Attachment__8_SABER_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 81 KB Posted

Attached to
CAPE SABER Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2521-14-R-0018
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

ATTACHMENT 8 SABER Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Sensitive Information (When Filled Out)

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA2521-14-R-0018

Attachment #8

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ______________________________ Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: _________________ Fax Number:

Email Address: _____________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: TSGT JEREMY BOGGS AND LINDA BRANTLEY at jeremy.boggs@us.af.mil and linda.brantley@patrick.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Upon award the contractor was timely in fulfilling contract requirements (submitting documents, starting work, submitting materials & acknowledgements, etc)?
2.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
3.
Demonstrated professionalism during negotiations.
4.
Demonstrates ability to hire, maintain, & replace if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
5.
Provided experienced employees with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.
6.
Provided material submittals in accordance with contract requirements.
7.
Demonstrated ability to keep change orders to a minimum.
8.
Compliance with Davis-Bacon Act and EEO requirements to include Payrolls properly completed and submitted
9.
Maintained a single point of contact to manage and resolve problems.
10.
Provided adequate employee supervision
11.
Company HQ participated in solving significant local problems
12.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
13.
Met established turnaround times for required periodic contract reports.
14.
Identified problems as they occurred.
15.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
16.
Was responsive to contract changes.
17.
Ability to hire and manage quality subcontractors
18.
Accuracy of proposals submitted.
19.
Completion of punch-list items.
20
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
21.
Developed realistic progress schedules and stay on schedule
22.
Adequacy of site cleanup- all work and storage areas are cleaned and secured at end of each day
23.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
24.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
25.
Use of Specified Materials – contractor used specified or equal material or products
26.
Ability to respond to short- or no-notice emergencies.
27.
Initiative in identifying and resolving unforeseen technical and schedule problems (causes, impacts, and resolutions).
28.
Ability to effectively plan efforts, provide realistic cost and schedule estimates.
29.
Accuracy of proposals submitted.
30.
Quality of work performed.
31.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
32.
Did the effort involve managing at least five (5) projects simultaneously with a combined value over $750K ?
YES/NO
33.
Did the effort involve managing at least two (2) projects simultaneously with a combined value over $1.5M?
YES/NO
34.
Did the effort involve managing at least two (2) projects simultaneously with a combined value over $100K ?
YES/NO
35.
Did the effort involve ALL of the following disciplines: Carpentry, Electrical, Plumbing, HVAC, Masonry, and Painting?
YES/NO
36.
Did the effort involve at least three of the following disciplines: Carpentry, Electrical, Plumbing, HVAC, Masonry, and Painting?
YES/NO
37.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
38.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
39.
Is the contractor rated in CCAS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________CONTRACT NUMBER _______________________ Remarks:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Source Selection Sensitive Information (When Filled Out)

Attachment #8

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .