DFR_-_Past_Present_Performance_Questionnaire_26_Aug_15.pdf

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA4484-15-R-0030 – Deicing Fluid Recovery Service

26 Aug 15

A. General Information:

Contractor’s Name: ______________________ Telephone Number: ______________________

Address: ______________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________

_____________________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ________________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ___________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. Respondent Information:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: _______________________________

Address: _______________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

______________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________

C. Send Completed Survey Form To: michael.petty.5@us.af.mil, or fax: 609-754-3735 mailto:michael.petty.5@us.af.mil

D. Performance Information: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (SU, SA, L, N and NA) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of L or N.

SU SA L N N/A

Substantial

Confidence

Satisfactory

Confidence

Limited

Confidence

No Confidence Not Applicable

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

26 Aug 15

Contractor Name: _____________________________ Contract Number.______________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: SU SA L N N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Was responsive to contract changes.

15. Provided adequate project supervision.

16. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

17. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

18. Cooperated with government personnel after award.

19. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

20. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES / NO

21. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES / NO

22. Is the contractor rated in CPARS / CORT? YES / NO

Remarks: