ESBD_File_353553_SECTION 8.docx

SECTION 8 (Reference Section 2.9)

RESPONDENT QUESTIONNAIRE AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

for

(M53) HET HVAC REPLACEMENT

HOBBY-EBERLY TELESCOPE (MCD)

RFP and CONTRACT NO.: 24CSP010

Respondents must submit a complete response to each of the items below. If additional space is required, please submit as an attachment to proposal package, keeping additional materials as explicit as possible and observing any limitation on the maximum number of pages. Repeating the question in the response is not required; however, please reference each response by its item number indicated below. Responses are required for all questions. Please note: the score for qualifications will constitute a maximum of 45 points of the overall score of 100 points.

GENERAL INFORMATION:

The following information must be completed and will be reviewed as part of the administrative review of the response. This information will not be a part of the evaluation scoring.

Legal name of Respondent:

Number of years the firm has been in business under this name:

Former business name and other assumed names if applicable:

Mailing and street address of office, which would be providing service:

(mailing address)

(city, state, zip)

(physical street address)

(city, state, zip)

Mailing and street address of principle or headquarters office:

(mailing address)

(city, state, zip)

(physical street address)

(city, state, zip)

Type of operation (check one):

Individual: __ Partnership: __ Corporation: __ Government: __ Number of employees assigned to the office providing service:

Annual sales volume over the last five (5) years for office providing service:

Annual sales volume during the last five (5) years for the entire firm:

Will Respondent provide copies of financial statements for the past two (2) years if requested by the University Yes: No:

Indicate Respondent’s maximum bonding capacity:

Is Respondent currently for sale or involved in any transaction to expand or to become acquired by another business entity? Yes: No: If yes, please explain the impact both in organization and company direction:

Provide any details of all past or pending litigation or claims filed against Respondent that could potentially affect performance under any contract awarded under this RFP:

1. CRITERION ONE: RESPONDENT’S ABILITY TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (Maximum points: 7)

1.1 Provide Examples of service support philosophy, such as response to client inquiry of potential change and time to follow up with warranty issues.

1.2 Provide the following information:

· Annual number, value and percent change of contracts in Texas;

· Annual number, value and percent change of contracts nationally year;

· Annual revenue totals and percentage change per year;

· Total bonding capacity;

· Available bonding capacity and current backlog.

2. CRITERION TWO: QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TEAM (Maximum points: 6)

2.1.2 Provide detailed information for the above-proposed project team members to include (at a minimum): the role they performed on the projects listed in response to Criterion One (i.e., project manager, assistant project manager, project engineer, etc.); their specific experience and expertise with similar projects; number of years with firm; their respective licenses and / or certifications; and their city of residence. (Note: key personnel must be committed to this project for its duration unless a substitution of an equally qualified individual is approved by the Owner.)

2.1.3 Provide resumes for all members of the proposed team that will be directly involved in the Project if award is received. Resumes must detail their experience with similar projects, number of years with firm, and city of residence. As applicable, include resumes for the project managers, superintendents, assistant project managers and superintendents, expeditors, project scheduler, quality control inspectors, safety coordinator/assistant, carpenter foreman, labor foreman, etc.

2.1.3.1 For each team member identified above, provide information on their current status and availability as it may affect the Project described in this RFP.

2.2.2 Provide resumes for all proposed subcontractors that will be directly involved in the Project described in this RFP, detailing experience with similar projects, number of years working with Respondent and city(ies) of residence.

2.2.3 Describe proposed methods to assure proper selection of competent sub-contractors while adhering to HUB requirements in Exhibit H.

2.2.4 Provide a customer reference list of no less than three (3) projects, either completed or in progress, on which proposed Subcontractors provided for MEP RENOVATIONS FOR LABORATORIES OR RESEARCH FACILITIES IN REMOTE LOCATIONS equal in type and scope, within the past five (5) years. Reference list must include: company name; contact person and telephone number; project description including how the project is equal in type and scope; length of business relationship and background of project (i.e., year of project, summary of work performed, etc.).

· Company name, contact person (the owner’s representative who served as the day-to-day liaison during construction) and telephone number;

· Project name, (i.e., year of project, summary of work performed, etc.), contract delivery method i.e., construction manager at risk with guaranteed maximum pricing, construction manager-agency, design/build, conventional bid, negotiated general contract), and description (i.e., year(s) of project, summary of work performed, etc.);

· Construction cost-include original cost and final construction cost;

· Final project size in square feet;

· Type of construction (new, renovation, expansion);

· Schedule information (i.e., actual notice to proceed, substantial completion, final payment dates) for project;

· Name and contact information for Project Manager (the individual responsible to the owner for the overall success of the project);

· Name and contact information for Project Superintendent (the individual responsible for coordinating the day to day work);

· Names of significant subcontractors (mechanical, plumbing, electrical, etc.); and

· Name, contact information and length of relationship with Respondent for project architect who served as the day-to-day liaison during construction.

3.2 Describe the types of records, reports, monitoring systems, and information management systems Respondent used in the management of the projects provided above.

3.2 Describe quality control program for each phase of a project and proposed method for controlling the quality of construction performed by subcontractors.

3.3 Describe the process for developing and maintaining project schedules utilizing the critical path method.

3.4 Describe execution plan for meeting or shortening the owner’s schedule during construction on past projects.

3.5 Describe payment plan to the subcontractors and material suppliers.

3.6 Identify a maximum of three (3) completed projects of any type for which Respondent received an award for construction excellence from a recognized organization and provide descriptive information for each.

4. CRITERION FOUR: PROPOSED TEAM’S PAST EXPERIENCE IN PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN OR OTHER UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE PAST FIVE YEARS (Maximum points: 6)

4.1 Describe past experience working with the University of Texas at Austin or other component institutions in the University of Texas System, detailing the project name, location, contract delivery method and brief description. For projects not at the University of Texas at Austin, also provide the following:

· Final construction costs;

· Size of project in gross square feet;

· Type of construction (new, renovation, expansion);

· Scheduling information (actual notice to proceed, actual date of substantial completion, final payment date);

· Name of Project Manager (the individual responsible to the owner for the overall success of the project);

· Name of Project Superintendent (the individual responsible for coordinating day-to-day work); and

· Names of significant subcontractors (mechanical, plumbing, electrical, etc.)

5 CRITERION FIVE: RESPONDENT’S SAFETY PROGRAM AND RECORD (Maximum points: 4) Provide the following information - all information must be accurate and sufficiently detailed to allow for evaluation.

5.1 Number of current employees.

Note: For companies with ten (10) employees or less, RCR & DART rates should be zero as OSHA 1904 record keeping is not applicable.

5.2 Provide the following rating information (include worksheets for calculating RCR and DART; see footnotes 2 & 3 below chart):

NAICS¹ code:

OSHA Recordable Case Rate² (RCR)

DART (Calendar Days Away / Restricted Time) Rate³

Number of Fatalities*

Number of OSHA Violations*

Worker’s Comp Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

Foot Notes for table;

1 North American Industry Classification System (see http://www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm)

5.3 Both the project Superintendent and Project Manager must have a current 30-hour OSHA Certification (reference section 3.3.2 of the Additional General Conditions). Provide dates of training completion for both Superintendent and Project Manager, and attach current certificates or proof of compliance with this training as a part of proposal.

5.4 Describe Respondent’s safety policy and job safety program, including a description of the method for ensuring compliance by all workers on the jobsite.

5.5 Describe safety goals for this project. What is the biggest risk associated with this project? Provide details of any risks or rate exposures.

5.6 How many visits from the assigned safety professional are anticipated for this project? How will a safety presence be maintained in the field?

5.7 Describe Respondent’s safety inspection criteria. How often will the project be inspected each day? Provide an Example of a report of findings from a safety inspection.

5.8 Describe an instance where a safety incident or near miss occurred on a project site under Respondent’s control. Did this incident or near miss lead to any changes in the existing safety policies? Describe the incident investigation process.

5.9 Identify any fatalities that have occurred on any project site under Respondent’s control either directly or through a subcontractor. Describe changes to safety programs resulting from the incident(s).

5.10 Subcontractors’ safety program – describe Respondent’s safety program as applicable to subcontractors, including responses to following in detail:

· How is safety considered in soliciting and selecting subcontractors?

· Are subcontractors’ safety policies and records examined as a part of the subcontracting process?

· Are subcontractors with poor safety records rejected?

6. CRITERION SIX: RESPONDENT’S PROPOSED PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN AND SCHEDULING (Maximum points: 4)

8. CRITERION EIGHT: CAPABILITY TO ACHIEVE PROJECT CLOSE-OUT (Maximum points: 4)

8.1 Provide a detailed schedule (including dates) of proposed method to achieve project close-out in accordance with Article 12 of the Uniform General Conditions and of the Additional General Conditions of this RFP.

9. CRITERION NINE: RESPONDENT’S PROPOSED WARRANTY AND SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAM (Maximum points: 4)

All pricing information MUST be completed SECTION 7 PRICING AND DELIVERY SCHEDULE.

MCD CP766229 03142024 RFP-43