Attachment_12_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(SAMPLE).docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Perimeter Vehicle Denial Barrier Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4427-19-R-A046
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for perimeter vehicle denial barrier construction services. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for an offeror on a previous contract, and evaluates performance ratings across various criteria. The solicitation seeks proposals for professional services, permits, equipment, labor, and materials to construct cable reinforcement for an existing perimeter fence at Travis Air Force Base in accordance with design documents and environmental requirements. Proposals are due within 180 days of notice to proceed. The opportunity is issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation_Amendment_FA442719RA0460002_SF_30.pdf | ||
| Attachment_14_UFGS_03_30_00_-_CAST-IN-PLACE_CONCRETE.pdf | ||
| Perimiter_Fence_Questions_Combined.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_Amendment_FA442719RA0460001_SF_30.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit_Attendance.pdf | ||
| Attachment_13_Financial_Institution_Reference_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_-_UFC_Design_Details.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Deadman_Detail.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10_-_Perimeter_Vehicle_Denial_SOW-XDAT_07-1156D-4_June_19.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_UFC_Design_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_EA_Denial_Fence_Overall_Site_Map.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment_7_-_Gate_Locations.pdf | ||
| Attachment_9_-_Access_Routes_to_Deadman_Anchor_Locations.pdf | ||
| Attachment_11_-_WD_CA20190007_26_Jul_19.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_-_FA442719RA046.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________________________________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________
Dollar Amount: ____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: ___________________ | |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: ___________________ |
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
60th Contracting Squadron Attn: TSgt Wendell Gibson wendell.gibson@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| No Confidence |
| Unknown Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 7. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 8. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 9. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 11. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 12. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 13. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 14. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
16. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .