Exhibit-B Performance Assessment Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 358 KB Posted

Attached to
Fire Fighting & PPE Equipment Maintenance Service
Solicitation number
M0068125R0002
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire issued by the US Marine Corps MCI-West for RFP M0068125R0002, requesting evaluation of offerors' previous performance on similar federal, state, local government or commercial contracts under NAICS code 811310. The questionnaire must be completed and returned to the Regional Contracting Office MCI-West by January 22, 2025, or within 15 days of receipt.

The assessment form includes evaluation criteria across five key areas: compliance with specifications and workmanship standards, effectiveness of project management, timeliness of performance, cost control effectiveness (for cost reimbursement contracts only), and commitment to customer satisfaction. Each area uses a four-tier rating system: Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence. The questionnaire requires detailed rationale for each rating and includes sections for the offeror's contract identification details, point of contact information, and respondent identification. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to the contracting officers at corey.slivnik@usmc.mil and maria.caceres@usmc.mil.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS WEST-MARINE

CORPS BASE BOX 555010

CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA 92055-5010

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) M0068125R0002

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Marine Corps MCI-West is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 811310. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the Regional Contracting Office MCI-West, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or by January 22, 2025, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to corey.slivnik@usmc.mil and maria.caceres@usmc.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned.

Sincerely, MARIA CACERES

Contracting Officer mailto:june.leeper@usmc.mil mailto:maria.caceres@usmc.mil

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division: ________________________________________ Address: ______________________________________________________________ Program Identification/Title: _______________________________________________ Contract Number: _______________________________________________________ Contract Type: _________________________________________________________ Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): __________ Contract Award Date: ____________________________________________________ Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: _______________________________ Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: ____________________________ Total Contract Value: ____________________________________________________

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________

E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

☐Substantial Confidence ☐Satisfactory Confidence ☐Limited Confidence ☐No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization: __________________________________________________________ Name: ________________________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________

E-mail Address: ________________________________________________________

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

2024-12-17T12:10:26-0600
CACERES.MARIA.P.1043667110

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .