FA301622B0001 REPAIR SCHOFIELD ROAD Questions and Answers Goverment Response 45 to 47 REVSION 1 27MAY22.pdf

PDF 569 KB Posted

Attached to
REPAIR SCHOFIELD ROAD -JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX
Solicitation number
FA301622B0001
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains government responses to questions regarding Solicitation Number FA301622B0001 for repair work on Schofield Road at Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston in Texas. The scope of work involves lime stabilization of the subgrade and Portland cement stabilization of the base course, with a 3-inch binder course required to be Type B asphalt for base repair sections. The project value is between $1 million and $5 million and has been set aside solely for women-owned small businesses. Offerors should complete various sections of the SF1442 solicitation form and include a detailed RS Means cost proposal and any supporting documents in their electronic bid submission. The closing date for bids and additional details on offer submittal are provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA301622B00010004 AMENDMENT 0004.pdf PDF
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road Q AND A 2.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Revised SOW and Specifications dated 23Jun2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 14- Appendix. G - Union Pacific ROW.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 -Appendix F - Rideshare Req..pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 11 - Section L Rev06Jun2022.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 1 SOW and Specifications 6 Jun 22.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 2 -Appendix A - Schofield Rd Site Map.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301622B00010003 SF 30.pdf PDF
FA301622B00010002.pdf PDF
Rideshare Requirements.pptx PPTX presentation
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road Q and A Govt Response 45 to 47.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Section L.pdf PDF
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road QA - Govt Response 18May2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 SOW and Specifications REVISED 16 May 22.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment AMENDMENT 0001 FA301622B00010001 .pdf PDF
SITE VISIT SIGN IN SCHOFIELD.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Section L (1).pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Section M.pdf PDF
Attachment 8-Climatology Report 2022-2021.pdf PDF
Attachment 7-Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment 1- SOW and Division 01 Specifications 19 APR 22.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA301622B0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 10- Construction Cost breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 -1354 15feb22.pdf PDF
Attachments 2-6 Apdix A-Ezip.zip ZIP file
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

QUESTIONS 45-47

45) To confirm specification to lime stabilize the subgrade, typically we lime stabilize the base course and not the subgrade?

Government Response: Statement of Work indicates stabilization of base course and subgrade are required. See page 13, para 1.3.1.14. For bidding purposes contractor is to assume lime stabilization for sub-grade which is stated in the SOW. (see section 01 11 00, paragraph 1.3.1.4) Also refer to UFGS 32 11 13.13 which is listed in section 01 11 00, paragraph 3.1)

46) Will geogrid be required for the subgrade if the prior question is to lime stabilize the base course?

Government Response: Per the SOW; Portland Cement-Stabilization is required for the base course stabilization. SEE UFGS specification 32 11 33.13; which is listed in Section 01 11 00, paragraph 3.1

47) Will the 3” binder course for the base repair sections be required to be Type B asphalt?

Government Response: Please refer to Question 34, of the Government Response to the Q&A.

****** Due to administrative error in mis-numbering, there is not a "Question 44"******.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .