2_-__JCAS_MOA.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
AFSOC Contracted Close Air Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA0021-16-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Attach 2 - JCAS MOA

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AFSOC Contracted Close Air Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
1_CCAS_PWS_07_Dec_2015.pdf PDF
1c_-_CDRL_A008_(Airworthiness)_v2.pdf PDF
Amend_05_FA0021-16-R-0001.pdf PDF
FA0021-16-R-0001_Amendment_04.pdf PDF
Section_L-4-2-_Cross_reference_matrix_(v4)_Amend_4.pdf PDF
FA0021-16-R-0001_-_CCAS_RFP.pdf PDF
FA0021-16-R-00001_Amendment_3.pdf PDF
9_-Cost_Proposal_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA0021-16-R-0001_Amend_02.pdf PDF
9_-Cost_Proposal_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA0021-16-R-0001_-_CCAS_RFP.pdf PDF
4_-_PP_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Q A_FA0021-16-R-0001.pdf PDF
FA0021-16-R-0001_Amend_01.pdf PDF
1_CCAS_PWS_02_Nov__15.pdf PDF
7_-_Consent_Ltr.pdf PDF
1c_-_CDRL_A002_(TRIP_REPORT).pdf PDF
1c_-_CDRL_A005_(CONTRACTOR_SOP).pdf PDF
9_-Cost_Proposal_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1b_-_PWS__App_H_-_Add't_Terms_and_Conditions_CCAS.docx DOCX document
1c_-_CDRL_A007_(ACCIDENT_INCIDENT_REPORT).pdf PDF
1c_-_CDRL_A006_(SCHEMATICS).pdf PDF
3_-_DD_FORM_254_-_Combined_CCAS5.pdf PDF
6_-P_ _PP_Citation.docx DOCX document
1c_-_CDRL_A001_(MONTHLY_STATUS_REPORT).pdf PDF
5_-_PPQ_Recipient_List.docx DOCX document
4_-_PP_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
1c_-_CDRL_A008_(Airworthiness).pdf PDF
1c_-CDRL_A004_(Roster).pdf PDF
1c_-_CDRL_A003_(Quality).pdf PDF
1a_-_Mission_Trip_Request.pdf PDF
FA0021-16-R-0001_-_CCAS_RFP.pdf PDF
1_CCAS_PWS_21_oct_15.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

UNCLASSIFIED

JCAS AP MOA 2004-01

Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) (Ground)

1 Jan 2012

Edition – 2 (25 Jan 2013)

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)

Between

Director, Joint Staff J8 and

U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7

U.S. Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans, and Requirements

U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations

U.S. Navy Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Operations, Plans, and Strategy

U.S. Special Operations Command Deputy Commander

Chief of Air Force, Royal Australian Air Force

Land Component Commander, Belgian Defence

Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, Canadian Armed Forces

Commander Air Force, Czech Republic

Chief of Operations, Finnish Defense Forces

Director, Operations and Training Department, Hungarian Ministry of Defence

Chief of Defense, Republic of Latvia

Director General for Capabilities and Armaments, Republic of Lithuania

Minister of Defence, Kingdom of The Netherlands

Chief of Army, New Zealand Defense Forces

Commander, Norwegian Land Warfare Center

Minister of National Defence of the Republic of Poland

Director of Armed Forces Training and Procurement, Swedish Armed Forces

Commander, United Arab Emirates Air Force and Air Defence and

Deputy Commander-in-Chief Operations, Air Command, Royal Air Force

JCAS AP MOA 2004-01

Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) (Ground)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PURPOSE

2. BACKGROUND

2.1. THE JOINT FIRE SUPPORT EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE (JFS ESC)

2.2. JCAS ACTION PLAN

2.3. LEGAL AUTHORITY

3. SCOPE

4. RESPONSIBILITIES

5. ACCREDITATION, CERTIFICATION, QUALIFICATION AND JMTL

5.1. ACCREDITATION

5.1.1. PARTNER NATION ACCREDITATION PROCESS

5.2. JTAC CERTIFICATION AND QUALIFICATION

5.2.1. JTAC INSTRUCTORS

5.2.2. JTAC CERTIFICATION TRAINING

5.2.3. JTAC QUALIFICATION PROCESS

5.2.4. JTAC EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS

5.2.5. JTAC EVALUATOR

5.2.6. JTAC REQUALIFICATION PROCESS

5.2.7. DEPLOYMENT PROCESS

5.2.8. JTAC EVALUATION FOLDER (TRAINING JACKET)

5.3. JTAC JOINT MISSION TASK LIST (JMTL)

5.3.1. DUTY AREA 01 – CAS PLANNING

5.3.2. DUTY AREA 02 – CAS PREPARATION

5.3.3. DUTY AREA 03 – CAS EXECUTION

6. PARTICIPATING U.S. SIGNATURE PAGE

7. PARTICIPATING PARTNER NATION SIGNATURE PAGE

A.1. CLOSE AIR SUPPORT CONTROLS FOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING

A.2. JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROLLER (JTAC) CAS LOG

A.3. JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROLLER (JTAC) EVALUATION FORM, AND EVALUATION

CRITERIA

A.4. EXAMPLE JTAC INSTRUCTOR WAIVER (OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE)

A.5. EXAMPLE JTAC INSTRUCTOR WAIVER (OPERATIONAL FAC(A) EXPERIENCE)

A.6. EXAMPLE JTAC CANDIDATE WAIVER (OPERATIONAL/FIRE SUPPORT EXPERIENCE)

A.7. EXAMPLE JTAC CANDIDATE WAIVER (ONE YEAR OPERATIONAL FLYING EXPERIENCE) 57

A.8. EXAMPLE PHASED PROGRAM ACADEMIC DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST

A.9. EXAMPLE JTAC STUDENT ACADEMIC COMPLETION LETTER

A.10. JFS ESC ACCREDITED JTAC SIMULATORS

B.1. JTAC TRAINING STANDARDIZATION

B.2. JTAC STANDARDIZATION TEAM CHECKLISTS

B.3. SAMPLE FINAL REPORT

B.4. JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROL (JTAC) OPERATIONAL UNIT CHECKLIST

C.1. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

C.2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

EDITION 2

DATED 25 JANUARY 2013

1. Title Page - Added: “Commander Air Force, Czech Republic” and “Director General for

Capabilities and Armaments, Republic of Lithuania”.

2. Paragraph 4, Page 5 – Responsibilities - English language requirement was updated.

3. Paragraph 5.2.1, Page 6 – JTAC Instructors, added "(see examples in Appendix A, Enclosure 4 and 5)." to JTAC Instructor Waiver authority note.

4. Paragraph 5.2.2.1, Page 7 – Added: “Hungarian Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC)

Program.” and “United Arab Emirates Air Warfare Center Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC)

Certification Course".

5. Paragraph 5.2.2.2, Page 7 – Change reference in “Accredited Simulation Device” to “5.2.3.2.”

6. Paragraph 5.2.2.3, Page 8 – JTAC Certification Process, added the following footnote "* JTAC candidate waiver authority will be in accordance with Service, USSOCOM, or Partner Nation directives, but should reside no lower than O-6/OF-5 (see examples in Appendix A, Enclosure 6 and 7). JTAC Programs which utilize a formal training pipeline (e.g. basic - intermediate -advanced) and /or an extended certification process (e.g. 12-18 months) do not require JTAC

Candidate waivers".

7. Paragraph 5.2.2.4, Page 10 – JTAC Schoolhouse Documentation, added "see examples in

Appendix A, Enclosure 8 and 9".

8. Paragraph 5.2.3.1, Page 11 – added para 5.2.3.1. FAC(A) with JTAC Qualification. Re-numbered

JTAC Training Simulators paragraph to 5.2.3.2.

9. Paragraph 5.2.3.2, Page 11 – JTAC Training Simulators, added “see accredited simulation devices in Appendix A, Enclosure10”.

10. Paragraph 5.3, Page 12 – JMTL 01.1.1, Delete: “Harrier GR-9”.

11. Paragraph 7, Page 32 – Partner Nation Signature Page - Added two Nations (Czech Republic, and

Lithuania).

12. Appendix A, Page 54 – added Enclosure 4, "Example JTAC Instructor Waiver (Operational

Experience)".

13. Appendix A, Page 55 – added Enclosure 5, " Example JTAC Instructor Waiver (Operational

FAC(A) Experience)".

14. Appendix A, Page 56 – added Enclosure 6, " Example JTAC Candidate Waiver (Operational/Fire

Support Experience)".

15. Appendix A, Page 57 – added Enclosure 7, " Example JTAC Candidate Waiver (One Year

Operational Flying Experience)".

16. Appendix A, Pages 58-63 – added Enclosure 8, " Example Phased Program Academic

Documentation Checklist".

17. Appendix A, Page 64 – added Enclosure 9, " Example JTAC Student Academic Completion

Letter".

18. Appendix A, Page 65-69 – added Enclosure 10, “JFS ESC Accredited JTAC Simulators”.

JOINT CLOSE AIR SUPPORT (JCAS) ACTION PLAN

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 2004-01

JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROLLER (JTAC) (GROUND)

1. Purpose. Establish minimum standards for JTAC certification and qualification, address

2003 United States General Accounting Office (GAO) recommendations and 2007 Bi-Strategic

Analysis and Lessons Learned (BALL) report to prepare terminal attack controllers to operate in a joint/combined environment. This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) also provides for the participation of Partner Nations in order to standardize JTAC certification and qualification requirements with Allied military forces.

2. Background. JTACs are the forward element of the theater air-ground system (TAGS) and must be organized, trained, and equipped to operate within that infrastructure. A JTAC is defined as, “A certified/qualified Service member who, from a forward position, directs the action of combat aircraft engaged in close air support and other air operations.” (JP 1-02, DOD

Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms) Contents of this MOA – specifically the Joint

Mission Task List (JMTL) and training standards are based on Joint Publication (JP) 3-09.3, CAS. A qualified JTAC will be recognized across DOD and participating nations as capable and authorized to perform terminal attack control.

2.1. The Joint Fire Support Executive Steering Committee (JFS ESC). The JFS ESC is chartered by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC), it nominates JCAS Action

Plan tasks based on combatant command, Service, agency, and participating Partner Nation inputs.

2.2. JCAS Action Plan. Issue 2 (JTAC (Ground)) of the JCAS Action Plan contains actions designed to standardize JTAC training throughout the Services, USSOCOM, and other DOD agencies. Issue 18 (Partner Nation JTAC and Forward Air Controllers (Airborne)

FAC (A) Training and Standardization) extends this standardization to Partner Nations.

Completion of these actions will improve joint/coalition force interoperability and reduce the potential for mishaps and fratricides. A JCAS working group convened and developed recommendations for JTAC certification and qualification requirements, procedures and associated JMTL. The JFS ESC endorsed these recommendations.

2.3. Legal Authority. Under United States domestic law, training and equipping JTACs is a

Title 10 responsibility of each Service component within the Department of Defense. In fulfillment of its Title 10 responsibility to train and equip the forces, each Service component has independently and voluntarily determined that it is in their Service’s best interests to meet or exceed the minimum standards for JTAC training and certification identified in this

MOA. This MOA does not create any legally binding obligations for any signatory under international law. US/DOD and participating Partner Nation may unilaterally withdraw from this MOA as specified in paragraphs 6 and 7. Further, this MOA does not prevent a

Geographic Combatant Commander (GCC) from requesting the Services to provide operational JTAC qualifications that exceed the standards identified in this MOA. If a GCC elects to specify JTAC qualifications that exceed the standards specified in this MOA then it would still be incumbent upon the Services to meet the GCC’s requirement.

3. Scope. This MOA outlines JTAC training by defining the certification and qualification process. It is intended for JTACs performing close air support (CAS). It does not address (FAC

(A)s) or individuals performing terminal guidance operations (TGO), regardless of the location of the terminal guidance operator. FAC (A) certification and qualification requirements are addressed in a separate MOA. Appendix A, Enclosure 1, lists CAS controls which support

JMTL Duty Area 03 (CAS Execution), Enclosure 2, is a standard form to be used as the basis for

JTAC log sheet, and Enclosure 3, is a standard form that may be used to document 18 month evaluations. Appendix B, Enclosure 1, outlines the standardization process for ensuring training standards are being adhered to by accredited schoolhouses, Enclosure 2, is the standardization team checklist, Enclosure 3, is a sample final report format to be used by the JTAC

Standardization Team, and Enclosure 4, is a unit checklist for JTAC evaluation team visits.

Appendix C, Enclosure 1, is abbreviations and acronyms, and Enclosure 2, is terms and definitions.

4. Responsibilities. Signatories which plan to train JTACs will ensure schools and units are in compliance with the certification requirements set forth in this MOA, that unit JTAC training programs comply with the qualification process as outlined in this MOA, and are in accordance with applicable national laws, regulations, and policies. Additionally, Signatories will ensure

JTAC trainees and JTACs satisfactorily accomplish the outlined JMTL during their certification and maintain identified qualification requirements. English is the language to be used; therefore, JTACs need adequate knowledge of and proficiency in the English language. NATO STANAG

6001 Level 3 is required in the following areas: Listening, Speaking, and Reading; Level 2+ is required in Writing (LSRW of 3 3 3 2+). It is a national responsibility to ensure JTACs meet this standard. Nations should bias any competency examination towards military, particularly

JTAC, terminology.

*JTACs entered into a JTAC-I upgrade must have successfully achieved a minimum of Level 3 in each area (LSRW of 3 3 3 3, based on STANAG 6001).

** If the ECL Test or a comparable test is used as part of the assessment, a minimum average test score of 85% is required, (80% is required in Writing for trainees entering a certification program). All four areas (LSRW) must be tested.

Being a Signatory of the JTAC MOA does not guarantee or obligate access to services, schoolhouse quotas, training assets, ranges, live fire training or the commitment of resources.

All activities conducted in furtherance of the JTAC MOA are subject to the availability of funds.

Signatories specifically agree that the JTAC MOA is non-binding in law.

5. Accreditation, Certification, Qualification and JMTL

5.1. Accreditation. The JFS ESC will accredit JTAC schoolhouses/programs that demonstrate compliance with academic, practical, and live terminal attack control training requirements in accordance with (IAW) the JTAC MOA. Accreditation/Biennial review is found in Appendix B, Enclosure 1. For Signatories without a schoolhouse, it is recognized that their certified JTACs have successfully completed an accredited JTAC schoolhouse course or an accredited Service or Nationally defined phased program, which includes successful completion of an accredited JTAC schoolhouse course and maintain a JTAC management program which meets JTAC MOA requirements.

5.1.1. Partner Nation Accreditation Process. The following conditions must be met prior to commencement of the accreditation process for Partner Nations:

− Agreement supporting the requirement (NATO/Bilateral).

− An official request for accreditation which is approved by the JFS ESC.

− Partner Nation is a JTAC MOA Signatory.

− Partner Nation has a Regulation/manual which outlines policies and personnel responsibilities for certification and qualification training of JTACs.

− One of the following: Partner Nation has an operating JTAC schoolhouse, member of multi-national schoolhouse, or has access to and successfully completes an accredited JTAC Schoolhouse (see para 5.2.2.1.).

5.2. JTAC Certification and Qualification. This section provides minimum entry level and recurring requirements that will be acceptable to joint/combined commanders.

5.2.1. JTAC Instructors. Qualified JTAC instructors (JTAC-I) must instruct JTAC trainees in terminal attack control that involves live aircraft. Non-JTAC certified instructors may instruct JTAC trainees on course topics which support CAS operations, but are not directly associated with controlling of aircraft (examples: fire support coordination measures, airspace management, and theater air-ground system). JTAC-I require a minimum of one year of operational experience as a qualified JTAC (or one year as an operational FAC(A)), have upgraded to instructor, and must meet JTAC qualification requirements to be designated a JTAC instructor*. JTAC-Is shall be Active

Duty, Guard, Reserve, DOD Civilian, Civilian Contractor or Partner Nation equivalent**.

During initial certification and requalification, when instructing JTAC trainees in terminal attack control, the instructor will be physically located with the individual being trained and be able to take control, if necessary.

Any non-certified personnel performing CAS familiarization controls must be under supervision of and physically co-located with a qualified JTAC. The qualified JTAC must be able to take control if necessary.

* JTAC Instructor waiver authority will be in accordance with Service, USSOCOM, or Partner

Nation directives, but should reside no lower than O-6/OF-5 (see examples in Appendix A, Enclosure 4 and 5).

** At the discretion of the Signatory, contractors may serve as JTAC-Is with the following criteria:

− Previously certified as JTAC-I while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.

− Meet certification and maintain qualification requirements in accordance with this MOA and their assigned Service/National regulation/directives.

− Restricted to operations in a training environment only.

− Prohibited from employing as a JTAC in support of contingency operations.

− Recurring evaluations will be completed by an Active, Guard, Reserve, or DOD Civilian

JTAC Evaluator (JTAC-E).

5.2.2. JTAC Certification Training.

5.2.2.1. Accredited JTAC Schoolhouses/Programs. The following organizations/training processes are currently recognized by the JFS ESC as being in compliance with JTAC MOA requirements:

− Expeditionary Warfare Training Group (EWTG) Atlantic/Pacific (LANT/PAC)

Tactical Air Control Party Course (TACP).

− Air Combat Command (ACC) Joint Terminal Attack Controller Qualification

Course (JTACQC).

− Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center (NSAWC) Joint Terminal Attack

Controller Course (JTACC).

− Special Operations Terminal Attack Controller Course (SOTACC).

− U.S. Air Forces Europe (USAFE) Air Ground Operations School (AGOS)

JTACQC.

− Australian Defense Force (ADF) 4 Squadron Joint Terminal Attack Controller

Course (JTACC).

− Canadian Armed Forces (CF) Forward Air Controller Course (FACC).

− Hungarian Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Program.

− Latvian Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Program.

− Netherlands Air Ground Operations School (AGOS).

− Norwegian Air Ground Operations Section (AGOS).

− Swedish Forward Air Controller (FAC) Course.

− United Arab Emirates Air Warfare Center Joint Terminal Attack Controller

(JTAC) Certification Course.

− United Kingdom (UK) Joint Forward Air Control Training and Standards Unit

(JFACTSU).

5.2.2.2. JTAC Training Definitions. For purposes of this JTAC MOA, the following JTAC training definitions apply:

− Accredited Simulation Device – a simulator which has been assessed and accredited by the JFS ESC to replace live controls (see para 5.2.3.2).

− Certified – individuals who satisfactorily complete the appropriate Service, USSOCOM, or Partner Nation academic, practical, and live control training requirements of a core JTAC training curriculum, and complete an initial

JTAC evaluation may be granted JTAC certification. Certification is a

National responsibility.

− Condition – describes the classroom or field conditions under which the task will be performed. The condition expands on the information in the task title by identifying when, where, and why the individual performs the task and what materials, personnel, and equipment the individual must have to perform the task.

− Control – consists of at least one aircraft (fixed/rotary wing) attacking a surface target. The control begins with a CAS brief, also known as the “ 9-

Line Briefing” (JP 3-09.3/ATP 3.3.2.1 standard) from a JTAC/Trainee and ends with “cleared hot”, “continue dry”, “cleared to engage” or an “abort” on a final attack run. An actual weapons release is not required. No more than two controls (Lead aircraft and wingman) can be counted per CAS briefing per target. JTAC-I instructing a trainee may count the control at the discretion of the Signatory. A control which involves both a qualified JTAC and a qualified

FAC(A) may be counted by both at the discretion of the Signatory.

− Digitally Aided CAS – The machine-to-machine exchange of required close air support mission data (e.g. aircraft check-in, 9-line, BDA) between JTAC (or

FAC(A)) and CAS platform (or C2 node) for the purpose of attacking a surface target.

− Dry Terminal Attack Control – Control of live aircraft where air-to-ground munitions are not present or release is not intended, also known as “Dry CAS”.

− Instructor Demo – a training event which allows an instructor to demonstrate the skills associated with correct use of equipment, tactics, techniques and procedures.

− Live Fire Exercise – a training event with live aircraft, (and may include surface-to-surface fires) where air-to-surface munitions (live, inert or training ordnance) are used allowing trainees to demonstrate the skills associated with correct use of equipment, tactics, techniques and procedures.

− Live Terminal Attack Control – Control of live aircraft where air-to-ground munitions (live, inert or training ordnance) are present and release is intended, also known as “Live CAS”.

− Non-permissive Control – A control where the target area threat level dictates that aircraft must maintain stand-off distances prior to target attack run. Must use a tactical scenario which requires a full nine line CAS brief (IP to target area).

− Permissive Control – A control where the target area threat level does not dictate aircraft maintain stand-off distances prior to target attack run. Tactical scenario permits the aircraft to hold over the target area for target talk-on or re-attack.

− Phased Program – certification requirements are accomplished by successful completion of an accredited JTAC schoolhouse academic curriculum, meeting minimum control requirements and receiving an initial JTAC evaluation (see para 5.2.2.3) under the supervision of a JTAC-E. The process used must be accredited by the JFS ESC, and be in accordance with Service, SOCOM, or

Partner Nation Regulation/manuals.

− Practical Exercise (PE) – a training event (e.g. sand table, simulator, table-top or field exercise) which allows trainees to demonstrate the skills associated with correct use of equipment, tactics, techniques and procedures.

− Qualified – a certified JTAC who completes the established minimum recurring training and evaluation requirements.

− Simulated Terminal Attack Control – Control of a simulated aircraft in a virtual environment used to enhance procedural training and mission rehearsal.

A JFS ESC accredited simulation device may replace a maximum of 2 qualification controls per 6 month period (see para 5.2.3.2).

− Simulation – the use of a device designed to train to a specific task such as a part-task trainer or simulator. Simulators have the capability to operate on virtual terrain and take the place of weapon systems (see para 5.2.3.2. JTAC

Training Simulators).

− Standard – criteria for how well a task or learning objective must be performed. The standard specifies how well, completely, or accurately a process must be performed or product produced.

− Task – A clearly defined and measurable activity accomplished by individuals and organizations. It must be specific; usually has a definite beginning and ending; may support or be supported by other tasks; generally is performed in a relatively short time (however, there may be no time limit or there may be a specific time limit); and it must be observable and measurable. The task title must contain an action verb and object and may contain a qualifier.

− Trainee – individual identified to attend the appropriate Service, USSOCOM, or Partner Nation academic, practical, and live terminal attack control training requirements of a core JTAC training curriculum (JTAC Course) with the intent of being certified as a JTAC.

5.2.2.3. JTAC Certification Process. Prior to commencing JTAC training, a JTAC candidate requires a minimum of one year in a position with operational or mission ready fire support exposure, or be an aircrew member with at least one year of operational flying experience.* Individuals will receive authorized training at the

JTAC accredited organizations listed in paragraph 5.2.2.1. Services, USSOCOM, and

Partner Nations will certify JTACs in accordance with their respective regulations and directives, as aligned with established JTAC guidelines, using the approved

JMTL. To be certified as a JTAC, the individual must successfully complete an accredited JTAC schoolhouse course, conduct a minimum of 12 successful controls under the supervision of a qualified JTAC-I and complete an initial JTAC evaluation by a designated individual (see recommendations in Appendix A, Enclosure 1 and 3).

Type 3 control can be counted towards certification at the discretion of the signatory-maximum of two controls. The 12 controls must consist of the following:

− Minimum of six Type 1 controls

− Minimum of one Type 2 control**

− Minimum of six fixed-wing controls

− Minimum of one control must employ a ground laser designator***

− Minimum of four must expend live or training ordnance

− Minimum of four non-permissive controls

− Minimum of two must be day

− Minimum of two must be at night

* JTAC candidate waiver authority will be in accordance with Service, USSOCOM, or Partner

Nation directives, but should reside no lower than O-6/OF-5 (see examples in Appendix A, Enclosure 6 and 7). JTAC Programs which utilize a formal training pipeline (e.g. basic -intermediate - advanced) and /or an extended certification process (e.g. 12-18 months) do not require JTAC Candidate waivers.

**Remote observer (Joint Fires Observer (JFO)) or video downlink may be used when available.

*** Laser shall be utilized throughout weapon delivery or dry attack run or to mark a target for an aircraft with a laser spot tracker. Intent is to utilize laser equipment and laser terminology.

Note – Services, USSOCOM/Partner Nations without LTD are exempt until such fielding occurs.

5.2.2.4. JTAC Schoolhouse Documentation. JTAC Schoolhouses will provide course completion documentation. If all the training was not accomplished, the JTAC

Schoolhouse will provide a deficiency letter listing any required training that was not accomplished to include the reason why the training was not accomplished (e.g. Only

6 of the 12 controls were completed due to weather) see examples in Appendix A, Enclosure 8 and 9. The JTAC Schoolhouse will provide guidance for follow-on training in order to complete certification.

All certification requirements may be accomplished by either successful completion of an accredited JTAC schoolhouse or by a phased program, which will include successful completion of an accredited JTAC schoolhouse course. JTAC certification may be granted by an accredited schoolhouse or by an operational commander upon completion of all certification requirements.

5.2.3. JTAC Qualification Process. Once certified a JTAC will remain qualified, provided 6 successful controls are completed within the past six month period and all recurring evaluation requirements are satisfactorily accomplished. Type 3 control can be counted towards qualification at the discretion of the signatory-maximum of two controls.

The 6 controls must consist of the following:

− Minimum of two Type 1 controls

− Minimum of one Type 2 control*

− Minimum of three fixed-wing controls

− Minimum of one control must employ a ground laser designator **

− Minimum of one must expend live or training ordnance

− Minimum of two non-permissive controlsMinimum of one must be at night ***

* Remote observer (Joint Fires Observer (JFO)) or video downlink may be used when available.

** Laser shall be utilized throughout weapon delivery or dry attack run or to mark a target for an aircraft with a laser spot tracker. Intent is to utilize laser equipment and laser terminology during a practical or live fire exercise. If accomplished in a simulator, it must be accredited with form/fit/function. Note – Services, USSOCOM/Partner Nations without LTD are exempt until such fielding occurs.

*** Units deployed to or stationed at extreme latitudes (>49 deg) may waive the night control for qualification until night sorties can be executed.

JTACs who do not accomplish the required six controls in a six-month period will be considered non-qualified. JTACs should satisfy their qualification requirements with ground maneuver units and JFO/FAC(A) integration whenever possible. Commanders are encouraged to establish guidance and goals within local constraints aimed at achieving greater joint interoperability.

5.2.3.1. FAC(A) with JTAC Qualification. A FAC(A) who is also a qualified

JTAC may count FAC(A) controls towards JTAC currency at the discretion of the

Signatory. Services, SOCOM and Partner Nations should identify this capability in their instruction/regulation. The following live JTAC controls will not be replaced:

one type 1, one night, one employing a laser.

5.2.3.2. JTAC Training Simulators. A terminal attack control simulation device should be used to enhance procedural training and mission rehearsal. Simulation devices will be assessed and accredited by the JFS ESC or their designated representative, for their capability to replace live controls for qualification training.

Units with an accredited simulation device may replace a maximum of two live terminal attack controls per six month period. (see accredited simulation devices in

Appendix A, Enclosure 10). The following live controls will not be replaced by simulation: three fixed-wing, two Type 1, one Type 2, one night, one expenditure of live or training ordnance, and two non-permissive controls.

5.2.4. JTAC Evaluation Requirements. Services, USSOCOM, and Partner Nations will determine their own evaluator and recurring evaluation requirements, but in no case will the interval for evaluations exceed 18 months. Evaluations will ensure compliance with JTAC MOA qualification standards and Joint Mission Task List (JMTL), and verify that the JTAC Evaluation Folder (Training Jacket) is up to date. JTACs lose their qualification if they fail the recurring evaluation or if their evaluation period lapses.

Appendix A, Enclosure 3, is an example of a form that may be used as a basis for evaluations.

5.2.5. JTAC Evaluator. A qualified JTAC Evaluator (JTAC-E) is a JTAC that has been designated to conduct initial and recurring 18-month JTAC evaluations. A JTAC-E requires a minimum of one year of operational experience as a qualified JTAC, complete a JTAC-E upgrade program and be designated by their unit commander.

5.2.6. JTAC Requalification Process.

5.2.6.1. Loss of Qualification. JTACs who fail to comply with qualification requirements (e.g. Controls or Evaluation) are considered Unqualified. Unqualified

JTACs (controls) must, under the supervision of a qualified JTAC and IAW Service, USSOCOM, or National directives, complete the number and category (e.g., appropriate night, fixed-wing, ordnance, etc.) of controls they failed to accomplish in the previous six months. A JTAC who is unqualified (controls) for more than six months, but less than 24 months, must complete the control requirements IAW para

5.2.3. (JTAC Qualification Process), under the supervision of a qualified JTAC. A

JTAC who fails to satisfactorily complete an evaluation, must satisfactorily complete a subsequent re-evaluation under the supervision of a JTAC-E prior to being considered requalified.

5.2.6.2. 24 Months or Longer Unqualified. A JTAC who is unqualified for 24 consecutive months must regain qualification by completing a Service, USSOCOM, or Partner Nation approved refresher syllabus and a minimum of six controls under supervision of a qualified JTAC-I. The six controls must consist of the following:

− Minimum of two Type 1 controls

− Minimum of one Type 2 control

− Minimum of two fixed-wing controls

− Minimum of two must be in a non-permissive environment

− Minimum of one must expend live or training ordnance

− Minimum of one must employ a ground laser designator*

− Minimum of one must be at night

* Laser shall be utilized throughout weapon delivery or dry attack run or to mark a target for an aircraft with a laser spot tracker. Intent is to utilize laser equipment and laser terminology during a practical or live fire exercise. If accomplished in a simulator, it must be accredited with form/fit/function.

Upon successful completion of the controls and an evaluation, the individual will be requalified as a JTAC. These six requalification controls do not count towards six month qualification requirements, but once requalified, six month requirements will be governed by paragraph 5.2.3.

5.2.7. Deployment Process. JTACs will deploy fully qualified. JTACs deployed in support of combat/contingency operations are considered qualified for the duration of the deployment and the 18 month evaluation requirement is waived. All deployed JTACs who do not maintain qualification requirements are considered unqualified upon completion of the deployment and must re-qualify IAW this MOA.

5.2.8. JTAC Evaluation Folder (Training Jacket). To properly document JTAC certification and qualification standards, an individual JTAC evaluation folder (training jacket) will be initiated IAW Service, USSOCOM, or Partner Nation directives and will be maintained by the individual’s assigned command. This training jacket or an up-to-date copy will accompany the individual to each duty assignment and deployment to provide unit commanders and commanding officers a reference for the individual’s JTAC certification and qualification status. It will be used to record and maintain appropriate

JTAC records during each assignment and deployment. Recommended organization listed below, but individual Parts may be moved at the discretion of the signatory. This evaluation folder is mandatory for all JTACs and will contain the following six part documentation system:

PART I: TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II: COMMANDER’S

DESIGNATION LETTERS

This section contains a copy of the JTAC’s current designation letter.

PART III: CAS LOG This section contains a record of all controls in legible format and must be in compliance with Appendix A of this document. This section should contain records of all controls performed since initial certification.

PART IV: DOCUMENTATION OF

TRAINING

All continuation training and refresher training should be documented in Part V to include academics and testing.

PART V: DOCUMENTATION OF

EVALUATIONS

This section contains documentation of all evaluations conducted since initial certification.

PART VI: JTAC FORMAL SCHOOL

DOCUMENTATION

This section contains copies of course completion documentation received from attending a formal course of instruction pertaining to close air support or terminal attack control.

5.3. JTAC Joint Mission Task List (JMTL). The following Joint Mission Tasks have been identified for a JTAC and will be the basis for developing a schoolhouse academic training syllabus for JTAC certification and unit continuation training. The JMTL will also be used for assessment of JTAC schoolhouses by the JTAC standardization team. The Joint

Mission Tasks are divided into duty areas for academic application and are listed by task and associated sub-tasks.

5.3.1. Duty Area 01 – CAS

Planning

This Duty Area focuses on the minimum classroom academics to be instructed. Each Task and Sub-Task will be covered in the schoolhouse lesson plan. Lesson plan learning objectives should also be based on the Task and Sub-task and be a source for test questions. To re-enforce the learning objectives, and to assess student comprehension, practical exercises, quizzes and examinations will be conducted.

TASK CONDITION STANDARD

01.1 Advise ground commander on

Close Air Support assets in support of ground scheme of maneuver.

Collective Task

01.1.1 Advise ground commander on

Fixed-Wing (FW) / Rotary-Wing (RW) CAS capabilities / limitations / employment.

Demonstrate knowledge of the capabilities, limitations, and employment of fixed wing/rotary wing CAS during a written evaluation (e.g. F-15E, F-16, F/A-18, AV-8B, A-10, B-1, B-52, AC-130.

RW: AH-1W/Z, AH-64A/D, UH-1N/Y. Partner Nation: Tornado, Tornado GR4, Mirage 2000, Euro Fighter, Gripen). JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on capabilities, limitations, and employment of FW/RW CAS platforms. Reference: JP 3-09.3 (pg I-5-6; III-18;

V-55-68; V-62-68).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.2 Advise ground commander on

FAC (A) capabilities / limitations / employment.

Demonstrate knowledge of the capabilities, limitations, and employment of fixed wing/rotary wing FAC (A) during a written evaluation. Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of supporting and supported forces when integrating FAC(A).

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the capabilities, limitations, and

Score 80% or employment of FW/RW FAC (A). Reference: JP 3-09.3 (Pg I-2,3; II-16; JP 3-09.3 pg I-2-3 III-38- 46; V-47-55).

01.1.3 Advise ground commander on

remote observer /Joint Fires Observer (JFO) capabilities / limitations / employment.

Demonstrate knowledge of the capabilities, limitations, and employment of a remote observer (e.g., scout, COLT, FIST, SOF)/ JFO, during a written evaluation. Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of supporting and supported forces when integrating a remote observer/ JFO.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on remote observer/JFO capabilities, limitations, and employment. Reference: JP 3-

09.3 (Pg II-10(6); V-23-28) applicable Service Publications.

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.4 Advise ground commander on

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) capabilities/limitations/employment.

Demonstrate knowledge of the capabilities, limitations, and employment of UAS during a written evaluation. Include using UAS for targeting and marking and employment of CAS weapons: (e.g. MQ-1, MQ-9). JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the capabilities, limitations, and employment of UAS IAW JP 3-09.3 Reference: JP 3-09.3 (Pg I-6-7; II- 27; V-101-106) and applicable Service Publications.

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.5 Advise ground commander on

aviation weapon capabilities / limitations / employment.

Demonstrate knowledge of CAS weapon’s capabilities, limitations, and employment methods of aviation delivered ordnance. (General purpose bombs, cluster munitions, laser guided munitions, Inertially aided munitions, aircraft guns, rockets, flares, Air to ground missiles) during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on weapons capabilities, limitations, and employment IAW JP

3-09.3 III-18, FM 3-09.32, MCRP 3-16.6A, NTTP

3-09.2, AFTTP(I) 3-2.6 JFIRE Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the Joint Application of Firepower publication and Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals. For additional information, type the following link into your browser: http://www.globalsecurity.org/ military/systems/aircraft/index.html.

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.6 Advise ground commander on

effects of weather, terrain, and threat on CAS capabilities.

Demonstrate knowledge of weather, terrain and threats when employing CAS assets during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on mission impacts of weather, terrain and threats when employing CAS assets IAW JP 3-09.3. Reference: JP 3-09.3 (Pg. I-10; III-19-23; V-63-64; V-79-80; V-82; V- 85-86).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.7 Advise ground commander on

effects of electronic warfare on CAS capabilities.

Demonstrate knowledge of airborne and ground base electronic warfare (EW) effects during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on EW effects, location of electronic warfare planners, the request process and how to submit an EW request (joint tactical air strike requests (JTAR)) when

Score 80% or greater on a http://www.globalsecurity.org/ employing CAS assets IAW JP 3-09.3. Reference:

JP 3-09.3 (Pg. A1-6); FM 3-09.32, MCRP 3-16.6A, NTTP 3-09.2, AFTTP(I) 3-2.6 JFIRE (Pg. 66-71).

01.1.8 Advise ground commander on

the use and timely submission of joint tactical air strike requests

(JTAR).

Demonstrate knowledge of the Air Tasking Order planning cycle and its effects on JTAR submission during the conduct of a written evaluation.

Address what an ATO is, the information listed and how to access the document. The trainee should also understand the process to get a preplanned mission on the ATO. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the Air Tasking Order planning cycle and its effects on JTAR submission. Reference: JP 3-09.3 (Pg III-4, 24, 31, 33, 36).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.1.9 Advise ground commander on

Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) and Mission Reporting (MISREP) procedures.

Demonstrate knowledge of the information required to successfully complete a BDA (e.g.

observed damage (enemy/civilian)), re-attack recommendation, BDA log, and MISREP procedures* during the conduct of a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the information required to successfully complete BDA report to CAS aircraft that includes: Size, Activity, Location. Time, Remarks — Munitions expended, observed damage (number of tanks destroyed, number still active, and recommendation), mission number, and mission accomplishment (SUCCESSFUL, UNSUCCESSFUL or UNKNOWN). Reference JP 3-09.3 (pg. V-44-46).

*Currently no formal standard exist.

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.2 Advise ground commander on

types of Terminal Attack Control.

Demonstrate knowledge of how tactical situation, aircrew, aircraft, and weapons capabilities/limitations determine appropriate types of CAS control during a written evaluation.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the types of CAS control and the factors that determine the type of control to use in a given situation. Reference: JP 3-09.3 (xv; V- 19-33, 47-53).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.3 Advise ground commander on

integration of CAS with indirect fires.

Demonstrate knowledge of the integration of indirect fires (surface to surface) with CAS during a written evaluation. Address deconfliction methods which facilitate simultaneous multi-ship/platform CAS and indirect fire operations.

Must be well versed in ACA terminology and have knowledge of all applicable ACAs in use. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on separation techniques that deconflict airspace to provide a reasonably safe operating space for aircraft to maneuver and attack targets.

Reference: JP 3-09.3 (pg. V-5-14).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.4 Advise ground commander on

the impact of fire support coordination measures (FSCM) on CAS mission planning.

Given a tactical scenario (e.g. operations order) assess the impact of FSCMs on CAS operations in support of the ground commander’s concept of operations during a written evaluation. Address, at a minimum, the definition and proper

Score 80% or employment of permissive and restrictive FSCMs to expedite the attack of targets. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on FSCMs used during CAS operations. Note:

Students should be briefed on Kill box terminology, but a kill box will not be established for close air support (CAS) missions. If a CAS mission is required within an established kill box, the portion of the kill box requiring detailed integration should be closed. Reference: JP 3-09.3

(pg. III 25-31) and JP 3-09.

01.5 Advise ground commander on

airspace command and control (Joint and Component) procedures and their impact on CAS mission planning.

Collective Task.

01.5.1 Advise ground commander on

the various components of airspace command and control and their impact on CAS mission planning.

Demonstrate knowledge of airspace command and control components and their impact on CAS mission planning (e.g. Theater Air Ground System (TAGS), Theater Air Control System (TACS)/Army Air-Ground System (AAGS), Marine Corps Air Command and Control System (MACCS), Navy Tactical Air Control System (NTACS), and Special Operations Air-Ground System (SOAGS)) during a written evaluation.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the primary command and control agencies and their roles and responsibilities within the associated Command and Control System.

References: JP 3-09.3 (Ch II (all)).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.5.2 Advise ground commander on

Airspace Control Order (ACO), Airspace Control Measures (ACM), Air Tasking Order (ATO), Special Instructions (Spins), and their impact on CAS mission planning.

Demonstrate knowledge of ACO, ACM, ATO, and SPINS during a written evaluation. Address, at a minimum, the definition and application of ACO, ACM, ATO, and SPINS. Also cover the standard time required to submit a JTAR for approval and inclusion in the ATO (e.g. air tasking cycle).

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the functions of the ACO, ACM, ATO, and SPINS. References: JP 3-09.3: (Pg I-4, 5, 10, III-4, 28 – 34).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.6 Apply intelligence products to

CAS mission planning.

Given a tactical scenario, operations order, apply intelligence products to support CAS mission planning in support of the ground commander’s concept of operations during a written evaluation.

Describe how intelligence supports air operations, available intelligence products (e.g. order of battle, maps, ISR imagery) and the importance of including Intel early in the planning process.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the intelligence products used to support CAS mission planning. References: JP 3- 09.3: (pg II-26-28; III-12, 18).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.7 Apply the products of the

targeting process to CAS mission planning.

Demonstrate knowledge of the targeting process during a written evaluation. Address the process which the supported commander selects and

Score 80% or prioritize targets and match appropriate effects.

Lesson should focus on the products the JTAC will use when planning the employment of CAS (tactical level). JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the targeting process products. (i.e. Target list) References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. I-4, II-6-10, 27, III-10, 12-13, 18).

01.8 Plan CAS missions with

precision and non-precision weapons, in support of the ground scheme of maneuver.

Collective Task

01.8.1 Plan a laser guided weapon

delivery.

Demonstrate knowledge of laser guided weapons employment during a written evaluation. Address the standard laser brevity terms and procedures for ground designating, and the proper employment of laser guided weapons. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on laser guided weapons employment.

References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. III-43, V-14-16, V-68- 77).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.8.2 Plan inertial aided munitions

deliveries.

Demonstrate knowledge of inertial aided munitions employment during a written evaluation. Address the unique characteristics and limitations of inertially aided/GPS guided weapons. Lesson will also cover target location error (TLE), Bomb on Coordinate (BOC), and Bomb on Target (BOT). JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on inertial aided munitions employment. References: JP 3- 09.3: (pg. III-23, V-2-4, 28-31, 78-79).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.8.3 Plan an airborne laser

designated weapon delivery.

Demonstrate knowledge of airborne Laser Target Designators (LTDs) (e.g. Target Pod, UAS) and their proper employment during a written evaluation. Address the standard laser brevity terms, procedures, and the process used to verify correct target location through the use of video downlink, and or laser spot. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on planning considerations for using an airborne LTD to provide terminal weapons guidance for laser guided weapon. . References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. V- 93-105).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.8.4 Plan non-precision weapons

deliveries.

Demonstrate knowledge of non-precision weapons employment during a written evaluation. Address the capabilities, limitations and employment of general purpose weapons. Consideration must be given to host aircraft navigation/weapons system accuracy. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on non-precision weapons employment. References: JP 3-09.3: (pg.

V-23, 55, 57, 67, 73).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.9 Plan the use of digital systems

in support of weapons deliveries.

*Note – Services, USSOCOM/Partner Nations without fielded digital CAS systems are

Demonstrate knowledge of digitally aided CAS/Fires systems to facilitate weapons employment during a written evaluation. Address the capabilities, limitations and proper use of Service, SOCOM, Partner Nation-fielded DACAS

Score 80% or exempt until such fielding occurs. systems. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on the use of DACAS systems.

References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. II-24, 26, IV-8, V-23, 28, 93-95).

01.10 Plan engagement with

appropriate weapon in order to achieve desired effects, proportional response, and minimize collateral damage.

Demonstrate knowledge of aviation ordnance capabilities and effects during a written evaluation. Lesson will present scenarios where ordnance is appropriately matched to targets to achieve ground commanders desired results and comply with Rules of Engagement (ROE) and restrictions. Theatre specific ROE, restrictions and lessons learned should be briefed.

Reinforcement through practical application is required during simulated and/or live controls.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on aviation ordnance capabilities and effects. References: JP 3-09.3: (Pg I-4-5, 9-10, III-20-21, V-19-20, 86).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.11 Plan day CAS missions, in

support of the ground scheme of maneuver.

01.11.1 Plan day FW CAS missions. Demonstrate knowledge of day, FW CAS planning factors, to include heavy bombers, during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on day, FW and heavy bomber CAS planning factors. References:

JP 3-09.3: (pg. III-13-24, V-55-62, 107-109).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.11.2 Plan day RW CAS missions. Demonstrate knowledge of day, RW CAS planning factors during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on RW CAS planning factors. References: JP 3-09.3:

(pg. III-13-24, V-62-68).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.11.3 Plan day UAS missions in

support of CAS.

Demonstrate knowledge of day, UAS planning factors in support of CAS during a written evaluation. JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on UAS planning factors ISO CAS. References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. I-6-

7, II-27, V-101-103).

Score 80% or greater on a written test.

01.12 Plan night CAS missions, in

support of the ground scheme of maneuver.

Collective Task

01.12.1 Plan night FW CAS missions. Demonstrate knowledge of night, FW CAS planning factors during a written evaluation.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on night, FW CAS planning factors.

References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. III-21-23, V-55-62, 79, 81-84, Appendix C).

Score 80% or written test.

01.12.2 Plan night RW CAS missions. Demonstrate knowledge of night, RW CAS planning factors during a written evaluation.

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on night, RW CAS planning factors.

References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. III-21-23, V-62-68, V- 79, V-81-84, Appendix C).

01.12.3 Plan Illumination in support

of night CAS missions.

01.12.3.1 Plan ground-delivered

Illumination.

Demonstrate knowledge of ground-delivered illumination, in support of CAS during a written evaluation. Address techniques and procedures on how to employ illumination via surface based fire support systems in support of CAS missions (Artillery, Mortars, and Naval Surface Fires).

JTAC trainee will be able to successfully answer questions on surface-delivered illumination, in support of CAS. References: JP 3-09.3: (pg. III-

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .