Evaluation Criteria.pdf

130 KB Posted

Attached to
EOLWD Collection and Analysis of Wage Transparency Data
Solicitation number
BD-25-1043-DAO01-32500-108881
Issued by
Massachusetts

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for RFR BD-25-1043-DAO01-32500-108881, a contract opportunity issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for the Collection and Analysis of Wage Transparency Data. The contract will require the selected bidder to synthesize PDFs, paper documents, and handwritten forms to extract pertinent data into a Microsoft Excel compatible sheet with high accuracy levels, meet the Commonwealth's timing requirements under the Frances Perkins Workplace Equity Act, and leverage AI or other emerging technology in a secure way to analyze and present the data. The bidder must demonstrate relevant experience in workforce data and pay equity policy, working with civic and advocacy community stakeholders, and securely handling confidential or encrypted data.

The evaluation criteria allocate points across several technical and operational factors, with the highest-scoring bidder deemed to provide the best value to the Commonwealth. Pricing will be ranked in reverse order with the lowest cost proposal receiving the most points. The contract will be awarded to the bidder that the Sourcing Strategy Team (SST) determines provides the best overall value.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bidder Questions and Answers_wage Equity RFR.pdf PDF
Notice of Apparent Successful Bidder Bid 108881.pdf PDF
form_CASL-for-corporations~2.pdf PDF
FY24 Fillable EFT Form_v1~4.pdf PDF
form_prompt-pay-discount~1.pdf PDF
FY24 Fillable MA W9_v1~1.pdf PDF
Business Response Template.docx DOCX document
Cost Template_Wage Transparency Data.docx DOCX document
Evaluation_Criteria.pdf PDF
Required Forms.pdf PDF
form_commonwealth-terms-and-conditions-for-information-technology~1.pdf PDF
Confidentiality_Policy_Agreement~2.pdf PDF
instructions_standard-contract-form~2.pdf PDF
Creating a Quote in Commbuys_How to Respond to Bid Solictiations.pdf PDF
form_standard-contract (1)~2.pdf PDF
Small Business Purchasing Program~4.pdf PDF
RFR Wage Equity Reporting.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Evaluation Criteria

Collection and Analysis of Wage Transparency Data / COMMBUYS Bid# BD-25-1043-DAO01-32500-108881

This proposed score sheet for RFR BD-25-1043-DAO01-32500-108881 contemplates the SST using consensus scoring to award points in each section. The bidder with the highest score, determined by the SST to provide the best value to the Commonwealth, shall be named the apparent successful bidder.

Section Score Transmittal Letter did the bid meet all requirements of transmittal letter?

Yes/No

General Technical Did the bid meet the technical requirements set forth in the response template?

Yes/No

Bidder’s Relevant Experience Does the Bidder have sufficient relevant experience performing similar work at the size and scale required by this project to give the SST confidence in its ability to perform the work contemplated here if awarded a contract under this RFR?

2 points

Bidder’s Approach Can Bidder synthesize PDFs and other types of paper or electronic documents with multiple fields and extract pertinent data into a Microsoft Excel compatible sheet with an accuracy level of 99.0% or greater?

10 points

Bidder’s Approach Can Bidder synthesize handwritten forms with multiple fields and extract pertinent data into a Microsoft Excel compatible sheet with an accuracy level of at least 98.0%?

7 points

Bidder’s Approach Does Bidder demonstrate an ability to meet the Commonwealth’s timing requirements under the Frances Perkins Workplace Equity Act?

10 points

Bidder’s Approach Does the proposed technology approach comport with the SST’s vision for the project?

Does the Solution leverage AI or other emerging technology in a secure way?

8 points

Bidder’s Approach Can the Bidder analyze and present data in a manner consistent with EOLWD’s requirements? Does the Bidder propose to use compatible tools? (ex. power Bi, Tableau, etc.?)

8 points

Bidder’s Approach Does the Bidder have experience with workforce data and pay equity policy? Does that experience include using aggregated

8 points

Evaluation Criteria

Collection and Analysis of Wage Transparency Data / COMMBUYS Bid# BD-25-1043-DAO01-32500-108881 and/or anonymized data to analyze wage gaps by demographic category?

Bidder’s Approach Does the Bidder have relevant experience working with civic and advocacy community stakeholders or educational partners?

5 points

Bidder’s Approach Did the Bidder demonstrate understanding of the project and related risks? Does the Bidder’s proposed plan successfully address/mitigate risks?

5 points

Bidder’s Approach Will Data be hosted in a secure environment in accordance with EOLWD hosting requirements?

4 points

Bidder’s Approach Does the Bidder demonstrate a clear ability to securely handle confidential or encrypted data?

5 points

Bidder’s Approach Do the additional activities proposed by the Bidder provide value to the project and/or support EOLWD and/or further the goals of the related legislation?

3 points

Staffing and Personnel Is the Bidder sufficiently staffed to perform the requirements set forth in the RFR?

5 points

Cost Cost shall be ranked in reverse order based on number of bids received with the most points going to the lowest costed proposal and the fewest points going to the highest costed proposal.

10 points

Does this proposal provide best value to

EOLWD?

10 points

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .