Exhibit B - Draft ASCEND Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

Exhibit B - Past Performance Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire for

All Domain Common Platform (ADCP) Security Cloud Engineering Network Development (ASCEND)

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center/Kessel Run

(AFLCMC/C3C)

11 Barksdale Street

Building 1614 Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-1700

OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Street Address

Point of Contact

(POC)

City

POC Phone Number State

CAGE Code

Zip Code

Contract Period of Performance (start to finish)

Email

Description of Work

Role of Offeror on this project/program

�Prime �Sub �Other

Percentage of work performed if other than prime

CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable) Contract Type (FFP, Cost, Other (please explain)

Award Date Contract Completion Date Original Contract Award Amount Final Contract Price Explain Difference Complexity of Work �High

�Medium �Routine

How is this project/program relevant to this acquisition?

See Relevancy table

INSTRUCTIONS TO PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CONTACT:

The offeror named above is submitting a proposal for a Department of the Air Force (DAF) contract and has sent this form to you as a past performance reference contact. PLEASE complete the following pages in full. Once completed, PLEASE send the form directly to the Government contact provided below. If you have any questions regarding this request, PLEASE contact BOTH Government contacts provided below:

Name: Michelle Landry Title: Procurement Contracting Officer Email: michelle.landry@us.af.mil

Name: Rosa Krauss Title: Contract Specialist Email: rosa.krauss.3@us.af.mil

Please return the completed form as soon as possible, but no later than 1700 on XX XX 2025.

GOVERNMENT AGENCY/CLIENT INFORMATION

Government Agency/Client Point of Contact (POC) Title Phone Number Email

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS & DEFINITIONS

Rating Definition Notes

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the mailto:michelle.landry@us.af.mil

Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract.

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY/CLIENT

PLEASE CHECK THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

QUALITY:

Quality of deliverables/technical data/report preparation efforts

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Timeliness/effectiveness of identified quality issue resolution

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Adequate/effectiveness of quality control program

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project/program?

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

Overall customer satisfaction

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR:

Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

Government property control

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Utilization of Small Business concerns.

Consider if the offeror complied with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory

�Unsatisfactory

Subcontracting Plan (when applicable). Please include information in the notes regarding compliance.

�Marginal

Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:

Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved performance or other factors that benefited the client

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or over runs)

�Exceptional �Very Good �Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are

�Yes �No there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

SAFETY/SECURITY:

Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory �Marginal

GENERAL:

Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

Compliance with contractual terms/provisions

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

Would you hire or work with this firm again?

�Yes �No

In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

�Satisfactory �Marginal �Unsatisfactory

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: