EX RPT - 26149 2008 Principal Spillway Inlet Scour.pdf

PDF 12 MB Posted

Attached to
751/26149. CTS, Shiawassee SGA-Dam 1819 Safety Reprs
Solicitation number
RFP 171 260000001501 3
Issued by
Saginaw County, Michigan

About this file

This document comprises a Dam Safety Inspection Report and associated Joint Permit Application submitted to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) for emergency repairs to the Shiawassee Flats Dam (Dam ID 1819) located in Saginaw County, Michigan. The inspection, conducted on March 24, 2008, and completed on April 2, 2008, by licensed professional engineer Paul T. Wessel, identified significant erosion issues on the stream banks immediately downstream of the radial gate structure that required remedial action. The project scope involves placing approximately 285 cubic yards of MDOT 8"x16" riprap into a scour hole adjacent and upstream of the radial gates to prevent undercutting and potential failure of the control structure. The riprap will be filled to an elevation 2 feet lower than the river bottom across dimensions of 80 feet in length and 40 feet in width with a maximum depth of 5 feet. The proposed project activity timeline indicated an August 15, 2009 commencement date with a September 15, 2009 completion date. The dam, consisting of a 15,000-foot long earthen embankment with a structural height of 12 feet, creates a wildlife flooding area of approximately 1,600 acres and is classified as low hazard potential.

The riprap material will be sourced commercially and placed waterward of the ordinary high watermark without filter fabric. The project was authorized under the joint permit application process requiring approvals from both MDEQ's Land and Water Management Division and USACE. The applicant, identified as the Michigan DNR Wildlife Division through contact Arnold Karr at the St. Charles Field Office (225 East Spruce Street, St. Charles, Michigan 48655), engaged the services of licensed professional engineer Jerry J. Powell of Williams and Works, Inc. in Grand Rapids, Michigan to support the application. The inspection report's recommendations prioritized the erosion investigation and remediation by December 31, 2008, with implementation of appropriate measures by December 31, 2009, while also recommending continued monitoring of seepage through previously filled corrugated metal pipes, annual embankment mowing, and periodic review and updating of the Operation and Maintenance plan. No emergency action plan was required given the low hazard potential classification.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DAM SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

SHIAWASSEE FLATS DAM

DAM ID 1819

SHIAWASSEE RIVER

SAGINAW COUNTY

Sections 34 and 35, T11N, R3E

OWNER/OPERATOR:

HAZARD POTENTIAL

CLASSIFICATION:

INSPECTION DATE:

REPORT DATE:

INSPECTED AND PREPARED BY:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources St. Charles Field Office, Wildlife Division Shiawassee River State Game Area 225 East Spruce Street St. Charles, Michigan 48655 989-865-6211

Low

March 24, 2008

April 2, 2008

Paul T. Wessel, P.E.

Registration Number 43893 Dam Safety Program Land and Water Management Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 30458 Lansing, Michigan 48909 517-335-6748

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this inspection is to evaluate the structural condition and hydraulic capacity of this dam as required by Part 315, Dam Safety, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451. This inspection was conducted by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) per the provisions of its Memorandum of Understanding with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), the owner of the dam, entitled “Inspection of MDNR-Owned Dams and Funding of MDEQ's Dam Safety Program.”

The report is limited to a discussion of observations based on a visual investigation and review of any previous inspection reports, plans, and data which are available. This report should not be considered an in-depth engineering investigation.

All references to “right” and “left” in this report are based on the observer facing downstream.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Shiawassee Flats Dam is in good condition. Based upon observations at the time of the inspection, there were no apparent structural deficiencies that may lead to the immediate failure of the dam. The dam has adequate spillway capacity to pass the design flood. The following recommended actions are listed by priority.

1. Further investigate the erosion problem on the stream banks just downstream of radial gate structure by December 31, 2008. On the basis of this study, install appropriate measures by December 31, 2009.

2. Continue to monitor seepage through the filled corrugated metal pipes of the Seven Tubes Structure on a regular basis.

3. Continue to mow embankments on an annual basis.

4. Review and update the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan as needed, providing a copy to the Dam Safety Program staff.

The low hazard potential rating for the dam remains appropriate.

PROJECT INFORMATION

The original construction date of the dikes at the Shiawassee Flats Dam is not known.

Improvements, including the installation of the Seven Tubes Structure, were completed based upon plans prepared in 1963. The dual radial gates were installed in 1977. The dam is located in the Shiawassee River State Game Area and maintained by the Wildlife Division personnel. The dam consists of a 15,000-foot long earthen embankment with a structural height of 12 feet, a normal head of approximately 8 feet, and creates a wildlife flooding with an estimated surface area of approximately 1,600 acres. The embankment has an approximate crest width of 12 feet and approximate upstream and downstream slopes of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. The principal spillway for the dam consists of a radial gate structure with two 20-foot radial gates (Radial Gate Structure). Impoundment levels were formerly controlled by a stoplog controlled overflow weir structure outletting to seven 36-inch corrugated metal pipes (CMP) (Seven Tubes Structure). The overflow weir was removed and the CMPs filled with flowable fill in 2001, based upon concerns over the condition of the riser frame support and the corrugated metal outlet pipes. A 900-foot length of lowered embankment located between the Radial Gate Structure and the former Seven Tubes Structure serves as an auxiliary spillway during high streamflow conditions. Impoundment levels are controlled by the operation of the radial gates.

SITE INVESTIGATION

The following discussion of the physical condition of the dam and appurtenances is based on observations and photographs obtained on the date of the inspection.

The overall condition of the earthen embankments is good. As seen in Photographs 1 and 2, the crest of the embankment serves as a two-track access road, with grass cover present between the wheel lanes. Several small areas of settlement were observed on the crest, as seen in Photographs 3 and 4. The small settled areas may be due to burrowing animals. The depressions should be filled with soil similar to that found on the embankment by August 1, 2008.

As seen in Photographs 1 and 2, the upstream embankment face is in good condition, with mostly high grass and weedy growth present on the upstream embankment face.

Very little brushy growth is present on the upstream embankment. The downstream embankment is in similar condition to the upstream embankment, as seen in Photographs 5 and 6.

Brushy growth makes observation of potential deficiencies with the dam, such as animal burrows, sloughing, or seepage, more difficult. The brushy growth should be removed from the embankment. All additional animal burrows observed should be filled with soil similar to the existing embankment fill.

The dimensions of the auxiliary spillway, located on the earth embankment between the Radial Gate Structure and the Seven Tubes Structure, do not conform to the 1963 dam improvement plans. However, the embankment is well vegetated, as seen in Photographs 7 and 8, and does provide the necessary spillway capacity.

The Radial Gate Structure, shown in Photographs 9 through 14, is generally in good condition. Minor efflorescence is visible upon the abutment walls, as seen in Photographs 14 through 16, and should be monitored. No significant cracking of the abutment walls was observed. The gates are operated on a frequent basis to maintain desired water levels in the flooding, and no problems were reported with their operation.

At the time of the inspection, the gates were fixed in the raised position through the placement of tubular steel supports, as seen in Photograph 14.

Erosion remains evident on both banks of the outlet channel from the radial gates, as seen in Photographs 15 through 18.

This erosion appears to be the result of high velocity releases and eddying from operation of the radial gates. Additional protection of the channel banks should be studied by December 2008. Based on this study, repairs should be implemented by December 31,2009. The use of an articulated concrete block revetment system is one option which may provide the necessary stability and long term durability.

The reduction of velocities exiting the radial gates may also reduce the erosion potential downstream of the spillway. Energy dissipation structures such as baffle blocks or heavy riprap could be installed in the channel downstream of the dam to reduce the velocity of the discharge.

The Seven Tubes Structure formerly consisted of a horseshoe-shaped concrete weir outletting to seven 36-inch CMPs. The walkway to the weir and the stoplogs in the weir were in poor condition at the time of the 1998 inspection. Based upon the deteriorated condition of the structure, it was determined that removal of the weir and the six bays of timber stoplogs, along with filling the CMPs with flowable fill, was the most effective way to address these deficiencies. This work was completed in 2001, as authorized by Permit 01-73-0057-P.

Minor seepage has been previously noted occurring through several of the previously filled CMPs. At the time of this inspection, the pipe outlets were submerged, and the downstream pool was covered with a thin layer of ice. This made observation of the pipes impossible. The pipes should continue to be monitored for seepage on a regular basis, as described in the O&M Plan.

STRUCTURAL STABILITY

Based upon observations during the inspection, there were no indicators of any conditions that endanger dam stability.

HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS

The contributing drainage area to the Shiawassee River at the dam is approximately 626 square miles. The design discharge for this dam is the 1 percent chance (100-year) flood discharge of 9,300 cubic feet per second (cfs). The actual spillway capacity of the dam is highly dependent upon tailwater conditions. As shown on the Saginaw County Flood Insurance Study, the 100-year floodplain elevation in the vicinity of the dam is 593.9 feet, which would result in at least 1.5 feet of embankment submergence. Given the long crest width being overtopped and minimal head differential between headwater and tailwater, the overtopping velocity is not expected to become severe enough to cause failure of the dam. Additional spillway capacity is not required.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

A written O&M plan, outlining procedures for upkeep and operation of the dam, has been prepared for the dam. This plan should be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changes in operation and maintenance procedures.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN

An emergency action plan (EAP) does not exist for the dam. Due to the low hazard potential rating for this dam, an EAP is not required.

APPENDICES

A location map and inspection photographs are provided in the appendix.

Shiawassee Flats Dam Dam ID 1819 Section 34, T UN, R 03E Saginaw County

SHIAWASSEE FLATS DAM, SAGINAW COUNTY

DAM ID NUMBER 1819

Photograph 1 - Upstream Embankment Face and Crest Viewed from Near Parking Area

Photograph 2 - Upstream Embankment and Crest Looking Right from 7 Tubes Structure

Photograph 3 - Settled Area on Embankment Crest Left of Radial Gate

Photograph 4 - Downstream Embankment Face at Spillway - Note Riprap Slope Protection

Photograph 5 - Downstream Embankment Face Viewed from Right of Seven Tubes Structure

Photograph 6 - Downstream Embankment Face Viewed from Left of Radial Gates

Photograph 7 - Upstream Face of Auxiliary Spillway Viewed from Left

Photograph 8 - Downstream Face of Auxiliary Spillway Viewed from Left

Photograph 9 - Radial Gate Structure Viewed from Left Upstream

Photograph 10 - Radial Gate Structure Viewed from Right Downstream Embankment

Photograph 11 - View of Right Trunnion of Left Gate

Photograph 12 - Close Up of Skin of Right Radial Gate

Photograph 13 - Left Radial Gate and Lifting Cables

Photograph 14 - Steel Gate Support at Center Pier

Photograph 15 - Erosion and Exposed Geotextile on Right Downstream Bank

Photograph 16 - Another Look at Erosion of Right Downstream Bank

Photograph 17 - Erosion on Left Downstream Bank

Photograph 18 - Erosion of Left Downstream Bank

• Print in black or blue ink and complete all items in Sections 1 through 9 and those items in Sections 10 through 21 that apply to your proposed project fell US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) \ P ^A^ \/ Michigan fitment of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) DEO.

LU

CO

o z

LU

o

Previous USACE Pennit or File Number

RECEIVI

ol

ALITY

NT DIV.

Land and Wer Management Division, MDEQ File Number > O m z o c co m

USACE File Number

JUN 0 7 20

Marina Operating Permit Number

ENVIRONMENTAL QI

LAND & WATER MANAGEME

Fee received $

Identification

H PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION

• Refer to your property's legal descriptior lip, Range, and Section information, and Address 225 E. Spruce St.

Township Name(s) Swan Creek

Township(s) Range(s) Section(s)

UN. O3E. 34

City/Village St. chiarles

County(ies) Saginaw

Property Tax Identification Number(s)

Name of Waterbody Shiawassee River

Project Name or Job Number Fill scour hole ■

Subdivision/Plat Lot Number Private Claim

Project types □ private 0 public/govemment (check all that apply) □ building addition □ new building or structure

□ other (explain)

□ industrial □

□ building renovation or restoration El commercial □ multi-family river restoration □ single-family

The proposed project is on, within, or involves (check all that apply) □ a legally established County Drain (date established. )

□ a stream □ a pond (less than 5 acres) □ a Great Lake or Section 10 Waters □ a natural river El a river □ a channel/canal □ a designated high risk erosion area □ a dam □ a structure removal

□ a ditch or drain □ an inland lake (more than 5 acres) □ a designated critical dune area El a wetland □ a utility crossing Ka floodway area ^ a 100-year floodplain Da designated environmental area El 500 feet of an existing waterbody

SEQUENCE AND METHODS

• Attach separate sheets, as needed, including necessary drawings, sketches, or plans. ' Emergency repairs requiring the placement of rip rap into a scour hole located adjacent and upstream of the radial gates water control on the Shiawassee River State Same Area to prevent further erosion of the river bottom and posssible failure of the control structure due to scouring of the stream bed (drawings attached).

H APPLICANT, AGENT/CONTRACTOR, AND PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION

• The applicant can be either the property owner or the person or company that proposes to undertake the activity.

act on their behalf.and it's owner must provide a written documentIf the applicant is a corporation, both Applicant (individual or corporate name) ■ Michigan DNR - Wildlife

Agent/Contractor (firm name and contact person)

Mailing Address 225 E. Spruce St. Address City State Zip Code St. Charles MI 48655

City State Zip Code

Daytime Telephone Number with Area Code

(989) 865-6211 or (989)385-5607

Daytime Telephone Number with Area Code

Fax E-mail

(989) 865-8503 karra@michigan.gov

Fax E-mail

Is the applicant the sole owner of all property on which this project is to be constructed and all property involved or impacted by this project? □ No □ Yes (If No, provide a letter signed by the property owner authorizing the agent/contractor to act on his or her behalf or a copy of easements or right-of-ways. If multiple owners, please attach all property owners' names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers.) ■ Property Owner’s Name (If different from applicant) Mailing Address

Daytime Telephone Number with Area Code City State Zip Code

Q PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE, INTENDED USE, AND ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED (Attach additional sheets if necessary)

• The purpose must include any new development or expansion of an existing land use.

• Include a description of alternatives considered to avoid or minimize resource impacts. Include factors such as, but not limited to, alternative construction technologies;

alternative project layout and design; alternative locations; local land use regulations and infrastructure; and pertinent environmental and resource issues.

• For utility crossings, include both alternative routes and alternative construction methods.

This project is needed to correct erosion issues addressed by in an April 18, 2008 DEQ Dam Safety Inspection Report for

Dam ID 1819. An engineering firm has recently concluded that about 285 cubic yards of MDOT 8"xl6" rip rap needs to be placed in the scour hole to prevent undercutting and failure the control structure. Rip rap will be filled to an elevation 2 feet lower than the river bottom. •

Joint Permit Application Pagel of7 February 2001 mailto:karra@michigan.gov

§ US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ligan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) D£Q

3 LOCATING YOUR PROJECT SITE

• Provide the requested information listed below that will help staff in locating your project site.

and include an arrow indii Is there an access road to the project? 0 No ^ Yes (If Yes, type of road, check all that apply) [□ private □ public □ improved □unimproved

Name of roads at closest main intersection Hulien and Bad River Directions from main intersection 2 miles east and north of St. charles on Hulien Rd.

Style of house or other building on site □ ranch □ 2-story □ cape cod □ bi-level □ cottage/cabin □ pole bam □ none □ other (describe)

Color Color of adjacent property house and/or buildings House number Address is visible on □ house □ garage □ mailbox □ sign □ other

Street name Fire lane number Lot number How can your site be identified if there is no visible address?

Provide directions to the project site, with distances from the best and nearest visible landmark and waterbody Arnie Karr, or Vic Weigold (989) 865 6211, will escort DEQ personnel to the sites as needed at their convenience.

Does project cross boundaries of two or more political jurisdictions? (City/Township, Township/Township, County/County, etc.)

□ No □ Yes (If Yes, list jurisdiction names.)

3 Ust all other federal, interstate, state, or local agencies authorizations required for the proposed activity, including all approvals or denials received.

Agency Type approval Identification number Date applied Date approved / denied If denied, reason for denial

H Ifapermitisissued, date activity will commence (M/D/Y)/lu^ust 15, 2009 Proposed completion date (M/D/Y) September 15, 2009 Has any construction activity commenced or been completed in a regulated area? □ No □ Yes If Yes, identify the portion(s) underway or completed on drawings or attach project specifications and give completion date('s) (M/D/Y)

Were the regulated activities conducted under a MDEQ permit?

□ No □ Yes ■ If Yes, list the MDEQ permit number

No □ Yes (If Yes, please explain)Are there any present unresolved violations of environmental law or litigation involving the property? K

Q PUBLIC NOTIFICATION (Attach additional sheets if necessary)

• Complete information for all adjacent and impacted property owners and the lake association or established lake board including the contact person's name.

• If you own the adjacent lot, provide the requested information for the first adjacent parcel beyond your property line._____________________________________ Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address City State Zip Code

Name of □ Established Lake Board □ or Lake Association Mailing Address and the Contact Person's Name Telephone Number

City State Zip Code

0 APPLICANTS CERTIFICATION READ CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING

1 am applying for a permit(s) to authorize the activities described herein. 1 certify that 1 am familiar with the information contained in this application, that it is true and accurate, and, to the best of my knowledge, is in compliance with the State Coastal Zone Management Program and the National Flood Insurance Program. 1 understand that there are penalties for submitting false information and that any permit issued pursuant to this application may be revoked if information on this application is untrue.

1 certify that 1 have the authority to undertake the activities proposed in this application. By signing this application, 1 agree to allow representatives of the MDEQ and the USACE to enter upon said property in order to inspect the proposed activity site and the completed project. 1 understand that 1 must obtain all other necessary local, county, state, or federal permits and that the granting of other permits by local, county, state, or federal agencies does not release me from the requirements of obtaining the permit requested herein before commencing the activity. 1 understand that the payment of the application fee does not guarantee the issuance of a permit.

• All applicants must complete all the items in Sections 1 through 9 on pages 1 and 2 of this application.

• Complete those items in Sections 10 through 21 that apply to your project. It is necessary to submit only those pages where you have provided information.

• Please list here the application page numbers being submitted and a brief description of other attachments included with your application.

□ Property Owner

□ Agent/Contractor

□ Corporation - Title Printed Name Arnold Karr Signature Date

Joint Permit Application Page 2 of 7 Februaiy2001 us Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)__________ A_____________________________________ Michigan (Ament of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) MQ

0 PROJECTS IMPACTING WETLANDS OR FLOODPlW OR LOCATED ON AN INLAND LAKE OR STREAM OTO GREAT LAKE

• Check boxes A through N that may be applicable to your project and provide the requested information.

• If your project may affect wetlands, also complete Section 12. If your project may impact regulated floodplains, also complete Section 13.

• Provide an overall site plan showing existing lakes, streams, wetlands, and other water features; existing structures', and the location of all proposed structures, land change activities and soil erosion and sedimentation control measures. Please review sample drawings for guidance in completing site-specific drawings for your project.

• On a Great Lake use IGLD 85 El surveyed □ converted from observed still water elevation. On inland waters, □ NGVD 29 □ local datum □ other

Observed water elevation (ft) , date of observation (M/D/Y) 3 A. PROJECTS REQUIRING FILL (See All Sample Drawings) z

• To calculate volume in cubic yards (cu yd), multiply the average length in feet (ft) times the average width (ft) times the average depth (ft) and divide by 27.

• Attach both plan and cross-section views to scale showing maximum and average fill dimensions.

(Check all that apply) □ floodplain fill □ wetland fill

□ boat launch □ off-shore swim area □ beach sanding

□ riprap

□ boatwell

□ seawall, bulkhead, or revetment □ bridge or culvert '

□ crib dock □ other.

Fill dimensions (ft) • Length 80 width 40 maximum depth 5

Fill volume (cu yd)

Maximum water depth in fill area (ft)

Type of clean fill □ pea stone Osand □ gravel □ wood chips ^ other MOOT rip rap Will filter fabric be used under proposed fill?

□ No □ Yes (If Yes, type)

Source of clean fill □ on-site, If on-site, show location on site plan K commercial □ other, If other, attach description of location

Fill will extend 30feet into the water from the shoreline and upland .Ofeet out of the water.

□ B. PROJECTS REQUIRING DREDGING OR EXCAVATION (t

• To calculate volume in cubic yards (cu yd), multiply the aver

• Attach both plan and cross-section views to scale showing rr

• The applicant will be notified if sediment sampling will be reo

See All Sample Drawings) age length in feet (ft) times the average width (ft) times the average depth (ft) and divide by 27..

laximum and average dredge or excavation dimensions.

luired.

(Check all that apply) □ floodplain excavation

□ navigation □ boat well

□ wetland dredge or draining □ seawall, bulkhead, or revetment

□ boat launch □ other

Dredge volume (cu yd) Method and equipment for dredging

Has proposed dredge material been tested for contaminants? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, attach testing results)

Has this same area been previously dredged? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, provide date and permit number, if available If Yes, are you proposing to enlarge the previously dredged area □ No □ Yes

(M/D/Y)

Is long-term maintenance dredging planned? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, when and how much?)

53 C. PROJECTS REQUIRING RIPRAP (See Sample Drawings 2,3,8,12,14,17,22, and 23. Others may apply)

Riprap waterward of the El shoreline OR □ ordinary high watermark Dimensions (ft) length 80 width 40 depth 5

Volume (cu yd)

Riprap landward of theD shoreline OR □ ordinary high watermark Dimensions length

(ft) width depth

Volume(cu yd)

Type of riprap □ field stone □ angular rock El other MDOT commercial

Will filter fabric be used under proposed riprap? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, type)

□ D. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Sample Drawings 2,3, and 17)

(check all that apply) □ riprap □ seawalllbulkhead □ revetment

□ E. DOCK - PIER ■ MOORING PILINGS (See Sample Drawing 10)____________________ ■__________________________________________________

Type □ open pile □filled Dcrib Seasonal structure? □ No □ Yes

Proposed stnicture dimensions (ft) length width Dimensions of nearest adjacent structures (ft) length width

□ F. BOAT WELL (No Sample Drawing available)

Type of bank stabilization □ wood □ steel □ concrete □ vinyl □riprap □ other ■ Boat well dimensions (ft) Length width depth

Number of boats

Volume of backfill behind sidewall stabilization (cu yd)

Distances of boat well from adjacent property lines (ft)

□ G. BOAT LAUNCH (No Sample Drawing available) (check all that apply) □ new □ existing □ public □ private □ commercial Type of material □ concrete Dwood □ stone □ other Overall boat launch dimensions (ft) Length width depth

Boat launch dimensions (ft) below ordinary high watermark length width depth

. Distances of launch from both property lines (ft)

Number of skid p/ers Skid p/erdimensions (ft) width length

□ H. BOAT HOIST (No Sample Drawing available)

(Check all that apply) □ seasonal □permanent □ cradle □ side lifter □ other located on □ seawall □ dock □ bottomlands Joint Permit Application Page 3 of 7 . February 2001

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ___________________________________ ___________ Jjdnlgan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) QgQ

□ I. BOARDWALKS AND DECKS IN WLI Uh HUUDPLAINS (See Sample PrawingslTaricrS)^^^

I (Check all that apply) □ boardwalk □ deck □ wetlands □ floodplain________________ Boardwalk or deck is on □fill □piling___________

Joint Permit Application Page 4 of 7 February 2001

WETLANDS oM Michigan D^^ment of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) DESI

IODPLAINS OR LOCATED ON AN INLAND LAKE ORTOEAM OR A GREAT LAKE

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

“1 J. INTAKE PIPES fSee Samole Drawino 16) Fl OUTLET PIPES (See Sample Drawing 22)

Type □ headwall □ end section Dpipe □ other If outlet pipe, discharge is to I I wetland |_| inland lake

□ stream, drain, or river □ Great Lake □ other

Dimensions of headwall OR end section (ft) length width. depth '

Number of pipes Pipe diameters and invert elevations

□ K. MOORING AND NAVIGATION BUOYS (No Sample Drawing available)

• Provide an overall site plan showing the distances between each buoy, distances from the shore to each buoy, and depth of water at each buoy in feet.

• Provide cross-section drawing(s) showing anchoring system(s) and dimensions.__________________________________________________________ Number of buoys Type of anchor system Purpose of buoy

□ mooring □ navigation Dimensions of buoys (ft) width height

Do you own the property along the shoreline? □ No □ Yes (If No, you must provide an authorization letter from the property ownerfs))

□ L. GROINS (No Sample Drawing available)

• Provide an overall site plan showing the distances (ft) of the outermost groins from the property lines, distances between grains, length and width of each groin, and the distance from the existing toe of the bluff to the lakeward end of the groins.

• If existing groins are located on adjacent properties, provide distances (ft) from closest neighboring groin to your property lines on the site plan.

Provide cross-section views showing the length and height of each groin and the height of groin ends above the observed water level (date and time). If step down type, show the height of each section above the observed water level.

Number of groins Type of groin

□ steel □ wood □ other

Will groin be placed on a foundation? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, dimensions of foundation (ft)) length width height

□ M. FENCES IN WETLANDS, STREAMS, OR FLOODPLAINS (No Sample Drawing available)

• Provide an overall site plan showing the proposed fencing through wetlands, streams, or floodplains.

• Provide drawing of fence profile showing the design, dimension, post spacing, board spacing, and distance from ground to bottom of fence (if in a floodplain).

(check all that apply)

□ wetlands □ streams □ floodplains

Total length (ft) of fence through wetlands streams floodplains

Fence height (ft) Fence type and material

□ N. OTHER - e.g., structure removal, marine railway, low sand trap wall, breakwater, and structural foundations in wetlands or floodplains

KJ CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LAKE OR POND (See Sample Drawings 4 and 15) ~ Which best describes your proposed waterbody use (check all that apply)

□ wildlife□ stormwater retention basin□ stormwater detention basin □ recreation □ wastewater basin □ other Water source for lake/pond

□ groundwater □ natural springs Q Inland Lake or Stream □ stormwater runoff □ pump□ sewage Pother

Will project involve construction of a dam, dike, outlet control structure, or spillway? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, complete Section 17)

E ACTIVITIES THAT MAY IMPACT WETLANDS '

• For information on the MDEQ's Wetland Assessment Program, please visit the LWMD website or call 517-241-8485.

(check all that apply) S fill (Section 10A) □ dredge or excavation (Section 10B) □ boardwalk or deck (Section 101)

□ fences (Section 10M) □ bridges and culverts (Section 14) □ draining surface water □ other Has a professional wetland delineation been conducted for this parcel? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, please provide a copy; if federal method was used, supply data sheets)______ '________________________

Applicant purchased property El before OR □ after October 1,1980.

Has the MDEQ conducted a wetland assessment for this parcel? El No □ Yes (If Yes, please provide a copy) Describe the wetland impacts, proposed use or development, and efforts to avoid/minimize impacts.

Project will result in the ability to add or remove water to maintain diked wetland habitat for wildlife.

Is any grading or mechanized land clearing proposed? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, please show locations on site plan)

Has any of the proposed grading or mechanized land clearing been completed?

□ No □ Yes (If Yes, please label and show locations on site plan)

• Complete the wetland dredge and wetland fill dimension information for each impacted wetland area. Attach additional sheets if necessary and label the impacted wetland areas on a site plan drawn to scale. Please attach at least one typical cross-section for each wetland dredge and/or fill area. (See Sample Drawings 8 & 9)

• Also complete Section 10A for fill and Section 10B for dredge or excavation activities.

• If dredge material will be disposed of on site, please show the location on site plan in an upland area and include soil erosion and sedimentation control measures.

Wetland dredge dimensions ■ maximum length (ft) maximum width (ft) dredge area

□ acres □ sg ft average depth (ft) dredge volume(cu yd)

Wetland fill dimensions maximum length (ft) maximum width (ft) fill area

□ acres □ sqft average depth (ft) fill volume(cu yd)

Total wetland dredge area

□ acres □ sg ft

Total wetland dredge volume (cu yd)

Total wetland fill area 1/4 0 acres □ sgft

Total wetland fill volume (cu yd)

The proposed project will be serviced by □ public sewer

□ private septic system (If septic system, show existing and new or expanded system on plans)

If septic system, has application been made to the County Health Department for a permit? □ No □ Yes

If Yes, has permit been issued?

□ No □ Yes (If Yes, provide copy)

Joint Permit Application Page 5 of 7 Februaiy 2001 ffi FLOODPLAIN ACTIVITIES (See SampieCTWnq 5. Others may apply) ---------------------W---------- » Please attach additional sheets with the requested information when multiple floodplain activities are included in this application.

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Jfchlgan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) DC&

(check all that apply) □fill □ dredge □ wetland impacts □ other .

Site is feet above □ ordinary high water mark (OHWM) ORD observed water level . Date of observation (M/D/Y)

Fill volume below the 100-year floodplain elevation (cu yd)

Compensating cut volume below the 100-year floodplain elevation (cu yd)

EJBRIDGES AND CULVERTS (Including Foot and Cart Bridges)

• Provide detailed site-specific drawings of existing and proposed Plan View (Sample Drawing 14A), Elevation View (Sample Drawing 14B), Stream and Floodplain

Cross-Section (Sample Drawing 14C), Stream Profile (Sample Drawing 14D) and Floodplain Fill (Sample Drawing 5) at a scale adequate for detailed review.

• Provide the requested information that applies to your project. If there is not an existing structure, leave the "Existing" column blank.

• If you choose to have a Licensed Professional Engineer "certify" that your project will not cause a "harmful interference" for a range of flood discharges up to and including the 100-year flood discharge then you must use the "Required Certification Language". A copy is available on our website under "Permit Application" or you may request a copy by phone, email, or mail. A hydraulic report supporting this certification may also be required.

• Please attach additional sheets with the requested information when multiple crossings are included in this application.

Existing Proposed Existing Proposed

Culvert type (box, circular, arch) and material (corrugated metal, timber, concrete, etc.)

Bridge span (length perpendicular to stream) OR culvert □ width □ diameter (ft)

Bridge type (concrete box beam, timber, concrete I-beam, etc.)

Bridge width (parallel to stream) OR culvert length (ft)

Entrance design (projecting, mitered, wingwalls, etc.)

Bridge rise (from bottom of beam to streambed) OR Culvert rise (from top of culvert to streambed) (ft)

Total structure waterway opening above streambed (sq ft)

□ elevation of culvert crown

□ bottom of bridge beam (ft)

Upstream Higher elevation of □ culvert invert

OR □ streambed within culvert (ft) Upstream

Downstream Downstream Elevation of road grade at structure (ft) Distance from low point of road to mid-point of bridge crossing (ft) Elevation of low point in road (ft)

Cross-sectional area of primary channel (sq ft) Average stream width at OHWM (See Sample Drawing 14C) outside the influence of the structure (ft)upstream downstream

Reference datum used (show on plans with description) □ NGVD 29 □/GLD 85 (Great Lakes coastal areas) □ local High water elevation - describe reference point and highest known water level above or below reference point and date of observation.

IS STREAM, RIVER, OR DRAIN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (No sample drawing available)

• Complete Section 10A for fill, Section 10B for dredge or excavation, and SectionlOC for riprap activities. .

• If side casting or other proposed activities will impact wetlands or floodplains, complete Sections 12 and 13, respectively.

• Provide an overall site plan showing existing lakes, streams, wetlands, and other water features; existing structures; and the location of all proposed structures and land change activities. Provide cross-section (elevation) drawings necessary to clearly show existing and proposed conditions. Be sure to indicate drawing scales.

• For activities on legally established county drains, provide original design and proposed dimensions and elevations. .

(check all that apply) □ maintenance □improvement □ relocation □enclosure □ new drain □ wetlands □other

Dimensions (ft) of existing stream/drain channel to be worked on. Length 80 width 40 depth 5

Dimensions (ft) of new, relocated, or enclosed stream/drain channel. Length width depth

Existing channel average water depth in a normal year (ft) 2 Proposed side slopes (vertical I horizontal)

How will slopes and bottom be stabilized?

Will old/enclosed stream channel be backfilled to top of bank grade? □ No □ Yes •

If an enclosed structure is proposed, check type? □ concrete □ corrugated metal □ plastic □ other

Will spoils be disposed of on site? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, show location of spoils on site plan in an upland area.)

Reference datum used (show on plans with description) □ NGVD 29 □ IGLD 85 (Great Lakes coastal areas) □ local

Reference datum used (show on plans with description) □ NGVD 29 □ IGLD 85 (Great Lakes coastal areas) □ local

Joint Permit Application Page 6 of 7 February 2001

§ US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

03 DRAWDOWN OF AN IMPOUNDMENT

• If wetlands will be impacted, also complete Section 12.

Michigan D^^ment of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) DEQ

Typeof drawdown □ overwinter □temporary □ one-time event □ annual event □ permanent (dam removal) □other.

Reason for drawdown

Has there been a previous drawdown? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, provide date (M/Y)) Previous permit number, if known

Does waterbody have established legal lake level? □ No □ Yes □ Not Sure Dam ID Number, if known

Extent of vertical drawdown (ft) Impoundment design head (ft) Number of adjacent or impacted property owners

Date drawdown would start (M/D/Y) Date drawdown would stop (M/D/Y) Rate of drawdown( ft/day)

Date refilling would start (M/D/Y) Date refill would end (M/D/Y) Rate of refill(ft/day)

Type of outlet discharge structure to be used

□ surface □ bottom □ mid-depth

Impoundment area at normal water level (acres) Sediment depth behind impoundment discharge structure (ft)

DAM, EMBANKMENT, DIKE, SPILLWAY, OR CONTROL STRUCTURE ACTIVITIES (See Sample Drawing 15) If wetlands will be impacted, also complete Section 12. .

Please attach site-specific conceptual plans for construction of a new dam, reconstruction of a failed dam, or enlargement of an existing dam for resource impact review. Detailed engineering plans are required once the activity has been determined to be permitable from an environmental standpoint.

a dam repair, dam alteration, dam abandonment, or dam removal.Please attach detailed Which one best describes your project? □ new dam construction □ reconstruction of a failed dam

□ dam repair □ dam alteration □ dam abandonment □ dam removal

□ enlargement of an existing dam 3 other ।

Dam ID Number If known 1819

Type of outlet discharge structure

□ surface □ bottom □ mid depth

Will proposed activities require a drawdown of the waterbody to complete the work?

0No □ Yes (If Yes, also complete Section 16)

Riprap volume (cu yd)

Dredging/excavation volume (cu yd) Fill volume (cu yd) Does structure allow complete 285 drainage of waterbody S No □ Yes

Benchmark elevation (ft) Datum used

□ Local □ NGVD 29 □ other

Describe benchmark and show on plans

Have you engaged the services of a Licensed Professional Engineer? □ No □ Yes (If Yes, name, registration number, and mailing address) Jerry J. Powell, P.E.,Registration ft , Williams and Works, Inc., 549 Ottawa NW, Grand Rapids, MNI. 49503 Will a water diversion during construction be required? 13 No □ Yes (If Yes, describe how the stream flow will be controlled through the dam construction area during the proposed project activities) '

• The following additional information is required for a new dam, reconstruction of a failed dam, or enlargement of an existing dam.

Describe the type of dam and how you will design the dam and embankment to control seepage through and underneath the dam.

Embankment top elevation (ft) Streambed elevation at downstream embankment toe (ft)

Structural height (difference between embankment top elevation and streambed elevation at downstream embankment toe) (ft)

Embankment Length (ft) Embankment top width (ft) Embankment bottom width (ft) Embankment slopes Upstream / (vertical / horizontal) Downstream /

Proposed normal pool elevation (ft) Impoundment flood elevation (ft) Maximum vertical drawdown capability (ft) (attach operational procedure of the proposed structure if available)

Have soil borings been taken at dam location? Will a cold water underspill be provided?

□ No □ Yes □ No □ Yes (if Yes, submit results with permit application) (|f Yes, invert elevation .ft)

Do you have flowage rights to all proposed flooded property at the design flood elevation?

□ No □ Yes

If side casting is required, complete Subsections 10A and 10B. If spoils will be placed in wetlands or wetlands may be impacted, complete Section 12.

Please attach additional sheets with the requested information as needed for multiple crossings._____________________________________

What method will be used to construct the crossings?

□ flume □ plow □ open trench □ jack and bore □ directional drilling

Crossing of □ Inland Lake or Stream □ floodplain

□ international waters □ wetlands (also complete Section 12)

Type Number of wetland crossings

Number of inland lake or stream crossings

Pipe diameter (inches)

Pipe length per crossing (feet)

Distance below streambed or wetland (inches)

□ sanitary sewer

□ storm sewer

□ watermain

□ cable

□ oil/gas pipeline

Joint Permit Application Page 7 of 7 February 2001 ligan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) DEO.

1------- —-------------------------------------------------------------------------- sUS Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ______________ ._________________________ __

0 MARINA CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATITOPERMIT INFORMATION (See Sample Drawing 21) . Marinas located on one of the Great Lakes, including Lake St. Clair, may be required to secure leases or conveyances from the state of Michigan to place structures on the bottomlands. ■ If you have a current pump-out agreement with another marina facility, please enclose a copy.

Marina owner Marina name

Mailing address Location address City State Zip Code City State Zip Code

Marina owner’s daytime telephone number with area code Marina's daytime telephone number with area code Check the reasons for submitting this application

□ Owner's name change

□ Construction of a new marina

□ Issuance of a new Marina Operating Permit

□ Expansion/modification of an existing marina Fl Reissuance of a Marina Ooeratinq Permit

Current Marina Operating Permit Number Expiration Date (M/D/Y)

Existing Proposed Existing Proposed

’Number of boat slips/wells Are sanitary pump-out facilities available? □ No □ Yes □ No □ Yes

Number of launch ramps/lanes Number of hoist/take-out wells

Number of mooring buoys Number of gas pumps

Lineal feet of broadside dockage Name of marina insurance company

Number of parking spaces 0HIGH RISK EROSION AND CRITICAL DUNE AREAS (See Sample Drawings 19 and 20, also Sample Drawing 9 if wetlands are impacted)

• Construction in critical dune areas on stopes greater than a 1-foot vertical rise in a 3-foot horizontal plane (33 percent) are prohibited without a speaal exception.

• Construction in critical dune areas on stopes that measure from a 1-foot vertical rise in a 4-foot horizontal plane (25 percent) to less than a 1-foot vertical rise in a 3-foot horizontal plane (33 percent) requires plans prepared by a registered architect or licensed professional engineer.

• All property boundaries and proposed structure comers, septic system, water well, and driveway locations must be staked before the MDEQ site inspection.

• Additional information, including the building construction plans, may be required to complete the application review.

• The use of federal funds includes any federally insured mortgages such as the Veterans Administration (VA) or Federal Housing Administration (FHA)._____________ Parcel dimensions (ft) Property is a If platted lot, year platted width death □ platted lot □ unplatted parcel ___

Length of shore frontage (ft)

Typeof construction activities Cl home D garage 0 driveway Cl septic Cl addition Cl renovation_____ Cl other_____________

The proposed project will be serviced by If septic system, has application been If Yes, has permit been issued?

| | public sewer O private septic system made to the County Health Department Cl No Cl Yes (If septic system, show existing and new or for a pemnit? □ No □ Yes (if Yes, provide copy) .

exoanded svstem on clans) ________________________________________________

Number of individual living-units in proposed building

Existing construction is on

□ pilings □ basement □ concrete slab □ crawl space

Proposed new construction will be on [J Pilings □ basement □ concrete slab □ crawl space

Existing construction material above foundation wall

□ stud frame □ log □ block □ other

Proposed new construction material above foundation wall

□ stud frame Cl log O block □ other

Existing siding material

□ wood □ vinyl □ block □ other

Proposed new siding material

□ wood □ vinyl □ block □ other

Area of the existing foundation, excluding attached garage (sq ft) Area of the proposed foundation, excluding attached garage (sq ft)

Area of the existing garage foundation (sq ft) Area of the proposed garage foundation (sq ft)

If renovating or restoring existing structure, renovation or restoration cost $ Current structure replacement value $

Tax assessed value of existing structure (excluding land value) $ Assessment year

Are federal funds being used to finance any portion of the proposed project? □ No Cl Yes (If Yes, please identify source)

Date by which project location will be staked (M/D/Y) J| ACTIVITIES IN DESIGNATED ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS (No Sample Drawings Available)

• Many designated environmental areas are completely or partially wetlands. Be sure to complete Section 12 if your proposed activities will also occur in wetlands.

• If you are proposing any alteration in a designated environmental area^please attach a detailed site plan. __________________________ (Check all that apply) □ placement of sfrucfures □ grading or other soil alteration □ alteration of natural drainage

□ alteration of vegetation O boardwalk or deck Cl driveway or road Cl dredge Cl fill Cl culvert O other

Has the MDEQ staff or anyone else conducted a wetland assessment for this parcel? Cl No Cl Yes (If Yes, please provide copy of response) Describe the proposed activity

Joint Permit Application Page 8 of 7 February 2001

S ' 3 - RD VILLE '^KOCH

t #|56§

WZ7 E9I8i t® 5 § 2L£3

30 » to co

\ VASOLD

I) *3 £ -AKEFIEEf ;

MoytJroNs

Hr'*? w;

K A

N E

’K

CAW!-

A Md CARTY c'

FROST

SUMP

S

WEBBfir'dl'/i MAKER CENTEf

FISC

8?

w.

Nl

S

£ Mmg

GARY2

CHESANIN GBALDWIN

5C IdeitW1CKIE

■IpEET

ERING

RD.1‘

RD;

JI

x Hg^aJS:

HARRIS

tfW"

RD.

RD

E.

iJA ^TITTABA WASSEE^

SCHUST 2

GRAHOJG

* 8

IVA

LUNNEY'

GEDDES

‘X 31

If

'S’.

£ 30

36 ^^

U> RICH RD.

DOYLE

Mt RAY RD.

29 §

■ RD.

-^ RD.

ER 2« •

NELSQ.

20 $

- RD.

RD.

CKWU

SHATUCK

ERFIELD

s s m a

O'HARA RD. 1

s

GEDDES “

RD.25x asi«

TRINK LEIN

OP.R

12 '

& El ff

. ^ to

O'HERN

RD.

35 .

EDERER

UI

i2 a 1^3 l?Swo BARfcfU' ■ * s

EH

SPENCER

WAlff

PRIOR ; 29

■^SjJ! er**

30 :

; rd

.ANDREWS

Kjje

§ ;8

JiANCHSTT rd£® ’ sm io

»j! «

RD J

FERGUS

- I

HARRIS

?S. RYAN

oi a:

3 2”

RD I

^1^03 is__ L_ii_IL r 25 ^ J^E ' ~eSt<

CO

■111 ELUS

.DUTCH RD

■HtH

RD. •

TRINKLEIN

HART

2 I 3

CLAUCEDALE F

Un I I’lS!

RD. -

; 8

VERNE

r-^r o

2.1

■ 24

BIRCH

RD.

BURT

^&V §5

§ 5 RD.

2^OT »

MICHIGAN I

I »./livers.lofe | BVimL'semtint park ;

Wickes1 I

RD

d

£, HUSEN

jg^jil ^- S| TOWNLINa v

S^W rag OnR 5|«L.alig4A8! S ■ rd.

HARRIS

RD.

DONAG*

RUN

HESS

YOU

K

W.

GAI

a 8 s

RD

E

1 ?

rd. ;' >2 f

RD.

SSKKG”e 4 i ■ C • I; 1 VOLKMER i

W.PLE

M.OVE

T.18! N.

D

MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

SHIAWASSEE RIVER

STATE GAME AREA

SAGINAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN

JREVELTPD

0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles, To hAiller Road Parlcing Lot &

: Boat Access R.03 E.

PRIOR ROAD

33^ sus

A

A

Portions of this area designated Watchable Wildlife viewing areas.

For more information on this and other areas, contact DNR offices or visit on the internet at: http://www.michigan.gov/dnr

Hunter Monies Made This Area Possible DNR-Wildlife Map - area 730101 (was 0813, Rev. 8/2006 -MLS)

■oat Access/Launch △ Pull-Over Foot Access or Field Entrance

State/Federal Highway County Road Street/Local Road ZXX Railroads Two-Track/Trail . _ City Limits Township-Range-Section Lines -

Sections numbered (1-36) near center Lakes / Ponds / Water Perennial Stream / Waterways

' Intermittent Stream / Drainage

To Plckere Parking Lot &

■ -Boat Access har es

I To Creek Road

Ax-14 u 4#

■Prior t Roads Areas J >

Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Outdoors www.michigan.gov/dnr

Scale 1:55000

Legend n£^ General Area - Open to Hunting permit required, contact office Ml Wildlife Refuge - DO NOT ENTER W Closed to Waterfowl Hunting

Managed Waterfowl Hunting Zone - Hunting by permit only.

2-4 hunters per party, Party Permits areas 6-48, 55-90

Managed Waterfowl Hunting Zone - Hunting by permit only, Individual Permits areas 1-5, 49-52, 61-117, 137-150

-A- Area Headquarters (in St Charles)

■ Parking Area

H Blind-Wheelchair Accessible |H| contact area office for details KM

® Pumping Station DiW| & Ditch Areas J*UTION - Deep Water! Always care when near all water areas.

Z http://www.michigan.gov/dnr http://www.michigan.gov/dnr

2008 Dam Safety Inspection Report.pdf
2010 Emergency rip rap repairs to scour hole.pdf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .