Attachment_10_-_Appendix_I.pdf

LIMITED

ASBESTOS & LEAD

INSPECTIONS

Kisling Community Center Building 2008

Lackland Air Force Base, Texas

For

Mr. Bernard Auch by AEHS, Inc.

4402 Center Gate

San Antonio, Texas 78217

(210) 656-9300 www.aehs-sa.com

Asbestos and Lead Inspections AEHS, Inc.

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

September 2014

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD INSPECTIONS

This report is divided into two sections corresponding to the consulting performed. The on-site inspections were performed by Matthew Bishop and

Michael Kauffman under the overall direction of Ronald M. Bishop. Matt is a

Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) licensed Asbestos

Individual Management Planner (No. 205572), and Lead Risk Assessor (No.

2070727). Mike Kauffman is a Texas Department of State Health Services

(TDSHS) licensed Asbestos Inspector (No. 60-3118) and Lead Risk Assessor (No.

2071013). Ron Bishop is a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Consultant, Lead Risk

Assessor, Lead Project Designer, and Mold Consultant as well as a Certified

Industrial Hygienist, Certified Safety Executive, Registered Sanitarian, Diplomate in Environmental Health, and Registered Environmental Professional, Registered

Environmental Manager and Green Consultant.

A. ASBESTOS INSPECTION

1.0. GENERAL.

1.1. Construction materials containing asbestos have been used extensively in buildings because it possesses excellent properties for fire-proofing, insulation, and condensation control. Asbestos may be found in: (1) cement products; (2) spray applied or trowel applied materials on ceiling, walls, and other surfaces; (3) insulation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and other equipment; (4) vinyl floor tiles; (5) roofing; (6) flooring coatings; and (7) other miscellaneous products.

1.2. Friable materials are those materials that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Material that contains more than one percent asbestos by weight is considered to be asbestos containing material. Some of these asbestos-containing building materials are not considered friable now, but could become friable if not properly managed and maintained under an asbestos management program.

1.3. The concern about exposure to asbestos in buildings is based on evidence linking various respiratory diseases with occupational exposure in the shipbuilding, mining, milling, and fabricating industries. The presence of asbestos in a building does not mean that there is a significant health risk to building occupants. As long as asbestos-containing materials remain in good condition and are not disturbed, exposure is unlikely. Through proper control of

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting building operations and maintenance activities, disturbance or damage to asbestos-containing materials is minimized, thus limiting the building occupant's exposure to airborne asbestos fibers.

1.4. Building alterations and/or demolition require knowledge of what materials contain asbestos and if they will be removed or disturbed during the project. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA has issued a National Emission Standard for Asbestos (40 CFR 61.140 - 61.156). This

Standard regulates reporting requirements, work practices, waste disposal, and emissions from facility modification and/or demolition operations. The Standard applies only to materials containing more than one percent asbestos. The State of Texas has adopted a set of regulations (25 TAC 295.31 - 295.70) known as "Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules" which govern asbestos removal, encapsulation, or enclosure, including licensing and regulation, in all buildings of public occupancy or access. Any disturbance or removal of

ACBM in the building or facilities are subject to this Texas Statute.

2.0. BACKGROUND.

2.1. AEHS, Inc. was contacted by Mr. Bernard Auch to perform limited asbestos and lead inspections on Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas.

2.2. The building houses a restaurant, bar, multi-purpose rooms, hallways, offices, and restrooms.

3.0. SCOPE OF WORK.

3.1. The asbestos inspection was performed on 17 September 2014 and consisted of visual assessments to determine the presence of suspect ACBM in the area of concern. Bulk samples of suspect ACBM (materials which possibly contain asbestos, as determined by an accredited

EPA AHERA Building Inspector/Consultant) were collected. The visual inspection, bulk sampling, and inspection documentation was performed by Matt Bishop [Asbestos Individual

Management Planner (No. 205572)].

3.2. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS Licensed Asbestos Constant Agency (No.10-0335), PCM

Laboratory (No. 30-0295), and Training Provider (No. 00-0068).

3.3. The specific objectives of the survey were to:

Perform a visual inspection and physical assessment following the Asbestos

Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocol as a guideline to identify, quantify, and assess accessible friable and non-friable ACBM;

Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect material for asbestos content and identification by an American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited

Laboratory that is also licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services;

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Ensure the technical quality of all work by using the AHERA protocol and a

TDSHS licensed consultant and inspector for the inspection.

ssue a final report that includes findings, bulk sample locations, and confirmed asbestos-containing building materials.

4.0. DESCRIPTION.

4.1. The inspection was of Building 2008 at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas.

4.2. It consist of a restaurant, bar, multi-purpose rooms, hallways, offices, and restrooms scheduled for renovation.

5.0. INVESTIGATIVE METHODS.

5.1. Visual Inspection.

5.1.1. Building materials were inspected and assessed using the methods presented in the federal AHERA regulations (40 CFR, Part 763) as a guideline. The procedures mandated are considered the industry standard and are applied to all surveys performed by

AEHS, Inc.

5.1.2. The suspect ACBM consisted of wallboard, float mud, plaster, duct mastic, four (4) types of ceiling tile, and six (6) types of floor tile with associated mastics.

5.2. Bulk Sampling.

5.2.1. Bulk samples of all homogeneous materials from identified functional spaces containing suspect ACBM were collected. A homogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in use, color and texture. Examples of homogeneous materials include:

Pipe insulation produced by the same manufacturer and installed during the same time period;

Floor or ceiling tile of identical size, color and/or pattern;

Sprayed-on acoustical ceiling materials located in contiguous areas; and

Trowelled on plaster of same texture and location.

5.2.2. A functional space is defined as any spatially distinct unit within a building that contains identifiable populations of current or previous building occupants. Examples of functional spaces include:

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Office areas;

Storage (warehousing) areas; and

Living quarters.

The functional space concept is helpful in determining the use and occupancy of building areas containing confirmed ACBM. Knowing the types of occupants and their use of an area also may influence the selection of an asbestos management option and/or corrective action. If multiple corrective actions are necessary, the occupancy and use of individual areas may also become important factors when establishing the priority, or ranking, of each corrective action.

5.2.3. Prior to obtaining the samples, all friable suspect material are sprayed with amended

(surfactant added) water to minimize fiber release. Small pieces of the suspect material were sampled by cutting off a sufficient quantity of the wetted suspect material in an inconspicuous location and securing the sample in a plastic bag. Samples were extracted from the center of the wetted area. The tool used to collect the suspect sample was then cleaned to ensure no cross-contamination occurred between samples. A plastic bag was used to contain the samples of the suspect material and quickly sealed to prevent the escape of the material or the introduction of ACBM contamination from outside sources.

5.3. Bulk Sample Analysis.

5.3.1. All bulk samples collected during this survey were analyzed by Environmental

Hazards Services, Inc.’s Laboratory in Richmond, Virginia. Environmental Hazards

Services laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and

Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the

American Industrial Hygiene Association. Additionally, the laboratory is a TDSHS licensed (No. 30-0188) Asbestos Laboratory (Polarized Light Microscopy). Their address, telephone number, and quality assurance review are depicted on their laboratory reports.

5.3.2. All asbestos samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion

Staining (PLM/DS) techniques in accordance with methodology approved by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), method number 600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos present in the samples was determined on the basis of a visual area estimation as set forth in 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A, Subpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4. The lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM/DS method is approximately

1% by volume.

5.3.2.1. The Environmental Protection Agency considers materials with greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos content to be asbestos containing. Therefore, when asbestos containing building material (ACBM) appear in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning the sample(s) taken contained greater than (>1%) asbestos and is considered a regulated material. However, material that contains equal to or less than one percent is not considered to be asbestos containing material. If the results of sampling indicate that the asbestos containing material is a trace or up to 10% asbestos, the results must be

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting verified by polarized light microscopy point counting or presumed to be asbestos. For this survey, AEHS personnel used their experience with similar materials.

5.3.2.2. When “No Asbestos Detected” (NAD) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning no asbestos was observed in the sample material above the reliable limit of detection for the PLM/DS method.

5.3.2.3. The Texas Department of State Health Services requires a minimum of three samples to be collected from each homogeneous area. In order for a material to be considered negative, all samples must be negative. On the other hand, if one of the three samples is positive, then the material is considered positive.

6.0. RESULTS OF INSPECTION.

6.1. Analytical Results. The analytical results from the inspection and chain of custody are at Appendix A. A total of forty-two (42) samples were collected which resulted in sixty-four

(64) analyses due to layering.

6.2. Photographs. Photographs are at Appendix B.

6.3. Summary Positive Asbestos Containing Building Materials. None. The laboratory results indicated “NAD – No Asbestos Detected” in all samples.

7.0. ASSESSMENT.

7.1. Friable Asbestos Material. None.

7.2. Non-Friable Materials. None.

8.0. RECOMMENDATION. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.

B. LEAD BASE PAINT

1.0. GENERAL.

1.1. Background.

1.1.1. Inspections and risk assessments for lead base paint (LBP) hazards emerged in response to an insurance problem in the nation’s public housing programs after children in

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting housing units throughout the nation were found to contain elevated blood lead levels.

When investigations pursued, the houses were found to contain LBP where deterioration was extensive and the children were ingesting the paint directly (chewing on the sills, etc.)

or indirectly by placing contaminated items into their mouths.

1.1.2. At the present time, many of the standards used in lead hazard assessments are not health-based standards. A limit that will not produce adverse health affects has not been established for lead content of paint, dust or in soil. This is due in part to differences in individual behavior, particularly with respect to hand-to-mouth activity. However, the limits that are established in the various standards will significantly reduce the health impacts. Also, these limits dictate requirements for action, if exceeded.

1.1.3. The reason lead base paint inspections are conducted for commercial facilities is to determine potential worker exposure and environmental insult during demolition and disposal of the wastes based on the lead content.

1.2. Standards. As indicated in the Table 1 below, there are various standards that currently define lead base paint. The applicable standards to this project include the OSHA requirements, for worker protection performing the renovation, and the environmental requirements for disposal of materials painted with lead base paint.

Table 1

Lead Standards

Standard/Regulation Level Remarks

Consumer Product Safety Commission 600 ppm

0.06% parts per million

% by weight

HUD – 24 CFR Part 35 0.5% by weight

1.0 mg/cm

NLLAP Accredited Lab

XRF

TELLR - Texas Environmental Lead

Reduction Rules

0.5% by weight

1.0 mg/cm

NLLAP Accredited Lab

XRF

OSHA - 29 CFR 1926.62 - Lead in

Construction; Interim Final Rule Any amount Worker Protection

EPA - 40 CFR 261 - Identification and

Listing of Hazardous Wastes 5 ppm TCLP

TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic

Leaching Procedure

1.3. Lead Risk Assessment.

1.3.1. A Lead Risk Assessment is to determine, and then report on the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead base paint hazards in residential dwellings through on-site investigations. Normally, risk assessments determine the immediately available sources of lead in a dwelling and provides advice on long-term and/or short-term responses to any hazards found. In general, inspections measure lead base paint concentrations while risk assessments measure lead base paint hazards.

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

1.3.2. The specific differences between an Inspection and a Risk Assessment depicted in

Table 2, below:

Table 2

Inspections/Risk Assessments

Inspections Risk Assessments

Measure the concentration of lead in the paint on a surface-by-surface basis

Measure the level of lead in dust and soil and deteriorated paint

Identify the presence of lead base paint on all components

Identity the location and nature of all lead base paint hazards (primary prevention)

Allow the owner to avoid treating paint that is not lead base paint

Consider information about past maintenance and management practices

Allow the owner to treat all lead hazards present

Limited Risk Assessment/Inspection

A combination of the Inspection and Risk Assessment tailored to the specific renovations to be performed under the specifications.

2.0. APPROACH.

2.1. Limited Inspection. A limited lead base paint inspection was conducted on 17

September 2014 at the location as described in paragraph 4 of the Asbestos Section.

2.2. Credentials.

2.2.1. The Limited Inspection was performed by Michael Kauffman. Mike is a TDSHS certified Lead Risk Assessor (No. 2071013).

2.2.2. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS certified/licensed Lead Firm (No. 21100283) and Lead

Training Provider (No. 20439)

2.3. Methodology. XRF measurements were taken at representative locations on interior painted surfaces in the area of concern as requested by the escort. XRF Niton Model XLp

300A (Serial No. 10381) was used in the testing for lead base paint. Calibrations were performed prior to and after testing each building in accordance with Performance

Characteristics Sheets (PCS). See Appendix C for a table of the results.

3.0. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS.

3.1. The HUD/EPA guidance for target housing is 1 mg/cm

while the Toxic Characteristic

Leaching Procedure (TCLP) limit for lead is 5 parts per million (ppm).

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

3.2. The OSHA requirements, as promulgated in 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead Standard for the

Construction Industry), considers any amount of lead as lead containing paint; however, any measured surface below 0.1 mg/cm should be considered negative for lead base paint.

4.0. RESULTS.

4.1. One hundred nine (109) measurements were made with the XRF for lead content.

4.2. Based on the XRF measurements, AEHS, Inc. has determined that the following should considered positive for lead base paint:

Beige plaster walls

Beige CMU walls

Brown wood corner trim

Orange metal door casings

Beige metal door casings

Beige metal door jambs

Brown metal door casings

Brown metal door transoms

White metal window sashes

Beige metal window sashes

Brown metal window sashes

Gray metal window sashes

Blue metal window sashes

Brown plaster window sills

White plaster window sills

5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS.

5.1. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.

5.2. Provide a copy of this report to the contractor performing the renovation and inform them that they must comply with all provisions of 29 CFR 1926.62.

5.3. Based on the levels of the lead content, it is highly unlikely that the waste material would exceed the TCLP level; therefore, the debris can be disposed of as construction waste.

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

DISCLAIMER

This report, which contains inspections/measurements for hazardous material is given for the sole benefit of the aforementioned client(s). The client expressly confirms their understanding that the conclusions/ recommendations stated in this report are limited to and based solely upon the scope of the assignment, and samples and field measurements taken. In addition, the client understands that any field observations contained herein reflect the conditions present on the date and time of inspection. No representations or warranties are made or may be implied as to the validity of their applicability to any other days or times.

Ronald M. Bishop, MPH, CIH

Asbestos Consultant (10-5492)

Lead Risk Assessor (2070124)

Lead Project Designer (2090015)

29 September 2014

Appendix A

Asbestos Lab Results

Asbestos Bulk Analysis Report

Client:

Report Number:

Project/Test Address:

Client Number:

Reported Date:

Received Date:

Analyzed Date:

AEHS 09/18/2014

45-5371

09/23/2014

14-09-02215

7469 Whitepine Rd

Telephone: 800.347.4010

Richmond, VA 23237

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Laboratory Results Fax Number:

210-656-8499

4402 Center Gate San Antonio, TX 78217

09/22/2014

Layer Type AsbestosClient Sample Number

Other Materials

Lab Gross DescriptionLab Sample Number

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-001A 1-BSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Orange Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-001B 1-BSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-002A 2-BSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Orange Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-002B 2-BSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-003A 3-BSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Orange Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-003B 3-BSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

1 of 9Page

Beige Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-004A 4-BRSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-004B 4-BRSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-005A 5-BRSFT 2% Synthetic 98% Non-Fibrous

Top Mastic

NAD

Beige Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-005B 5-BRSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-005C 5-BRSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Other * NAD

*Bottom Mastic

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-006A 6-BRSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Top Mastic

NAD

Beige Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-006B 6-BRSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-006C 6-BRSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Other * NAD

*Bottom Mastic

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample Number

2 of 9Page

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-007A 7-GFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-007B 7-GFT 3% Synthetic 97% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-008A 8-GFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-008B 8-GFT 2% Synthetic 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-009A 9-GFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-009B 9-GFT 2% Synthetic 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-010 10-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-011 11-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

3 of 9Page

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-012 12-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-013 13-CDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-014 14-CDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-015 15-CDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-016 16-WDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-017 17-WDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-018 18-WDCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

4 of 9Page

Yellow Adhesive;

14-09-02215-019A 19-BGSFT 100% Non-FibrousTop Mastic

NAD

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-019B 19-BGSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-019C 19-BGSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Other * NAD

*Bottom Mastic

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-020A 20-BGSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Top Mastic

NAD

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-020B 20-BGSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-020C 20-BGSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Other * NAD

*Bottom Mastic

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-021A 21-BGSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-021B 21-BGSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

No top mastic present

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

5 of 9Page

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-022 22-DCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-023 23-DCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-024 24-DCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-025A 25-GSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-025B 25-GSFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-026A 26-GSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Orange Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-026B 26-GSFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-027A 27-GSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

6 of 9Page

14-09-02215-027B 27-GSFT 1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

White Chalky; Brown Fibrous; Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-028 28-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Chalky;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-029 29-WB 3% Cellulose 97% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Chalky;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-030 30-WB 3% Cellulose 97% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Chalky; Beige Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-031 31-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

White Chalky; Beige Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-032 32-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

White Chalky; White Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

14-09-02215-033 33-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Beige Granular;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-034 34-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

7 of 9Page

Beige Granular;

14-09-02215-035 35-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Beige Granular;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-036 36-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Yellow Adhesive-Like;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-037 37-DM 4% Cellulose 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive-Like;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-038 38-DM 3% Cellulose 97% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive-Like;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-039 39-DM 4% Cellulose 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-040A 40-GCFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-040B 40-GCFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-041A 41-GCFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-041B 41-GCFT 3% Cellulose 97% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

8 of 9Page

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous14-09-02215-042A 42-GCFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Homogeneous

14-09-02215-042B 42-GCFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Tasha Eaddy

1% Asbestos

Analyst:

Reporting Limit:

Method:

QC Blank:

QC Sample:

Kathy Fletcher

EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020

QA/QC Clerk

Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

14-M11996-2

SRM 1866 Fiberglass

NAD = no asbestos detectedLEGEND:

The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the

Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0. All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy

(TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.

400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.

* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 14-09-02215

LAFB B-2008; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

9 of 9Page

Appendix B

Photographs

(Asbestos Photographs)

1. Wallboard – NAD 2. Duct Mastic – NAD 3. Plaster – NAD

Float Mud – NAD

4. Crater Ceiling Tile – NAD 5. Worm Ceiling Tile – NAD 6. Decorative Ceiling Tile – NAD

7. Blue Speck Floor Tile – NAD 8. Gray Floor Tile – NAD 9. Brown Speck Tile – NAD

10. Gray Speck Tile – NAD 11. Gray Camo Tile – NAD 12. Beige Speck Tile – NAD

(Lead Photographs)

1. Beige Plaster Wall 2. Beige CMU Wall 3. Brown Door Casing & Transom

4. Orange Door Casing 5. Beige Door Casing & Jamb 6. Brown Plaster Window Sill &

Beige Metal Sash

7. White Window Sash 8. White Plaster Window Sill 9. Brown Metal Window Sash

10. Blue Metal Window Sash 11. Gray Metal Window Sash 12. Brown Corner Trim

Appendix C

XRF Measurements

Building 2008, Lackland Air Force Base

No. Time Bldg. Room Component Feature Substrate Condition Color Results PbC

1 9/17/14 11:09 3.27

2 9/17/14 11:15 Calibration Pos 1.1

3 9/17/14 11:15 Calibration Pos 1.2

4 9/17/14 11:16 Calibration Neg 0.9

5 9/17/14 11:17 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

6 9/17/14 11:17 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0

7 9/17/14 11:18 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Intact White Neg 0.02

8 9/17/14 11:18 2008 Interior Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0.01

9 9/17/14 11:18 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Intact White Pos 0.15

10 9/17/14 11:19 2008 Interior Window Sill Wood Intact White Neg 0

11 9/17/14 11:19 2008 Interior Window Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0.01

12 9/17/14 11:21 2008 Interior Ceiling Trim Wood Intact White Neg 0.01

13 9/17/14 11:22 2008 Interior Vent Casing Metal Intact White Neg -0.27

14 9/17/14 11:22 2008 Interior Vent Metal Intact White Neg 0

15 9/17/14 11:22 2008 Interior Chair Rail Wood Intact White Neg 0.01

16 9/17/14 11:23 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0

17 9/17/14 11:23 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Intact Brown Neg 0.01

18 9/17/14 11:23 2008 Interior Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg -0.34

19 9/17/14 11:25 2008 Interior Bar Door Wood Intact Black Neg 0

20 9/17/14 11:25 2008 Interior Bar Column Wood Det Black Neg 0

21 9/17/14 11:26 2008 Interior Bar Column Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

22 9/17/14 11:26 2008 Interior Cabinet Casing Wood Det White Neg 0

23 9/17/14 11:26 2008 Interior Cabinet Door Wood Det White Neg 0

24 9/17/14 11:28 2008 Interior Electr Panel Door Metal Intact White Neg 0

25 9/17/14 11:28 2008 Interior Electr Panel Casing Metal Intact White Neg 0

26 9/17/14 11:28 2008 Interior Wall Shelf Wood Intact White Neg 0

27 9/17/14 11:29 2008 Interior Wall Panel Det Beige Neg 0.01

28 9/17/14 11:29 2008 Interior Ceiling Panel Det Beige Neg 0

29 9/17/14 11:30 2008 Interior Electr Panel Panel Det Beige Neg 0.01

30 9/17/14 11:30 2008 Interior Pipe Metal Det Beige Neg 0

31 9/17/14 11:30 2008 Interior Window Casing Wood Intact Beige Neg 0.07

32 9/17/14 11:31 2008 Interior Window Trim Wood Intact Beige Neg 0

33 9/17/14 11:32 2008 Interior Door Metal Det White Neg 0

34 9/17/14 11:33 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0.01

35 9/17/14 11:33 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Intact White Neg 0.01

36 9/17/14 11:33 2008 Interior Access Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0

37 9/17/14 11:34 2008 Interior Access Door Wood Intact White Neg 0

38 9/17/14 11:35 2008 Interior Wall Board Wood Intact Beige Neg 0.01

39 9/17/14 11:36 2008 Interior Column Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

40 9/17/14 11:36 2008 Interior Column Trim Wood Intact White Neg 0

41 9/17/14 11:36 2008 Interior Pass Thru Shelf Wood Intact White Neg 0

42 9/17/14 11:37 2008 Interior Trim-Corner Wood Intact White Neg 0

43 9/17/14 11:38 2008 Interior Wall Trim Drywall Intact White Neg 0

44 9/17/14 11:39 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Yellow Neg 0

No. Time Bldg. Room Component Feature Substrate Condition Color Results PbC

45 9/17/14 11:39 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Orange Neg 0

46 9/17/14 11:39 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Intact Orange Pos 0.1

47 9/17/14 11:40 2008 Interior Door Jamb Metal Intact Orange Neg 0.01

48 9/17/14 11:40 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Det White Neg 0

49 9/17/14 11:41 2008 Interior Wall CMU Det White Neg 0

50 9/17/14 11:41 2008 Interior Wall Shelf Wood Det Beige Neg 0

51 9/17/14 11:42 2008 Interior Door Wood Det Gray Neg 0

52 9/17/14 11:42 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Det Gray Neg 0.05

53 9/17/14 11:42 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Det Gray Neg 0

54 9/17/14 11:44 2008 Interior Shelf Wood Det White Neg 0

55 9/17/14 11:44 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Det Blue Neg 0

56 9/17/14 11:45 2008 Interior Chair Rail Wood Intact Blue Neg 0.01

57 9/17/14 11:45 2008 Interior Door Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

58 9/17/14 11:46 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Det Black Neg 0

59 9/17/14 11:46 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Det Pink Neg 0

60 9/17/14 11:46 2008 Interior Door Jamb Metal Det Pink Neg 0

61 9/17/14 11:48 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Det Orange Neg 0.02

62 9/17/14 12:00 2008 Interior Wall Plaster Intact Beige Pos 0.5

63 9/17/14 12:01 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Det Beige Pos 0.1

64 9/17/14 12:01 2008 Interior Window Pane Glass Intact Beige Neg 0

65 9/17/14 12:02 2008 Interior Bath Stall Metal Intact Beige Neg 0

66 9/17/14 12:02 2008 Interior Bath Door Metal Intact Beige Neg 0

67 9/17/14 12:02 2008 Interior Cabinet Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

68 9/17/14 12:03 2008 Interior Cabinet Casing Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

69 9/17/14 12:03 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Det Beige Pos 0.19

70 9/17/14 12:03 2008 Interior Door Jamb Metal Det Beige Pos 0.2

71 9/17/14 12:04 2008 Interior Door Wood Det Beige Neg 0.01

72 9/17/14 12:04 2008 Interior Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

73 9/17/14 12:04 2008 Interior Wall CMU Intact White Neg 0.03

74 9/17/14 12:05 2008 Interior Pipe Metal Det White Neg -0.2

75 9/17/14 12:05 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Intact Beige Neg 0.04

76 9/17/14 12:06 2008 Interior Window Sill Plaster Det Brown Pos 0.7

77 9/17/14 12:06 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Det Beige Pos 0.23

78 9/17/14 12:06 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

79 9/17/14 12:07 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact White Neg 0

80 9/17/14 12:07 2008 Interior Baseboard Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

81 9/17/14 12:07 2008 Interior Trim-Corner Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

82 9/17/14 12:08 2008 Interior Door Metal Intact Brown Neg 0

83 9/17/14 12:08 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Intact Brown Neg 0

84 9/17/14 12:08 2008 Interior Door Jamb Metal Intact Brown Neg 0

85 9/17/14 12:08 2008 Interior Door Wood Det Varnish Neg 0.01

86 9/17/14 12:08 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

87 9/17/14 12:09 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

88 9/17/14 12:09 2008 Interior Wall Panel Det Varnish Neg 0

No. Time Bldg. Room Component Feature Substrate Condition Color Results PbC

89 9/17/14 12:09 2008 Interior Wall Wood Det Varnish Neg 0

90 9/17/14 12:10 2008 Interior Chair Rail Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

91 9/17/14 12:10 2008 Interior Window Sill Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

92 9/17/14 12:10 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Pos 0.1

93 9/17/14 12:12 2008 Interior Wall CMU Det Beige Pos 0.4

94 9/17/14 12:12 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Intact White Neg 0.01

95 9/17/14 12:13 2008 Interior Window Pane Glass Intact White Neg 0.01

96 9/17/14 12:13 2008 Interior Window Sill Plaster Intact White Neg 0.07

97 9/17/14 12:14 2008 Interior Window Sill Plaster Intact White Pos 0.16

98 9/17/14 12:15 2008 Interior Wall Board Wood Intact White Neg 0

99 9/17/14 12:16 2008 Interior Baseboard Ceramic Det White Neg 0.05

100 9/17/14 12:16 2008 Interior Wall Panel Intact Varnish Neg 0

101 9/17/14 12:16 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact White Neg 0

102 9/17/14 12:17 2008 Interior Trim-Corner Wood Det Brown Pos 2

103 9/17/14 12:18 2008 Interior Door Casing Metal Det Brown Pos 0.19

104 9/17/14 12:18 2008 Interior Door Jamb Metal Det Brown Neg 0.08

105 9/17/14 12:18 2008 Interior Door Transom Metal Det Brown Pos 0.12

106 9/17/14 12:19 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Intact Gray Pos 0.18

107 9/17/14 12:19 2008 Interior Window Sash Metal Det Blue Pos 0.15

108 9/17/14 12:19 2008 Interior Chair Rail Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

109 9/17/14 12:20 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Blue Neg 0

110 9/17/14 12:20 2008 Interior Wall Drywall Intact Lt Blue Neg 0

111 9/17/14 12:21 2008 Interior Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

112 9/17/14 12:21 2008 Interior Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

113 9/17/14 12:21 2008 Interior Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

114 9/17/14 12:23 Calibration Pos 1

115 9/17/14 12:24 Calibration Pos 1

116 9/17/14 12:25 Calibration Neg 0.9