Past Performance Questionnaire Template.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grounds Maintenance IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA282324Q0021
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template. It provides a standardized format for assessing a contractor's prior performance on a federal contract. The template covers key performance areas such as overall fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate. It uses a rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory to evaluate the contractor's performance in meeting contractual requirements. The questionnaire also includes sections for capturing contract details, the respondent's information, and an overall performance summary.
The related federal contract opportunity is for Grounds Maintenance IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity) services at Eglin Air Force Base. The solicitation number is FA282324Q0021. The contract has a performance period consisting of the base period plus any options. Offerors must submit quotations in accordance with FAR 52.212-1 and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM). Questions and requests for clarification must be submitted in writing by email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist by April 22, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice of Award Letter.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4531 Rev. 25 Okaloosa.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4561 Rev. 24 Escambia and Santa Rosa.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5731 Rev.25 Walton.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA282324Q00210001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Questions for Grounds Mx Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Solicitation FA282324Q0021.pdf | ||
| Map of Eglin Testing Range.jpg | JPG image | |
| IDIQ Cost Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS.pdf | ||
| Map and Directions.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA282324Q0021.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MARKET SEGMENT
| Ancillary Services |
| Dental Services |
| Nursing Services |
| Physician Services |
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Number of Credentialed FTEs:
Number of Privileged FTEs:
Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified HCW’s IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .