Evaluator Score Sheet for FTS Modernization.pdf

PDF 159 KB Posted

Attached to
Cloud-based Fiscal Tracking System (FTS)
Solicitation number
RFP-09951
Issued by
St. Johns County, Florida

About this file

This document is an Evaluator Score Sheet for the FTS Modernization project, which appears to be a state government contract opportunity. The score sheet outlines the technical evaluation criteria that will be used to assess vendor proposals, including the ability to meet functional requirements such as purchase orders, invoices, payroll data, and reporting; integration with the Florida PALM system; technical requirements like security, scalability, and data migration; project management and implementation approach; ability to deliver key project deliverables; post-implementation support; vendor experience and references; budget and cost efficiency; and data security and confidentiality. The maximum technical points available is 125, and there are an additional 75 pricing points. The evaluation summary section provides space for documenting the strengths, weaknesses, and a recommendation on whether to award the contract.

The pricing points will be calculated based on a formula that awards the lowest proposed bid price the maximum of 75 points. The total maximum points available for this solicitation is 200, combining the technical and pricing points. No other details about the pricing, set-asides, incumbents, funding sources, or contract term are provided in this document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DMA-RFP-315 FTS.pdf PDF
Evaluator Score Sheet for FTS Modernization.pdf PDF
Evaluator Score Sheet for FTS Modernization.pdf PDF
DMA-RFP-315 FTS.pdf PDF
DMA-RFP-315 FTS.pdf PDF
Q & A.docx DOCX document
DMA-RFP-315 FTS 3.pdf PDF
Q & A.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT I

Evaluator Score Sheet for FTS Modernization Project

Vendor Information

• Vendor Name:

• Contact Person:

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Criteria Description Max Points Score Comments

1. Functional Requirements

Ability to meet all functional requirements including purchase orders, invoices, direct payments, travel payments, payroll data, agreement cash balances, Form 270 workflow, and reporting needs.

2. Integration with Florida PALM

Capability to integrate with the Florida PALM system, including direct interface and spreadsheet upload functionalities.

3. Technical Requirements

Provision of a secure, scalable cloud-based solution with robust security, user-friendly interface, and data migration capabilities.

4. Project Management and Implementation

Quality of project management approach, including phases, timeline, stakeholder engagement, and training.

5. Deliverables Ability to deliver functional and technical specifications, prototype/demo, final system, user training materials, and support plan.

6. Post- Implementation Support

Provision of comprehensive support and maintenance post-implementation.

7. Experience and References

Vendor's experience with similar projects and 3 references from past clients.

8. Budget and Cost Efficiency

Proposed budget and cost efficiency relative to the quality of services provided.

9. Confidentiality and Data Security

Adherence to data privacy and security regulations, and measures for protecting sensitive data.

Maximum Technical Points: 125 Total Technical Points:

Pricing Points formula: 75 points x lowest proposed bid price, divided by proposer’s bid price

Pricing Points:

Maximum Points for this Solicitation:

Maximum Points Available for this Solicitation (Technical Points + Pricing Points) - 200

Evaluation Summary

• Strengths:

• Weaknesses:

• Additional Comments:

Decision

• Recommended for Award (Yes/No):

• Evaluator's Name:

• Date:

ATTACHMENT I
Vendor Score Sheet for FTS Modernization Project
Vendor Information
Maximum Points Available for this Solicitation (Technical Points + Pricing Points) - 200
Evaluation Summary
Decision

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .