Additional_Questions_&_Answers.pdf
PDF 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA4664-17-B-0003
About this file
Atch 9 - Additional Questions & Answers
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_-_Amendment_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_8_-_Questions_&_Answers.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_-_Bid_Schedule.pdf | ||
| FA4664-17-B-0001_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_-SOW_8_Sep_17.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_-_General_Decision_Number_9-8-17.pdf | ||
| Site_Walk_Notes.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_-_SOW_8-18-17.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_-_Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch_5_-_Security_Pamphlet.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_-_General_Decision_Number_8-4-17.pdf | ||
| Atch_7_-_Bid_Opening-Delivery_Pass_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF1442_-_FA4664-17-B-0003.pdf | ||
| Atch_4_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Atch_3_-_Schedule_of_Material_Submittals.pdf | ||
| Atch_6_-_FEP_March_ARB_June_2016.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 9 to
FA4664-17-B-0003
(Amendment 0002, 13 September 2017)
Repair Airfield Concrete & Asphalt (Taxiway A & Alert Fighter Area)
Additional Questions & Answers
(13 September 2017)
1. QUESTION #1 and QUESTION #2: The Davis Bacon Wage Decision which says it was revised as of 9/8/2017, is incorrect and the wage rates for Laborers and Operating Engineers are the same expired wage rates that were in the Original Solicitation. I understand that you folks are just downloading information from a web-site, but if you review Pages 23 through 25 of the
Prevailing Wage Document that was sent in Addendum 1 you will see that the coding process that is used in order to establish the date that the Prevailing Wage Rates are effective upon. For instance, in the Power Equipment Operators the rates listed are from the Operating Engineers
Union Local 12 established on 7/1/2016. These rates are expired and are no longer in effect.
Both the wages and fringes have gone up substantially. See Page 5 of 25 for Operators Rates and
Page 17 of 25 for Laborers Rates. We have attached a copy of both current Laborers and
Operators Union Wage Rates Notification for your review.
ANSWER: The wage determination appeals process is identifed on page 24 and 25 of the wage decision.
2. QUESTION #5: What is the Contractor to consider damaged, striping or markings on Taxiway
A? When the Contractor plows out the existing sealant that has been painted over, it is going to remove the paint for the width of the joint and possibly 1" on either side of the joint due to flaking and chipping. Would this require restriping? Your answer in regards to the Alert Area is that you will not provide an Airfield Marking Plan and that we are just supposed to match the existing. The problem is, once the micro resurfacing is installed you will not be able to see the existing markings or striping to match the existing. Are you stating that the Contractor must make an As-Built Plan prior to the existing striping being coated over? Please clarify.
ANSWER: Striping or markings plowed out during seleant removal is considered damaged. Yes, this requires restriping. No, as-builts are not required by contractor. Marking plan after contract award may be available.
3. QUESTION #6: The answer to Question #6 stated that testing of joint seal is not required.
But, what about the waste water?
ANSWER: Waste water does not need to be tested.
Attachment 9 to
(Amendment 0002, 13 September 2017)
4. QUESTION #15: A 1 1/2'' wide x 4" deep open slot in the asphalt pavement cannot be patched with micro surfacing material. Please indicate what type of material Contractor is to install in these wide openings.
ANSWER: Polymer-modified cold asphalt
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .