EXHIBIT C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

545 KB Posted

Attached to
Z1DA--VANJHCS Demolition and Abatement IDIQ East Orange and Lyons
Solicitation number
36C24226Q0857
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This file is an exhibit containing a Past Performance Questionnaire template for the Z1DA--VANJHCS Demolition and Abatement IDIQ contract. The questionnaire is designed as an evaluation tool for assessing contractor qualifications and historical performance relevant to demolition and abatement services. As a template document, it does not specify particular products, services, pricing terms, or response deadlines, but rather provides a standardized format for vendors to complete during the proposal evaluation process for this VA contracting opportunity.

The questionnaire serves to gather information about contractors' relevant experience with similar demolition and abatement projects, particularly those involving asbestos removal, hazardous materials handling, and compliance with regulatory requirements such as New Jersey Administrative Code standards. Contractors responding to the solicitation (36C24226Q0857) for the five-year IDIQ contract with a minimum value of $10,000 and maximum value of $2,000,000 for work at the East Orange and Lyons VA Medical Centers would be required to complete this questionnaire as part of their proposal submission.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
VAAR 852.219-75.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT B - Sample Transmittal Letter for Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
WD Essex.docx DOCX document
LINE ITEM PRICING SHEET LYN-EO DEMOLITION AND ABATEMENT.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
WD Somerset.docx DOCX document
36C24226Q0857_1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Network Contracting Office 4 1010 Delafield Road Pittsburgh, PA 15215

Past Performance Questionnaire for: 529-22-101 Replace Bldg. #7 Master Control Panel

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR

Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.

Company Name

Street Address

Point of Contact (POC)

City

POC Phone Number

State

Reference Project Title

Zip Code

Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):

Email

Contract Number

Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box)
|_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-contractor |_| Key Personnel

INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT

The contractor named above is submitting a proposal for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract, and has sent this form to you as a past performance reference contact. Please complete the following pages in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Officer by emailing directly to:

Hanna.Karmazyn@va.gov

Please return the completed form ASAP, but no later than 12:00 pm local time, January 23, 2024.

If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer: Elijah.mcintosh@va.gov

RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]

Company Name

Street Address

POC Name

City

Phone Number

State

Email

Zip Code

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 (Neutral) to 5 (Exceptional) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE OVERALL RATING in the Remarks section, below.

0
1
2
3
4
5
NEUTRAL
UNACCEPTABLE
MARGINAL
ACCEPTABLE
VERY GOOD
OUTSTANDING
No record of past performance, or not applicable or the record is inconclusive.
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met most contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance exceeded all contract requirements. There were no problems.
The Contractor …
0
1
2
3
4
5

QUALITY – MANAGEMENT & WORKMANSHIP

1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified construction personnel during the contract period.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Provided and followed approved quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
5.
Submittals clearly identified the proposed item IAW the specifications and drawings.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
6.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

TIMELINESS AND ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULE

0
1
2
3
4
5
7.
Contractor provided timely notices of possible delays/schedule revisions.

REMARKS:

|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
8.
Timeliness in submitting submittals and reports and responding to agency inquiries, RFP's, etc.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
9.
Developed realistic and met approved progress schedules.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

BUSINESS PRACTICES/CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP AND ABILITY TO PERFORM

10.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
11.
How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance?
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
12.
Subcontractors / tradesmen were adequately managed and coordinated. Explain any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract(s).
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
13.
For contract changes, contractor provided timely and realistic change order proposals.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

COMPLIANCE & SAFETY

0
1
2
3
4
5
14.
Reports (i.e., daily, test, logs) / records were submitted completely and accurately satisfy the requirement.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
15.
Applicable to Federal Contracts –Contractor complied with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Construction Wage Rate Requirements – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Environmental Regulations and Use of Recovered Materials; Executive Order 13101 Greening the Government.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
16.
Contractor’s safety program was in compliance with federal regulations. Contractor implemented and followed their safety plan and ran a “safe jobsite”.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

INFECTION CONTROL

17.
Contractor had an Infection Control Process in place and complied with agency Infection Control Requirements.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

18.
Demonstrated reasonableness in modifications cost proposal.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
19.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
|_|
YES
|_|
NO
20.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
|_|
YES
|_|
NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).

I hereby certify that the information that I have reported above is accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Printed Name

E-mail address

Business Title

Signature

Date

1 | Page image1.png image10.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .