Amend 4 SF30.pdf

EXCEPTION OF SF 30, APPROVED BY NARS 5/79

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FA462026QA210

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

7 May 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

CODE

FA4620 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

CODE

92nd Contracting Sq./PKA 110 W Ent St., Suite 200 SAME AS BLOCK 6 Fairchild AFB, WA 99011 Attn: kathleen.rauch@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (√) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

FA462026QA210

All Offerors 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14 April 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[X] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [X] is extended, [] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning _1_ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [] is not, [X] is required to sign this document and return _1_ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10 A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

KATHLEEN L. RAUCH, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105-03 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FA462026QA210

Amendment 0004 Page 2

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional responses to questions submitted by prospective contractors, to revise the Statement of Work, to revise the COMBO, and to extend the due date.

1. Responses to Contractor Questions All questions and answers are provided below. All applicable revisions have been incorporated into Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV2).

Q1: Appendix C2 lists 305 buildings that will need to be surveyed with potable water. The solicitation states entirety of the premise (transmission and distribution lines). Please confirm the number of buildings contractors should base their quotes on.

A1: For bidding purposes, contractors must base their proposals on surveying the entire water system, not just a fixed number of buildings. The system includes approximately 490,000 linear feet of piping (distribution, transmission, and service lines) and an estimated 500 total connections requiring survey.

Of those 500 connections, approximately 305 are located within facilities (buildings). The provided appendices list known components but are not all-inclusive.

Q2: What must be surveyed at the GSU system? The entire system or only the containment assemblies (Point of service). What are the distances to each of the 5 Geographically Separated Units to account for travel and time from Fairchild AFB?

A2: The survey at the GSUs must cover the entirety of the water system, including both premise and in-premise protection, not just containment assemblies at the point of service. The approximate one-way travel distances from Fairchild AFB to the GSUs are as follows:

Ft. Wright Wells & Cemetery: 10 miles Geiger Reservoir: 7 miles White Bluff: 9 miles Ruby Creek: 90 miles Tacoma Creek: 74 miles Clear Lake Recreation Area: 17 miles

Q3: Is Appendix D included in these locations of 305 buildings? It appears 12 locations have DC assemblies that will need to be surveyed and inspected.

A3: The survey of the irrigation devices listed in Appendix D is required as part of the overall scope of work. However, these device locations are separate from the 305 facilities identified in Appendix C2.

Contractors should account for the Appendix D locations as part of the broader ~500 total connections across the entirety of the premise.

Q4: Will Fairchild AFB, WA provide a person to escort and assist in access to each building with potable water?

A4: Yes. In accordance with SOW Sections 4.4 and 6.1.2, a Fairchild AFB CE Water Shop representative will be available to aid in the location of devices and provide necessary access.

Q5: Can the attached Form 848 be used to conduct the cross-connection survey?

Amendment 0004 Page 3

A5: Yes. The provided Microsoft Word version of the AF Form 848 is an acceptable equivalent, provided that all data fields required by the official form are included and the final deliverable is compatible with Microsoft Office, as per SOW Section 5.2.4.

Q6: The SOW (Section 6.2.2) explicitly requires 'appropriate Washington State certifications.' A prospective contractor holds certifications from other states (Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa) as well as the American Backflow Prevention Association (ABPA). Please confirm if out-of-state or national ABPA certifications are acceptable, or if it is a strict requirement that the team lead holds a certification specifically issued by the State of Washington.

A6: No. In accordance with SOW Section 6.2.2, the team lead is strictly required to hold an active certification specifically issued by the State of Washington (e.g., Washington State-certified Cross- Connection Control Specialist). Please note that the State of Washington may offer reciprocity options for individuals holding out-of-state or national certifications, which contractors may pursue independently to meet this requirement.

Q7: When was the last time these similar surveys were conducted?

A7: The last verifiable comprehensive report was completed in 2008. Please note that the data provided in the solicitation appendices is informational. In accordance with the Statement of Work, the contractor is required to perform a 100% physical survey to field-verify all current devices, conditions, and connections across the entirety of the premise.

Q8: For the fire protection systems, is the scope of work limited to locating and inspecting the Backflow Prevention Devices (BFDs)?

A8: No. In accordance with SOW Section 3.2.3, the contractor must inspect the fire protection systems for all potential cross-connections, assess the associated BFDs for proper selection and installation, and determine the boundary for non-potable systems. The work is not limited to locating BFDs.

Q9: Is the overall project scope limited to surveying BFDs?

A9: No. As stated in SOW Sections 1 and 3, this is a comprehensive cross-connection survey of the entirety of the water system, including all piping and connections. The evaluation of existing BFDs is only one component of this comprehensive survey.

Q10: Is the contractor required to perform functional tests on devices or conduct water quality sampling?

A10: No. The scope is limited to a physical, visual survey. As stated in SOW Sections 3.2.1.2, 3.2.2.2, and 3.2.3.2, a "physical evaluation of devices' function is not necessary," and there is no requirement for water quality sampling or testing.

2. Revised Statement of Work

Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV1) is hereby replaced with Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV2). Attachment 1: Statement of Work (REV2) supersedes and replaces all previous versions of the Statement of Work. There is no change to the SOW Appendices.

3. Revised Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (COMBO) FAR Provision 52.222-90 Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors has been added to the

COMBO.

Amendment 0004 Page 4

26QA210 COMBO (REV1) is hereby replaced with 26QA210 COMBO (REV2). 26QA210 COMBO (REV2) supersedes and replaces all previous versions of the COMBO.

4. RFQ Due Date Extension The RFQ due date/time 08 May 2026 / 10:00 AM PT is hereby extended to 13 May 2026 /

10:00 AM PT.

All other items remain unchanged.

Fill out blocks 15a, 15b, and 15c and provide a copy with your proposal.

END SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Attachments:

26QA210 COMBO (REV2)

Attachment 1 – Statement of Work (REV2) Question 5: Attachment – AF FORM 848.docx

7 May 2026