AETC BOS - Industry Survey.pdf
PDF 247 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA300224AETCBOS
About this file
This document is a Request for Industry Input for a planned multiple-award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract to provide Base Operations Support (BOS) services to the Air Education and Training Command (AETC). The government is requesting industry feedback on potential evaluation factors, technical evaluation methodology, and past performance evaluation criteria for the future solicitation. Key details include:
The government is considering an enterprise-wide BOS services contract to support all AETC bases, with a 10-year ordering period and up to 5 additional years of performance. The NAICS code is 561210 - Facilities Support Services with a $47 million size standard. The government is specifically seeking feedback on the importance and evaluation of 21 different BOS service areas, as well as recommendations on pricing methodology, small business participation, and contractor capabilities to meet surge requirements. Industry responses are due by September 20, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Work Statement 6 Jan 25 DRAFT.pdf | ||
| Comment Resolution Matrix for PWS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AETC BOS Industry Day Slides 28 Sep 2024.pdf | ||
| AETC MAC IDIQ Questions Updated 10 Sep 2024.pdf | ||
| Registration for Industry Day.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AETC BOS IDIQ Industry Day 28 - 29 Aug 2024.pdf | ||
| AETC BOS RFI.pdf | ||
| Draft Performance Work Statement 11 Apr 2024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Survey – Request for Industry Input
Suspense – 20 September 2024
Air Education Training Command (AETC) Base Operations Support (BOS) Services – Enterprise Solution
This document is intended to further support the AETC BOS Services – Enterprise Solution Request for Information (RFI) that was posted to SAM.gov on 11 Apr 2024, and the AETC BOS industry day that was held 28 – 29 August 2024.
The 338th Enterprise Sourcing Squadron (ESS) is continuing to determine the feasibility of an AETC Enterprise Wide, Multiple Award Contract BOS services to AETC. The Government is requesting industry input to best develop potential evaluation factors for this effort. This input may be provided by answering the following questions.
1) Please identify the PWS service area level of importance to Base Operational Support missions by numbering each service area from 1 to 21 (1 being most important).
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency Maintenance
__Airfield Management
2) Which PWS service areas do you recommend evaluating as part of the technical evaluation to ensure an effective and streamlined multiple contract award evaluation? (Place an “X” next to the corresponding service area)
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency
3) For the technical evaluation methodology:
a. Please provide your recommended technical evaluation methodology i.e.
Acceptable/Unacceptable, Technical/Risk, etc. and why.
b. What criteria do you recommend using to evaluate technical proposals?
c. How do you suggest we weigh the different evaluation criteria to ensure the most qualified contractors are selected?
d. What are the key performance indicators that you would recommend including in the evaluation criteria?
e. How do you recommend we evaluate the contractor's proposed innovation and continuous improvement plan?
4) Which PWS service areas do you recommend evaluating as part of the past performance evaluation to ensure an effective and streamlined multiple contract award evaluation? (Place an “X” next to the corresponding service area)
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency
5) How many years do you recommend the Government include in the recency period when evaluating past performance? (Place an “X” next to the corresponding response)
__2 Years __3 Years __4 Years __5 Years __6 Years
6) Please indicate which of the 21 PWS service areas you could directly perform under one CAGE/DUNS/UEI code. (Place an “X” next to the corresponding service area)
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency
7) Please indicate which of the 21 PWS service areas you could perform though sub-contracting and/or a teaming arrangement. (Place an “X” next to the corresponding service area)
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency
8) If the Government chose to solicit the 21 PWS service areas in groups/pools of like/similar service areas, how do you suggest grouping them? (Please use “A” for your first grouping, “B” for your second… etc.)
__All Services __Facility Maintenance/Operations __Weather Services
__Transient Maintenance __Installation Engineering __Transportation
__Resource Management __Grounds Maintenance __Human Resources
__Communications and IT __Custodial Services __Community Services
__Visual Information __Emergency Management __Purchasing
__Publication Management __Vertical Transportation Equipment
__Supply/Logistics
__Installation Management __Fire and Emergency
9) Please provide feedback on any previous BOS source selection you proposed to in the past.
a. Are there any best practices or evaluation procedures your company would like to see repeated?
b. Are there any practices or evaluation procedures your company would like to see not be repeated?
10) In your response, please provide your companies size of business and socioeconomic status, pursuant to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 561210 – Facilities Support Services (Size Standard $47 million).
This notice is issued solely for information and planning (market research) purposes. It does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP in the future. Conducting the Industry Day does not commit the Government to contract for any supply or service. Further, the Government is not at this time seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals. Respondents are advised that the U.S. Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in responding to this request for responses or participating in the Industry Day; all costs associated with responding to this request will be solely at the interested party’s expense. Not responding to this request does not preclude participation in any future acquisition or RFP, if any is issued. It is the responsibility of the vendor who is interested in any potential future solicitation(s) to monitor all sites for additional information pertaining to this requirement.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .