Evaluation_Score_BPM003384.pdf
PDF 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR057594
- Contract number
- CTR057594
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
The document is an evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation BPM003384 for Hydro Engineering Services, featuring scoring results from three evaluators across nine engineering firms: Cardno Inc, Dowl Hkm, J2 Engineering, JE Fuller, Natural Channel Design, NextGen Engineering, Stantec, Tetra Tech, and Wilson & Co. The scoresheet evaluates each firm's proposal across five key categories: Project Experience, Overall Experience, Design Philosophy/Process/QA/QC, Common Problems, and Overall Quality of Proposal.
The solicitation assesses the firms' technical proposals, with a maximum possible score of 100 points. Each category is weighted differently, with Project Experience carrying the most points (40) and Overall Quality of Proposal the least (10). Based on the evaluators' scores, J2 Engineering ranked first with a total score of 73.33, followed by Dowl Hkm at 68.67 and Cardno Inc at 68.33. The lowest-ranked firms were Natural Channel Design and NextGen Engineering, scoring 45.33 and 39.33 respectively. The scoring process involved three independent evaluators whose individual scores were then averaged to determine a consensus score for each firm across the evaluated categories.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M A
X
IM
U M
P O
IN
T
S
C a rd n o I n c
D o w l H k m
J
E n g in e e ri n g
J E
F u ll e r
N a tu ra l
C h a n n e l
D e s ig
N x tG
E g in e e ri g
S ta n te c
T e tr a
T e c h
W il s o
C o
Evaluator 1 22 22 10 22 5 5 18 14 10
2 28 32 25 35 20 15 30 31 32
3 28 28 18 28 20 20 20 20 28
CONSENSUS SCORE 26 27.333 17.667 28.333 15 13.333 22.667 21.667 23.333
Evaluator 1 14 12 10 14 5 5 8 8 15
2 15 13 15 18 10 10 18 15 17
3 16 16 14 16 12 12 14 16 16
CONSENSUS SCORE 15 13.667 13 16 9 9 13.333 13 16
Design Philosophy, Process, QA/QC
Evaluator 1 8 9 12 13 5 5 11 7 7
2 12 14 12 13 10 10 12 12 12
3 12 8 10 8 6 8 8 10 12
CONSENSUS SCORE 10.6667 10.333 11.333 11.333 7 7.6667 10.333 9.6667 10.333
Evaluator 1 6 7 7 14 12 2 5 11 5 2 12 12 12 10 10 10 8 8 12 3 12 8 8 6 4 4 8 6 8
CONSENSUS SCORE 10 9 9 10 8.6667 5.3333 7 8.3333 8.3333
Evaluator 1 2 6 6 6 4 2 6 5 6
2 8 9 10 7 9 6 8 8 9
3 10 10 10 10 4 4 8 10 10
CONSENSUS SCORE 6.66667 8.3333 8.6667 7.6667 5.6667 4 7.3333 7.6667 8.3333
100 68.33 68.67 59.67 73.33 45.33 39.33 60.67 60.33 66.33
Evaluator 1 52 56 45 69 31 19 48 45 43
2 75 80 74 83 59 51 76 74 82
3 78 70 60 68 46 48 58 62 74
64 68 60 76 45 35 62 60 63
RANK 3 2 6 1 8 9 5 6 4
Solicitation BPM003384 Hydro Engineering Services - EVALUATOR'S INDIVIDUAL SCORES
Project Experience
Common Problems
TOTAL SCORE
Overall Experience
Overall Quality of Proposal
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .