EXHIBIT_C_-_Reference_Questionnaire_Package NEW Ld.docx

DOCX document 83 KB Posted

Attached to
B222 Renovation and Addition Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912LM20R1003
Issued by
Department of the Army Minnesota Army National Guard

About this file

This solicitation package seeks proposals for the renovation and addition to an existing base supply facility located at the 148th Fighter Wing of the Duluth Air National Guard Base in Minnesota. Key requirements include constructing an addition to accommodate base supply functions, replacing building systems, and repairing the existing metal roof and brick facade. Proposals are due by October 29, 2020. The contract is a small business set-aside with a maximum value between $5-10 million and a performance period of 540 days from notice to proceed. Evaluation factors are best value past performance and price. The North American Industry Classification System code is 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction. A pre-proposal conference will be held on October 7 and site visit to follow. Questions are due by October 26. The solicitation and amendments will be posted to beta.SAM.gov.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to B222 Renovation and Addition, newest first.
File Type Posted
Addendum 09.doc DOC document
B 08 W912LM20R1003 Amendment 01 B222 Renovation and Addition.pdf PDF
Addendum 08.doc DOC document
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 08 81 00.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 102554_ - Sheet - AD010 - GROUND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 08 11 13.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07_Structural.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 102554_ - Sheet - A-353 - SECTION DETAILS.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 08 71 00.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 07 27Oct2020 08 51 13.pdf PDF
Addendum 07.doc DOC document
222-1976-Original Construction.pdf PDF
222-1984-84005-Addition to Engine Shop.pdf PDF
B222_2007_Renovation.pdf PDF
B222_2007_ExistingWindowInformation.pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 05 09 29 00 26OCT20.pdf PDF
Addendum 05 and 06.doc DOC document
Q and A Addendum 05 08 33 13 26OCT20.pdf PDF
Addendum 03 and 04.doc DOC document
Q and A Addendum 03 Architecture.pdf PDF
Addendum 01 and 02.doc DOC document
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (07 05 23).pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (08 81 00).pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (14 21 23).pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (08 71 00).pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (102554_Elec_PanelboardSchedules_Add01).pdf PDF
Q and A Addendum 01_02 (07 27 10.00 10).pdf PDF
Preproposal Conference.pdf PDF
MATOC Preproposal Conference.pdf PDF
B222 Site visit.pdf PDF
B 04 DB Wage Det 28 Sep.pdf PDF
148FW Form 66.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT B Ld.doc DOC document
B 08 W912LM20R1003 B222 Renovation and Addition.pdf PDF
Exhibit D_Letter of Commitment Ld.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT A Ld.doc DOC document
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation W912LM-20-R-1003 FY20 Renovate B222 for LRS

EXHIBIT C

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms:

Prepare and submit to the owners of the projects listed in your Exhibit A “Performance Relevancy Questionnaires”, a Past Performance Reference Questionnaire (Exhibit C). For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Specialist at MN USPFO Camp Ripley Bldg 15-2 15000 Hwy 115 Little Falls MN 56345. For commercial references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. Offerors should follow-up and encourage references to return completed questionnaires in a timely manner. If you have multiple references at one location (i.e. at a military base), send one cover letter and questionnaires for each contract for which you need a reference. Your questionnaire package should contain the following:

· Cover Letter (See SAMPLE on the next page)

· Respondent Info Rating Sheets (Exhibit C) (the following 4 pages). Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes.

· Suggested – Pre-addressed stamped envelope.

OFFEROR SHOULD PLACE THEIR NAME ON TOP OF EACH QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE In accordance with SECTION 002116 – PROPOSAL EVALUATIONS AND BASIS FOR AWARD, completed questionnaires should be returned to the Offeror and included with the proposal.

SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Your Company Letterhead

Date:

To:

We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm will be submitting a proposal under a project advertised by the USPFO _________. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Only one response from each office is required.

Please return your completed questionnaire to my attention at the following address:

[Contractor to enter his/her address for receipt of documents and incorporation into the proposal package]

This documentation must arrive NOT LATER THAN [Contractor to enter date] , so that it can be incorporated into our proposal.

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the USPFO Contracting Officer at ______________ via email (preferred) at: or alternatively by telephone at XXX-XXX-XXXX. Thank you for your assistance.

Signature and Title

National Guard PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Exhibit C)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:
Complexity of WorkHighMedRoutine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: THE NATIONAL GUARD REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO __________. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
EVGSMUN

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
EVGSMUN
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
EVGSMUN

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
EVGSMUN
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
EVGSMUN

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
EVGSMUN
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
EVGSMUN
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
EVGSMUN
d) Overall customer satisfaction
EVGSMUN

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
EVGSMUN
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
EVGSMUN
c) Government Property Control
EVGSMUN
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
EVGSMUN
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
EVGSMUN
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
EVGSMUN

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
EVGSMUN

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
EVGSMUN

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
YesNo

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
YesNo

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
EVGSMUN

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
EVGSMUN
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
YesNo
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
EVGSMUN

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .