Enclosure 2 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf

PROCUREMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DIVISION

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

Managed by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORM

Form No. AMS-Form-039

Revision No. 0

APPROVED BY:

A. Guadagni /01/18/2017

PPM Manager/Date

Evaluation Criteria

RFP No. 454235 Title: Temporary Support/Contract Labor Services

Noted below are the evaluation criteria and percentage distribution in order of importance identified by Tabulated sections. The point rating established below will be utilized as a guide in establishing the technical ranking of each supplier which must also be supported by each Offeror’s strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies (if applicable).

Each proposal will be evaluated based on how well the proposal meets or exceeds the requirements of the RFP.

Tab 1 – General Overall Summary

0BThe Offeror shall discuss, in general terms, how they plan to accomplish the requirements of the SOW. This submission will not be evaluated or scored as part of the evaluation criteria.

Tab 2 – SOW Compliance Matrix (0 points) The Offeror shall provide a paragraph-by-paragraph compliance matrix for each section of the Statement of Work (SOW) that clearly shows the Offeror’s acceptance.

Offerors shall list each SOW section by number and provide a detailed explanation of how they will meet the corresponding requirements. General statements or simple lists indicating compliance are not sufficient; Offerors must provide detailed explanations that demonstrate how each requirement will be met.

Any exceptions shall be clearly documented, and the Offeror shall provide a detailed explanation why the exception is being taken and any alternative recommendations. The compliance matrices will not be point scored.

Tab 3 – Recruitment Process (40 Points)

A. (20 Points) The Offeror shall discuss and provide details on how the Offeror sources, advertises for, and screens personnel.

B. (20 Points) The Offeror shall provide a detailed description of the process employed to verify personnel qualifications including: education, previous employment, U.S. Citizenship, or authorization to work in the U.S.

Note: Tabs (3A) and (3B) above are only applicable to the services within the United States.

Evaluation Method for Tab 3: (Items correspond to similarly lettered items above)

A. The Offeror will be evaluated on its ability to recruit quality personnel.

B. The Offeror will be evaluated on its methods for verifying information and ensuring quality candidates.

Tab 4 – Organizational Experience/Past Performance (40 Points):

A. (5 Points) The Offeror shall identify the number of years they have been in business with special emphasis on how long the Offeror has provided temporary staffing services. Preference will be given to those who have five (5) years or more experience. The Offeror shall describe their process for measuring customer satisfaction.

B. (10 Points) The Offeror shall describe their experience with temporary staffing services (recruiting, placing, and managing) in the New York metropolitan area, preferably on Long Island. If the Offeror has prior experience, the Offeror shall provide three (3) recent references, preferably from organizations where the Offeror staffed personnel across multiple labor categories consistent with those defined in the Statement of Work (e.g.

administrative, engineering, scientific support, technical support, information technology, and scientists).

C. (20 Points) The Offeror shall provide a listing of government accounts (clients) during the past 3 years.

This list shall include company name, address, telephone number, e-mail and contact person. The Offeror shall describe in detail any previous experience with Brookhaven National Laboratory and any other national laboratory.

If the Offeror has no experience with National Laboratories, the Offeror is to provide a minimum list of ten (10) commercial accounts.

D. (5 Points) The Offeror shall provide the number of temporary personnel for the past three (3) years assigned to the clients (as noted above) and include their job classifications such as engineers, technical, scientific support, technical support, information technology, and scientists. The Offeror shall provide supporting documentation (e.g., staffing reports, invoices, timesheets, references, etc.) to substantiate these figures.

Evaluation Method for Tab 4: (Items correspond to similarly lettered items above)

A. The Offeror will be evaluated on the years of experience in business with particular emphasis on providing temporary staffing services. The Offeror will be evaluated on its ability to measure customer satisfaction.

B. The Offeror will be evaluated by their experience staffing in the New York metropolitan area, preferably on Long Island.

C. The Offeror will be evaluated by the number of clients and experience providing temporary staffing services to similar institutions.

D. The Offeror will be evaluated on the number of temporary staffing and types of classifications they fill.

Tab 5 –Payroll Outside the U.S. and Security Clearances (20 Points):

A. (10 Points) The Offeror shall describe and provide details on the firm’s ability and experience processing payroll for those working outside the U.S. The Offeror shall provide examples of previous contracts where the firm provided this service.

B. (10 Points) The Offeror shall describe and provide details on the firm’s ability and experience maintaining security clearances. The Offeror shall provide examples of previous contracts where the firm was required to maintain security clearances.

Evaluation Method for Tab 5: (items correspond to similarly lettered items above) A. The Offeror’s payroll system will be evaluated on its ability to process payroll for those working outside the U.S. in accordance with the SOW.

B. The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated as to the experience and capability to maintain security clearances.

The Offeror shall discuss, in general terms, how they plan to accomplish the requirements of the SOW. This submission will not be evaluated or scored as part of the evaluation criteria.