Exhibit Y_Design Manual - Architectural.pdf

DECEMBER 2010

design

AUGUST 1, 2014

Architectural Design Manual

Office of Construction & Facilities Management

INDEX

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW

1.1 INTRODUCTION 1-1

● Compassion 1-1

● Excellence 1-1

● Professionalism 1-1

● Integrity 1-1

● Accountability 1-1

● Stewardship 1-1

● Design Intent 1-1

1.2 PURPOSE 1-2

1.3 HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM (VAHBS) 1-3

1.4 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROCESS (IDP) 1-3

● Overview 1-3

● Schematic Design 1-3

● Design Development 1-3

● Contract Documentation 1-4

● Performance Measures and Functional Objectives 1-4

1.5 BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) 1-5

1.6 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN 1-6

1.6.1 OPTIMIZE ENERGY PERFORMANCE 1-6

● Energy Efficiency 1-6

● Measurement and Verification 1-6

1.6.2 PROTECT AND CONSERVE WATER 1-7

● Indoor Water 1-7

● Outdoor Water 1-7

1.6.3 EXECUTIVE ORDER 13514, REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES 1-7

1.6.4 ENHANCE INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1-8

● Ventilation and Thermal Comfort 1-8

● Moisture Control 1-8

● Day-lighting 1-8

● Low-Emitting Materials 1-8

● Protect Indoor Air Quality during Construction 1-8

1.6.5 REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF MATERIALS 1-8

● Recycled Content 1-8

● Bio-based Content 1-9

● Construction Waste 1-9

● Ozone Depleting Compounds 1-9

1.7 ACCESSIBILITY 1-9

1.8 PHYSICAL SECURITY 1-9

1.8.1 OVERVIEW 1-9

1.8.2 CONSIDERATIONS 1-9

1.9 SEISMIC AND OTHER NATURAL HAZARDS 1-10

1.10 PATIENT CENTRIC DESIGN 1-10

1.11 COMMISSIONING 1-11

CHAPTER 2: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

2.1 RESPONSIBILITY 2-1

2.2 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION 2-1

INDEX-1 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

2.3 COORDINATION 2-1

2.3.1 DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL 2-1

2.3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1

2.4 VA DESIGN CRITERIA 2-1

2.4.1 MASTER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (PG-18-1) 2-1

2.4.2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES (PG-18-3) 2-2

2.4.3 NATIONAL CAD STANDARD, VHA APPLICATION GUIDE & STANDARD

DETAILS (PG-18-4) 2-2

2.4.4 EQUIPMENT GUIDE LIST (PG-18-5) 2-2

2.4.5 SEISMIC DESIGN HANDBOOK (H-18-8) 2-2

2.4.6 TIL - SPACE AND FACILITY PLANNING (PG-18-9) 2-3

2.4.7 DESIGN MANUALS (PG-18-10) 2-3

2.4.8 DESIGN GUIDES, GRAPHICAL, BY FUNCTION (PG-18-12) 2-3

2.4.9 BARRIER FREE DESIGN GUIDES (PG-18-13) 2-4

2.4.10 ROOM FINISHES, DOOR, AND HARDWARE SCHEDULES (PG-18-14) 2-4

2.4.11 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A/E SUBMISSIONS (PG-18-15) 2-4

2.4.12 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANUAL (PG-18-17) 2-5

2.4.13 VA CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (H-7545) 2-5

2.4.14 TIL - ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVIEW CHECKLIST 2-6

2.4.15 TIL - DESIGN ALERTS 2-6

2.4.16 TIL QUALITY ALERTS 2-6

2.4.17 TIL - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS-PHYSICAL SECURITY 2-6

2.4.18 COST ESTIMATING MANUAL 2-7

2.4.19 TIL - SUSTAINABLE DESIGN & ENERGY REDUCTION 2-7

2.4.20 TIL - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS-FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN 2-7

2.5. VA HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM 2-8

2.5.12 COMPUTER AIDED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (CAFM) 2-8

2.6 THERMAL DESIGN CRITERIA 2-8

2.6.1 ENERGY CONSERVATION 2-8

2.6.2 DOE INTERIM FINAL RULE 2-9

2.6.3 ASHRAE STANDARDS 2-9

2.6.3.1 ASHRAE STANDARD 90.1 2-9

● ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 – 2004 2-9

● ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 – 2007 2-9

● ASHRAE/IESNA/USGBC Standard 189.1 – 2009 2-9

● ASHRAE/IESNA/ASHE Standard 180 – 2008 2-9

● ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1 – 2007 2-9

● ASHRAE Guideline 1.1 – 2007 2-9

● ASHRAE Guideline 0 – 2005 2-9

● ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55 – 2004 2-9

● ASHRAE 2-9

2.6.3.2 ADDITIONAL MANDATED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 2-9

● Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis (Requirements) 2-9

● Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (Methodology) 2-10

2.6.4 EXECUTIVE ORDER 13423 DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 2-10

2.6.4.1 NEW CONSTRUCTION 2-10

2.6.4.2 MAJOR RENOVATIONS 2-10

2.6.4.3 VA POLICY: ENERGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2-10

2.6.4.4 ADDITIONAL MEASURES (MOU) 2-11

2.6.5 MEASUREMENTS AND VERIFICATION 2-11

2.7 APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS 2-11

2.7.1 GENERAL 2-11

INDEX-2 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

2.7.2 LOCAL CODES AND CONDITIONS 2-12

2.8 ABBREVIATIONS 2-12

CHAPTER 3: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PARAMETERS AND CRITERIA

3.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS 3-1

3.1.1 PURPOSE 3-1

● Responsibility 3-1

● Building Goals 3-1

● Applicability 3-1

3.1.2 DESIGN PRINCIPLES 3-1

3.1.3 CHANGES DURING DESIGN 3-2

3.1.4 COORDINATION OF DOCUMENTS 3-2

3.1.5 CONSTRUCTION TERMINOLOGY 3-2

3.1.6 NAMES OF SPACES 3-2

3.2 SCHEDULED PROGRESS REVIEWS 3-2

3.3 DRAWINGS 3-3

3.3.1 COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN AND DRAFTING (CADD) 3-3

3.3.2 ROOM FINISHES, DOORS AND HARDWARE 3-3

3.3.3 FIRE-PROTECTION AND EQUIPMENT DRAWING SYMBOLS 3-3

3.3.4 REFLECTED CEILING PLANS 3-3

3.3.5 PRESENTATION OF DESIGN 3-3

3.3.6 COLOR RENDERINGS 3-3

3.3.7 COMPARISON OF EXTERIOR MATERIALS 3-4

3.4 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS 3-4

3.4.1 FLOOR-TO-FLOOR HEIGHTS 3-4

3.4.1.1 NEW CONSTRUCTION ADJOINING EXISTING BUILDING 3-4

3.4.1.2 ANALYSIS OF RESTRICTED FLOOR-TO-FLOOR HEIGHTS 3-4

3.5 SEISMIC DESIGN 3-4

3.6 VA HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM (VAHBS) 3-4

3.6.1 PG-18-3 VA POLICY ON THE USE OF INTERSTITIAL-SPACE SYSTEM 3-4

3.6.2 VA STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION, HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM

DEVELOPMENT STUDY 3-4

3.6.3 VA FIRE PROTECTION MANUAL PG 18-10 3-4

3.7 EQUIPMEMT, CASEWORK, AND PLUMBING FIXTURES 3-5

3.8 FIRE RATED AND SMOKE-BARRIER PARTITIONS 3-5

3.9 FLOOR DRAINS 3-5

3.10 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 3-5

3.10.1 BARIATRIC AND SPECIAL NEEDS ACCOMMODATION 3-5

● Overview 3-5

● Design Parameters Hospital Based 3-5 o Patient Lift System 3-5 o Patient Room 3-5 o Patient Toilet-Shower Room 3-6 o Portable Lift Storage 3-6 o Waiting Areas 3-6 o Elevators 3-6

3.10.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS CLC BASED 3-6

3.10.3 DESIGN PARAMETERS SCI BASED 3-6

3.10.4 DESIGN PARAMETERS PRC BASED 3-6

3.11 ENERGY CENTER 3-7

INDEX-3 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

3.12 HVAC EQUIPMENT SPACES 3-7

3.13 ELECTRICAL ROOMS, CLOSETS AND VAULTS 3-7

3.13.1 ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR AND SERVICE ENTRY ROOMS 3-7

3.12.2 CEILINGS 3-7

3.12.3 TRANSFORMER VAULTS 3-7

3.14 MINIMUM SPACE REQUIREMENTS 3-7

3.15 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER 3-8

3.16 OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 3-9

3.17 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOMS 3-9

3.17.1 MAIN SERVICE ROOM 3-9

● Vertical Clearances 3-9

● Hoists 3-9

● Horizontal Clearances 3-9

● Lighting 3-9

● Housekeeping Pads 3-9

● Posted Instructions 3-9

● Means of Egress 3-9

● 600 Volts Nominal or less 3-9

● Over 600 Volts Nominal 3-10

3.17.2 ELECTRIC CLOSET REQUIREMENTS 3-10

3.18 ELEVATOR PLANNING 3-10

3.18.1 HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 3-10

3.19 PNEUMATIC TUBE SYSTEMS 3-10

CHAPTER 4: TECHNICAL METHODS AND MEANS

4.1 TECHNICAL METHODS AND MEANS 4-1

4.1.1 PURPOSE 4-1

4.2 SITEWORK, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, SLABS 4-1

4.2.1 BUILDING PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINAGE 4-1

4.2.2 MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING AT INTERIOR FLOOR DRAINS 4-1

4.2.2.1 GENERAL 4-1

4.2.2.2 EXCEPTIONS 4-1

4.2.3 KITCHEN MEMBRANE INSULATION 4-1

4.2.3.1 GENERAL 4-1

4.2.3.2 DRAWINGS 4-1

4.3 PIPE BASEMENTS 4-1

4.4 FLOOR SLAB DEPRESSIONS 4-2

4.5 BUILDING ENVELOPE 4-2

4.5.1 ENERGY CONSERVATION 4-2

4.5.2 GOVERNING REGULATIONS 4-2

4.5.3 ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS 4-2

4.6 EXTERIOR ENTRANCES AND PLATFORMS 4-2

4.6.1 AMBULANCE ENTRANCES 4-2

4.6.1.1 AMBULANCE PLATFORMS 4-2

4.6.1.2 AMBULANCE CANOPIES 4-2

4.6.1.3 OTHER PROVISIONS 4-2

4.6.1.4 ENCLOSED AMBULANCE ENTRANCES 4-3

4.6.2 OTHER PATIENT ENTRANCES 4-3

4.6.2.1 CANOPIES 4-3

4.6.2.2 REVOLVING DOORS 4-3

INDEX-4 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

4.6.2.3 AIR LOCKS 4-3

4.6.3 MORGUE ENTRANCES/EXITS 4-3

4.6.4 LOADING DOCKS 4-3

4.6.4.1 PLATFORMS 4-3

4.6.4.2 CANOPIES 4-3

4.6.4.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 4-4

4.6.5 OVERHEAD CLEARANCE FOR TRUCKS AND BUSES 4-4

4.6.6 MAINTENANCE-SHOP ENTRANCE PLATFORMS 4-4

4.6.7 ENTRANCE AND EXIT ACCESSIBILITY 4-4

4.7 EXIT AND EGRESS DOOR LOCKS 4-4

4.7.1 BUILDING ACCESS AND EGRESS DOORS (EXTERIOR) 4-4

4.7.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCKING SYSTEM 4-4

4.7.2.1 GENERAL 4-4

4.7.2.2 MONITORS AND ALARMS 4-4

4.7.2.3 DESIGN BY SECURITY CONSULTANT 4-4

4.7.2.4 MANUALLY OPERATED LOCKS 4-4

4.8 STAIRWAY DOORS 4-5

4.8.1 EXTERIOR EXIT DOORS AT STAIRWAYS 4-5

4.8.2 INTERIOR STAIRWAY DOORS 4-5

4.8.3 ALARMS, BELLS, AND COMMUNICATORS ON DOORS 4-5

4.9 AUTOMATIC DOORS 4-5

4.9.1 GENERAL 4-5

4.9.2 TYPES AND LOCATIONS 4-5

4.9.2.1 MOTION DETECTORS 4-5

4.9.2.2 SCI/D 4-6

4.9.2.3 REMOTE PUSH PLATES 4-6

4.9.2.4 WALK-OFF MATS 4-6

4.9.2.5 CHAIN PULL 4-6

4.10 EXTERIOR WINDOWS 4-6

4.10.1 HISTORIC BUILDINGS 4-6

4.10.2 ENERGY CONSERVATION 4-6

4.10.3 INTEGRAL VENETIAN BLINDS 4-7

4.10.4 SILL HEIGHT 4-7

4.10.5 OPERABLE WINDOWS 4-7

4.10.6 SAFETY GLAZING 4-8

4.11 SCREENS - WINDOW, DETENTION, SECURITY AND VENTILATION 4-8

4.11.1 INSECT SCREENS 4-8

4.11.2 DETENTION SCREENS 4-8

4.11.3 SECURITY SCREENS 4-8

4.11.4 VENTILATION SYSTEM SCREENS 4-8

4.12 LOUVERS 4-8

4.13 PARAPET WALLS, ROOF STRUCTURES, AND WALKWAYS 4-8

4.13.1 PARAPET WALLS 4-8

4.13.2 ROOF STRUCTURES 4-9

4.13.3 ROOF WALKWAYS 4-9

4.13.4 ATTIC WALKWAYS 4-8

4.13.5 ROOFTOP GUARDRAILS 4-8

4.14 LOW-SLOPE ROOF SYSTEMS 4-9

4.14.1 GENERAL 4-9

4.14.2 FLAT ROOF POLICY 4-9

4.14.3 DESIGN LAYOUT OF LOW-SLOPE ROOFS 4-9

INDEX-5 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

4-14.4 ROOFING SELECTION 4-10

4.15 ANCHORAGE OF INSULATION 4-10

4.16 BALLAST 4-10

4.17 BASE FLASHING AND PENETRATIONS 4-10

4.18 SCUPPERS 4-10

4.19 PROVISION FOR FUTURE VERTICAL EXPANSION 4-10

4.20 EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM 4-11

4.21 STRUCTURAL STEEL ANGLE GUARDS 4-11

4.22 BUILDING INTERIOR 4-11

4.22.1 DOORS 4-11

4.22.2 GENERAL 4-11

4.22.3 CORRIDOR-TO-CORRIDOR DOORS 4-11

4.22.4 FIRE-PARTITION AND SMOKE-BARRIER DOORS 4-11

4-23 SHADES, BLINDS, DRAPERIES, AND CURTAINS 4-11

4.23.1 LIGHTPROOF SHADES 4-11

4.23.2 OPAQUE SHADES 4-12

4.23.3 WINDOW HEADS 4-12

4.24 PARTITIONS 4-12

4.24.1 METAL STUD PARTITIONS 4-12

4.24.2 STRUCTURAL DESIGN 4-12

4.24.3 GYPSUM BOARD 4-12

4.24.4 RADIATION PROTECTION 4-12

4.24.5 HEIGHT OF GYPSUM BOARD 4-12

4.24.6 SECURITY PARTITIONS 4-13

4.25 VA GUIDE TO ROOM FINISHES 4-13

4.26 HANDRAILS, WALL GUARDS, AND CORNER GUARDS 4-13

4.26.1 RIGID ADHESIVE-APPLIED ACRYLIC/VINYL CORNER GUARDS 4-14

4.26.2 STRUCTURAL STEEL CORNER GUARDS 4-14

4.27 CEILINGS 4-14

4.27.1 CUBICLE CURTAIN TRACKS 4-14

4.27.2 MINIMUM CEILING HEIGHTS 4-14

4.27.3 EFFECTS OF VA HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM 4-16

4.28 TOILET PARTITIONS, SCREENS AND WALL PROTECTION 4-16

4.28.1 TOILET ROOM PARTITIONS 4-16

4.28.2 VISUAL SCREENING 4-16

4.28.3 WALL PROTECTION AT PLUMBING FIXTURES 4-16

4.29 WATER COOLERS 4-17

4-30 SHOWERS 4-17

4-30.1 SHOWER ENCLOSURES 4-17

4.30.2 SHOWER FLOORS 4-17

4.30.3 SHOWER ACCESSIBILITY 4-17

4.31 ROOM NUMBERING 4-17

4.31.1 ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS 4-17

4.32 SIGNS, PLAQUES AND EMBLEMS 4-17

4.32.1 GENERAL 4-17

4.32.2 SAFETY SIGN 4-17

4.32.3 CONSTRUCTION SIGN 4-17

4.32.4 DEDICATION PLAQUE 4-18

4.32.5 VA EMBLEM 4-18

4.33 ATRIUMS, MALLS AND LARGE SPACES 4-18

4.33.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ATRIUMS, MALLS AND LARGE SPACES 4-18

INDEX-6 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

4.33.2 ANIMAL RESEARCH FACILITY (ARF) / VETERINARY MEDICAL UNIT (VMU) 4-18

4.34 AUDIOLOGY SOUND SUITES 4-18

4.35 COMPUTER ROOMS (CENTRAL) 4-19

4.36 ELECTROMAGNETIC SHIELDING 4-19

4.36.1 GENERAL 4-19

4.36.2 AVOIDANCE OF EMI SOURCES 4-19

4.36.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH TEST 4-19

4.37 INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU) 4-20

4.38 ISOLATION ROOMS 4-20

4.38.1 FUNCTION 4-20

4.38.2 NEGATIVE PRESSURE ISOLATION PATIENT ROOMS 4-20

4.38.3 PATIENT CARE UNITS ISOLATION ROOM (NURSING UNITS) 4-20

4.38.4 PATIENT CARE ISOLATION ROOM DESIGN 4-21

4.38.5 ISOLATION ROOMS IN AMBULATORY CARE 4-21

4.38.6 ISOLATION AUTOPSY ROOM IN MORGUE 4-21

4.38.7 PATIENT PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT ROOM (PEI) 4-22

4.38.8 PROTECTIVE PATIENT ROOM DESIGN 4-22

4.38.9 SECLUSION ROOMS MENTAL HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL (PSYCHIATRIC)

PATIENT UNITS 4-23

4.39 MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) 4-23

4.39.1 DESCRIPTION 4-23

4.39.2 MRI SUITE DESIGN 4-23

4-40 PHARMACY 4-23

4-40.1 PHARMACY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4-23

4-40.2 PHARMACY SECURITY 4-24

4.41 MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES 4-24

4.41.1 GENERAL 4-24

4.41.2 FINISHES AND DOORS MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES 4-25

4.41.3 BARRIER DOORS AND STAIRWAY DOORS 4-25

4.41.4 WINDOWS MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES 4-25

4.41.5 CUBICLE CURTAIN TRACKS MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES 4-25

4.41.6 PATIENT TOILETS AND BATHROOMS MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES 4-25

4.42 RADIATION THERAPY 4-26

4.42.1 GENERAL 4-26

4.42.2 SHIELDING POLICY 4-26

4.42.3 SPECIFICATION OF PROTECTIVE SHIELDING 4-26

4.42.4 CERTIFICATION 4-26

4.42.5 DESIGN 4-26

4.43 RADIOLOGY (DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY) 4-26

4.43.1 GENERAL 4-26

4.43.2 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION AND INSTALLATION FOR X-RAY ROOMS 4-27

4.43.3 SHELLED-IN OPTION 4-27

4.43.4 DESIGN 4-27

4.43.5 X-RAY CONTROL ROOMS 4-27

4.43.5.1 SINGLE-PANE VIEWING WINDOWS OF CONVENTIONAL LEAD GLASS 4-27

4.43.5.2 PARTITIONS AND SHIELDING 4-28

4.43.5.3 CEILING HEIGHTS 4-28

4.43.5.4 CEILING SUPPORT SYSTEM 4-28

4.43.5.5 FLOOR DEPRESSIONS 4-28

4.44 REFRIGERATORS AND FREEZERS (BUILT-IN) 4-28

4.44.1 REFRIGERATORS AND FREEZERS IN KITCHEN AREAS 4-28

4.44.1.1 TYPE AND SIZE 4-28

INDEX-7 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

4.44.1.2 DOORS 4-28

4.44.1.3 FLOOR 4-28

4.44.1.4 CEILING SPACE ENCLOSURE 4-28

4.44.1.5 SPACE FOR COOLING SYSTEMS 4-28

4.44.1.6 ENTRY TO FROZEN FOOD FREEZERS 4-28

4.44.2 MORTUARY REFRIGERATORS 4-29

4.44.2.1 TYPES 4-29

4.44.2.2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 4-29

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS 4-30

INDEX-8 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

1.1 INTRODUCTION

Health care facilities encompass a wide range of types, from small and relatively simple medical clinics to large, complex, and costly, teaching and research hospitals. Large hospital medical centers may include various subsidiary healthcare facilities that are often co-located on a single campus. The old expression, "You never get a second chance to make a good first impression" applies to health care facilities. VA medical facilities convey a message to patients, visitors, volunteers, vendors, and staff that the mission is to help veterans by providing health care in all its forms, as well as for medical research.

The foundation of our mission in designing facilities for our nation’s veterans is based on the VA Core Values:

● Compassion: We will design facilities that treat all veterans and their families with the utmost dignity and compassion. These facilities will provide services in a caring manner, with a sympathetic consciousness of others’ distress together with a desire to alleviate it, and understanding that Veterans have earned our nation’s gratitude and respect. Their health care needs to drive our actions.

● Excellence: Each VA facility shall strive to perform at the highest level of professional competence and take pride in our accomplishments.

● Professionalism: Our success depends on maintaining a highly-skilled, diverse, and compassionate workforce. We foster a culture that values equal opportunity, innovation, and accountability.

● Integrity: We recognize the importance of accurate information. We practice open, truthful, and timely communication with veterans, employees, and external stakeholders. By carefully listening and responding to their concerns, we seek continuous improvement in our programs and services.

● Accountability: We will perform in a manner at all times that makes us accountable, responsible and answerable to veterans and their families, our leaders and other employees as well as external stakeholders.

● Stewardship: The architect must ensure in the design responsible stewardship of the human, financial, natural and cultural resources as well as data and information entrusted to them in meeting the goals and mission of the VA. Each facility planned and designed must improve these performance measures through the use of innovative technologies, evidence-based medical practices, and sound business principles.

● Design Intent: The facility’s design communicates a visual impression about the organization and the medical care being provided there. These visual clues start at the approach to the facility, the drop-off area, the parking facilities, and the street signage. The message should convey a sense of welcoming, caring, comfort, and compassion, and commitment to patient well-being and safety, where stress is relieved, refuge is provided, respect is reciprocated, competence is symbolized, way-finding is facilitated, accommodating all who utilize the facility. Likewise these attributes also influence employee service attitudes and behaviors. Finishes, signage, and artwork must be carefully selected, well-coordinated, and integrated. Security can

Page 1-1 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014 be balanced with some features apparent to patients/visitors, while conveying a message of safety. Thoughtful design can help ensure the proper first impression is created and sustained.

● The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) owns, leases, and operates a nationwide system of healthcare facilities dedicated to serving veterans of U.S. Military Services.

VA’s infrastructure encompasses billions of dollars of total value and the average age of its buildings is approaching 60 years.

● The Architectural Design Manual (ADM) is the starting point for all design professionals engaged to work on any building design for VA. This Manual not only identifies VA’s design philosophy and recent technological enhancements but also helps the designer to locate specific information for any building type or technical requirement.

1.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this manual is to serve as the master reference document for architectural planning and design of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. Architectural requirements and criteria in this manual are expected to be followed in planning of VA facilities.

Architect/Engineer (henceforth referred to as the A/E) engaged in the design and renovation of the VA facilities are required to follow this manual. VA facilities are defined as:

● New Hospitals

● Replacement Hospitals

● Ambulatory Care Centers – Hospital Based

● Clinical Additions

● Energy Centers

● Outpatient Clinics

● Animal Research Facilities

● Laboratory Buildings

It is expected that architectural components, elements and facilities designed with the use of this manual will meet their primary objective of providing a safe and functional healing environment for patients, staff and visitors. The Architectural design shall meet all VA Space Planning Criteria, VA Design Guide and Design Manual requirements, applicable codes, technical requirements, as well as being well coordinated with other trades and disciplines.

Deviations can be made from the requirements of this manual to accommodate new concepts, methods of construction and design enhancements. Such deviations shall be approved by the VA. Deviations not permitted from those requirements included Federal Regulations, Public Laws, Executive Orders, and other applicable codes and standards.

Throughout this manual, the statement is made: to obtain approval from the VA Authorities.

The VA Authority is defined as the VA Project Manager or the local VA Medical Center’s Chief Engineer.

Page 1-2 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

1.3 HOSPITAL BUILDING SYSTEM (VAHBS)

VA policy on the design of new hospital buildings is to provide for their continuing adaptability to changing conditions and programs throughout their structural life.

The VAHBS concept described in VA Office of Construction Research Study Report (Red Book), Project No. 99-R047 (U.S. Government Printing Office Stock No. 051-000-00 112-5), provides such adaptability. All new and replacement VA hospital buildings shall use the VAHBS system. Consideration should also be given to this system for major additions to existing hospitals where future adaptability is an important factor.

1.4 INTEGRATED DESIGN PROCESS (IDP)

Overview:

VA is a proponent of the Integrated Design Process. IDP a project delivery method, following closely upon the heels of CM-at-large, Design/Build, and LEAN construction.

But IDP goes beyond these other delivery methods in that it binds the parties into a contractual arrangement where risk and reward are truly shared. IDP, also, goes well beyond typical collaboration and team building efforts.

Preparation for a project is led by VA who identifies the need for building on the basis of quantifiable requirements for space and budgetary capacity to undertake the activity. A needs assessment accompanies this planning activity—it describes space use; develops estimates of requirements both spatial and technical; initiates assessment of possible environmental impacts, and arrives at a Program for Design (PFD) around which design activity can develop.

Pre-Design:

● Schematic Design: Once the Pre-design activities are complete and an A/E is selected as the Design Team, the Schematic Design Phase commences. The A/E design team produces initial graphic alternatives/options/scenarios for the project or portions of it. These are meant to stimulate thought and discussion, not necessarily describe the final outcome.

Involvement of all members of the Project Design Team, Owner, Users, A/E, and other consultants, is a critical part of the process at this stage - their individual insights made at this point can prevent costly changes further along in the process.

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) and consultation with regulators and affected parties at this stage of the process helps identify alternative scenarios and potential impacts on the environment to be resolved through design. Gradually a design emerges which embodies the interests and requirements of all participants while also meeting the overall area requirements which the project budget established during Pre-Design activities. The resulting Schematic Designs produced at this stage show site location and organization, general building shape, space allocation, and an outline specification which makes an initial list of components and systems to be designed and/or specified for the final project design. It is often useful to have a cost estimate performed by a professional cost estimator at this point. For smaller projects, one or more possible building contractors may perform this service as part of a preliminary bidding arrangement.

Page 1-3 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

● Design Development enlarges the scale of consideration—greater detail is developed for all aspects of the building—the collaborative process continues with the architect in the role of facilitator for the various contributors. Greater detail is achieved for all aspects of the building. The conclusion of this phase is a detailed design on which all players agree and may be asked to sign off. By the end of this phase, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and, where relevant, the National Historic Preservation Act should be complete, resulting in the incorporation of measures to minimize unnecessary negative impacts on significant aspects of the built and natural environments.

● Contract Documentation: The Development of Contract Documents involves translating the Design Development information into formats suitable for pricing, permitting, and construction. Contract document quality can be achieved by scrutiny, accountability to the initial program needs by the design team and the client, along with careful coordination among the technical consultants on the design team.

Decisions continue to be made with the appropriate contributions of all team members. Changes in scope during this phase become more expensive due to the extensive level of documentation that may need to be adjusted due to the change and if project pricing has commenced. Cost estimates by an estimator may be made at this point, prior to or simultaneous with bidding, in order to assure compliance with the budget and to check the bids. Bids taken at this point may be used as a basis for selecting a builder.

After the award of the project to the general contractor the architect and other members of the team must remain fully involved. Decisions previously made may require clarification;

suppliers' information must be reviewed for compliance with the Contract Documents; and substitutions must be evaluated. If changes affect the operation of the building, it is especially important that the user/client be involved. User requirements may change, necessitating changes in the building—these changes require broad consultation among the consultants and sub-consultants, pricing, and incorporation into the contract documents and the building.

The design team is responsible for assuring that the building meets the requirements of the Contract Documents, but the building's success at meeting the requirements of the original program can be assessed by the construction management team or third parties in a process known as Commissioning. A full range of functions in the building should be evaluated and the design and construction team can be called upon to make changes and adjustments as needed.

The architect acts as the lead designer coordinating the consultants, assuring compliance with the PFD, and assuring compliance with the budget. The architect participates in the construction phase of the project, assessing compliance with the contract documents by managing appropriate inspections, submissions approvals, and evaluations by the sub-consultants. The architect assists in the evaluation of requests for payment by the builder and other professionals.

● Performance Measures and Functional Objectives: The A/E shall ensure the design supports quality based performance measures for customer satisfaction, energy consumption, control of impacts on the built and natural environment,and reduced operations and maintenance. The A/E shall also identify all functional

Page 1-4 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014 expectations and establish alternative features that support attainment of those expectations. To the maximum extent possible, the A/E shall apply those architectural and engineering elements that optimize building performance and functional capabilities.

A landscape architect should be involved early in the project to assess natural systems, and how they will be affected by the project and the best ways to accommodate the project to those systems.

The Civil Engineer is essential for understanding the land, soil, and regulatory aspects of any construction project; early involvement is essential. The civil engineer prepares contract documents and assesses compliance of the work with the contract documents.

The Structural Engineer’s duty is to provide safe designs. Typically, the Structural Engineer is responsible for the structural design of the overall project, including specification of the design loads, seismic and wind loading design, progressive collapse analysis, etc. The structural engineer prepares contract documents and assesses compliance of the work with the contract documents

Mechanical and Electrical Engineers can be engaged by the architect as part of his work or, on larger or more complex projects, may be engaged separately by the VA. They are responsible for the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning and the power, signal, and illumination aspects of the project. Each produces portions of the contract documents and should be involved in assessing their part of the work for compliance with those documents.

Specialized Consultants such as medical equipment planners, material management and vertical transportation consultants and environmental and historic preservation consultants should be involved as required by the special requirements of the project. These may include specifications writers, materials and component specialists, sustainability consultants, and technical specialists with expertise in food service, audio-visual, materials handling, historic preservation, and parking design. The size, complexity, and specialization of the project will suggest the kinds of additional experts who will be needed. Like all contributors to the integrated design process, they should be involved early enough to include their suggestions and requirements in the design, not so late that their contributions must be remedial.

After the facility is fully operational, a Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) also known as a Facility Performance Evaluation (FPE) should be engaged no earlier than twelve months after the facility is commissioned as operational to assess how the building meets the original and emerging requirements for its use. Such information is useful for VA when additional construction of the same type is contemplated. Mistakes can be prevented and successes repeated.

This summary describes the standard operation of the integrated project team. But it depends on:

● clear and continuous communication

● rigorous attention to detail

● active collaboration among all team members throughout all phases of the project

Page 1-5 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

1.5 BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM)

BIM is an integrated database of coordinated information to which many participants in the design process contribute. VA requires the design team to utilize the BIM tool in designing VA facilities. BIM modeling provides for continuous and immediate analysis of project design, scope, schedule, cost information and other matter. BIM identifies and enhances design documentation and brings numerous attributes and benefits such as:

● Higher quality of work performance

● Better coordination among design and engineering disciplines

● Costs savings in the design and engineering work

● Increased speed of delivery

Supporters of such model based technology indicate that the globalization of the design process especially on large projects is forcing increased efficiency. Speed to market issues is forcing new means of collaboration including advanced design build models and more sophisticated use of internet project management. BIM is at the forefront of this movement and is viewed by many as an important tool of change and competitive advantage for design professionals.

BIM enhances the collaborative process of design and engineering. It provides an integrated database of coordinated information among the contributors to the design and engineering of a building. In addition to graphically depicting the project, BIM offers key information about the building that can be used to analyze its performance. The use of coordinated, consistent, computable information results in a reliable, digital representation of the building that can be used during the design decision process, production of contract documents, planning and building performance. BIM allows information to be kept up to date and accessible to architects, engineers, contractors and others.

1.6 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

The Federal Government has issued three Federal Mandates (one law and two Executive Branch policies) for Executive Branch agencies that outline sustainable and energy goals. In addition, on March 30, 2007 VA signed a Green Buildings Action Plan that provides guidance for compliance.

The VA Sustainable Design Manual is the agency’s guidance to define a methodology to achieve these Federal Mandates. The Manual provides guidance in incorporating sustainable design on every phase of a project, from proposals, goal setting, and preliminary planning through design and construction for projects of all sizes. Recognizing that each space acquisition project is unique and will require different strategies, all projects are, nevertheless, required to meet the Federal Mandates as appropriate given the project scope and budget.

1.6.1 OPTIMIZE ENERGY PERFORMANCE

● Energy Efficiency: Establish a whole building performance target that takes into account the intended use, occupancy, operations, plug loads, other energy demands, and design to earn the Energy Star® targets for new construction and major renovation where applicable. For new construction, reduce the energy cost budget by 30 percent compared to the baseline building performance rating per the American

Page 1-6 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., (ASHRAE) and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1- 2004, Energy Standard for Buildings except Low-Rise Residential. For major renovations, reduce the energy cost budget by 20 percent below pre-renovations 2003 building performance baseline.

● Measurement and Verification: In accordance with DOE guidelines issued under section 103 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EP Act), install building level utility meters in new major construction and renovation projects to track and continuously optimize performance. Compare actual performance data from the first year of operation with the energy design target. After one year of occupancy, measure all new major installations using the Energy Star® Benchmarking Tool for building and space types covered by Energy Star®. Enter data and lessons learned from sustainable buildings into the High Performance Buildings Database.

1.6.2 PROTECT AND CONSERVE WATER

● Indoor Water: Employ strategies that in aggregate use a minimum of 20 percent less potable water than the indoor water use baseline calculated for the building, after meeting the Energy Policy Act of 1992 fixture performance requirements.

● Outdoor Water: Use water efficient landscape and irrigation strategies, including water reuse and recycling, to reduce outdoor potable water consumption by a minimum of 50 percent over that consumed by conventional means (plant species and plant densities). Employ design and construction strategies that reduce storm water runoff and polluted site water runoff.

1.6.3 EXECUTIVE ORDER 13514, REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES

This Executive Order requires agencies to measure, manage, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions toward agency-defined targets. It describes a process by which agency goals will be set and reported, additionally the Executive Order requires all Federal agencies to meet a number of energy, water, and waste reduction targets, including:

● 30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020;

● 26% improvement in water efficiency by 2020;

● 50% recycling and waste diversion by 2015;

● 95% of all applicable contracts will meet sustainability requirements;

● Implementation of the 2030 net-zero-energy building requirement;

● Implementation of the storm water provisions of the Energy Independence and

Security Act of 2007, section 438, and;

● Development of guidance for sustainable Federal building locations in alignment with the Livability Principles put forward by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

It is the intent and responsibility that all A/E’s designing projects for the VA whether they be minor or major in scope meet the goals of this Executive Order to reduce costs, reduce air and water pollution, and utilize clean energy. Implementation of the Executive Order will focus on integrating achievement of sustainability goals with agency mission and strategic planning to optimize performance and minimize implementation costs.

Page 1-7 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

Implementation will be managed through the previously-established Office of the Federal Environmental Executive, working in close partnership with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

U.S. Department of Energy has developed a series of initiatives to more broadly implement cool roof technologies on U.S. Government Facilities and Buildings. Cool roofs use lighter-colored roofing surfaces or special coatings to reflect more of the sun’s heat, helping improve building efficiency by reducing cooling costs and offsetting carbon emissions.

Cool roofs are one of the quickest and lowest cost ways to reduce the global carbon emissions. By demonstrating the benefits of cool roofs on our VA facilities, and can lead the nation toward more sustainable building practices, while reducing the federal carbon footprint and saving money for taxpayers.

Roofs and road pavement cover 50 to 65 percent of urban areas. Because they absorb so much heat, dark-colored roofs and roadways create what is called the “urban heat island effect,” where a city is significantly warmer than its surrounding rural areas. Cool roofs significantly reduce the heat island effect and improve air quality by reducing emissions. A recent DOE initiative (Read Secretary Chu’s memorandum) indicates that using cool roofs and cool pavements in cities can help reduce the demand for air conditioning, cool entire cities, and potentially cancel the heating effect of up to two years of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions.

1.6.4 ENHANCE INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

The A/E shall implement and comply with the VA Green Buildings Action Plan: Implementing the Memorandum of Understanding on Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings, dated February 28, 2006.

● Ventilation and Thermal Comfort: Meet the current ASHRAE Standards, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, including continuous humidity control within established ranges per climate zone, and ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.

● Moisture Control: Establish and implement a moisture control strategy pursuant to ASHRAE Standards 55-2004 and 62-2004 for controlling moisture flows and condensation to prevent building damage and mold contamination.

● Day-lighting: Achieve a minimum daylight factor of 2 percent (excluding all direct sunlight penetration) in 75 percent of all space occupied for critical visual tasks.

Provide automatic dimming controls or accessible manual lighting controls, and appropriate glare control.

● Low-Emitting Materials: Specify materials and products with low pollutant emissions, including adhesives, sealants, paints, carpet systems, and furnishings.

● Protect Indoor Air Quality during Construction: Follow the recommended approach of the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractor's National Association Indoor Air Quality Guidelines for Occupied Buildings under Construction, 1995. After construction and prior to occupancy, conduct a minimum 72-hour flush-out with

Page 1-8 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014 http://www.eere.energy.gov/pdfs/chu_memo_installation_cool_roofs_doe_buildings.pdf maximum outdoor air consistent with achieving relative humidity no greater than 60 percent. After occupancy, continue flush-out as necessary to minimize exposure to contaminants from new building materials.

1.6.5 REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF MATERIALS

● Recycled Content: For EPA-designated products, use products meeting or exceeding EPA's recycled content recommendations. For other products, use materials with recycled content such that the sum of post-consumer recycled content plus one-half of the pre-consumer content constitutes at least 10% (based on cost) of the total value of the materials in the project.

● Bio-based Content: For USDA-designated products use materials meeting or exceeding USDA's bio-based content recommendations. For other products, use bio-based products made from rapidly renewable resources and certified sustainable wood products.

● Construction Waste: During a project's planning stage, identify local recycling and salvage operations that could process site related waste. Program the design to recycle or salvage at least 50 percent construction, demolition and land clearing waste, excluding soil, where markets or onsite recycling opportunities exist.

● Ozone Depleting Compounds: Eliminate the use of ozone depleting compounds during and after construction where alternative environmentally preferable products are available, consistent with Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 or equivalent overall air quality benefits that take into account life cycle impacts.

1.6.6 PRIORITY TO RENOVATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES.

● If not inconsistent with mission needs, priority should be given to the renovation of existing buildings and other facilities over new construction. Renovation saves energy and physical resources and is often more cost-effective than new construction.

● Where historic buildings or building complexes are present, special efforts should be made to rehabilitate and reuse them in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, provided doing so achieves VA's mission requirements.

1.7 ACCESSIBILITY

Refer to the TIL - Accessibility (PG-18-13)

1.8 PHYSICAL SECURITY

1.8.1 OVERVIEW

VA facilities that are owned, leased, or managed; to be constructed or modernized; or to be purchased shall have countermeasures designed into the facility’s infrastructure to abate potential threats.

Page 1-9 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

1.8.2 CONSIDERATIONS

● Providing for secure design that meets all facility requirements is often a challenge.

With limited resources, it is not always feasible to provide for the most secure facility, architecturally expressive design, or energy efficient building envelope. From the planning and concept stages through the development of construction documents, it is important that all project or design stakeholders work cooperatively to ensure a balanced design. Successful designs must consider all competing design objectives and make the best selections.

● Care should be taken to implement physical security measures that allow Fire

Protection forces access to sites, buildings and building occupants with adequate means of emergency egress.

● Consideration should be given to integrating various stand-alone security systems, integrating systems across remote locations, and integrating security systems with other systems such as communications, and fire and emergency management.

Refer to the TIL – Physical Security Design Manual

1.9 SEISMIC AND OTHER NATURAL HAZARDS

Consideration should be given to seismic and blast resistant design as they share some common analytical methodologies and a performance based design philosophy that accepts varying levels of damage in response to varying levels of dynamic excitation. Both design approaches recognize that it is cost prohibitive to provide comprehensive protection against all conceivable events and an appropriate level of protection that lessens the risk of mass casualties can be provided at a reasonable cost. Both seismic design and blast resistant design approaches benefit from a risk assessment that evaluates the functionality, criticality, occupancy, site conditions and design features of a building. Weather related (hurricane and tornado) protection requires blast resistant design. Blast resistant façade systems require the glass to satisfy the debris hazard conditions in response to the specified blast loading, while the mullions and anchors are required to resist the collected forces within the specified deflection and ductility limits. In addition to resisting the specified blast loads, the criteria often require the designer to consider the damages resulting from a more extreme blast loading. The criterion requires a balanced design, for which the mullions must develop the capacity of the selected glass within allowable deformation limits and the anchors must develop the capacity of the selected mullions.

● Window Fenestration: The total fenestration openings are not limited; however, a maximum of 40 percent per structural bay is a preferred design goal. In renovation of older buildings, and in new construction in ensembles of older buildings, the impacts of fenestration design on historic buildings and views must be considered and addressed in planning.

● Window Frames: The frame system should develop the full capacity of the chosen glazing up to 750 breaks per 1000, and provide the required level of protection without failure. This can be shown through design calculations or approved testing methods.

Page 1-10 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

● Anchorage: The anchorage should remain attached to the walls of the facility during an explosive event without failure. Capacity of the anchorage system can be shown through design calculations or approved tests that demonstrate that failure of the proposed anchorage will not occur and that the required performance level specified is provided.

1.10 PATIENT CENTRIC DESIGN

The VA provides a full spectrum of medical, surgical and rehabilitative care of our country’s veterans. The VA has embraced the principles, spirit and intent of Evidence Based Design (EBD) together with the Planetree model of care which creates a healing environment for all their facilities. VA Medical Centers around the country have realized these principles can assist in identifying standards and solutions to veteran-centered care approaches to health care.

Veteran-Centered Design is a core guiding principle approach to design as it focuses specifically on supporting the veteran. It is the patient that is the central focus of the design. It means designing for the experience of what the Veteran is going through to support positive outcomes. The VA philosophy supports the body, mind and spirit of the veteran and his/her family and friends.

Care that is truly patient-centered that considers patients’ cultural traditions, their personal preferences and values, their family situations, and their lifestyle, is to be the mainstay of VA facilities. It makes the patient and their loved ones an integral part of the care team who collaborate with health care professionals in making clinical decisions. Patient-centered care puts responsibility for important aspects of self-care and monitoring in patients’ hands — along with the tools and support they need to carry out that responsibility. Patient-centered care ensures that transitions between providers, departments, and health care settings are respectful, coordinated, and efficient. When care is patient centered, unneeded and unwanted services are reduced.

1.11 COMMISSIONING

In 2006, the VA co-signed the Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), along many other federal agencies, which was subsequently included in Executive Order 13423 – Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management. One of the requirements of this MOU is for total building commissioning (Cx) practices for federal buildings.

Total building commissioning practices shall be employed in the design, construction, and guarantee phases of a project. VA will identify a Commissioning Agent (CxA) who works directly for VA at the pre-design phase. The A/E shall work collaboratively with the CxA in all aspects of commissioning work from the pre-design, Schematic, Design Development and Construction Document phases of the design work. Moreover, the A/E shall work collaboratively with the CxA during the construction phase of the project.

The VA utilizes the services of an independent third party commissioning authority to oversee the project from design to construction documents, and Post Occupancy commissioning plan to verify design and engineering performance including the installation and performance of systems to be commissioned, and provide the VA with a commissioning report.

Page 1-11 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

The A/E shall use and follow the VA Whole Building Commissioning Process Manual located in the Technical Information Library as a guide for the commissioning work.

The A/E shall use and modify, as needed, the VA General Commissioning Specifications, located in: TIL – Master Construction Specifications (PG-18-1), Div 01, General Requirements, Section 01 91 00, to suit the design criteria, size and complexity of a project.

Page 1-12 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014

2.1 RESPONSIBILITY

The A/E shall provide all necessary professional services to perform planning and design of the systems for the project. The A/E is responsible and liable for the professional design in accordance with the contract, good engineering practices, VA standards, VA project-specific requirements if any, and applicable codes.

2.2 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION

Unless otherwise directed by VA, the Authority Having Jurisdiction is the VISN Safety Officer.

2.3 COORDINATION

2.3.1 DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL:

The Architect-Engineer shall coordinate planning and design work with the architectural, structural, civil, plumbing, mechanical, fire protection, and LEED/Sustainable designs as applicable.

The A/E shall implement and maintain a quality-control program assuring that all services, designs, drawings, and specifications required by the contract are performed and provided in a manner that meets professional architectural and engineering quality standards adopted and utilized by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The design documents shall be systematically and thoroughly reviewed for compliance with VA’s project requirements and applicable codes, commitments made in EIA documents, and agreements entered into under environmental and historic preservation regulations. VA approved deviations in the design documents shall be documented. The A/E shall furnish to the VA and sub-consultants copies of all instructions, manuals, and other documents pertaining to design requirements to insure a completely coordinated design. The A/E shall be held responsible for ensuring that all sub-consultants comply with the design requirements. Likewise, all Sub-consultants shall be held responsible for insuring that their portion of the project is in compliance with the design requirements.

2.3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS:

For renovations of and/or additions to existing buildings, the A/E shall investigate the building to determine if sufficient structural, mechanical, plumbing, site utilities and electrical capacity is available to accommodate the new renovations of and/or additions. Special attention should be directed towards structural loads, medical gas, HVAC and electrical systems. If applicable, the A/E shall inform the VA Project Manager if additional structural, mechanical, plumbing and electrical capacity required.

2.4 VA DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS:

The following are requirements and standards of VA’s Office of Construction and Facilities Management Technical Information Library (TIL):

2.4.1 MASTER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (PG-18-1)

Located in Technical Information Library http://www.cfm.va.gov/til/spec.asp

Page 2 -1 Architectural Design Manual – August 1, 2014 http://www.cfm.va.gov/til/spec.asp

Purpose:

Defines a standardized method for the A/E to assure that the contractor provides equipment and systems that meet the design intent in terms of performance, quality and cost

The Specifications accomplish this by:

●…