PPQ Fire Alarm.doc
DOC document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Alarm Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance
- Solicitation number
- FA441820RFIRE
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for contractors providing fire alarm inspection, testing, and maintenance services. It requests information on the contractor's previous experience including the number of buildings and square footage maintained, contract period, and whether they served as the prime contractor or subcontractor. The contractor is asked to rate their own past performance on a scale of 1 to 6 in areas such as managing personnel, identifying and resolving issues, and responding to contract changes. The questionnaire also includes questions on whether the contractor has received cure notices and if the customer would award them another contract.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to provide inspection, testing, and maintenance of fire protection systems for all facilities at Joint Base Charleston in South Carolina. Services will be performed by certified technicians in accordance with industry standards, regulations, and manufacturer requirements and warranties. The contracting agency is the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
Solicitation
FA4418-14-X-XXXX
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title:
Telephone Number:
__________________ Email Address: ___________________
Project Title or Brief Description of work: __________________________________________*
Contract Number: ____________________ Dollar Amount: _________________* Number of Buildings Maintained ________* Total Square Footage Maintained __________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance: __________________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor
B.
EMAIL FORM TO: victor.mckinnon@us.af.mil C.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Neutral (N) |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided adequate experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 4. |
| Provided timely resolution of discrepancies |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 5. |
| Identified risks/problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7. |
| Cooperated with personnel after award and was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8. |
| Performed Emergency, Urgent & Routine Service Calls |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 9. |
| Performed Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Services |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 10. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 11. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 12. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .