J - Atchs 6 thru 12.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GATES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4452-12-R-0001
About this file
Attachments 6 - 12
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4452-12-R-0001-0004 | — | |
| Inventory List - GATES.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Questions and Answers | — | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001-0003 | — | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001 Amd 0003.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers | — | |
| Questions and Answers | — | |
| J - Atchs 6 thru 12 | — | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001-0002 | — | |
| J - Atch 2 - CDRL Package | — | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001 Amd 0002.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers | — | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001 Amd 0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA4452-12-R-0001-0001 | — | |
| J - Atch 4 - GFE List.docx | DOCX document | |
| J - Atch 5 - DD254.doc | DOC document | |
| J - Atch 2 - CDRL Package.pdf | ||
| J - Attch 1 - PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| J - Atch 3 - QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| GATES - RFP | — | |
| GATES Bid Library Agenda.doc | DOC document | |
| J - Attch 1 - PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| GATES Acquisition Library Rules_v1 0.ppt | PPT presentation |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET
Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program (citation) being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of citations submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at paragraphs 4.3 and 1.2, respectively, of Section L of this solicitation.
| A. | Offeror Name (Company/Division): | ____________________ |
| CAGE Code:____________________ | ||
| DUNS Number:____________________ |
(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the "Organizational Structure Change History" you provided as part of your Past Performance Volume).
| B. | Program Title:____________________ |
| C. | Contract Specifics: |
| 1. Contracting Agency or Customer _____________________________________________ | |
| 2. Contract Number__________________________________________________________ | |
| 3. Contract Type __________________________ | |
| 4. Period of Performance __________________________ | |
| 5. Original Contract $ Value _________________ (Do not include unexercised options) | |
| 6. Current Contract $ Value _________________ (Do not include unexercised options) | |
| 7. If Amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
D. Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor (Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase (or Service) and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition) E. Completion Date:
| 1. Original date: | ____________________ |
| 2. Current Schedule: ____________________ | |
| 3. Estimate at Completion: ____________________ | |
| 4. How Many Times Changed: ____________________ | |
| 5. Primary Causes of Change: _____________________________________________________ | |
| _______________________________________________________________________________ |
F. Primary Customer Points of Contact: (For Government contracts provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles).
1. Program Manager and/or Site Manager:
| Name | ____________________ | |
| Office | ____________________ | |
| Address________________________________________ | ||
| Telephone__________________ | ||
| FAX Number_______________ |
2. Contracting Officer:
| Name | ____________________ | |
| Office | ____________________ | |
| Address________________________________________ | ||
| Telephone__________________ | ||
| FAX Number_______________ |
3. Administrative Contracting Officer:
Name ____________________ Office ____________________ Address________________________________________
| Telephone__________________ |
| FAX Number_______________ |
G. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract/program considered unique.
H. For each of the applicable sub-factors under the Technical factor in Section M, illustrate how your experience on this program applies to that sub-factor.
I. Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the instant acquisition. Also, indicate their contractual roles for both acquisitions.
J. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).
K. Describe additional information you deem pertinent.
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 7
SAMPLE SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT LETTER
FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR
Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor’s or teaming partner’s consent. Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government’s Past Performance evaluation team in assessing your recent past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent letter be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.
SAMPLE
Dear “Contracting Officer:”
We are participating as a (insert “subcontractor” or “teaming partner”) with (insert name of prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Request for Proposal FA4452-12-R-0001 for Global Air Transportation Execution System (GATES) application and system support services.
We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.
(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)
Company Name:
Address:
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 8
SAMPLE CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
Past performance information concerning private sector contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners cannot be disclosed to the Government without their consent. Client authorization letters are required for each identified effort for a commercial customer. This letter will authorize release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance. The Government will need that consent before contacting commercial customers to assess the offeror’s past performance. In an effort to assist the Government's Past Performance evaluation team in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following client authorization letter be completed by any commercial customers identified in your proposal. The completed client authorization letters should be submitted as part of your Present/Past Performance Volume.
Offerors should send with their list of references a letter similar to the following authorizing the reference to provide past performance information to the Government.
Dear “Client:”
We are responding to a Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Request for Proposal FA4452-12-R-0001 for the Global Air Transportation Execution System (GATES) contract.
In their acquisitions, the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring those clients of entities responding to their solicitation to be identified, and their participation in the evaluation process is requested. In the event that you are contacted for information on work performed, you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.
We have identified Mr./Ms.____________________________ of your organization as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge of our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to .
Sincerely, SECTION J ATTACHMENT 9
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________
1. Prime or Subcontractor for this contract: _________________________
1. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
1. Contract number: ______________________________________
1. Contract type: ______________________________
1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________ Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE RATING | |
| B | BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur. | |
| P | PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| G | GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| Y | YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | |
| R | RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. | |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. |
| Technical Approach |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
T1. How would you rate the contractor's capability, knowledge, and expertise in developing, testing, and documenting software solutions?
Remarks:
T2. How would you rate the level/quality of operations support provided by the contractor?
T3. How would you rate the level/quality of security engineering certification and accreditation support?
T4. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to develop, maintain, and execute a Configuration Management Plan?
T5. How would you rate the contractor’s phase-in actions required to organize its resources to meet the contract schedule for full performance?
T6. How would you rate the contractor’s capability to develop, maintain, and execute a Quality Assurance Plan?
T7. How would you rate the level/quality of the contractor’s Asset Management approach?
T8. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?
T9. How would you rate the contractor’s overall technical approach and ability to meet the Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work requirements?
| Staffing Approach |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
S1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?
S2. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?
S3. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?
S4. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel?
| Cost Performance |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?
C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?
C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?
C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?
2. Please discuss every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in remarks section of each of the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire by email to:
E-mail to: thomas.jaeger.1@us.af.mil
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 10
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) COVER LETTER
26 Apr 12
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
| The Specialized Contracting Branch of the Air Force Headquarters Air Mobility Command (HQ AMC/A7KQ) is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Global Air Transportation Execution System (GATES) software application upgrades and patches to improve and sustain GATES capabilities and functionality. In addition to the software application upgrades, the planned procurement will provide GATES software/hardware engineering support and 24/7 technical services, which along with the GATES unique applications, includes Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Oracle, UNIX, Microsoft, and Sybase infrastructure products. |
| One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts. |
| Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations. |
| To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to thomas.jaeger.1@us.af.mil. Please call Mr. Jaeger at (618) 256-9950 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records. |
| Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection. |
Karen M. Kinzel Contracting Officer
1 Atch:
Past Performance Questionnaire
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 11
WORKLOAD ESTIMATE BY TASK
TRANSITION
| 3 Month POP: 1 Feb 13 - 30 Apr 13 |
| est. Hours |
CLIN 0005 -- Transition for all Tasks
25182
BASE
| 4 Month POP: 1 May 13 - 31 Aug 13 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 0001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 2410 |
| CLIN 0001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 5706 |
| CLIN 0001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 25804 |
| CLIN 0002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 32525 |
OPTION PERIOD 1
| 12 Month POP: 1 Sep 13 - 31 Aug 14 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 1001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 7220 |
| CLIN 1001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 17100 |
| CLIN 1001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 77330 |
| CLIN 1002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 97470 |
OPTION PERIOD 2
| 12 Month POP: 1 Sep 14 - 31 Aug 15 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 2001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 7220 |
| CLIN 2001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 17100 |
| CLIN 2001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 77330 |
| CLIN 2002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 97470 |
OPTION PERIOD 3
| 12 Month POP: 1 Sep 15 - 31 Aug 16 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 3001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 7220 |
| CLIN 3001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 17100 |
| CLIN 3001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 77330 |
| CLIN 3002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 97470 |
OPTION PERIOD 4
| 12 Month POP: 1 Sep 16 - 31 Aug 17 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 4001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 7220 |
| CLIN 4001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 19000 |
| CLIN 4001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 77330 |
| CLIN 4002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 97470 |
OPTION PERIOD 5
| 5 Month POP: 1 Sep 17 - 31 Jan 18 |
| est. Hours |
| CLIN 5001 -- Task 1 - ENTERPRISE IT POLICY & PLANNING (FFP) |
| 3010 |
| CLIN 5001 -- Task 6 - ASSET MANAGEMENT (FFP) |
| 7920 |
| CLIN 5001 -- Task 8 - OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FFP) |
| 32235 |
| CLIN 5002 -- Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 - INTEGRATED APPLICATIONS SERVICES (CPFF) |
| 40630 |
SECTION J ATTACHMENT 12
TRAVEL AND ODC ESTIMATES
Travel Summary
| Transition period* |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| Base Period** |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| OP I |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| OP II |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| OP III |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| OP IV |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| OP V*** |
| $ 5,000.00 |
| Total Travel Est. (All Periods) |
| $ 35,000.00 |
Other Direct Costs Summary
| Transition period* |
| $100,000.00 |
| Base Period** |
| $100,000.00 |
| OP I |
| $100,000.00 |
| OP II |
| $100,000.00 |
| OP III |
| $100,000.00 |
| OP IV |
| $100,000.00 |
| OP V*** |
| $100,000.00 |
| Total ODC Est. (All Periods) |
| $700,000.00 |
*POP is 3 months
**POP is 4 months
***POP is 5 months
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .