Attachment 12 - Section M.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
REPAIR SCHOFIELD ROAD -JBSA FORT SAM HOUSTON, TX
Solicitation number
FA301622B0001
Issued by

About this file

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a solicitation seeking repair services for Schofield Road on Joint Base San Antonio - Fort Sam Houston in Texas. Price will be the sole evaluation factor, with award going to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer. The requirement is set aside exclusively for woman-owned small businesses. Offerors must submit pricing details and completed contract forms electronically by the closing date. The work magnitude is estimated between $1 million and $5 million.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA301622B00010004 AMENDMENT 0004.pdf PDF
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road Q AND A 2.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Revised SOW and Specifications dated 23Jun2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 14- Appendix. G - Union Pacific ROW.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 -Appendix F - Rideshare Req..pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 11 - Section L Rev06Jun2022.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 1 SOW and Specifications 6 Jun 22.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 2 -Appendix A - Schofield Rd Site Map.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301622B00010003 SF 30.pdf PDF
FA301622B00010002.pdf PDF
Rideshare Requirements.pptx PPTX presentation
FA301622B0001 REPAIR SCHOFIELD ROAD Questions and Answers Goverment Response 45 to 47 REVSION 1 27MAY22.pdf PDF
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road Q and A Govt Response 45 to 47.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Section L.pdf PDF
FA301622B0001 Repair Schofield Road QA - Govt Response 18May2022.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 SOW and Specifications REVISED 16 May 22.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment AMENDMENT 0001 FA301622B00010001 .pdf PDF
SITE VISIT SIGN IN SCHOFIELD.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Section L (1).pdf PDF
Attachment 8-Climatology Report 2022-2021.pdf PDF
Attachment 7-Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment 1- SOW and Division 01 Specifications 19 APR 22.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA301622B0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 10- Construction Cost breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 -1354 15feb22.pdf PDF
Attachments 2-6 Apdix A-Ezip.zip ZIP file
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Section M – Evaluation for Award

Evaluation and Basis for Award. The 502d CONS/JBKAD will issue an award to the offeror who is determined to offer the best value to the Government.

1. The Government will perform a general review of each bid, as follows:

a) Only bids that are specific to this effort will be evaluated.

b) This acquisition is restricted for Woman Owned Small Businesses(WOSB) as determined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in accordance with 13 CFR Part 125. Therefore, only offer from WOSB will be eligible for award.

c) Offerors will be checked against the List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. Any offeror who is listed will be eliminated without further consideration.

d) Bids will be checked for minor informalities or irregularities. The Contracting Officer either will give the offeror an opportunity through a clarification to cure any defect resulting from a minor informality or irregularity, whichever is to the advantage of the Government. The Government plans on awarding a contract without conducting discussions.

e) Price will be the sole evaluation factor evaluated.

f) Offerors shall submit all required bid documentation to be considered responsive (Volume

I and II).

2. Only electronic copies will be evaluated. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes:

a) Volume I – Pricing (Contractor Detailed Cost Breakdown): The offeror shall submit a detailed cost breakdown (Attachment #10) displaying the essential elements of work with pricing.

b) Volume II – Contract Documentation (Filled SF 1442): The offeror shall submit the SF 1442 with all required fill ins.

(i) Section A: SF 1442 with completed blocks 14, 15, 16 (if different than block 14), 17, 20a, 20b, 20c, and block 19 if amendments have been issued. An authorized official of the firm must sign SF 1442 block 20b.

(ii) Section B: Complete pricing information for all CLINs.

(ii) Section I: Complete appropriate certifications.

(iv) Section K: Complete all appropriate and applicable Representations and

Certifications.

(v) Bid Guarantee: A copy of the bid guarantee should be included in the electronic bid. The original sealed copy should be mailed out addressed to the official POCs so it is received no later than the time and day of bid opening.

3. Price Evaluation. Price will be the sole factor evaluated to determine best value for the Government. The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B as supplemented by the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown (Attachment 10).

FA301622B0001 Attachment 12 14 Apr 22

3.1 Price Factor: Prices will be evaluated based on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP), which will be calculated by multiplying the quantities for CLIN 0001 by the CLIN’s unit price to determine the total amount for CLIN0001. The same process will be calculated for all the subsequent CLINs. The total amount for all CLINs added together will then equal the

TEP.

3.2 Best Value: The offeror that provides the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for all items covered in the solicitation will represent the best value and be considered for an award.

3.3 Price Reasonableness: The contracting officer will make a determination that a prospective contractor is responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1 and that the prices offered are reasonable and balanced using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1. Note that unreasonably high prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for the Government not to proceed with award. The burden of proof for credibility of prices rests with the Offeror.

3.4 Adequate price competition for this acquisition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1) is anticipated;

therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required per FAR 15.403-1(b)(1). If at any time, however, during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, or if price reasonableness cannot be determined offerors may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or additional data other than certified cost or pricing data (as appropriate) for the CO to determine price reasonableness.

(End of Evaluation)

FA301622B0001 Attachment 12 14 Apr 22

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .