04 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 227 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Eglin Demo IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA282325R0020
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Demolition Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract (Solicitation Number FA282325R0020) for Eglin Air Force Base. The form provides a structured evaluation framework for assessing a contractor's past performance across nine key performance areas, including project scheduling, submittals, payroll management, personnel quality, subcontractor management, problem-solving, quality control, and overall reliability. The evaluation uses a confidence assessment scale ranging from Substantial Confidence (high expectation of successful performance) to No Confidence (no expectation of successful performance), allowing the government to systematically rate a contractor's previous contract execution capabilities.
The questionnaire is designed to capture detailed insights into a contractor's performance, with rating options for each evaluation criteria and space for additional comments and explanations. Specific assessment areas include the contractor's ability to develop realistic progress schedules, provide timely and accurate submittals, comply with labor regulations, deploy experienced management, effectively manage subcontractors, proactively address problems, and deliver quality work. The form is part of the solicitation process for a demolition contract at Eglin AFB, which requires furnishing labor, materials, and equipment to perform demolition work on the base and surrounding reservation, with work to be performed on an "as required" task order basis.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 01 - Line Item Pricing Matrix - Demo IDIQ_2025-2030.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 03 - Past Performance Information.pdf | ||
| 07 - Wage Determinations - Building - All Counties.pdf | ||
| 09 - Wage Determinations - Residential - All Counties.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA282325R0020.pdf | ||
| 06 - Instructions_Evaluation Factors.pdf | ||
| 10 - SOW IDIQ Demolition Specification-20 May 25.pdf | ||
| 02 - Financial Responsibility Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| 05 - Consent Form.pdf | ||
| 08 - Wage Determinations - Heavy - All Counties.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX B
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal: FA2823-25-R-0020
Demolition IDIQ; FTFA 25-AD12, Eglin AFB, FL 32542
1. Name of Contractor:
Contract or Identifying Number:
Title/Description of Contract:
Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Appendix A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements.
2. Brief description of scope of work:
EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Assessment Definition
Substantial Confidence
(SC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
(SAT)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence
(LC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
(NC)
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, The Government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence
(Neutral) (UC)
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: ___________________________
01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.
SC SAT LC NC UC
02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
SC SAT LC NC UC
03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.
SC SAT LC NC UC
04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
SC SAT LC NC UC
05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them.
SC SAT LC NC UC
06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
SC SAT LC NC UC
07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.
SC SAT LC NC UC
08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC
09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section
SC SAT LC NC UC
OVERALL RATING: ______________________________
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Name of Person Completing Evaluation:
Base/Company: Date:
Position Title/Grade: Phone:
Email: Fax:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .