2) PPIs PPQs Price (Factor 3)

70 Total Pages All subfactors shall be addressed within the page limit of Factor 1. The breakout of those pages is at the offeror’s discretion.

3 Pages (Overview in relation to the solicitation) 5 Pages Per Reference

L-4. PROPOSAL CONTENT.

L-4.1. Business.

L-4.1.1. Cover Page and Model Contract: Provide a completed Section B, pages 4 – 6 of the SF 1442 and Section B, Atch 3, Pricing Schedule (Note: the Government will fill in the CLIN information on pages 4 - 6 of the SF 1442, Section B, upon contract award). Provide a filled-in Section I. Provide completion confirmation of the required Representations and Certifications (Section K) in System for Award Management (SAM) located at https://www.sam.gov.

L-4.1.2. Pre-Award Documentation: Include any of the documentation provided in accordance with section L-3.8. above.

L-4.1.3. Section 8(a) Status: Include letter from the SBA showing proof of Section 8(a) status. Offeror shall include the Section 8(a) status letter with its Pre-Award Clearance Documentation.

L-4.1.4. Partnering Documentation: Provide documentation identifying the arrangement and disclosing company relationships (FAR 9.603) for any Joint Venture, Teaming Arrangement, Mentor-Protégé, etc. established for the purposes of https://www.sam.gov/ this solicitation.

L-4.1.5. Bona Fide Place of Business: Unless the Section 8(a) offeror is registered in the System of Award Management (SAM) with a principle place of business address that reflects a state that is included in the SBA’s Region III (included states are Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington D.C.), the offeror shall include a determination letter from the SBA denoting the 8(a) offeror has a bona fide place of business within the SBA’s Region III.

This letter is required to be eligible for award. Offeror shall include this letter with its Pre-Award Clearance Documentation.

L-4.2. Factor 1: Technical Capability

L-4.2.1. Subfactor A, Program Management Plan. Describe your integrated management approach to provide an organizational structure that consists of an appropriate leadership hierarchy, assigned roles and responsibilities, lines of authority, and cohesive functional relationships to ensure satisfactory performance of all the program areas noted in the SABER General Provisions at Attachment 1. Also, provide your communications approach with effective lines of communication, reporting, progress checkpoints, and interfaces between management, technical staff, subcontractors/teaming partners, and the Government to ensure continuity and mission success.

L-4.2.2. Subfactor B, Staffing Plan. Provide your integrated approach for hiring and retaining qualified management and technical personnel for the job categories/positions required by the SABER General Provisions at Attachment 1. The staffing plan shall state the qualifications of positions outlined in the General Provisions. Resumes are not requested nor will they be evaluated.

L-4.2.3. Subfactor C, Seed Project. Offeror shall provide a proposal for Langley Project MUHJ 20-4072, Renovate Interior Auditorium of Facility 15 – reference solicitation Attachment 2. The proposal shall capture all required labor, tools, materials, supplies, equipment and all other items necessary to successfully complete the project. The proposal shall include a separate technical proposal and a separate price proposal. The technical proposal shall include an AF Form 3064, Contract Progress Schedule that properly denotes all expected disciplines and efforts required to complete the project in a feasible manner that coincides with the requested period of performance of one hundred thirty (130) calendar days. Furthermore, the technical proposal shall include a detailed AF Form 66, Schedule of Material Submittals. The proposal shall also include a detailed price proposal that identifies the necessary line items/tasks from the applicable R.S. Means guides dated 2020. The price proposal shall properly include all expected disciplines required to complete the project and that each discipline is priced according with R.S. Means at an expected level of effort per the statement of work. The price proposal shall include the bid coefficient.

L-4.2.3.1. Subfactor C, Seed Project Site Visit. A site visit for the seed project will be held on 24 May 2021 at 9:00 AM ET at Facility 15, Room 203, located at 45 Nealy Avenue on Langley AFB. Offeror shall email the POCs noted in Section L paragraph L-2 above no later than 4:30 PM ET on 19 May 2021 to advise of their intent to attend the site visit. The Government will submit a DoD SAFE drop-off request to each offeror planning to attend the site visit. The offeror shall upload a Government provided Excel spreadsheet noting the following information no later than 2:00 PM ET on 21 May 2021 so base passes are made available: Company Name, Full Name of Individual(s) attending (to include their middle initial), Gender, and Date of Birth. Offeror is allowed no more than two personnel to attend the site visit. The site visit is not mandatory, but it will provide a more in-depth insight to the project and thus should allow offeror to submit a more precise seed project proposal for evaluation. It is the Government’s intention to award a task order for the seed project at the SABER awardee’s proposed price soon after award of the IDIQ.

L-4.3. Factor 2: Past Performance.

L-4.3.1. This acquisition is a best value source selection utilizing a subjective tradeoff evaluation methodology whereby past performance may be traded for price. Past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than cost or price considerations; however, cost/price will contribute substantially to the selection decision.

L-4.3.2. Offeror shall submit thorough, accurate, and complete past performance information (PPI). Offeror submitted PPIs and Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) will be the primary sources used in evaluation. The Government may use additional sources of information in its evaluation, at its discretion. Additional information can come from any sources available to the Government.

L-4.3.3. Offeror shall submit the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number of the Prime Offeror and each team member, partner or subcontractor included in your proposal. Include written consent from all subcontractor or team members to allow the Government to address any evaluated past performance directly with the Prime Offeror.

L-4.3.4. If PPI is submitted from prior organization structures, (e.g. mergers, subsidiaries, purchases, novation’s, etc.) submit a detailed change history, to include company names, CAGE codes, DUNS numbers, and specific dates.

L-4.3.5. Past Performance Information (PPI) Reference Sheets (Section L: Attachment 1): Submit a minimum of three and a maximum of six separate PPIs for contracts, task orders, or calls that are recent and relevant as defined in Section M. It is the offeror’s responsibility to explain how their chosen PPIs are relevant; however, the Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion in determining relevancy. Three of the submitted PPIs should be for the Prime Offeror if available. PPIs submitted for a basic IDIQ or Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) will be considered a single PPI reference.

L-4.3.6. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Section L: Attachment 2): If a submitted PPI reference does not have a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR), the Government shall use the attached PPQ as a tool for evaluating. All PPQs are to be submitted to the Government by the POC identified in Section 3 of the Attached PPQ, via email to the 633 CONS personnel listed in paragraph L-2.1. above. Any PPQs submitted directly by an offeror will not be considered. It is the sole responsibility of the offeror to send out and track the completion of a PPQ to ensure it is received by the proposal deadline.

L-4.4. Factor 3: Price

L-4.4.1. The Unit Price Guide (UPG) to be utilized for this contract is R.S. Means. All line items in the R.S. Means Facilities Construction Guide are considered pre-priced line items. The offeror will be responsible for proposing two priced elements --coefficient rates and design fees.

L-4.4.2. Coefficient Rates. Offeror’s coefficient rates shall represent its costs for labor, overhead, profit, general & administrative expenses, bond premiums, taxes, mobilization, demobilization, and all other associated costs as noted in the General Provisions at Attachment 1. Coefficient rates will be multiplied against the localized unit prices in the R.S. Means Facilities Construction Guide and then multiplied by the City Cost Index (CCI) to calculate the finalized task order price. The coefficient shall represent “net” (equal to 1.0) or a percentage “decrease from” (e.g. .82) or an “increase from” (e.g. 1.12) to the unit prices listed in the appropriate R.S. Means Facility Construction Cost Data Unit Price Book. The pricing coefficient is not subject to economic price adjustments and will remain unchanged for the existing terms and conditions of the contract.

L-4.4.2.1. Since JBLE is separated into two geographical locations, an independent coefficient rate for Langley AFB and Fort Eustis may be proposed by the offeror. Furthermore, an independent coefficient rate may be proposed for the 203 Red Horse Squadron (Camp Pendleton State Military Reservation, Virginia Beach, VA) and the 200 Weather Flight (Sandston, VA).

Note: the 192 Virginia Air National Guard Contracting Office (located on Langley AFB) will be given decentralized authority to write its own task orders using the SABER IDIQ in support of the 203 Red Horse Squadron and the 200 Weather Flight.

L-4.4.2.2. The IDIQ contract will be awarded with a single standard and nonstandard coefficient rate for Langley AFB, Fort Eustis, Virginia Beach, and Sandston (unless offeror elects to propose same coefficient for all locations). Projects categorized as standard take place during normal working hours (0730 - 1630), Monday through Friday excluding federal holidays.

Projects categorized as nonstandard typically take place outside of the normal working hours, or in a secure area where the contractor must be escorted. The nonstandard coefficient may be utilized to account for loss of productivity while working in secure areas, working on weekends, and working during nonstandard hours only. In addition, the nonstandard coefficient may be used to accelerate contractor’s performance to include multiple shifts during both standard and nonstandard hours.

L-4.4.3. Minimum Design. The concept of the SABER program provides for a 35% design level of effort. However, on occasion some portions of a design may require up to a 65 to 80% design effort depending upon the nature and complexity (i.e. mechanical/electrical) of the project. A 100% design level effort may be necessary when Professional Engineer (PE) Certification is required. For purposes of supplying a minimum design fee, the offeror shall price at a 35% design level of effort.

L-4.4.3.1. Minimum Design Ranges/Fees. The minimum design ranges are broken out into the following three categories of magnitude. The offeror shall provide a FFP design fee amount for each minimum design range category for the base and all option year periods.

Category 1 (Low), minimum design range: $2,000.01 - $50,000.00 Category 2 (Medium), minimum design range: $50,000.01 - $300,000.00 Category 3 (High), minimum design range: Over $300,000.00

L-4.4.4. Pricing Schedule – Solicitation Attachment 3. Offerors shall complete the Pricing Schedule at Attachment 3 of the solicitation by inserting its proposed standard and nonstandard coefficient rates and minimum design fees for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including all option periods. The three minimum design fee amounts shall be inserted as single project amounts.

L-4.4.4.1. The pre-built Pricing Schedule formula will add the offeror’s proposed standard and nonstandard coefficient rates together and multiply that total by the annual dollar amount estimated for work to be completed to obtain the overall proposed coefficient amount. The pre-built Pricing Schedule formula will also multiply each of the offeror’s proposed minimum design fee amounts by the estimated quantity of each design range to obtain the overall proposed minimum design fee amount. The total proposed amount of the coefficient rates and the minimum design fees will be added together to reach the offeror’s overall total proposed price.

L-4.4.5. Offerors shall fully explain the basis for development of its coefficients and design fees. Unreasonably high or unrealistically low coefficient rates or minimum design fees, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirements or the coefficient/minimum design amount represent an unacceptable risk to the Government.

L-4.4.6. Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The TEP consists of all offeror proposed amounts for the base and all option periods plus 50% of the Option Year 4 pricing to evaluate the 6-month extension of services period IAW FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. The SABER Seed Project noted at paragraph L-4.2.3. is not a factor of the TEP and therefore shall not be included in this total.

L-4.4.7. Certified Cost or Pricing Data. Since adequate price competition is expected, contract award will be made without obtaining certified cost or pricing data; however, other than cost or pricing data may be requested after receipt and evaluation of proposals if necessary to make a determination of price reasonableness.

L-4.4.8. Responsibility Determination. In order to expedite the responsibility determination required by FAR 9.103(b), offeror shall provide documentation from its financial institution showing its adequate financial resources, or the ability to obtain them (see FAR 9.104-3(a)). This documentation will only be used to establish responsibility in the event of contract award, and will not be used to evaluate proposed pricing.

SECTION L

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (PPI) CONTRACT REFERENCE SHEET

Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being submitted. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at paragraph L-3.9, Table 2 of Section L of this solicitation.

A. Offeror Name (Company/Division): ____________________

CAGE Code:____________________

DUNS Number:____________________

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume).

B. Program Title:____________________

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Contracting Agency or Customer _____________________________________________

2. Contract Number__________________________________________________________

3. Contract Type __________________________

4. Period of Performance __________________________

5. Original Contract $ Value _________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

6. Current Contract $ Value _________________ (Do not include unexercised options)

7. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason

D. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor

(Provide a brief description of the service provided and actual work performed under this contract reference. Highlight portions considered most relevant to SABER IDIQ. If submitting a reference for a subcontractor, teaming partner, joint venture, or a corporate division related to the offeror, describe the nature and portion (percentage) of the work to be performed on the SABER IDIQ by the company referenced on the PPI sheet, and clearly define the relationship. Indicate place(s) of performance:

- State if performance was in multiple locations. If so, specify locations.

- State if performance serviced state or federal Government, and provide details.

- State if performance serviced the Department of Defense, and provide details.)

E. Completion Date:

1. Original date: ____________________

2. Current Schedule: ____________________

3. Estimate at Completion: ____________________

4. How Many Times Changed: ____________________

5. Primary Causes of Change: _______________________________________________________

F. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles).

1. Program Manager and/or Site Manager:

Name ____________________

Office ____________________

Address________________________________________

Telephone__________________

FAX Number_______________

2. Contracting Officer:

Name ____________________

Office ____________________

Address________________________________________

3. Administrative Contracting Officer:

Name ____________________

Office ____________________

Address________________________________________

G. Explain how your experience and the experience of the contract references provided for your teaming partners, joint ventures, major or critical subcontractors is relevant IAW the relevancy criteria provided at M-2.2.6.

H. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).

I. IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii), relevant experience from predecessor companies, key personnel, or subcontractors may be evaluated. If relying on experience of any of the entities, clearly explain “whose” past performance, and “how” the past performance is relevant to the proposed effort.

SECTION L

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The Government may use the following PPQ as a tool for conducting Past Performance telephonic or e-mail interviews. In the event a PPQ is used, it will be treated as source selection information IAW FAR Part 2.101 and

3.104. Offerors shall not complete and submit any PPQ. Any PPQs submitted by offerors will not be considered as part of the evaluation.

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Completed project on time/as scheduled and on budget as designed.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. Met all applicable environmental requirements; complied with all applicable labor laws, and provided for a safe workplace.

22. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

23. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

24. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

IF THIS CONTRACTOR HAS PERFORMED MULTIPLE PROJECTS FOR YOU:

Have they provided a satisfactory history of starting and completing numerous, simultaneous construction projects?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, were the projects completed on time/as scheduled and on budget as designed? Please explain.

Has the contactor shown a satisfactory history of being cooperative, flexible, and reasonable in resolving customer complaints and unforeseen conditions?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, please provide an example of at least one instance.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

phillip.nease.1@us.af.mil ian.barnes.11@us.af.mil Please note the following in the subject line: “PPQ: SABER Sol FA480021R0005” valarie.fleming.1@us.af.mil mailto:phillip.nease.1@us.af.mil mailto:ian.barnes.11@us.af.mil mailto:valarie.fleming.1@us.af.mil