RFP - Museum Services - Scott AFB Version 2.pdf

29 August 2025

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

Solicitation Draft #: FA440725RMUSE

Contracting Activity: 375TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON

Scott Air Force Base (AFB), IL 62225-5015

Government Representative: Brandon Katka – Contracting Officer

Phone – 618-578-1131 brandon.katka@us.af.mil

Nicholas Dillon Weiss – Contract Specialist

Phone – 618-256-9288 nicholas.weiss.5@us.af.mil

The Air Force seeks to award up to two Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts to museum/exhibit design firms for comprehensive museum enhancement projects at Scott AFB, IL.

Specifically, this initial effort is focused on the Air Force Cyberspace and Communications (AFCC)

Heritage Center (Building 1700) for Headquarters (HQ) Cyberspace Capabilities Center (CCC) at

Scott Air Force Base, IL.

To allow the Air Force to efficiently procure these services, 375 CONS seeks to establish a 5-year

IDIQ contract. As part of this effort, 375 CONS will initially solicit the Multiple Award IDIQ along with a seed project based on the 2024 Heritage Center Master Plan (FA440723P0043) @ B1700.

This Multiple Award IDIQ will be solicited as a 100% small business set-aside utilizing NAICS

712110 (Museums) which has a Small Business Size Standard of $34M and PSC Code Z2JZ (Repair or Alteration of Miscellaneous Buildings).

Following the awarding of the Multiple Award IDIQ, the seed project will immediately be awarded as the initial task order under the IDIQ.

Please provide an offer for the services listed below by Monday, 22 September 2025 @ 11:00 AM.

To be eligible for award, your organization must maintain an active registration in SAM.gov.

Overview: While this IDIQ could potentially entail several museum enhancement projects, the Air Force currently seeks a design-build contractor to revitalize the AFCC Heritage

Center (B1700) at Scott AFB. This project encompasses eight distinct initiatives, including outdoor and indoor exhibits, a Hall of Fame display, website development, and broadcasting capabilities. The goal is to create engaging and informative experiences highlighting the history of Air Force cyberspace and communications. All work must adhere to strict regulations. Ultimately, the project aims to transform the Heritage Center into a modern and accessible resource for showcasing the Air Force's vital role in the cyber domain.

Anticipated Ordering Period: 30 September 2025 – 29 September 2030 mailto:nicholas.weiss.5@us.af.mil

Site Visit (Optional): A site visit will be conducted on Monday, 08 September 2025 @ 1:00

PM CST. Vendors interested in seeing the sites are instructed to meet outside 201 E. Winters St.

Bldg 50 on Scott AFB, IL. From building 50, we will drive to the location of this project/requirement. For getting access to the base, please email nicholas.weiss.5@us.af.mil and brandon.katka@us.af.mil with the first and last names of members attending, 48 hours prior to the site visit date. From that point, we can submit your pass to the Visitors Center which you’ll be able to pick up on the day of the site visit. Note- Visitor Center now requires Real ID drivers licenses. If member does not have a Real ID, they can provide a Non-Real ID drivers license with a certified (no copies) passport, birth certificate, or social security card.

CLIN Information: The CLINS listed below represent the initial task order under the Multiple

Award IDIQ for the AFCC Heritage Center Museum Projects @ B1700 on Scott AFB, IL. Please note that some of these CLINS may be removed when the initial task order is awarded.

CLIN Structure/Pricing

Item # Description Pricing

Arrange ment

Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Price

0001 Tactical Communications Exhibit

Firm Fixed

Price (FFP) 1 Lot

0002 Ground Control Station Exhibit

FFP 1 Lot

0003 Hall of Fame Exhibit

0004 Update Switchboard Exhibit

0005 New Grant Exhibit

Website and Digital Walkthrough

(Online)

0007 Broadcasting Solution

0008 Update Materials and Finishes

Total

FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services

(Sept 2023) is hereby incorporated by reference, with the same force and effect as if it were given in full text.

In addition to the following addendum, all terms and conditions of FAR 52.212-1 remain in effect. The following is tailored to this acquisition and is hereby added via addendum:

1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the offer, the offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. The offer must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation.

2. Specific Instructions: The response shall consist of the following:

Cover Letter – The Cover Letter shall be formatted on company letterhead and include the

Offeror’s points of contact with e-mail address and phone number who are authorized to contractually obligate the company, CAGE Code, UEI Number, large/small business status/categories, a statement the company understands the requirements specified and will meet the performance standards and requirements therein, and a statement the company does or does not take exception to any of the requirements of this RFP.

3. Please provide the following information with your offer:

a. Expiration Date of Proposal:

b. Proposed Payment Terms or Discount (i.e, Net 30, 1% 10 days):

c. Ordering Period Begin/Complete:

d. Pricing Sheet

e. Technical Proposal – Referencing RFP Attachment 1- Statement of Work, please offer no more than 10 Pages per project. Please provide sanitized and non-sanitized version.

f. Past Performance Information Sheet

g. Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses

4. All questions in regards to the RFP must first be directed to the Contracting Specialist

Nicholas “Dillon” Weiss, via e-mail nicholas.weiss.5@us.af.mil with the Contracting Officer

Brandon Katka Cc’d- brandon.katka@us.af.mil. Deadline for questions is Wednesday 10

September 2025 @ 10:00 AM CST . Offers must be e-mailed to above addresses. If issues are encountered with e-mail, please contact Nicholas “Dillon” Weiss @ 618-256-9288.

Period for Acceptance of Offer. The paragraph is tailored as follows:

mailto:brandon.katka@us.af.mil

The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm until time of award or completion of any protests unless otherwise withdrawn. Proposal shall include a cover letter stating the proposal is valid through at least 30 September 2025. A proposal offering less than 30 September 2025 will be deemed unacceptable.

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror shall follow the instructions contained herein. The offeror is required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offeror being ineligible for award. The offeror must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Any exceptions shall be outlined in the offeror’s cover letter.

The offeror is required to submit the following in response to this solicitation:

1. Cover Letter with Technical Proposal

2. Past Performance Information

3. Pricing Sheet (to include support/justification for pricing)

Only electronic copies shall be submitted in response to this solicitation. Indicate volume number, title, and the use of separate files to permit rapid location of information. The electronic copy of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office suite of applications. A complete response to this solicitation shall consist of one electronic copy submitted by e-mail to nicholas.weiss.5@us.af.mil and brandon.katka@us.af.mil no later than the required proposal due date. Late proposals will not be accepted. Your email submission must be checked and determined to be "virus free" prior to submission. After receipt of your proposal, the CS or CO will email a confirmation of receipt. If you do not receive confirmation of receipt prior to the due date/time, the offeror is encouraged to reach out to the CS and CO to ensure the proposal was received.

This acquisition does not require certified cost or pricing data. However, if deemed necessary, the contracting officer may request other than certified cost and pricing data to make a price fair and reasonable determination. To avoid delays, the offeror is encouraged to submit documentation deemed appropriate to support the proposed solution and pricing.

Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): At the time of submitting a proposal, the offeror must state affirmatively whether or not it has OCI issues and must submit an OCI Identification and

Mitigation Plan with the proposal if OCI issues exist. The Government-accepted OCI

Identification and Mitigation Plan shall be incorporated by reference into a resultant Contract. If no OCI exists, the offeror shall provide a statement stating no OCI exists.

Specific Instructions:

1. Factor I – Past Performance

a) Provide three (3) past performance examples of recent and relevant work. Recent is defined as work performed within the past five (5) years. Relevant is defined as work involving design, fabrication and/or installation of museum exhibits and any other work included in the SOW. For each example, include:

• Customer name and contact information

• Dollar value of the work performed

• Contract number (if applicable)

• Period of performance

• Brief description of the work performed

• Customer assessment of performance (e.g., CPARS rating, letter of recommendation, and point of contact willing to be interviewed).

2. Factor II –Technical Proposal

Please provide a summary of your technical approach to the design, fabrication and installation, term maintenance of the Air Force Cyberspace and Communications (AFCC) Heritage Center exhibits.

Your summary should detail your proposed solution for achieving the project objectives, demonstrating a clear understanding of the Statement of Work (SOW) requirements. Specifically, explain your approach for:

- Design Process: Outline your methodology for the phased design process, including site analysis, stakeholder collaboration, integration of existing collections, and alignment with the Heritage

Center's master plan.

- Fabrication & Installation: Describe your quality control measures and your approach to the physical creation and installation of the exhibits, including digital integration and any considerations for Scott AFB standards.

Your summary should include details of proposed processes to implement proactive and comprehensive solutions and include a plan for providing written service reports, and recommendations that describe the work to be accomplished in accordance with the SOW.

Offerors shall not simply copy and paste information directly from the Statement of Work; rather, they should provide their unique proposed solution for accomplishing the required services. Technical proposals should utilize Times New Roman font, 12 pt font sizing, with standard single spacing.

Offerors shall provide a sanitized and unsanitized version of their technical proposal.

3. Factor III – Price

a) The offeror shall submit pricing to support the completeness and reasonableness of their proposed prices for all contract line-item numbers (CLINS). The pricing information submitted shall fully support the SOW requirements for each element specified in the SOW. Information shall be segregated by the performance periods and the total price for each CLIN as specified in the solicitation. Information shall also show the consolidated total price for performance. This factor shall be completed in the Pricing Worksheet included in the solicitation package.

b) The extended amounts must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units

(i.e., (12) months). All unit and total dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar.

Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items (NOV 2021)

This is a competitive best value subjective tradeoff acquisition. Award will be made to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation's requirements. The Government will utilize the subjective tradeoff methodology to select the best overall proposal, based upon an integrated assessment of Past Performance, Technical, and

Price. The Government will conduct a price analysis to determine whether proposed prices are fair, reasonable, and balanced. A contract may be awarded to up to two offerors who are deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by the solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offerors who give the Air Force the greatest confidence that it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the requirement owner and Contracting Officer reasonably determine that the technical solution and/or past performance of the higher price offeror outweighs the cost difference.

The Contracting Officer will base the award decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against the criteria in the solicitation (as described below). While the Government's evaluation team will strive for maximum objectivity, the trade-off process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

The Government will award up to two contractors on a Multiple Award IDIQ resulting from the solicitation that will be evaluated based on past performance, technical approach, and pricing to represent the best value to the Government.

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate the Scott AFB Museum Services IDIQ

Contract:

- Factor 1 – Past Performance: Offeror's are instructed to submit a Past Performance Information

Worksheet for 3 projects they have previously worked on that are most relevant and recent to the seed project and the IDIQ as a whole.

- Factor 2 – Technical Approach: Measures of merit for this factor is met when an offeror's technical approach provides the following essential elements:

a) Technical Plan: Offeror's shall submit a detailed technical plan describing their technical methodology/approach to performing the requirements of the seed project IAW the SOW.

- Factor 3 – Price: The Initial Total Evaluated Price (I-TEP) will be calculated as the sum of the

Offeror’s proposed price for the seed project.

Strengths Exceedances

The Government intends, if it is in its best interest, to incorporate into the resulting contract, all beneficial aspects of the awardee’s proposal and all above threshold (minimum) attributes, performance levels, or capabilities for which evaluation credit was given.

By submission of your proposal, the offeror agrees to all solicitation requirements including terms and conditions and representations and certifications. The offeror shall clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The

Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, with no obligation to the offeror.

In accordance with the instructions at Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, evaluation will utilize a phased approach consisting of three phases (past performance, technical, price). If an offeror receives a rating of low confidence for Past Performance in Phase 1, their proposal will not be evaluated further in

Phase 2 and 3. If an offeror receives a rating of Unacceptable for Technical in Phase 2, their proposal will not be evaluated further in Phase 3.

A. Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Past Performance to determine whether the offeror’s past performance is recent and relevant to this requirement as defined in FAR

52.212-1. The Government will also evaluate how well the offeror performed on prior contracts/projects. In addition to the submitted Past Performance Information Sheets, the government reserves the right to use other sources of past performance information in determining a confidence rating. These sources include but are not limited to: CPARS, internet searches, Better Business

Bureau, Google and other online reviews, etc.

Step 1: Recency Assessment

- The Government will first review the past performance references provided by the vendor and those found in other sources (e.g., CPARS) to determine if they are recent. A past performance reference is considered recent if the work was performed within five (5) years prior to the issuance date of this RFQ. References that are not recent will not be evaluated further.

Step 2: Relevancy Assessment

- For all recent past performance references, the Government will assess their relevance to the work required by the SOW. The Government will consider the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the prior work. A relevancy rating of Highly Relevant or Relevant will be assigned.

o Highly Relevant: The work performed was virtually the same as the SOW requirements.

o Relevant: The work performed was similar to the SOW requirements.

o Not Relevant: The work was not similar.

Step 3: Performance Quality and Confidence Assessment

The Government will evaluate the quality of performance on contracts deemed recent and relevant to assign an overall confidence rating as defined below:

- High Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the

Government has a high degree of confidence that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort. The vendor's record indicates performance was of high quality.

- Adequate Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort. The vendor's record indicates performance was of acceptable quality.

- Neutral Confidence: No recent and relevant performance record is available for review, or the record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment can be made. This rating is not viewed favorably or unfavorably.

- Low Confidence: Based on the vendor’s performance quality on recent and relevant efforts, the

Government has a low expectation that the vendor will be able to successfully perform the required effort. The record may indicate performance issues on one or more contracts.

B. Technical: The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis, assigning a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable, as defined below.

a. Acceptable- The submitted proposal is compliant with RFP and SOW requirements.

b. Unacceptable- The submitted proposal is non-compliant with RFP and SOW requirements, rendering it ineligible for award due to the presence of deficiencies.

C. Price: The Government will evaluate the price proposal for the seed project submitted in response to this solicitation, reviewing the price proposal to ensure that the proposed price is complete, reasonable, and balanced as defined below. In the event multiple offerors receive equal past performance and technically acceptable ratings, price will be the determining factor for award. Note -

The Government reserves the right to reject an offer if the Contracting Officer determines that the proposed price does not meet the criteria of completeness, reasonableness, and balance.

i. Completeness. The offeror's price and other supporting information will be evaluated (but not rated) to ensure continuity and traceability of prices to the proposed technical plan and between initial proposals and any revisions thereto. The review will determine the adequacy of the offeror's proposal in addressing and fulfilling the solicitation requirements.

ii. Reasonableness. The proposals prices will be reviewed to determine the reasonableness of price and the offeror's understanding of and ability to perform the requirement.

iii. Balance. IAW FAR 15.404 unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. All separately priced line items will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. The offer may be rejected if the CO determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

General Considerations: The proposal must comply in all material respects with the requirement of law, regulations, and conditions set forth in the solicitation. To be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.104-1.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed, or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Basis of Award: The Multiple Award IDIQ will be made on a best value tradeoff basis. For the purposes of this evaluation, past performance is more important than technical and price.

Award will be made IAW the procedures specified in this Request for Proposal (RFP). The

Government intends to award a target of two (2) IDIQ contracts to small businesses as a result of this solicitation. The Government may award less contracts than the intended target. A contract may be awarded to the offerors who are deemed responsible IAW FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and is judged to represent the best value to the

Government in accordance with the process spelled out below. In the event that multiple offerors receive equal past performance and technical ratings, price will be the determining factor for award.

Also from this solicitation, one contractor on the IDIQ will be awarded an initial task order to complete some or all of the eight projects included in the seed project. The other awardee will receive a $500 Minimum Guarantee for being awarded as the other IDIQ contractor and will be able to compete on future orders issued under this IDIQ. The Government will determine prices fair and reasonable through the use of competition. In the event adequate price competition is not received, the

Contracting Officer will use one or more of the price analysis techniques described at FAR 15.404-

1(b)(2) to ensure the price to the Government for the initial task order is fair and reasonable.

The Government will evaluate proposals using the following phases:

Phase 1. Past Performance Evaluation: Past performance will be graded on the Performance

Quality and Confidence criteria described in the addendum to FAR 52.212-2.

Phase 2. Technical Evaluation: Technical will be reviewed second and evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis per the criteria described in the addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and FAR

52.212-2. If Technical is deemed Unacceptable and not easily made acceptable, price will not be reviewed and the proposal will be ineligible for award due to an Unacceptable rating.

Phase 3. Price Evaluation: Price will be evaluated for reasonableness, completeness, and balance as described in the addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and FAR 52.212-2.

Moving onward, the following factors will be used in evaluation process for Task Orders awarded off the Multiple Award IDIQ: The Government will solicit the task orders and organize the proposals based on the lowest price and will evaluate the technical approach of the lowest priced offeror first. If the lowest priced offeror is technically acceptable, that offer represents the best value for the

Government and the evaluation process ceases at this point. Award will be made to that offeror without further consideration to any other offers. Technically acceptable in this case will be defined as meeting all technical requirements specific to the work specified in the accompanying SOW while also being able to perform the work specified in the required time frame. Past performance will not be evaluated as this will be accomplished at the IDIQ level. Note - as it relates to the evaluation of offers to be awarded off the IDIQ following the initial task order, the Government reserves the right to reject an offer if the Contracting Officer determines that the proposed price for the task order does not meet the criteria of completeness, reasonableness, and balance as discussed in the IDIQ pricing evaluation criteria mentioned above.

The Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges. These interchanges may be used to clarify aspects of proposals, resolve minor deficiencies, or allow offerors to revise their proposals (including price). The Government is not obligated to conduct interchanges with all offerors and may award without conducting interchanges.

DAFFARS 5352.201-9101 Ombudsman (July 2023)

(a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern.

(b) Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution.

Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions).

(c) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the ombudsman, Ms. Susan R. Madison, AFICA KMP, 507 Symington Drive, Scott AFB IL 62225-

5022, (618) 229-0267, fax (618) 256-6668 email: Susan madison@us.af.mil. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the

Center/MAJCOM/DRU/SMC ombudsman level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary

(ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (571) 256-2395, facsimile number (571) 256-2431.

(d) The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency.

(e) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

DAFFARS 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access Air Force Installations (June 2024)

(a) The contractor shall obtain base identification and vehicle passes, if required, for all contractor personnel who make frequent visits to or perform work on the Department of the Air Force installation(s) cited in the contract. Contractor personnel are required to wear or prominently display installation identification badges or contractor-furnished, contractor identification badges while visiting or performing work on the installation.

(b) The contractor shall submit a written request on company letterhead to the contracting officer listing the following: contract number, location of work site, start and stop dates, and names of employees and subcontractor employees needing access to the base. The letter will also specify the individual(s) authorized to sign for a request for base identification credentials or vehicle passes. The contracting officer will endorse the request and forward it to the issuing base pass and registration office or Security Forces for processing. When reporting to the registration office, the authorized contractor individual(s) should provide a valid driver’s license, current vehicle registration, valid vehicle insurance certificate, and [ insert any additional requirements to comply with local security procedures ] to obtain a vehicle pass.

(c) During performance of the contract, the contractor shall be responsible for obtaining required identification for newly assigned personnel and for prompt return of credentials and vehicle passes for any employee who no longer requires access to the work site.

(d) When work under this contract requires unescorted entry to controlled or restricted areas, the contractor shall comply with [insert any additional requirements to comply with AFI 31-101 , Integrated Defense, and DODMAN5200.02_AFMAN 16-1405 , Air Force Personnel Security

Program ] citing the appropriate paragraphs as applicable.

(e) Upon completion or termination of the contract or expiration of the identification passes, the prime contractor shall ensure that all base identification passes issued to employees and subcontractor mailto:madison@us.af.mil http://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4/publication/afi31-101/generic_wms.pdf https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/saf_aa/publication/dodman5200.02_afman16-1405/dodm5200.02_afman16-1405.pdf employees are returned to the issuing office.

(f) The contractor shall provide an after-hours contact number or after-hours email in the Emergency

Mass Notification System (EMNS) for each of their personnel, whose normal place of duty is on a

DoD installation or within a DoD facility. The contractor shall comply with any additional requirements in DAFMAN 10-206 for emergency operational reporting. Foreign Nationals may participate and may remove themselves from the Emergency Mass Notification System at any time.

To update information, personnel can access the globe icon on their system desktop screens and choose the “Access Self-Service” option.

(g) Failure to comply with these requirements may result in withholding of final payment.

(End of clause)

Attachment List:

RFP Attachment 1 – Statement of Work – B1700 Heritage Center Museum Project

RFP Attachment 2 – B1700 Heritage Center Museum – Master Plan

RFP Attachment 3 – Past Performance Information Sheet

RFP Attachment 4 – Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clause

RFP Attachment 5 – Scott AFB General Requirements

RFP Attachment 5a – Energy Management and Control System (ECMS)

RFP Attachment 5b – Fixed Wing Aprons

RFP Attachment 5c – Non-Nuclear Configuration Management Database (CMD) Equipment

Approval

RFP Attachment 5d – Soil Testing and Disposal Procedure

RFP Attachment 5e – Maximum Allowable Concentrations

RFP Attachment 6 – Pricing Workbook

RFP Attachment 7 – RFI Log

Amendment 01 – RFI Log – 09.04.2025