C2SES_III_Contracting_Industry_Day.pptx
PPTX presentation 161 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C2SES III
- Solicitation number
- FA4600-16-R-0007
About this file
See the attached Industry Day Contracting Briefing.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Command and Control Software Engineering and Support III (C2SES III)
Industry Day
9 June 2016 Contracting Officer: Ms. Theresa Bryant, 55 CONS/LGCZ
Acquisition Strategy Full and Open Competition Period of Performance: five year ordering period: 1 Oct 17 – 30 Sep 22 (six month extension through 31 Mar 2023) Single Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract Sustainment and Maintenance TO 0001 to be awarded upon IDIQ award.
One month transition period on TO 0001 Future growth CLINs on additional Task Orders available for forthcoming efforts Small Business goal of 15% NAICS Code: 541511, Custom Computer Programming Services Task Order Types:
Cost Plus Incentive Fee – Technical Support/Future Growth Cost Plus Fixed Fee - Technical Support/Future Growth Firm Fixed Price – Technical Support/Future Growth Firm Fixed Price Level of Effort – Technical Support/Future Growth Cost Reimbursement – Travel/ODCs
Acquisition Planning Source Selection Process (Competitive) Adequate competition anticipated Best Value Trade Off Source Selection IAW FAR 15.3, DFARS 215.3, AFFARS 5315.3 Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3, DoD Source Selection Procedures effective 4 March 2011, and AFICA MP Evaluation Criteria Factor 1 – Technical (Acceptable/Unacceptable)/Technical Risk (L,M,H) Factor 2 – Past Performance (Confidence Assessment) Factor 3 – Cost/Price Trade Off Technical is rated acceptable/unacceptable Technical Risk will be rated as Low, Moderate, or High Past Performance is rated with a confidence level rating Tradeoff between Technical Risk, Past Performance and Cost/Price Technical Risk is equal to Past Performance When combined, Technical Risk and Past Performance are more important than Cost/Price
Acquisition Planning Source Selection Process (Competitive) Factor 1 – Technical Evaluation (Acceptable/Unacceptable)/ Technical Risk (L,M,H) SUBFACTOR 1: Software Engineering Services SUBFACTOR 2: System Engineering SUBFACTOR 3: Program Management SUBFACTOR 4: Small Business Participation Plan Separate Technical Risk Rating for each subfactor and an Overall Risk Rating (Low, Moderate, High) Risk evaluation to include review of labor hours and categories proposed Must pass all technical subfactors with Acceptable rating to be considered for award Overall High risk is not awardable Only offerors deemed “Acceptable” rating in all technical subfactors and a “Low” or “Moderate” risk rating for all technical subfactors are eligible for award Competitive range may include proposals rated “Unacceptable” under the Technical factor, “High” Technical Risk, and /or rated “No Confidence” under the Past Performance factor.
Source Selection Process (Competitive) Factor 2 – Past Performance Evaluation Maximum of 5 contracts for prime contractor Maximum of 3 contracts for each proposed major subcontractor Recency: Ending on or after 1 Oct 13 and performance not less than one year Relevancy (based on technical subfactors) Performance Rating Outcome: Confidence Assessment Rating Sources of information Proposals
CPARS
Questionnaires Other sources
Source Selection Process (Competitive) Factor 3 –Cost/Price Evaluation Cost and Price Analysis Cost Realism Price Realism (if needed) Unbalanced Pricing Cost/Price Model Work breakdown structure for Task Order 0001 (Maintenance & Sustainment) Cost elements for Task Order 0001 Fully burdened rates for FFP future unknown task orders Field Pricing Assistance (DCAA and DCMA) Audit Reports Forward Pricing Rate Recommendations and Agreements Other than certified cost and pricing data Model provides the labor categories with position descriptions As part of the price evaluation, the Offerors’ total compensation plan, setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for the professional employees who will work under the contract, will be assessed in accordance with FAR 52.222-46
IDIQ CLIN Structure:
X001 Technical Support (CPIF) X002 Technical Support (CPFF) X003 Technical Support (FFP) X004 Technical Support (FFP-LOE) X005 Travel (CR)
X006 ODC (CR)
X007 Data (NSP) X008 Transition (CPIF)
Contract Parameters Draft CLIN Structure
Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level
Contract Parameters Place of Performance:
Activities are primarily conducted at the USSTRATCOM, Offutt AFB, NE The use of the IDIQ will allow for other locations if necessary Special terms and conditions:
Government-provided pricing model Security – DD Form 254 (Top Secret) Data rights will comply with DFARS 252.227 Mission Essential Functions and Personnel IAW DoD Instructions 1100.22 and DFARS 252.237-7023; Identified in the PWS Government-Furnished Equipment (software, test equipment, etc.) for future work if necessary; RFP to include IUID Registry clauses
Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation Performance-Based Contract IAW FAR 37.601(b), AFI 63-138 (Chapters 3 and 4) and MP5301.602-2(d) Services Summary in PWS Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for CPFF, FFP, and FFP-LOE efforts Contracting Officer’s Representatives (CORs) Incentive Fee Plan for CPIF efforts
Point of Contacts Contracting Officer:
Ms. Theresa Bryant Phone: (402) 294-7304 or DSN: 271-7304 E-mail: theresa.bryant@us.af.mil
Contract Administrator:
Ms. Melissa Hergenrader Phone: (402) 232-5992 or DSN: 272-5992 E-mail: melissa.hergenrader@us.af.mil image2.png image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .