Attachment 14 - Past Performance Questionaire 15 Sep 22.docx

Past Performance Questionnaire –

The 436th Contracting Squadron at Dover AFB, DE is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a grounds maintenance requirement. The contractor shall provide non-personal services, to include all personnel, supervision, equipment, and tools necessary to perform grounds maintenance at Dover Air Force Base (AFB). The service shall be performed in a manner that will promote the growth of healthy grass, trees, shrubs, and plants and present a clean, neat, and professional appearance.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 05 October 2022, 12:00pm EST. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the information prior to the start of the selection process.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to eric.oliver.5@us.af.mil and brittney.santiago@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

SANTIAGO.BRITTNEY.L.105903 Digitally signed by Controlled

Unclassified

Information When completed, this document is

Source

Selection

Information

IAW FAR

2.101 and

3.104

Controlled

Unclassified

Information Page of

Contracting Officer Team Lead, Infrastructure Flight

1 Attch Past Performance Questionnaire

SANTIAGO.BRITTNEY.L.1059038210 Date: 2022.08.26 14:36:03 -04'00'

Past Performance Questionnaire –

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Offerors Name (Company/Division):

B. POC for Offeror:

C. Project Title:

D. Description of work (Performed by the offeror):

E. Contract Number:

F. Contract Dollar Value:

G. Period of Performance:

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Ratings of substantial performance shall include sufficient information to support. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

5 SUBSTANTIAL PERFORMANCE – Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE – Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared or were satisfactory.

3 NEUTRAL or NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was sparse.

2 LIMITED PERFORMANCE – Low expectation performed and contractor did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance assessed reflected a serious problem for which the contractor did not identify corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appeared only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1 NO RATING – Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance assessed contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

1. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements (i.e., ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period).

SUPPORTING INFORMATION (Required for substantial rating):

2. Contractor demonstrated the ability to provide sufficient equipment and manpower required for contracted requirement, 1,800 acres of improved, semi- improved, un-improved grounds.

3. Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements, correct deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant

Controlled

Unclassified

Information When completed, this document is

Source

Selection

Information

IAW FAR

2.101 and

3.104 Past

Performance

Questionnaire

Controlled

Unclassified

Information Page of to their quality control procedures and understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

4. Demonstrated ability to maintain standards for 200+ acres of improved grounds (mow, edge, trim, control vegetation, litter patrol).

5. Demonstrated ability to provide herbicide services to control vegetation on hard surfaces, fence lines, airfield vegetation heights for growth and seed heads.

6. Demonstrated capability to provide snow and ice removal for 5,000+ square yards (SY) of sidewalks.

7. Demonstrated ability to provide tree services (trimming, tree and stump removal) and maintain planting beds in excess of 65,000 SF.

8. Demonstrated capability to maintain irrigation systems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (Required for substantial rating):

9. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? SUPPORTING INFORMATION (Required for substantial rating):

Respondent’s Signature (printed name) Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: eric.oliver.5@us.af.mil AND brittney.santiago@us.af.mil image1.png