PPQ.pdf

PDF 192 KB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Solid Waste Management Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2543-19-R-A-001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Integrated Solid Waste Management Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_3_Description.pdf PDF
Amend_3_FA2543-19-R-A001_ISWM.pdf PDF
Question_2_-_Buckely_AFB.pdf PDF
Amend_2_FA2543-19-R-A001_ISWM.pdf PDF
Amendment_2_Description.pdf PDF
Amend_1_FA2543-19-R-A001_ISWM.pdf PDF
Question_Responses.pdf PDF
PWS_ISWM_27_Aug_18.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_Description.pdf PDF
WD_15-5419_10_Jul_18.pdf PDF
PWS_ISWM_8_Aug_18.pdf PDF
Combo_-_FA2543-19-R-A001_Integrated_Solid_Waste.pdf PDF
QASP-new_10Jan18_signed.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

460TH SPACE WING (AFSPC)

AMERICA’S MISSILE WARNING WING

15 August 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

FROM: 460 CONF/PKA

SUBJECT: Request for Performance Information, Solicitation # FA2543-19-R-A001, Integrated Solid Waste & Recycling Management

1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort.

This effort, solicitation number FA2543-1-R-A001 is for Integrated Solid Waste & Recycling Management Services for Buckley AFB, CO. We depend upon information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of their performance. Therefore, we request that the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror’s present/past performance.

2. Our areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. You are urged to submit your comments on similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information that you think would benefit Buckley AFB, CO in our evaluation of the offeror’s proposal would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken.

3. Due time constraints, it is imperative that the questionnaire be completed and returned by 2:00 PM MST EDT on 5 September 2018 to the following addresses:

460th Contracting Flight 460th Contracting Flight Attn: Mr. Milan D. Woodard Attn: SSgt Zacarias Sena 510 S. Aspen St (MS 92) 510 S. Aspen St (MS 92) Buckley AFB, CO 80011-9572 Buckley AFB, CO 80011-9572 Telephone: (720) 847-6440 Telephone: (720) 847-9140 Fax: (720) 847-6443 Fax: (720) 847-6443

Email: milan.woodard@us.af.mil Email: zacarias.sena.1@us.af.mil

Mark documents “SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY”

4. If additional information is required, please contact, Mr. Milan D. Woodard at (720) 847-6440 or Mr. Reginald E. Myles at (720) 847-7427.

REGINALD E. MYLES

Contracting Officer mailto:milan.woodard@us.af.mil mailto:zacarias.sena.1@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA2543-19-R-A001

Integrated Solid Waste Management & Recycling

Services

1. Please complete this questionnaire. The following is an explanation of the evaluation codes:

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY

RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Evaluator please complete the following:

A. Contractor:

B. Subcontractor:

C. Contract number:

D. Total annual contract dollar amount:

E. Period of Performance: From: To:

Exercised Option Periods:

F. Description of services being performed:

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SOLICITATION

NUMBER: FA2543-19-R-A001 Integrated Solid Waste Management

& Recycling Service

1. How well did management work to resolve problems encountered throughout the performance of the contract.

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

2. How well did the contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

3. How well did the home office participate in solving significant local problems?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

4. How well did the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

5. How well did the contractor comply with all regulations and guidelines?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

6. How effective was the contractor’s quality control program?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

7. Did the contractor correct deficiencies in a timely manner in accordance with their quality control procedures?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

8. Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another contract?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

9. Did management personnel have sufficient experience to accomplish the requirements of the contract?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

10. Please rate the contractor’s demonstrated ability on this contract in each of the following service areas (if applicable). “Satisfactory” needs no further explanation; however, if possible, please provide a short explanatory narrative for performance deemed Unknown Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence.

a. Did contractor exhibit ability to identify and correct non-compliance issues or internal concerns (i.e.

management, personnel, scheduling, and quality issues)?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

b. The contractor prevents trends in unacceptable performance?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

c. During the course of the contract, was notification sent to contractor identifying unsatisfactory work:

[ ] Yes [ ] No

Narrative:

d. If answered, was immediate action taken by contractor to correct the situation? [ ] Yes [ ] No

e. How well did contractor meet required deadlines?

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

f. How well did contractor respond to contract changes?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

Please check “yes” or “no” to the following questions:

11. Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied?

[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No

Narrative:

12. Does the Offeror have experience hauling refuse and/or recycleables in large volume?

[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No

Narrative:

13. Does the offeror have experience in organic waste collection and proper disposal?

[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No

14. Does the offeror have experience operating a recycling collection point (non-sorting recycle center)?

[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No

Narrative:

RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

A. Name(s):

B. Phone Number(s):

C. Position/Duty Title :

Name of reviewer (print) ;

Location

Telephone Number

Attachment 4
* PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA4803-18-R-0018

2018-08-15T17:58:04-0600
MYLES.REGINALD.E.1075281281

File details come from the government source that posted it.