Att_6_PPQ_5_Jan_2015.doc

DOC document 74 KB Posted

Attached to
Full Food Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3016-15-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This 5 Jan 2015 version replaces previous version. Updated POC info on page 1.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Full Food Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA3016-15-R-0003-0004.pdf PDF
13_FEB_2015_Att_3_Electronic_Sect_B_Worksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Conformed_FA3016-15-R-0003-0003_Food_Service.pdf PDF
FA3016-15-R-0003-0003_Food_Service.pdf PDF
15-R-0003_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Att_1_PWS_Final_9_Feb_15_(2).pdf PDF
Attachment_8_Supplemental_Agreement.pdf PDF
FA3016-15-R-0003-0001.pdf PDF
JBSA_FSH_Food_Services_Site_Visit_Minutes_7_Jan_15.pdf PDF
Attachment_1._Sign-in_Sheet.pdf PDF
Att 1 PWS Final 16 Oct 14.doc DOC document
Att 7 SubContractor Consent Letter.doc DOC document
Att 1-1 FloorDiagramsSlagel.pdf PDF
Att 1-1 5124FloorPlan.pdf PDF
Att 6 PPQ.doc DOC document
Att 1-3 GovFurnMat.doc DOC document
Att 3 Electronic Sect B Worksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Att 5 PPI.doc DOC document
Att 1-1 5107FloorPlan.pdf PDF
Att 1-1 5105FloorPlan.pdf PDF
Att 2 CBA.pdf PDF
Att 1-4 Recommended Supplies.doc DOC document
Att 1-1 RoccoDFAC FloorPlan .pdf PDF
FA3016-15-R-0003 Full Food Service.pdf PDF
Att 1-1 5106FloorPlan.pdf PDF
Att 1-2 GFE List.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Food Service contract at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact either Mr. Charles D. Rhea at 210-295-4929 or Mr. Randy Allen at 210-808-0193.

CHARLES D. RHEA

Contracting Officer

1 Atch

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________

Fax Number:

Email Address: _____________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Mr. Randy Allen at randy.d.allen10.civ@mail.mil and courtesy copy Mr. Charles D. Rhea at charles.d.rhea.civ@mail.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .