A1_23-089-073 DEFAC Assessment.pdf
PDF 14 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Mold Remediation Services - Building 1075 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462625Q0062
About this file
This document is a limited environmental assessment report by TD&H Engineering for a crawlspace inspection at Building 1075, Malmstrom Air Force Base (MAFB) in Montana, conducted on June 27, 2023. The inspection focused on asbestos, mold, and bacteria in a single-story building with a partial basement and crawlspace tunnels. The crawlspace, approximately 4-4.5 feet tall, contained standing water and was identified as a confined space with potential hazards including sewage-contaminated water, bacterial growth, and mold.
Key findings include no asbestos-containing materials detected, relative humidity levels conducive to mold growth (64-87%), and the presence of potentially harmful microorganisms. Specific bacterial concerns included Listeria monocytogenes in the crawlspace, which can grow inside host cells and is considered a virulent foodborne pathogen. Mold samples revealed Stachybotrys, a genus known to produce mycotoxins that can cause negative health effects. The report recommends developing a comprehensive cleaning and remediation specification to ensure safe maintenance activities, including procedures for entry, bacterial disinfection, mold removal, ventilation, and waste management.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment FA462625Q00620001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA462625Q00620001.pdf | ||
| Questions - Final.pdf | ||
| B2_Mold Photographs Portrait.pdf | ||
| B1_Mold Photographs Landscape.pdf | ||
| D2_Mold Mechanical Room Work.pdf | ||
| D1_Mold Figure Working_Edited.pdf | ||
| C1_Original First Floor Plan with Unexcavated Crawlspace .085in=1ft.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination - SAM.pdf | ||
| SOW Mold Remediation - Bldg 1075.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA462625Q0062.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MONTANA | WASHINGTON | IDAHO | NORTH DAKOTA | PENNSYLVANIA
4 0 6 . 7 6 1 . 3 0 1 0 t d h e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m
1 8 0 0 R i v e r D r i v e N o r t h
G r e a t F a l l s , MT 5 9 4 0 1
August 4, 2023
Mr. Michael O’Brien Malmstrom Air Force Base
341 CEOE
Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402-7536
RE: LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF
CRAWLSPACE
BUILDING 1075, MALMSTROM DEFAC
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA
TD&H ENGINEERING JOB NO. 23-089-073
Dear Mr. O’Brien, TD&H Engineering, Inc. (TD&H) performed a limited asbestos, mold and bacteria inspection at the crawlspace in Building 1075, Malmstrom Air Force Base (MAFB) on June 27, 2023.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Building 1075 is a single-story structure with a partial basement and crawlspace tunnels.
The exterior walls and some rooms are constructed of concrete masonry units (CMU) that are covered by brick and stucco on the exterior and drywall on the interior. A mechanical room is in the basement with piping running from this room through the utility tunnels to other parts of the building.
We understand workers need to access the unventilated crawl space to work on failing plumbing. The crawlspace has standing water in places, and is approximately 4 – 4 ½’ tall.
Based on these conditions, the crawlspace is a confined space with a potential for dangerous atmosphere, including asbestos and the potential for sewage contaminated water, bacterial and mold growth. Representative photographs collected during the assessment are provided in Appendix A.
ASBESTOS INSPECTION
The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) 17.74.354 require an asbestos inspection be completed for all building materials prior to scheduled renovation activities to determine if asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are present. The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP – 40 CFR 61) and the ARM regulate asbestos due to the respiratory hazard that airborne asbestos fibers present. The inspection was performed by Mr. Corey League of TD&H, a technician Montana-accredited asbestos inspector, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Asbestos Hazards and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation 40 CFR 763. Documentation of accreditation is provided in Appendix B.
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 2 t d h e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m
Building materials were identified, categorized, numbered, and placed into homogeneous areas (HAs) for sample collection and laboratory analysis. The asbestos inspection was limited to building materials to be impacted by the plumbing repair activities wi thin the crawlspace. The number of samples collected from building materials identified in the inspection is based on the following:
• Surfacing Materials: Three samples for spray-applied and trowel-applied surfacing materials between 10 and 1,000 square feet (SF), five samples for surfacing materials between 1,000 and 5,000 SF, and seven samples for surfacing materials over 5,000 SF.
• Thermal System Insulation (TSI): Three samples from each HA of thermal system insulation, which may include boiler insulation, mudded fittings, and expanded vermiculite insulation.
• Miscellaneous Materials: Three samples from each HA of miscellaneous material, such as ceiling tile, sheetrock (drywall), cove base mastic, floor tile and mastic, concrete, roofing materials, and brick mortar.
• Patching Materials: At least one sample from each HA of patching material, such as replacement floor tiles or patching plaster, and materials of less than 10 SF in total area.
A total of three suspect building materials were identified during the inspection. Bulk samples were collected from the building in accordance with the currently recognized standard protocol developed under AHERA. Bulk samples were placed into containers and shipped to Crisp Analytical LLC, (CA Labs) in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the EPA Method 600/R-93/116. CA Labs is accredited through the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The point-counting technique employed by CA Labs in the analysis of these samples has a limit of detection of approximately 0.1 percent by volume when asbestos concentrations are below 1.0 percent.
All HAs are listed as “None Detected” and are shown in Table 1. The analytical report provided by CA Labs is provided in Appendix C. Sample identification and locations are shown in Appendix D as Figure 1.
Table 1 Non-Asbestos-Containing Building Materials
Building 1075 Malmstrom DEFAC, MAFB
Homogenous Area (HA)
Sample Description Location-Room
T1.1 White Cover/ Silver Foil/ Yellow Insulation Crawlspace
T8.1 Black Plastic/ Pink Insulation Crawlspace
T11.1 Black HVAC Collar/ White Insulation Crawlspace
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 3
CHEMICAL MONITORING
Ambient air measurements were collected from within the crawlspace during the time of the assessment.
Air temperature and relative humidity were measured using a HT-350 Temperature and Humidity Meter. Temperatures within the crawlspace ranged from 67 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit, and relative humidity ranged from 64% to 87%. Humidity should be below 60% (ideally 30%-50%) according to the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), the Environmental Design (LEED). The relative humidity levels measured within the crawlspace are conducive to mold growth.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon monoxide (CO), oxygen, and explosive gases (expressed as a percentage of lower explosive limit) were measured using a Scondaor portable 4 gas detector meter.
Oxygen levels within the crawlspace ranged from 20.1% to 20.2%, which are normal levels.
H2S, CO, and explosive gases were not detected.
MOLD & BACTERIA INSPECTION
A TD&H Council – Certified Indoor Environmental (CIE) conducted the sampling and inspection to ensure suspected areas for mold and bacteria were identified and tested.
Documentation of accreditation is provided in Appendix B. All mold and bacteria samples were shipped under chain-of-custody protocol to EMSL Analytical, Inc (EMSL), in Houston, Texas for analysis.
Mold Inspection
The limited mold inspection consisted of visual inspection, culturable air sampling, culturable bulk sampling, direct exam sampling, and spore trap air sampling.
• Visual Inspection: A visual inspection was conducted to determine if there was any staining on building surfaces and if detected, whether the staining may have been caused by mold growth.
• Culturable Air Sampling: Three air samples were collected from the crawlspace in the central portion of the building. One air sample was collected from the building exterior and used as a control sample. A VP-400 microbial sampler was used to pump a measured amount of air over the culture plate, depositing spores on a culturable medium contained within the sampler. The media were analyzed for visible fungus identification and density determination.
• Culturable Bulk Sampling: Four bulk samples were collected from the crawlspace floor to the northeast, south, west, and east of the kitchen access hatch. The media were analyzed for visible fungus identification and density determination.
• Direct Exam Sampling (Bulk): Four bulk samples were collected from the crawlspace at the same locations where culturable bulk samples were collected.
Samples were analyzed for viable and non-viable spore identification and density
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 4 determination.
• Spore Trap: Three air samples were collected from the crawlspace, and one was collected from the building exterior at the same locations where the culturable air samples were collected. A calibrated high-flow air pump was used to pump air through an Allergenco-D ® cassette for a measured period of time. Viable and non-viable mold spores were collected on the cassette’s medium. The cassettes were analyzed for mold identification and density determination.
Bacteria Inspection
The limited bacteria inspection consisted of culturable air sampling and a sewage screen analysis from standing water.
• Culturable Air Sampling: Three air samples were collected from the crawlspace, and one was collected from the building exterior at the same locations where the mold air samples were collected. A VP-400 microbial sampler was used to pump a measured amount of air over the culture plate, depositing bacteria on a culturable medium contained within the sampler. The samples were analyzed for bacteria identification and density determination.
• Sewage Screen: One water sample was collected from the crawlspace, east of kitchen hatch. The sample was analyzed for total Coliform, E.Coli and Enterococci.
RESULTS
The results of the mold and bacteria assessment are provided below.
Mold
Air and bulk sample locations are presented in Figure 2 within Appendix E, and laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix F.
Visual Inspection
The crawlspace has a concrete floor throughout the areas inspected. The floor was generally dry with a fine layer of sediment/dust near the basement entrance and below the utility closet located on the west side of the building. Ground conditions were damp, with a layer of brown sediment about half-way between the basement entrance and kitchen access hatch. Near the kitchen hatch conditions became wet, with an orange and brown discolored layer of sediment covering the floor. Wet floor conditions ranged at least 20’ in all directions from the kitchen access hatch. Building components generally cons isted of CMU block, concrete, metal pipes, PVC pipes, and TSI. These building materials are generally not conducive to mold growth, except for the TSI which had black discoloration in places. A leaking sewer line was observed west of the kitchen access hatch (see Photograph 6).
Cultured Air Samples
The air samples taken from the building interior indicated that the total mold spore
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 5 concentration was below that of concentration measured in the outside air (control) sample.
TABLE 2
ANALYSIS OF CULTURABLE AIR SAMPLES FOR MOLD
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Fungal Spore In The Air- Count/cubic meter (m3)
Sample ID Sample Location Fungal Identifications (CFU/m3) Total
A-C-F-01 Exterior, N
Aspergillus fumigatus 60
Aspergillus sogae 12
Aspergillus terreus 12
Chrysosporium sp. 12
Penicillium brevicompactum 540
Sterile (Dark) 12
A-C-F-02 Crawlspace, NE of
Kitchen Hatch
Aspergillus sojae 12
Chrysosporium sp. 12
Fusarium sp. 12
Penicillium brevicompactum 12
Sterile (White) 12
A-C-F-03 Crawlspace, S of
Kitchen Hatch
Penicillium decumbens 12
48 Sterile(dark) 12
Sterile(white) 24
A-C-F-04 Crawlspace, W of
Kitchen Hatch None Detected
CFU = Colony Forming Unit
Spore Trap Air Samples
The air samples taken from the building interior indicated that the total mold spore concentration was below that of concentration measured in the outside air (control) sample.
The laboratory analytical data reveal that at the time of our inspection, the airborne spore concentrations of Aspergillus/Penicillium (A/P) were only present on the south and west of kitchen hatch. This genus was not detected in the control sample. The appearance of the airborne spore of Chaetomium and Stachybotrys/Memnoniella within two of the crawlspace samples indicated wet conditions. The laboratory report also indicated that one spore of Stachybotrys/Memnoniella in south and one in the west of the kitchen hatch, but none detected in the control sample. The presence of Stachbotrys is cause for concern as this genus can produce mycotoxins that can cause negative health effects. Mycotoxins may lead to increased sensitivity and reaction to the spores as they are either inhaled or absorbed. Mycotoxins can be found on the mold spore and mold fragments; therefore, they can also be found on the substrate upon which the mold grows. Routes of entry for these substances can include ingestion, dermal exposure, and inhalation. This mold spore type has a “sticky” surface and is difficult to remove
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 6 from affected surfaces.
As can be seen in Table 3 below, most of the fungal general identified from the air samples, except for Chaetomium and Stachybotrys/Memnoniella are common and usually do not pose a health risk to healthy individuals. They may affect those who are afflicted with “hay fever”, asthma or are immune compromised. Health effects of common fungal spore genera are contained in Appendix G.
TABLE 3
ANALYSIS OF MOLD SPORES IN AIR BY DIRECT EXAM
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Fungal Spore Type - Count/cubic meter (m3)
Sample
ID
Sample Location
A lt en a ri a
U lo cl a d iu m
A sc o sp o re s
A sp er g ill u s/ P en ic ill iu m
B a si d io sp o re s
C h a et o m iu
C la d o sp o ri u
Fu sa ri
M yx o m yc et es
P it h o m yc
St ch yb o tr ys /M em n o n ie lla
To ta l F u n gi
A-ST-F-01
Exterior, North 40 1,500 0 6,670 0 2,400 40 880 40 0 11,570
A-ST-F-02
Crawlspace , NE of Kitchen Hatch 0 200 0 2,400 0 200 0 200 0 0 3,000
A-ST-F-03
Crawlspace , S of Kitchen Hatch 0 200 1,700 740 100 0 0 70 0 70 2,880
A-ST-F-04
Crawlspace , W of Kitchen Hatch 0 300 4,500 100 100 300 0 100 0 20 5,420
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 7
Culturable Bulk Sampling
The bulk samples taken from the interior indicated that the mold level in the containment area ranged from 57,000 colony forming units (CFU), located west of the kitchen hatch, to over 1,800,000 CFUs located northeast of the kitchen hatch.
TABLE 4
ANALYSIS OF CULTURABLE BULK SAMPLES FOR MOLD
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Fungal Type - CFU per gram (CFU/g)
Sample ID Sample Location Fungal Identifications (CFU/g) Total
B-C-F-01 Crawlspace, NE of
Kitchen Hatch
Aspergillus sydowii 400,000
1,800,000
Aspergillus versicolor 400,000
Cladosporium cladosporioides 300,000
Fusarium sp. 600,000
Penicillium chrysogenum 100,000
B-C-F-02 Crawlspace, S of
Kitchen Hatch
Fusarium sp. 100,000
420,000
Penicillium chrysogenum 20,000
Penicillium decumbens 100,000
Rhizopus sp. 100,000
Sterile(dark) 100,000
B-C-F-03 Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch
Aspergillus sydowii 20,000 57,000
Yeast 37,000
B-C-F-04 Crawlspace, E of 1
Kitchen Hatch
Aspergillus sydowii 200,000
1,500,000 Aspergillus versicolor 300,000
Fusarium sp. 900,000
Sterile(dark) 100,000
Direct Exam Sampling (Bulk)
Common molds typically are Ascospores, Basidiomycetes, and Cladosporium. Molds indicative of moisture impacted materials include Altenaria, Chaetomium, Memnoniella, Stachybotrys. The fungal spores identified on the bulk sample collected on the black discolored TSI contained low but detectable concentrations of Stachybotrys/Memnoniella. As described above, the presence of Stachbotrys is cause for concern as this genus can produce mycotoxins that can cause negative health effects. Zygomycetes are common around decaying plant and animal matter. The sediment on the crawlspace floor could be a source of Zygomycetes.
Medium levels of Zygomycetes may be a health concern for people.
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 8
TABLE 5
ANALYSIS OF BULK MOLD SAMPLES BY DIRECT EXAM
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Fungal Type - Density
Sample ID Sample Location
A lt en a ri a
U lo cl a d iu m
A sc o sp o re s
B a si d io sp o re s
C la d o sp o ri
M yx o m yc
St ch yb o tr ys /M em n o n ie lla
Zy go m yc
B-DE-F-01
Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen Hatch -- -- -- -- -- -- --
B-DE-F-02
Crawlspace, S of Kitchen Hatch Rare Rare -- Rare -- -- Medium
B-DE-F-03
Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch -- -- -- -- -- Low --
B-DE-F-04
Crawlspace, E of Kitchen Hatch -- Rare Rare Rare Rare -- Medium
Bold Font = Signature fungi indicating wet conditions -- = Not Detected Rare = 1 to 10 mold spores/per area analyzed Low = 11 to 100 mold spores/per area analyzed Medium = 101 to 1,000 mold spores/per area analyzed
Bacteria
Air and water sample locations are presented in Figure 3 within Appendix H, and laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix I.
Culturable Air Sampling
The results show that the control sample from the exterior was overloaded with fungus during our inspection time. Most of the bacteria genera identified from the air samples usually do not pose a health risk to heathy individuals except Listeria monocytogenes found in the northeast of the kitchen hatch. The presence of Listeria monocytogenes is cause for concern as this species can grow and reproduce inside the host’s cell and is one of the most virulent foodborne pathogens.
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 9
TABLE 6
ANALYSIS OF BACTERIA IN AIR
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Bacteria Type - Count/cubic meter (m3)
Sample ID Sample
Location Fungal Identifications (CFU/m3) Total
A-C-B-01 Exterior, N Sample overloaded with fungi
A-C-B-02 Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen Hatch
Bacillus firmus 24
Clavibacter michiganensis ss michiganensis 12
Listeria monocytogenes 36
Lysinibacillus fusiformis 12
Staphylococcus hominis ss novobiosepticus 12
A-C-B-03 Crawlspace, S of Kitchen Hatch
Bacillus decisifrondis 60
Bacillus simplex/butanolivorans 24
Bacillus thuringiensis/cereus 12
Bacillus weihenstephanensus/ cereus 12
A-C-B-04 Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch
Bacillus atrophaeus/subtilis 36
Bacillus thuringiensis/cereus 36
Lysinibacillus sphaericus 120
Sewage Screen
Results of laboratory analysis of the water sample collected from the crawlspace indicated that the total coliform, E. Coli, and Enterococcus concentration was not found during our inspection time.
TABLE 7
ANALYSIS OF BACTERIA BY WATER
BUILDING 1075 DEFAC, MAFB
Bacteria Type - Most Probable Number (MPN)/ 100mL
Sample ID Sample Location
Total Coliform (MPN/100 mL)
E. coli (MPN/100 mL)
Enterococcus (MPN/100 mL)
W-B-01 Crawlspace <1 <1 <1
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 10
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our observations and data review, TD&H makes the following recommendations.
Chemical Monitoring
Air monitoring in accordance with confined space protocols should be used when personnel enter the crawlspace.
Asbestos
Since all the samples were analyzed as “none detected,” no further action relative to asbestos is required before the repair work may begin.
Mold & Bacteria
Based on the results of TD&H’s visual assessment and analytical data reports, a specification for cleaning and remediation should be developed to provide an environment that is safe for people performing maintenance activities in the crawlspace. The work plan should include, but not limited to, the following:
▪ Specifications for cleaning and remediation o Mobilization: Personnel & Equipment o Tasks
▪ Crawl Space
▪ Procedures/Requirements before Entering and Exiting the Work Area
▪ Bacterial Disinfection
▪ Mold Removal
▪ Active Ventilation System
▪ Clean-Up and Removal
▪ Waste Management o Health & Safety Plan o Cleanup Levels o Schedule and Work Plan Approval
LIMITATIONS
This assessment report was prepared based on information gathered during one site visit and interpretations of laboratory analytical results provided by CA Labs and EMSL.
Organisms respond to changes to environmental conditions and changes in fungal and bacteria populations and growth may occur relatively rapidly. Control of environmental conditions within the structure, particularly moisture, is therefore paramount.
This assessment report is intended for use by Malmstrom Air Force Base and its clients.
The scope of services performed by TD&H may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re-use of this document, or the findings presented herein is at the sole risk of the user.
August 4, 2023 PAGE NO. 11
CLOSING
We appreciate this opportunity to provide these industrial hygiene consulting services to you and look forward to assisting you through the remainder of the project. Should you have questions or need further clarification about information contained herein, please feel free to contact us at (406) 761-3010.
Sincerely, Thuy Nguyen Industrial Hygiene Technician
TD&H ENGINEERING
Corey League CHMM, CIE Matt McGee, PE Project Manager Civil Engineer/Principal
TD&H ENGINEERING TD&H ENGINEERING
APPENDICES: A PHOTOGRAPHS
B DOCUMENTATION OF ACCREDITATION
C ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT
D ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
E MOLD SAMPLE LOCATIONS
F MOLD LABORATORY REPORTS
G FUNGAL SPORE TYPE HEALTH EFFECTS
H BACTERIA SAMPLE LOCATIONS
I BACTERIA SAMPLE RESULTS
APPENDIX A
PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 1_Exterior(Control) Air Sample Location
Photo 3_Ground Condition NE Of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 2_NE Of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 4_South Of Kitchen Access Hatch
June 27, 2023 Inspection Photos
Photo 5_Ground Conditions South Of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 7_Deteriorated Pipe Insulation With Stachybotrys Mold West of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 6_West Of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 8_Ground Condition West Of Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 9_Pooled Water Near Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 11_Non-Asbestos Flexible Ventilation Duct
Photo 10_Pipe Insulation Debris Pile Near Kitchen Access Hatch
Photo 12_Non-Asbestos Ventilation Duct
APPENDIX B
DOCUMENTATION OF ACCREDITATION
hereby certifies that
H. Corey League has met all the specific standards and qualifications of the re-certification process, including continued professional development, and is hereby re-certified as a
CIE
Council-certified
Indoor Environmentalist
This certificate expires on September 30, 2024.
This certificate remains the property of the American Council for Accredited Certification.
American Council for Accredited Certification
Charles F. Wiles, Executive Director Certificate Number
1409017 has met the requirements of Montana Administrative Rule
17.74.362 and/or 17.74.363 for accreditation in the following asbestos occupation(s) through the specified expiration date(s).
THI ANH THUY NGUYEN
T H
I A
N H
T H
U Y
N G
U Y
E N
8T H
S T
R E
E T
N O
R T
H G
R E
A T
F A
L L
S M
T
MTA-6185
Asbestos Inspector 03/15/2024
MT DEQ Asbestos Control Program
APPENDIX C
ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT
Attn:
Customer Project:
Reference #: Date: 7/5/2023
Analysis and Method
Discussion
Qualifications
Some samples (floor tiles, surfacings, etc.) may contain fibers too small to be detectable by PLM analysis and should be analyzed by TEM bulk protocols.
A "trace asbestos" will be reported if the analyst observes far less than 1% asbestos. CA Labs defines "trace asbestos" as a few fibers detected by the analyst in several preparations and will indicate as such under these circumstances.
Quantification of <1% will actually be reported as <=1% (allowable variance close to 1% is high). Such results are ideal for point counting, and the technique is mandatory for friable samples (NESHAP, Nov. 1990 and clarification letter 8 May 1991) under 1% percent asbestos and the "trace asbestos". In order to make all initial PLM reports issued from CA Labs NESHAP compliant, all <1% asbestos results (except floor tiles) will be point counted at no additional charge.
CA Labs is accredited by the National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for selected test methods for airborne fiber analysis (TEM), and for bulk asbestos fiber analysis (PLM). All analysts have a college degree in a natural science (geology, biology, or environmental science) or are recognized by a state professional board in one these disciplines .Extensive in-house training programs are used to augment education background of the analyst. The group leader of polarized light has received supplemental McCrone Research training for asbestos identification. This report is not covered by the scope of AIHA accreditation. Analysis performed at CA Labs, LLC 12232 Industriplex, Suite 32 Baton Rouge, LA 70809.
1800 River Drive North
Great Falls, MT 59401 Building 1075
CBR23065032
Summary of polarizing light microscopy (PLM / Stereomicroscopy bulk asbestos analysis) using the methods described in 40CFR Part 763
Appendix E to Subpart E (Interim and EPA 600 / R-93 / 116 (Improved). The sample is first viewed with the aid of stereomicroscopy. Numerous liquid slide preparations are created for analysis under the polarized microscope where identifications and quantifications are preformed. Calibrated liquid refractive oils are used as liquid mouting medium. These oils are used for identification (dispersion staining). A calibrated visual estimation is reported, should any asbestiform mineral be present. Other techniques such as acid washing are used in conjugation with refractive oils for detection of smaller quantities of asbestos. All asbestos percentages are based on calibrated visual estimation traceable to NIST standards for regulated of asbestos. Traceability to measurement and calibration is achieved by using known amounts and types of asbestos from standards where analyst and laboratory accuracy are measured. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 0.50% (well above the laboratory definition of trace).
Vermiculite containing samples may have trace amounts of actinolite-tremolite, where not found be PLM should be analyzed using TEM methods and / or water separation techniques. Suspected actinolite/vermiculite presence will be indicated through the sample comment section of this report.
Fibrous talc containing samples may even contain a related asbestos fiber known as anthophyllite. Under certain conditions the same fiber may actually contain both talc and anthophyllite (a phenomenon called intergrowth). Again, TEM detection methods are recommended. CA Labs PLM report comments will denote suspected amounts of asbestiform anthophyllite with talc, where further analysis is recommended.
CA Labs
Dedicated to
Quality
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Phone 225-751-5632
Fax 225-751-5634
NVLAP #200772-0
TDSHS #300370
CDPHE #AL-18111
LELAP #03069
Materials Characterization - Bulk Asbestos Analysis Laboratory Analysis Report - Polarized Light
TD & H Engineering Corey League
Labs
A
Overview of Project Sample Material Containing Asbestos
Customer Project: Building 1075 CA Labs Project #: CBR23065032
No Asbestos Detected.
Glossary of abbreviations (non-asbestos fibers and non-fibrous minerals):
This report relates to the items tested. This report is not to be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, LLC, or any other agency of the federal government. This report may not be reproduced except in full without written permission from CA Labs. These results are submitted pursuant to CA Labs' current terms and sale, condition of sale, including the company's standard warranty and limitations of liability provisions and no responsibility or liability is assumed for the manner in which the results are used or interpreted. Unless notified in writing to return the samples covered by this report, CA Labs will store the samples for a period of ninety (90) days before discarding. A shipping or handling fee may be assessed for the return of any samples.
ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot - other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay)
CA Labs
Dedicated to
Quality
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Phone 225-751-5632
Fax 225-751-5634
NVLAP #200772-0
TDSHS #300370
CDPHE #AL-18111
LELAP #03069
Sample # Layer
Analysts Physical Description of
Subsample
Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent
List of Affected Building
Material Types
Labs
A
Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization
Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:
7/5/2023
5 day 6/29/2023
Phone # 6/27/2023
Fax # 23-089-073
Laboratory Director
Chris Williams
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < 1% Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Zo Andriampenomanana Senior Analyst
Analyst Alicia Stretz
100% fg
Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
T1.1C-
2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected
100% qu, ma, ca
T1.1C T1.1C-
1 Tan Wrap with Foil N None Detected
10% fg
60% ce 30% qu, ma, ot
T1.1B-
3 Gray Plaster Y None Detected
10% fg
60% ce 30% qu, ma, ot
T1.1B-
2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg
T1.1B T1.1B-
1 Tan Wrap with Foil N None Detected
30% qu, ma, ot
T1.1A-
2 Yellow Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg
Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent
Non-asbestos fiber type / percent
Non-fibrous type
/ percent
T1.1A T1.1A-
1 Tan Wrap with Foil N None Detected
10% fg
60% ce
406-761-3010 Date Of Sampling:
406-727-2872 Purchase Order #:
Sample # Com ment
Layer
Analysts Physical Description of
Subsample
Homo-geneo us
(Y/N)
TD & H Engineering Building 1075 CBR23065032
1800 River Drive North
Great Falls, MT 59401 Date:
Turnaround Time: Samples Received:
CA Labs
Dedicated to
Quality
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Phone 225-751-5632
Fax 225-751-5634
NVLAP #200772-0
TDSHS #300370
CDPHE #AL-18111
LELAP #03069
Corey League CA Labs Project #:
Labs
A
Polarized Light Asbestiform Materials Characterization
Customer Info: Attn: Customer Project:
7/5/2023
5 day 6/29/2023
Phone # 6/27/2023
Fax # 23-089-073
Laboratory Director
Chris Williams
1. Fire Damage significant fiber damage - reported percentages reflect unaltered fibers
2. Fire Damage no significant fiber damages effecting fibrous percentages
3. Actinolite in association with Vermiculite
4. Layer not analyzed - attached to previous positive layer and contamination is suspected
5. Not enough sample to analyze
6. Anthophyllite in association with Fibrous Talc
7. Contamination suspected from other building materials
8. Favorable scenario for water separation on vermiculite for possible analysis by another method
9. < 1% Result point counted positive
10. TEM analysis suggested
Zo Andriampenomanana Senior Analyst
Analyst Alicia Stretz
Analysis Method: Interim (40CFR Part 763 Appendix E to Subpart E) / Improved (EPA-600 / R-93/116)
Preparation Method: HCL acid washing for carbonate based samples, chemical reduction for organically bound components, oil immersion for identification of asbestos types by dispersion attaining / becke line method.
ca - carbonate gypsum - gypsum bi - binder or - organic ma - matrix mi - mica ve - vermiculite ot -other pe - perlite qu - quartz fg - fiberglass mw - mineral wool wo - wollastinite ta - talc sy - synthetic ce - cellulose br - brucite ka - kaolin (clay) pa - palygorskite (clay) Approved Signatories:
100% qu, ma, ot
T11.1-
2 White Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg
T11.1 T11.1-
1 Black Sealant Y None Detected
100% ot
T8.1-
2 Pink Fibrous Insulation Y None Detected 100% fg
Asbestos type / calibrated visual estimate percent
Non-asbestos fiber type / percent
Non-fibrous type
/ percent
T8.1 T8.1-
1 Black Covering Y None Detected
406-761-3010 Date Of Sampling:
406-727-2872 Purchase Order #:
Sample # Com ment
Layer
Analysts Physical Description of
Subsample
Homo-geneo us
(Y/N)
TD & H Engineering Building 1075 CBR23065032
1800 River Drive North
Great Falls, MT 59401 Date:
Turnaround Time: Samples Received:
CA Labs
Dedicated to
Quality
CA Labs, L.L.C.
12232 Industriplex, Suite 32
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Phone 225-751-5632
Fax 225-751-5634
NVLAP #200772-0
TDSHS #300370
CDPHE #AL-18111
LELAP #03069
Corey League CA Labs Project #:
Labs
A
APPENDIX D
ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Asbestos-Containing Material
Non Asbestos-Containing Material
LEGEND
X0.0X
X0.0X
B u il d in g
D
E F
A C
M
A F
B
A s b e s to s S a m p le
L o c a ti o n s
F ig u re
T1.1C
T8.1
T1.1B
T1.1A
T11.1
Kitchen Access Hatch
Project North
APPENDIX E
MOLD SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Mold Air Sample - Cultured
LEGEND
A-C-F-0#
B u il d in g
D E
F A
C M
A F
B
M o ld S a m p le
L o c a ti o n s
F ig u re
A-C-F-02
A-ST-F-02
B-C-F-01
B-DE-F-01
A-C-F-03
A-ST-F-03
B-C-F-02
B-DE-F-02
A-C-F-04
A-ST-F-04
B-C-F-03
B-DE-F-03
Kitchen Access Hatch
A-C-F-01
A-ST-F-01
Exterior (Control) Samples
Mold Air Sample - Spore Trap
Mold Bulk Sample - Cultured
Mold Bulk Sample - Direct Exam
A-ST-F-0#
B-C-F-0#
B-DE-F-0#
B-C-F-04
B-DE-F-04
APPENDIX F
MOLD LABORATORY REPORTS
Sample Description Location
Volume
(L) Fungal Identification
Colony CountMedia
Incubation Temp (C)
Sensitivity (CFU/m³) CFU/m³
Test Report: Viable Fungi Identification and Enumeration from Impactors (Including Speciation of Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Stachybotrys (EMSL Method
MICRO-SOP-202)
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd., Houston, TX 77040 Phone/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645 http://www.EMSL.com houstonlab@emsl.com
Attn: Corey League Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.
1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401
Received: 6/29/2023 10:00 AM
MAFB Building 107
Fax: (406) 727-2872 Phone: (406) 761-3010
Project:
7/14/2023Analysis Date:
6/27/2023Collected:
152303811 CustomerID: TDHI78 CustomerPO: 23-089-073 ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
A-C-F-01 152303811-0001
Exterior, N 85 MEA 25 12 Aspergillus fumigatus 5 60 Aspergillus sogae 1 12 Aspergillus terreus 1 12 Chrysosporium sp. 1 12 Penicillium brevicompactum 45 540 Sterile(dark) 1 12
54 648Total A-C-F-02
152303811-0002
Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen Hatch
85 MEA 25 12 Aspergillus sojae 1 12 Chrysosporium sp. 1 12 Fusarium sp. 1 12 Penicillium brevicompactum 1 12 Sterile(white) 1 12
5 60Total A-C-F-03
152303811-0003
Crawlspace, S of Kitchen Hatch
85 MEA 25 12 Penicillium decumbens 1 12 Sterile(dark) 1 12 Sterile(white) 2 24
4 48Total A-C-F-04
152303811-0004
Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch
85 None DetectedMEA 25 12
No discernable blank was submitted with this group of samples.
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 1Test Report ViableFungi-7.26.0 Printed: 7/14/2023 3:40:19 PM
Analyst(s)
Terri Lawrence, Lab Manager or other approved signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.
Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.
Positive hole correction factors have not been applied to the reported data. The detection limit is equal to 1 colony forming unit (CFU) per agar plate.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX AIHA LAP, LLC-EMLAP Accredited #102575
Ramadi Muntaha (4)
Initial report from 07/14/2023 15:40:19 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:houstonlab@emsl.com
OrderID: 152303811 http://www.EMSL.com / houstonlab@emsl.com
Tel/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645
5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd. Houston, TX 77040
EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 152303872
Customer ID: TDHI78
Customer PO: 23-089-073
Project ID:
Attention: (406) 761-3010Phone: Corey League
Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc. (406) 727-2872Fax:
1800 River Drive North Collected Date: 06/27/2023
Great Falls, MT 59401 Received Date: 06/29/2023
Analyzed Date: 07/14/2023
Project: MAFB Building 1075
Test Report: Allergenco-D(™) Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods MICRO-SOP-201, ASTM D7391)
Lab Sample Number:
Client Sample ID:
Volume (L):
Sample Location:
152303872-0001
A-ST-F-01
Exterior, North
152303872-0002
A-ST-F-02
Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen Hatch
152303872-0003
A-ST-F-03
Crawlspace, S of Kitchen Hatch
Spore Types Raw Count Count/m³ % of Total Raw Count Count/m³ % of Total Raw Count Count/m³ % of Total
Alternaria (Ulocladium) 1 40 0.3 - - - - - -
Ascospores 34 1500 13 3 200 6.7 3 200 6.9
Aspergillus/Penicillium - - - - - - 23 1700 59
Basidiospores 151 6670 57.6 33 2400 80 10 740 25.7
Bipolaris++ - - - - - - - - -
Chaetomium++ - - - - - - 2 100 3.5
Cladosporium 55 2400 20.7 3 200 6.7 - - -
Curvularia - - - - - - - - -
Epicoccum - - - - - - - - -
Fusarium++ 1 40 0.3 - - - - - -
Ganoderma - - - - - - - - -
Myxomycetes++ 20 880 7.6 3 200 6.7 1 70 2.4
Pithomyces++ 1 40 0.3 - - - - - -
Rust - - - - - - - - -
Scopulariopsis/Microascus - - - - - - - - -
Stachybotrys/Memnoniella - - - - - - 1 70 2.4
Unidentifiable Spores - - - - - - - - -
Zygomycetes - - - - - - - - -
Total Fungi 263 11570 100 42 3000 100 40 2880 100
Hyphal Fragment - - - - - - - - -
Insect Fragment - - - - - - - - -
Pollen - - - - - - 1 70 -
Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 44 - - 74 - - 74 -
Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 13* - - 22* - - 22* -
Skin Fragments (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - - 1 -
Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - 1 - - 1 -
Background (1-5) - 2 - - 2 - - 3 -
Terri Lawrence, Lab Manager or other Approved Signatory
++ Includes other spores with similar morphology; see EMSL's fungal glossary for each specific category.
No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples.
Skin Fragment and Fibrous Particulate ratings are based on the percent of non-fungal material they represent: 1 (1-25%), 2 (26-50%), 3 (51-75%), or 4 (76-100%). Background ratings are based on the total area covered by non-fungal particles: 1 (1-25%), 2 (26-50%), 3 (51-75%), 4 (76-99%), or 5 (100%; overloaded, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification). High levels of background will obscure spores and other particulates, leading to underestimation.
Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment. "*" Denotes particles found at 300X. "-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts in excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received. When the information supplied by the customer can affect the validity of the result, it will be noted on the report.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX AIHA LAP, LLC-EMLAP Accredited #102575
Initial report from: 07/14/2023 09:33 AM
For information on the fungi listed in this report, please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com
Page 1 of 2Test Report - STVER3-2.24 Printed 07/14/2023 09:33 AM
5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd. Houston, TX 77040
EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 152303872
Customer ID: TDHI78
Customer PO: 23-089-073
Project ID:
Attention: (406) 761-3010Phone: Corey League
Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc. (406) 727-2872Fax:
1800 River Drive North Collected Date: 06/27/2023
Great Falls, MT 59401 Received Date: 06/29/2023
Analyzed Date: 07/14/2023
Project: MAFB Building 1075
Test Report: Allergenco-D(™) Analysis of Fungal Spores & Particulates by Optical Microscopy (Methods MICRO-SOP-201, ASTM D7391)
Lab Sample Number:
Client Sample ID:
Volume (L):
Sample Location:
152303872-0004
A-ST-F-04
Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch
152303872-9901
Dummy
Dummy
Dummy
152303872-9902
Dummy
Dummy
Dummy
Spore Types Raw Count Count/m³ % of Total - - - - - -
Alternaria (Ulocladium) - - - - - - - - -
Ascospores 4 300 5.5 - - - - - -
Aspergillus/Penicillium 61 4500 83 - - - - - -
Basidiospores 2 100 1.8 - - - - - -
Bipolaris++ - - - - - - - - -
Chaetomium++ 2 100 1.8 - - - - - -
Cladosporium 4 300 5.5 - - - - - -
Curvularia - - - - - - - - -
Epicoccum - - - - - - - - -
Fusarium++ - - - - - - - - -
Ganoderma - - - - - - - - -
Myxomycetes++ 2 100 1.8 - - - - - -
Pithomyces++ - - - - - - - - -
Rust - - - - - - - - -
Scopulariopsis/Microascus - - - - - - - - -
Stachybotrys/Memnoniella 1* 20* 0.4 - - - - - -
Unidentifiable Spores - - - - - - - - -
Zygomycetes - - - - - - - - -
Total Fungi 76 5420 100 - - - - - -
Hyphal Fragment 1 70 - - - - - - -
Insect Fragment - - - - - - - - -
Pollen - - - - - - - - -
Analyt. Sensitivity 600x - 74 - - - - - - -
Analyt. Sensitivity 300x - 22* - - - - - - -
Skin Fragments (1-4) - 1 - - - - - - -
Fibrous Particulate (1-4) - 1 - - - - - - -
Background (1-5) - 3 - - - - - - -
Terri Lawrence, Lab Manager or other Approved Signatory
++ Includes other spores with similar morphology; see EMSL's fungal glossary for each specific category.
No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples.
Skin Fragment and Fibrous Particulate ratings are based on the percent of non-fungal material they represent: 1 (1-25%), 2 (26-50%), 3 (51-75%), or 4 (76-100%). Background ratings are based on the total area covered by non-fungal particles: 1 (1-25%), 2 (26-50%), 3 (51-75%), 4 (76-99%), or 5 (100%; overloaded, prohibiting accurate detection and quantification). High levels of background will obscure spores and other particulates, leading to underestimation.
Present = Spores detected on overloaded samples. Results are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted. The detection limit is equal to one fungal spore, structure, pollen, fiber particle or insect fragment. "*" Denotes particles found at 300X. "-" Denotes not detected. Due to method stopping rules, raw counts in excess of 100 are extrapolated based on the percentage analyzed. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received. When the information supplied by the customer can affect the validity of the result, it will be noted on the report.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX AIHA LAP, LLC-EMLAP Accredited #102575
Initial report from: 07/14/2023 09:33 AM
For information on the fungi listed in this report, please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com
Page 2 of 2Test Report - STVER3-2.24 Printed 07/14/2023 09:33 AM
OrderID: 152303872
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd., Houston, TX 77040 Phone/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645 http://www.EMSL.com houstonlab@emsl.com
Attn: Corey League Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.
1800 River Drive North Great Falls, MT 59401
Received: 6/29/2023 10:00 AM
MAFB Building 1075
Fax: (406) 727-2872 Phone: (406) 761-3010
Project:
7/18/2023Analysis Date:
6/27/2023Collected:
152303810 CustomerID: TDHI78 CustomerPO: 23-089-073 ProjectID:
EMSL Order:
Sample Description Dilution Fungal Identification
Colony Count
Temp (C)
CFUs
Sample Measure
( CFU/g )
Analytical Sensitivity
( CFU/g )(g )Sample Location Percent of Total
Test Report: Identification and Enumeration of Culturable Fungi by Bulk (Including Speciation of Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, and Stachybotrys
(EMSL Method MICRO-SOP-202))
B-C-F-01
152303810-0001 MEA
25 1Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen Hatch Media:
Aspergillus sydowii 4 400,000100000100,000 22.2 Aspergillus versicolor 4 400,000100000100,000 22.2 Cladosporium cladosporioides 3 300,000100000100,000 16.7 Fusarium sp. 6 600,000100000100,000 33.3 Penicillium chrysogenum 1 100,000100000100,000 5.6 Total 18 1,800,000
B-C-F-02
152303810-0002 MEA
25 1Crawlspace, S of Kitchen Hatch Media:
Fusarium sp. 1 100,000100000100,000 23.8 Penicillium chrysogenum 2 20,0001000010,000 4.8 Penicillium decumbens 10 100,0001000010,000 23.8 Rhizopus sp. 1 100,000100000100,000 23.8 Sterile(dark) 10 100,0001000010,000 23.8 Total 24 420,000
B-C-F-03
152303810-0003 MEA
25 1Crawlspace, W of Kitchen Hatch Media:
Aspergillus sydowii 2 20,0001000010,000 35.1 Yeast 37 37,00010001000 64.9 Total 39 57,000
B-C-F-04
152303810-0004 MEA
25 1Crawlspace, E of Kitchen Hatch Media:
Aspergillus sydowii 2 200,000100000100,000 13.3 Aspergillus versicolor 3 300,000100000100,000 20.0 Fusarium sp. 9 900,000100000100,000 60.0 Sterile(dark) 1 100,000100000100,000 6.7 Total 15 1,500,000
No discernable blank was submitted with this group of samples
Terri Lawrence, Lab Manager or other approved signatory
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT. 1Test Report CultFung_7.35.9 Printed: 7/20/2023 5:02:19 PM
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received.
Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.
The detection limit is equal to 1 colony forming unit (CFU) per agar plate.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX AIHA LAP, LLC-EMLAP Accredited #102575
Ramadi Muntaha (4)
Initial report from 07/20/2023 17:02:19
OrderID: 152303810
5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd. Houston, TX 77040
EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL Order: 152303873
Customer ID: TDHI78
Customer PO: 23-089-073
Project ID:
Attention: (406) 761-3010Phone: Corey League
Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc. (406) 727-2872Fax:
1800 River Drive North Collected Date: 06/27/2023
Great Falls, MT 59401 Received Date: 06/30/2023
Analyzed Date: 07/14/2023
Project: MAFB Building 1075
Test Report: Microscopic Examination of Fungal Spores, Fungal Structures, Hyphae, and Other
Particulates from Bulk Samples (EMSL Method MICRO-SOP-200)
Lab Sample Number:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Location:
152303873-0001
B-DE-F-01
152303873-0002
B-DE-F-02
152303873-0003
B-DE-F-03
152303873-0004
B-DE-F-04
152303873-9901
Dummy
Crawlspace, NE of Kitchen
Hatch
Crawlspace, S of Kitchen
Hatch
Crawlspace, W of Kitchen
Hatch
Crawlspace, E of Kitchen
Hatch Dummy
Spore Types Category Category Category Category -
Alternaria (Ulocladium) - Rare - - -
Ascospores - Rare - Rare -
Aspergillus/Penicillium - - - - -
Basidiospores - - - Rare -
Bipolaris++ - - - - -
Chaetomium++ - - - - -
Cladosporium - Rare - Rare -
Curvularia - - - - -
Epicoccum - - - - -
Fusarium++ - - - - -
Ganoderma - - - - -
Myxomycetes++ - - - Rare -
Pithomyces++ - - - - -
Rust - - - - -
Scopulariopsis/Microascus - - - - -
Stachybotrys/Memnoniella - - Low - -
Unidentifiable Spores - - - - -
Zygomycetes - *Medium* - Medium -
Hyphal Fragment - - - - -
Insect Fragment - - - - -
Pollen - - - - -
Fibrous Particulate Rare Rare Low Low -
Category: Count/per area analyzed - Rare: 1 to 10 Low: 11 to 100 Medium: 101 to 1000 High: >1000
- Denotes Not Detected.
++ Includes other spores with similar morphology; see EMSL's fungal glossary for each specific category.
* = Sample contains fruiting structures and/or hyphae associated with the spores.
Terri Lawrence, Lab Manager or other Approved Signatory
No discernable field blank was submitted with this group of samples.
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received. Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX AIHA LAP, LLC-EMLAP Accredited #102575, Texas Mold LAB0105
Initial report from: 07/14/2023 08:47 AM
For information on the fungi listed in this report, please visit the Resources section at www.emsl.com
Page 1 of 1Test Report DEVER1-2.9.0 Printed 07/14/2023 08:47 AM
OrderID: 152303873
APPENDIX G
FUNGAL SPORE TYPE HEALTH EFFECTS
FUNGAL SPORE HEALTH RISKS
Fungal Spore Type Health Risk (EMSL Fugal Glossary)
Alternaria
Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Type III (Hypersensitivity)
Arthrinium Arthrinium sphaerospermum is recognized as an allergen
Ascospores Depends on Species
Basidiospores
Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Type III (Hypersensitivity)
Aspergillus
Allergic Bronchopulmonary
Aspergillosis (ABPA)
Aspergillus Sinusitis
Invasive Aspergillsis
Penicillium
Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Type III (Hypersensitivity)
Bipolaris
Allergic and Chronic
Invasive Sinusitis
Cercospora Unknown
Chaetomium Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Cladosporium Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Curvularia
Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Allergic Fungal Sinusitis
Epicoccum Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Fusarium Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Ganoderma Know to Cause Allergies
Myxomycetes Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Oidium Unknown
Nigrospora Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Pithomyces Unknown
Scopulariopsis Type III (Hypersensitivity)
Sordaria Unknown
Spegazzinia Unknown
Stachybotrys Type I (hay fever, asthma)
Ulocladium
Type I (Asthma and Hay Fever)
Exacerbates effects of Alternaria
APPENDIX H
BACTERIA SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Bacteria Air Sample
LEGEND
A-C-B-0#
B u il d in g
D E
F A
C M
A F
B
B a c te ri a S a m p le
L o c a ti o n s
F ig u re
A-C-B-02
A-C-B-03
A-C-B-04
Kitchen Access Hatch
Bacteria Water SampleW-B-01
W-B-01
A-C-B-01 Exterior (Control)
APPENDIX I
BACTERIA SAMPLE REPORTS
Description Location
Volume
(L) Bacteria Identification
Colony CountMedia
Incubation Temp (C)
Sensitivity (CFU/m³) CFU/m³
Test Report: Identification and Enumeration of Culturable Bacteria by Air (Five Most Prominent Types (EMSL Method MICRO-SOP-132))
EMSL Analytical,…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .