Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Trainer Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3016-16-R-0009
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers__1-4_28_April_16.doc | DOC document | |
| Addendum_1_-_52.212-1.pdf | ||
| Attachment_03.pdf | ||
| Addendum_1_-_52.212-1.pdf | ||
| Attachment_07.pdf | ||
| Attachment_11.pdf | ||
| Attachment_13.pdf | ||
| Attachment_04.pdf | ||
| Attachment_15.pdf | ||
| Attachment_21.pdf | ||
| Attachment_05.pdf | ||
| Attachment_18.pdf | ||
| Attachment_02.pdf | ||
| FA3016-16-R-0009.pdf | ||
| Attachment_16.pdf | ||
| Performance_Work_Statement_PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_09.pdf | ||
| JBSA_Lackland_Map_for_Base_Passes.pdf | ||
| Attachment_12.pdf | ||
| Attachment_20.pdf | ||
| Attachment_17.pdf | ||
| Addendum_2_-_52.212-2.pdf | ||
| Attachment_01.pdf | ||
| Attachment_22.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_Sample_Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_19.pdf | ||
| Attachment_08.pdf | ||
| Attachment_06.pdf |
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR: [CONTRACTOR INSERT NAME]
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA3016-16-R-0009
TO: [CONTRACTOR INSERT RESPONDER’S NAME]
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Trainer Maintenance Service at Joint Base San Antonio, Lackland.
Questionnaires are due by 1100 AM CST May 9, 2015. Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer, michael.doerr@us.af.mil or robert.delarosa.1@us.af.mil respectively.
Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ______________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: __________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ________________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
__________________________ Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
Contract Specialist: Michael V. Doerr/SSgt/USAF michael.doerr@us.af.mil Contracting Officer: Robert De La Rosa robert.delarosa.1@us.af.mil D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1 |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel. |
| 3 |
| Delegated authority to project managers/supervisors to commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5 |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures. |
| 7 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner. |
| 8 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9 |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12 |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13 |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14 |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 15 |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16 |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17 |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18 |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19 |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 20 |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21 |
| Contractor's overall performance |
| 22 |
| Was the contractor issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome under “remarks.” |
| YES |
| NO |
| 23 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| NO |
Remarks
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .